Lifetime Brands non-glass bottles or jars
1 report to CPSC, the latest made Sep 4, 2013. A report isn’t a recall.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CPSC’s own search is on saferproducts.gov.
At a glance
From SaferProducts.gov, released Oct 25, 2026.
- 1report to CPSC
- Sep 4, 2013the latest report was made
- Sep 4, 2013the earliest
- 0with the company’s comments
- Brand
- Lifetime Brands
- Maker
- Lifetime BrandsMakers, importers or sellers, as the reports name them
- Product
- Non-glass bottles or jarsCPSC’s product type: Nonglass Bottles or Jars (code 1127), in Containers & Packaging: Other
By month
The numbers, as a table
| Month | Reports |
|---|---|
| September 2013 | 1 |
How badly anyone was hurt
- Seen by a doctor or nurse 1 CPSC: Injury, Seen by Medical Professional
As each report says it, in short words; CPSC’s own words are under each.
The reports, as CPSC published them
Reports people made to the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission. CPSC publishes each one after sending it to the company named, and doesn’t guarantee they’re accurate. A report isn’t a recall.
Each report is the words of the person who made it, as CPSC published them. The company’s comments, where CPSC published any, are set apart as the company’s own.
CPSC, SaferProducts.gov public database export. Released Oct 25, 2026. Updated daily.
-
Seen by a doctor or nurse Made Sep 4, 2013, sent to the company Nov 4, 2013, published by CPSC Nov 19, 2013
The product, in the report: Water bottle
On July 23, 2013, consumer incurred an injury to the right eye caused by the peeling paint on a water bottle made by the company. Her eye was seriously damaged which prompted an emergency room visit and a follow up appointment with an eye specialist the following day. At this time, she still have some blurriness in her vision.
She contacted the firm because she believes there is a dangerous defect in the product and should be addressed. Attached are pictures of her injured eye on Day 1 and Day 2 along with photos of the bottle, hospital statement, physician statement and hospital report. She is still waiting on the report from the eye specialist [REDACTED] she saw the following day. Due to injury caused by the peeling paint on the Design for Living product, she asking for the company to reimburse her for the costs incurred for treatment, as well as for recovery time.
- Model
- unknown
- Serial number
- unknown
- Where
- Hendersonville, Tennessee: Home/
Apartment/ Condominium - Who was involved
- Female
- The reporter’s relation to them
- Unspecified
- As this report names them
- Brand Lifetime Brands, made or sold by Lifetime Brands
- How badly, in CPSC’s words
- Injury, Seen by Medical Professional
CPSC’s disclaimer
Disclaimer: CPSC does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the contents of the Publicly Available Consumer Product Safety Information Database on SaferProducts.gov, particularly with respect to information submitted by people outside of CPSC.
Word for word, from the disclaimer in CPSC’s export.
Sources
Sources
-
U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, SaferProducts.gov public database export.
Released Oct 25, 2026 and checked Oct 25, 2026. Updated daily. Public domain (U.S. Government work). CPSC asks to be credited, and that no endorsement be implied.
Reports of harm are from the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), on SaferProducts.gov. CPSC does not endorse Hearth Record.