Copa soccer
1 report to CPSC, the latest made Jun 3, 2022. A report isn’t a recall.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CPSC’s own search is on saferproducts.gov.
At a glance
From SaferProducts.gov, released Oct 25, 2026.
- 1report to CPSC
- Jun 3, 2022the latest report was made
- Jun 3, 2022the earliest
- 0with the company’s comments
- Brand
- Copa
- Maker
- adidas GroupMakers, importers or sellers, as the reports name them
- Product
- SoccerThe activity, its clothing or equipmentCPSC’s product type: Soccer (Activity, Apparel or Equipment) (code 1267), in Sports and Recreation: Field & Court Sports
By month
The numbers, as a table
| Month | Reports |
|---|---|
| June 2022 | 1 |
How badly anyone was hurt
- Emergency room 1 CPSC: Injury, Emergency Department Treatment Received
As each report says it, in short words; CPSC’s own words are under each.
The reports, as CPSC published them
Reports people made to the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission. CPSC publishes each one after sending it to the company named, and doesn’t guarantee they’re accurate. A report isn’t a recall.
Each report is the words of the person who made it, as CPSC published them. The company’s comments, where CPSC published any, are set apart as the company’s own.
CPSC, SaferProducts.gov public database export. Released Oct 25, 2026. Updated daily.
-
Emergency room Made Jun 3, 2022, sent to the company Jun 9, 2022, published by CPSC Jun 27, 2022
The product, in the report: Adidas Men’s Copa Gloro 20.2 Firm Ground Boots Soccer Shoe / Item model number ?: EF8361. This a soccer boot.
Using the Adidas Copa Gloro 20.2 cleats, I was severely injured while playing a semi-professional soccer game. I tore my ACL, MCL, meniscus, and patella ligament (no one touched me, I just collapsed). The lack of quality and support in the shoes caused this unprovoked accident which resulted in three surgeries and up to a year of not being able to play.
I’ve been an athlete for over 20 years and have only ever worn Copas, so I’m incredibly familiar with how the boot should feel and fit. Adidas’s recent upgrades to the Copa line have been pretty awful.
Similar reviews online show consistency amongst other athletes who have found the 20.2 to be uncomfortable and of poor quality. Adidas recently discontinued this line (without reason) but did not recall the shoe. Shame on Adidas for making a boot that unsafe for their athletes.
- Model
- EF8361
- Bought from
- Adidas Outlet
- Bought
- Aug 1, 2021, about then
- Where
- Denver, Colorado: Place of Recreation or Sports
- Who was involved
- Age 27, Female
- The reporter’s relation to them
- Self
- As this report names them
- Brand Copa, made or sold by adidas Group
- How badly, in CPSC’s words
- Injury, Emergency Department Treatment Received
CPSC’s disclaimer
Disclaimer: CPSC does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the contents of the Publicly Available Consumer Product Safety Information Database on SaferProducts.gov, particularly with respect to information submitted by people outside of CPSC.
Word for word, from the disclaimer in CPSC’s export.
Sources
Sources
-
U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, SaferProducts.gov public database export.
Released Oct 25, 2026 and checked Oct 25, 2026. Updated daily. Public domain (U.S. Government work). CPSC asks to be credited, and that no endorsement be implied.
Reports of harm are from the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), on SaferProducts.gov. CPSC does not endorse Hearth Record.