Hospitals in Umatilla County
Shortlist up to four to read them side by side.
Filter them by what their records say, and open any one to read it: every fact with its source and date.
2 hospitals in Umatilla County, Oregon.
From CMS’s quarterly release of Aug 13, 2026. With Oregon’s own list of the hospitals it licenses that Medicare doesn’t certify. The record lists 64 hospitals in Oregon.
Also listed
OHA’s list of licensed hospitals holds 62 licensed hospitals. 59 of them are in CMS’s files (by Medicare number, name or address) and shown from CMS’s records; 1 is listed here as licensed by Oregon and not Medicare-certified. Not listed: 2 campuses or health centres of hospitals CMS lists, which Oregon licenses one by one.
2of 2 hospitalsshown with your filters
What the words on these cards mean7
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
- Condition-level deficiency
- For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.
- Immediate jeopardy
- CMS’s most serious finding: the place’s failure to meet a rule caused, or was likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment or death to someone in its care. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 489.3.
- None on record
- The source lists nothing of this kind for the place, over the years its file covers. That is what the record holds, not proof that nothing ever happened. Source: How this site reads each source.
- Not published
- The source has no such field for this place. It isn’t a zero, and it isn’t a clean record. Source: How this site reads each source.
The list
- Critical access hospital Good Shepherd Medical Center Hermiston, Oregon 97838 Not ratedCMS’s overall rating4of 5patient survey ratingNoinspections on record in the last three years OverallNot publishedPatient survey4 of 5Deficiencies, 3 yearsNot publishedEmergencyYesBeds49
- Critical access hospital St Anthony Hospital Pendleton, Oregon 97801 EMTALA deficiency in the last three years 3of 5CMS’s overall rating5of 5patient survey rating4deficiencies cited in the last three years Overall3 of 5Patient survey5 of 5Deficiencies, 3 years4EmergencyYesBeds49 4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Nov 2025. Most serious: Standard-level.
Nothing matches all of these.
Remove a filter to see more. Each one is a fact the source publishes, so a place can be left out because its record is silent, not only because of what it says.
CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Oregon Health Authority, Health Care Regulation and Quality Improvement, Licensed Hospitals. Released Aug 9, 2026. Updated monthly.
Your shortlist0 of 4
Add one more to compare.