Hearth Record

Back to Diapers

Snug and Dry diapers

1 report to CPSC, the latest made Aug 15, 2011. A report isn’t a recall.

Watch it to hear when CPSC publishes new reports about it. CPSC’s own search, on saferproducts.gov

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CPSC’s own search is on saferproducts.gov.

At a glance

From SaferProducts.gov, released Oct 25, 2026.

  • 1report to CPSC
  • Aug 15, 2011the latest report was made
  • Aug 15, 2011the earliest
  • 1with the company’s comments
Brand
Snug and Dry
Maker
KIMBERLY-CLARK CORP.Makers, importers or sellers, as the reports name them
Product
DiapersCPSC’s product type: Diapers (code 1512), in Baby: Nursery Equipment & Supplies

By month

1 report from September 2010 to August 2011; the most in August 2011, 1.
The numbers, as a table
Reports to CPSC by the month each was made, newest first
MonthReports
August 20111

How badly anyone was hurt

  • First aid 1 CPSC: Injury, First Aid Received by Non-Medical Professional

As each report says it, in short words; CPSC’s own words are under each.

The reports, as CPSC published them

Reports people made to the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission. CPSC publishes each one after sending it to the company named, and doesn’t guarantee they’re accurate. A report isn’t a recall.

Each report is the words of the person who made it, as CPSC published them. The company’s comments, where CPSC published any, are set apart as the company’s own.

Source:

CPSC, SaferProducts.gov public database export. Released Oct 25, 2026. Updated daily.

  1. First aid

    Made Aug 15, 2011, published by CPSC Sep 6, 2011

    The product, in the report: Huggies Snug & Dry. Size 4. Disney/Mickey Mouse characters

    Our 1 year old obtained a diaper rash after our testing of Huggies Snug and Dry. It would appear it has “leak lock” a technology similar to the [REDACTED] that received similar complaints earlier this year.

    We have used ‘original’ [REDACTED]- since she was born. She has NEVER had a diaper rash. We were only 10 diapers into this first time trial of Huggies and found her ripping and pulling at her diaper. Clearly uncomfortable and upset by her diaper, we changed her to discover a horrible rash. We immediately switched back to [REDACTED] this afternoon and have been applying medication every hour. The rash appears to be improving - but is still bad enough to awaken her from her sleep.

    We searched online to see if anyone had a similar experience and were horrified to learn of many children experiencing the same.

    While I understand the CPSC has not identified a root cause in the [REDACTED] case, I promise you that the only thing we’ve done differently with our daughter in the past 24 hours is change the brand of diapers. We bought it because the character on them is Mickey Mouse. Having just returned from a Disney trip, her brother thought they were ‘cute’.

    I must repeat, this child has never had a diaper rash. We are diligent about changes and baths. Our first born was exactly the same. To see her in this level of discomfort as a result to a diaper is inexcusable. Huggies, and [REDACTED], are well aware that this ‘leak lock” technology is generating a horrible reaction for many children. They should not be allowed to keep it on the market.

    Please force these diaper brands to pull this technology from their products. They are hurting defenseless kids.

    Model
    Huggies Snug and Dry with Leak Lock
    UPC
    360005504
    Serial number
    n/a
    Bought from
    A&P
    Bought
    Aug 8, 2011, about then
    Where
    Long Valley, New Jersey: Home/Apartment/Condominium
    Who was involved
    Age 1, Female
    The reporter’s relation to them
    My Child
    As this report names them
    Brand Snug and Dry, made or sold by KIMBERLY-CLARK CORP.
    How badly, in CPSC’s words
    Injury, First Aid Received by Non-Medical Professional

CPSC’s disclaimer

Disclaimer: CPSC does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the contents of the Publicly Available Consumer Product Safety Information Database on SaferProducts.gov, particularly with respect to information submitted by people outside of CPSC.

Source:

Word for word, from the disclaimer in CPSC’s export.

Sources

Sources
  • U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, SaferProducts.gov public database export.

    Released Oct 25, 2026 and checked Oct 25, 2026. Updated daily. Public domain (U.S. Government work). CPSC asks to be credited, and that no endorsement be implied.

Source:

Reports of harm are from the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), on SaferProducts.gov. CPSC does not endorse Hearth Record.

Back to Diapers

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.