[REDACTED] baby bottles or nipples
1 report to CPSC, the latest made Mar 14, 2024. A report isn’t a recall.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CPSC’s own search is on saferproducts.gov.
At a glance
From SaferProducts.gov, released Oct 25, 2026.
- 1report to CPSC
- Mar 14, 2024the latest report was made
- Mar 14, 2024the earliest
- 1with the company’s comments
- Brand
- [REDACTED]
- Maker
- PigeonMakers, importers or sellers, as the reports name them
- Product
- Baby bottles or nipplesCPSC’s product type: Baby Bottles or Nipples (code 1509), in Baby: Nursery Equipment & Supplies
By month
The numbers, as a table
| Month | Reports |
|---|---|
| March 2024 | 1 |
How badly anyone was hurt
- No one hurt 1 CPSC: Incident, No Injury
As each report says it, in short words; CPSC’s own words are under each.
The reports, as CPSC published them
Reports people made to the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission. CPSC publishes each one after sending it to the company named, and doesn’t guarantee they’re accurate. A report isn’t a recall.
Each report is the words of the person who made it, as CPSC published them. The company’s comments, where CPSC published any, are set apart as the company’s own.
CPSC, SaferProducts.gov public database export. Released Oct 25, 2026. Updated daily.
-
No one hurt Made Mar 14, 2024, sent to the company Apr 4, 2024, published by CPSC Apr 18, 2024
The product, in the report: These were the exact glass baby bottles that tested for over 90 ppm lead: [REDACTED] Pigeon Glass Nursing Bottle Wide Neck 4,199 ppm lead, 2nd test 9,201 ppm lead. (2nd Pigeon Bottle tested purchased months ago had no detectable lead so seems to be inconsistency with manufacturing) [REDACTED]
We XRF tested 32 baby bottles purchased on Amazon for lead in the print/design. We found over 90 ppm lead in 11 baby bottles. The information was posted here and was scientifically reviewed by [REDACTED], who was Director of the National Institute for Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) for over a decade, [REDACTED] . These are the bottles that had lead over 90 ppm, [REDACTED] --Pigeon Glass Nursing Bottle Wide Neck 4,199 ppm lead, 2nd test 9,201 ppm lead. (2nd Pigeon Bottle tested purchased months ago had no detectable lead so seems to be inconsistency with manufacturing) [REDACTED]
- Model
- Not enough room for this, please contact us!
- Serial number
- Not enough room for this, please contact us!
- Bought from
- Amazon
- Bought
- Mar 1, 2024, about then
- Where
- Setauket, New York: Other
- Who was involved
- Age 0, Female
- The reporter’s relation to them
- No Relationship
- As this report names them
- Brand [REDACTED], made or sold by Pigeon
- How badly, in CPSC’s words
- Incident, No Injury
CPSC’s disclaimer
Disclaimer: CPSC does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the contents of the Publicly Available Consumer Product Safety Information Database on SaferProducts.gov, particularly with respect to information submitted by people outside of CPSC.
Word for word, from the disclaimer in CPSC’s export.
Sources
Sources
-
U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, SaferProducts.gov public database export.
Released Oct 25, 2026 and checked Oct 25, 2026. Updated daily. Public domain (U.S. Government work). CPSC asks to be credited, and that no endorsement be implied.
Reports of harm are from the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), on SaferProducts.gov. CPSC does not endorse Hearth Record.