Hearth Record

Back to Building sets

Amosting building sets

1 report to CPSC, the latest made Mar 20, 2017. A report isn’t a recall.

Watch it to hear when CPSC publishes new reports about it. CPSC’s own search, on saferproducts.gov

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CPSC’s own search is on saferproducts.gov.

At a glance

From SaferProducts.gov, released Oct 25, 2026.

  • 1report to CPSC
  • Mar 20, 2017the latest report was made
  • Mar 20, 2017the earliest
  • 0with the company’s comments
Brand
Amosting
Maker
AmostingMakers, importers or sellers, as the reports name them
Product
Building setsCPSC’s product type: Building Sets (code 1345), in Toys & Children: Toys

By month

1 report from April 2016 to March 2017; the most in March 2017, 1.
The numbers, as a table
Reports to CPSC by the month each was made, newest first
MonthReports
March 20171

How badly anyone was hurt

  • No one hurt 1 CPSC: Incident, No Injury

As each report says it, in short words; CPSC’s own words are under each.

The reports, as CPSC published them

Reports people made to the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission. CPSC publishes each one after sending it to the company named, and doesn’t guarantee they’re accurate. A report isn’t a recall.

Each report is the words of the person who made it, as CPSC published them. The company’s comments, where CPSC published any, are set apart as the company’s own.

Source:

CPSC, SaferProducts.gov public database export. Released Oct 25, 2026. Updated daily.

  1. No one hurt

    Made Mar 20, 2017, sent to the company Apr 28, 2017, published by CPSC May 12, 2017

    The product, in the report: My 3 year old son loves his Amosting magnetic building tiles. However, as I was cleaning them up the other day, I noticed something attached to the outside of one square. I was shocked to realize it was 2 magnets from inside one of the square tiles. The square has partially separated, allowing the magnets to fall out. I wanted to report this, considering the lethality of swallowed magnets. I contacted the company, with the following reply: We are deeply sorry for the issue you encountered. Pls offer us the order ID so that we can follow this issue better. For you children’s safety, we suggest that you throw away the original split tile. Normally the two halves of our tile are pressed together tightly by a robot with hydraulic technology. And only a few pics of every 20,000 pics miss this pressing process. We beg for your understanding. We have added more workers in robot maintenance and quality check. We have been striving for offering 100% safe and reliable products since they are for children. Pls give us a chance to rectify this problem. As our apology and compensation, we suggest the following 2 suggestions: 1) We send you an improved new 64-pics set from China, and it may take 10-20 days to reach you. 2) We fully refund you without your returning. Which solution do you prefer? Best wishes, Amosting customer service team **(I have photos, but the file upload feature is nonfunctional)

    My 3 year old son loves his Amosting magnetic building tiles. However, as I was cleaning them up the other day, I noticed something attached to the outside of one square. I was shocked to realize it was 2 magnets from inside one of the square tiles. The square has partially separated, allowing the magnets to fall out. I wanted to report this, considering the lethality of swallowed magnets.

    Model
    Magnetic Toys Building Tiles Blocks Stack Set - 64 pcs
    UPC
    765326862748
    Bought from
    Amazon
    Bought
    Dec 15, 2016, about then
    Where
    Unspecified: Home/Apartment/Condominium
    Who was involved
    Unspecified
    The reporter’s relation to them
    Unspecified
    As this report names them
    Brand Amosting, made or sold by Amosting
    How badly, in CPSC’s words
    Incident, No Injury

CPSC’s disclaimer

Disclaimer: CPSC does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the contents of the Publicly Available Consumer Product Safety Information Database on SaferProducts.gov, particularly with respect to information submitted by people outside of CPSC.

Source:

Word for word, from the disclaimer in CPSC’s export.

Sources

Sources

  • U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, SaferProducts.gov public database export.

    Released Oct 25, 2026 and checked Oct 25, 2026. Updated daily. Public domain (U.S. Government work). CPSC asks to be credited, and that no endorsement be implied.

Source:

Reports of harm are from the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), on SaferProducts.gov. CPSC does not endorse Hearth Record.

Back to Building sets

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.