The Procter & Gamble Company diapers
3 reports to CPSC, the latest made Jul 27, 2013. A report isn’t a recall.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CPSC’s own search is on saferproducts.gov.
At a glance
From SaferProducts.gov, released Oct 25, 2026.
- 3reports to CPSC
- Jul 27, 2013the latest report was made
- Jun 13, 2013the earliest
- 3with the company’s comments
- Brand
- None given: no report names a brand, so the group is named for its maker, The Procter & Gamble Company
- Maker
- The Procter & Gamble CompanyMakers, importers or sellers, as the reports name them
- Product
- DiapersCPSC’s product type: Diapers (code 1512), in Baby: Nursery Equipment & Supplies
By month
The numbers, as a table
| Month | Reports |
|---|---|
| July 2013 | 2 |
| June 2013 | 1 |
How badly anyone was hurt
- Seen by a doctor or nurse 2 CPSC: Injury, Seen by Medical Professional
- Not said 1 CPSC: Unspecified
As each report says it, in short words; CPSC’s own words are under each.
The reports, as CPSC published them
Reports people made to the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission. CPSC publishes each one after sending it to the company named, and doesn’t guarantee they’re accurate. A report isn’t a recall.
Each report is the words of the person who made it, as CPSC published them. The company’s comments, where CPSC published any, are set apart as the company’s own.
CPSC, SaferProducts.gov public database export. Released Oct 25, 2026. Updated daily.
-
Seen by a doctor or nurse Made Jul 27, 2013, sent to the company Aug 5, 2013, published by CPSC Aug 26, 2013
The product, in the report: Caused a Skin irrationation on our grand daughter which i have custody of... was seen by a doctor and was prescribed ointment for the area... I swiched from Pampers cruisers to [REDACTED] and now no problems of a bad red rash area...
Last month , which would be 6/15/2013, My granddaughter went to the doctors office for an appointment... I asked the doctor that our granddaughter gets rashes really easially... He said it was not a rash but a skin irratation whats causing her to get these red areas around her private area... i did not know nothing about this DRY max FROM Pampers Cruisers at the time... So, i went home and started checking what could cause it... Will Checking, i found out about the pampers cruisers with dry max... I switched daipers and now the irratation she had is gone... I have told the doctor and he said the diapers could have caused the4 problem...
- Where
- Evansville, United States: Mobile/
Manufactured Home - Who was involved
- Age 1, Female
- The reporter’s relation to them
- Other Relative
- As this report names them
- made or sold by The Procter & Gamble Company
- How badly, in CPSC’s words
- Injury, Seen by Medical Professional
-
Seen by a doctor or nurse Made Jul 26, 2013, sent to the company Aug 5, 2013, published by CPSC Aug 26, 2013
The product, in the report: PAMPER’S EASY UPS
I have used pampers diapers since July of 2012 and about a month after I switched she started getting a diaper rash/blisters on her bottom. I never until today realized that it was caused by her diaper. About 2 months ago I switched from the diaper to Pampers Easy Ups and at first the rash cleared up but for the last 6 weeks we cannot get rid of the rash. She has been to her paediatrician numerous times for this and noone ever said anything about the diapers. Her next appointment is on Friday Aug 2nd. For the 1st year of her life she NEVER had a diaper rash. Now as soon as I get one cleared up it comes right back. I will never purchase another Pamper’s product again after I did some research tonight cause she has bleeding blisters on her bottom now. According to the information that I read on the internet, these types of reactions have been happening to babies since 2010 and this product is still on the market. What the heck! These are our babies.
- Bought from
- WALMART, Maryland
- Bought
- Jul 12, 2013
- Where
- Unspecified: Unspecified
- Who was involved
- Age 2, Female
- The reporter’s relation to them
- My Child
- As this report names them
- made or sold by The Procter & Gamble Company
- How badly, in CPSC’s words
- Injury, Seen by Medical Professional
-
Not said Made Jun 13, 2013, sent to the company Jun 21, 2013, published by CPSC Jul 15, 2013
The product, in the report: Pampers Size 3 Swaddlers
My wife and I found 4 splinters embedded in the mesh of a4 separate diapers in a package of sealed Pampers Size 3 Swaddlers and reported it to the company.
- Bought from
- Target, North Carolina
- Bought
- May 28, 2013
- Where
- Morrisville, North Carolina: Home/
Apartment/ Condominium - Who was involved
- Unspecified
- The reporter’s relation to them
- Unspecified
- As this report names them
- made or sold by The Procter & Gamble Company
- How badly, in CPSC’s words
- Unspecified
CPSC’s disclaimer
Disclaimer: CPSC does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the contents of the Publicly Available Consumer Product Safety Information Database on SaferProducts.gov, particularly with respect to information submitted by people outside of CPSC.
Word for word, from the disclaimer in CPSC’s export.
Sources
Sources
-
U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, SaferProducts.gov public database export.
Released Oct 25, 2026 and checked Oct 25, 2026. Updated daily. Public domain (U.S. Government work). CPSC asks to be credited, and that no endorsement be implied.
Reports of harm are from the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), on SaferProducts.gov. CPSC does not endorse Hearth Record.