Hearth Record

Medical City Fort Worth

An acute care hospital in Fort Worth, Texas 76104

900 Eighth Avenue, Fort Worth, Texas 76104. (817) 336-2100.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 20, 2026.

The last 24 months 5 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Dec 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Sep 3, 2026: a complaint inspection.

5 deficiencies cited in the last three years, 2 of them under EMTALA, the law requiring an emergency department to examine and stabilise anyone who comes to it.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

5 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Dec 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.

5 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 Dec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNov

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Dec 17, 2024: complaint inspection2 deficiencies
  • Emergency Room Log

    The inspectors’ words, 489 words

    “EMERGENCY ROOM LOG CFR(s): 489.20(r)(3) [The provider agrees,] in the case of a hospital as defined in §489.24(b) (including both the transferring and receiving hospitals), to maintain a central log on each individual who comes to the emergency department, as defined in §489.24(b), seeking assistance and whether he or she refused treatment, was refused treatment, or whether he or she was transferred, admitted and treated, stabilized and transferred, or discharged. §489.24 The provisions of this regulation apply to all hospitals that participate in Medicare and provide emergency services. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 33326 Based on interview, record review, and observation, the facility failed to maintain a central log on each individual who comes to the emergency department, as defined in §489.24(b), seeking assistance and whether he or she refused treatment, was refused treatment, or whether he or she was transferred, admitted and treated, stabilized and transferred, or discharged when, Patient #1 was not recorded as having been in the facility’s emergency department, seeking care for a medical emergency and the facility did not record and capture all patients leaving before an emergency screening examination. Findings: During a telephone interview, on the afternoon of 12/15/24, Patient #1’s mother stated, “I took Patient #1 to the emergency room, we always go to this hospital. I tried to check her in; the person at the desk kept asking me for my daughter’s social security (SS) number and ID (identification). I asked him what would he do if they didn’t have a SS number, or if they were from another country? He answered by asking for the SS and ID. I told him to look her up by her name, again he asked for the SS and ID. I told him he was denying care and left.” When asked if Staff #7, Paramedic, recently had a patient leave because they didn’t have the SS or ID, Staff#7 stated, “I remember, it was a mother and her daughter. I asked for the SS. She (mother) gave me her (patient) name. She (mother) said why can’t you just register her? I asked if she(mother) had her birthdate. She(she) told me she had the SS number; she gave me eleven numbers. I told her it had eleven numbers. We just went back and forth. I was trying to find a way to register her. We (the facility) can’t give service without registering them.” When asked if Staff# had reported the patient leaving, Staff#7 stated, “I told the charge nurse, he just shook his head.” During an interview on 12/17/24 at 9:30 am, in an administrative office, when asked about the missing patient on the emergency room log, Staff #8, Chief Nursing Officer confirmed the patient was not on the log. When asked how and where the facility recorded patients that had left the emergency room, Staff #8 stated, “If a patient came in and wasn’t registered, they wouldn’t be on the log.””

    Rule A2405. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Delay In Examination Or Treatment

    The inspectors’ words, 1,083 words

    “DELAY IN EXAMINATION OR TREATMENT CFR(s): 489.24(d)(4-5) (4) Delay in treatment. (i) A participating hospital may not delay providing an appropriate medical screening examination required under paragraph (a) of this section or further medical examination and treatment required under paragraph (d)(1) of this section in order to inquire about the individual’s method of payment or insurance status. (ii)A participating hospital may not seek, or direct an individual to seek, authorization from the individual’s insurance company for screening or stabilization services to be furnished by a hospital, physician, or nonphysician practitioner to an individual until after the hospital has provided the appropriate medical screening examination required under paragraph (a) of this section, and initiated any further medical examination and treatment that may be required to stabilize the emergency medical condition under paragraph (d)(1) of this section. (iii) An emergency physician or nonphysician practitioner is not precluded from contacting the individual’s physician at any time to seek advice regarding the individual’s medical history and needs that may be relevant to the medical treatment and screening of the patient, as long as this consultation does not inappropriately delay services required under paragraph (a) or paragraphs (d)(1) and (d)(2) of this section. Hospitals may follow reasonable registration processes for individuals for whom examination or treatment is required by this section, including asking whether an individual is insured and, if so, what that insurance is, as long as that inquiry does not delay screening or treatment. Reasonable registration processes may not unduly discourage individuals from remaining for further evaluation. A hospital meets the requirements of paragraph (d)(1)(ii) of this section with respect to an individual if the hospital offers to transfer the individual to another medical facility in accordance with paragraph (e) of this section and informs the individual (or a person acting on his or her behalf) of the risks and benefits to the individual of the transfer, but the individual (or a person acting on the individual’s behalf) does not consent to the transfer. The hospital must take all reasonable steps to secure the individual’s written informed refusal (or that of a person acting on his or her behalf). The written document must indicate the person has been informed of the risks and benefits of the transfer and state the reasons for the individual’s refusal. The medical record must contain a description of the proposed transfer that was refused by or on behalf of the individual. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 33326 Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide a reasonable registration process when a patient was discouraged from remaining for a medical emergency screening evaluation. Patient #1 was repeatedly asked for a social security number and identification; preventing her from being registered and advancing to triage and receiving a medical screening examination. Findings: Review of the facility provided Emergency Department Triage Guidelines (dated 12/21) reflected, “Triage is performed by a qualified RN at the time of presentation and may be done in concert with a quick registration ...C. All patients presenting to the emergency room are triaged (assessed) to determine the chief complaint and assign acuity. The acuity determines the time to treatment goals and the amount of time the patient can safely wait to be seen by a physician when no beds or caregivers are immediately available.” During a telephone interview, on the afternoon of 12/15/24, Patient #1’s mother stated, “I took Patient #1 to the emergency room, we always go to this hospital. I tried to check her in; the person at the desk kept asking me for my daughter’s social security (SS) number and ID (identification). I asked him what would he do if they didn’t have a SS number, or if they were from another country? He answered by asking for the SS and ID. I told him to look her up by her name, again he asked for the SS and ID. I told him he was denying care and left.” During a telephone interview, on the afternoon of 12/16/24, in an administrative conference room, Staff # 7, paramedic when asked how he registers patients into the emergency department stated, “I ask them if they have been here before. I get their SS and ID; I have to go to a different screen if this is their first time here. We can also use their name and date of birth.” When asked if Staff #7, Paramedic, recently had a patient leave because they didn’t have the SS or ID, Staff#7 stated, “I remember, it was a mother and her daughter. I asked for the SS. She (mother) gave me her (patient) name. She (mother) said why can’t you just register her? I asked if she(mother) had her birthdate. She(she) told me she had the SS number; she gave me eleven numbers. I told her it had eleven numbers. We just went back and forth. I was trying to find a way to register her. We (the facility) can’t give service without registering them.” When asked if Staff#7 had reported the patient leaving, Staff#7 stated, “I told the charge nurse, he just shook his head.” During an interview on the morning of 12/16/24, in an administrative conference room, when asked about the facility’s policy for registering patients in the facility’s emergency room, Staff #3, Quality Director stated, “We don’t have a policy for the registering of patients. The registering is not part of triage.” During an interview on the morning of 12/17/24, in an administrative conference room, when asked who received the training on triaging patients, Staff #2, ED Nurse manager stated, “The nurses get training on triage. Triage is the initial nursing assessment to find out why the patient is here and to decide if they need to go back immediately. The paramedics and techs do not, they will register the patients and the nurse will do the triage.” When asked if the patient is unable or refuses to give the number and ID how does the staff handle the situation? “We wouldn’t have had a system on how to handle this type of situation. Now, we are prepared for it. We had a meeting last night and decided to use the down time forms to get the patient triaged; registration can get them registered, after the medical screening examination. We get the social security number and ID so we can find them (the patient) in the electronic records, it gives the providers access to a patient’s previous admissions, medical history, and medications.””

    Rule A2408. Standard-level. From a complaint.

Jan 10, 2024: complaint inspection1 deficiency
  • Rn Supervision Of Nursing Care

    The inspectors’ words, 187 words

    “RN SUPERVISION OF NURSING CARE CFR(s): 482.23(b)(3) A registered nurse must supervise and evaluate the nursing care for each patient. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 46427 Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that a registered nurse supervised and evaluated the nursing care for 1 of 1 patient (Patient #1), in that, Patient #1 did not receive accurate assessments and care for a post-operative surgical wound as required by a physician’s order. Findings: Record Review of Patient #1’s medical record revealed Patient #1 was admitted to Medical City Fort Worth on 09/01/2023 for back pain and drainage from a lumbar surgical wound. Patient #1 underwent an Incision and Drainage to a lumbar wound on 09/02/2023. Provider order on 09/02/2023 indicated daily dressing changes and prn starting 2nd day postoperative. Record review of patient #1’s medical record reflected no documented nursing assessment of the surgical wound on 09/08/2023. Record review of patient #1’s medical record reflected no documented surgical dressing changes on 09/07/2023 and 09/08/2023. During an interview with Personnel #1, 2, 3, and 5 on 01/08/2024 confirmed the above findings.”

    Rule A0395. Standard-level. From a complaint.

Jan 8, 2024: complaint inspection2 deficiencies
  • Rn Supervision Of Nursing Care

    The inspectors’ words, 482 words

    “RN SUPERVISION OF NURSING CARE CFR(s): 482.23(b)(3) A registered nurse must supervise and evaluate the nursing care for each patient. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 46427 Based on record review and interview, the registered nurse failed to supervise and evaluate the nursing care for 1 of 1 patients (Patient #1) in accordance with the patient’s needs, in that the registered nurse failed to obtain a weight upon admission and failed to assess and document the amount of meal consumption. The facility failed to follow policy. Findings included: Record review of patient #1 medical record indicated weight was not assessed and documented upon admission to the unit. During an interview with Personnel #17 on 01/04/2024, Personnel #17 confirmed Patient #1 did not have a weight assessment performed upon admission to the unit. Personnel #17 stated it is facility policy to obtain height and weight on all patients admitted to the unit. Review of patient #1 medical record reflected Strict Input & Output measurement was ordered on 12/13/2023 at 1:16 PM. A review of the medical record for patient #1 revealed the facility’s Daily Nursing Assessment, performed every 12 hours reflected no documented meal consumption on the following days: 1. 12/12/2023 No documented meal consumption for dinner. 2. 12/13/2023 No documented meal consumption for lunch or dinner. 3. 12/14/2023 No documented meal consumption for lunch or dinner. 4. 12/15/2023 No documented meal consumption for dinner. 5. 12/16/2023 No documented meal consumption for breakfast. 6. 12/17/2023 No documented meal consumption for breakfast, lunch, or dinner. 7. 12/18/2023 No documented meal consumption for breakfast, lunch, or dinner. 8. 12/19/2023 No documented meal consumption for breakfast, lunch, or dinner. During an interview with Personnel #17 on 01/04/2023, confirmed meal consumption is required and is part of the nutritional assessment. During an interview on 01/04/2024 with Personnel # 1, 2, 3, and 4 confirmed there was no documented weight upon admission and no documentation for percentage of meal consumption on patient #1. Review of facility Policy and Procedure titled Documenting the Provision of Care, CS.300, effective January 2018, “ ...documentation in the electronic health record is focused on patient care activities, clinical decisions and patient response to care ...key elements of the patient-centered electronic health record are: history, screening and risk assessment, individual considerations for care, Assessment, plan of care, care activities ...Routine care activities include: admission history, assessment, vital signs/height & weight/measurements, safety/risk/regulatory, intake & output, pain management, manage/notify/refer, teach/educate, lines/drains and airways, activities of daily living (hygiene care/meals/ambulation(repositioning). Review of facility Policy and Procedure titled Standards of Care, HAH109, effective 01/01/2020, reviewed 02/2022, “ ...I & O, twice a day for all patients including but not limited to: 1. IV Intake, 2. Oral Intake, 3. Urine output, 4. Foley output. 5. Drain output. Assessment /Reassessment ...3. Focus re-assessments are performed based on patient condition and documented when there is a change in condition.”

    Rule A0395. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Therapeutic Diets

    The inspectors’ words, 457 words

    “THERAPEUTIC DIETS CFR(s): 482.28(b), (b)(1) §482.28(b) Menus must meet the needs of patients. (1) Individual patient nutritional needs must be met in accordance with recognized dietary practices. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 46427 Based on record review and interview the facility failed to provide necessary therapeutics to maintain healthy albumin and protein levels on 1 of 1 patient (Patient #1); after a 13-day stay the patient was transferred to a higher level of care with low levels of albumin and overall protein to sustain health for patient #1 who suffered from Sepsis, Acute on chronic hypoxic respiratory failure, Bilateral multilobar pneumonia, Hypertension, and Hypothyroidism Findings included: Record review of patient #1 medical records reflected an albumin level of 3.3 on 12/08/2023. Four days later on 12/12/2023, Albumin level was 3.2. Record review of patient #1 medical record reflected a protein level of 7.2 on 12/08/2023 and 6.9 on 12/12/2023. Review of Patient #1 medical record reflected a diet order was placed on 12/11/2023 that consisted of a regular diet with supplemental drinks three times a day (TID) with every meal. Review of patient #1 medical record from 12/11/2023 to 12/20/2023 revealed no documentation to ensure the supplemental drinks were provided. Review of Patient #1 medical record reflected a Nutrition/dietitian consult was ordered on 12/18/2023 at 3:24 PM for “Eval and Recommend, Reason: education; Comment: patient has requested supplement drinks. During an interview with Personnel #6 on 01/04/2024 confirmed he was unable to provide documentation Patient #1 received her supplemental drinks. During an interview with Personnel #6 on 01/04/2024 stated when a change in a diet order has been made the order automatically prints to the kitchen. A kitchen employee is responsible for entering the revised order into Comp Nutrition. Personnel #6 stated the order for the supplemental drinks was not modified in Comp Nutrition therefor the patient did not receive her supplemental drinks. During an interview with Personnel #10 on 01/04/2024 confirmed there was no process to ensure a nutrition consult was completed within 48 hours as policy states. During an interview with Personnel #1, 2, and 3 on 01/04/2024 confirmed the above findings. Facility policy titled “Standards of Nutrition Care”, FNS.040, effective June 1996, reviewed 12/2023,” ...Purpose: To establish basic standards of care for patients’ optimal nutrition care regardless of physical condition or disease state. Policy: All patients will receive quality nutrition care.” Facility policy titled “Modified Diets”, FNS.046, effective May 1996, reviewed 12/2023, “ ...Purpose: The purpose of this procedure is to provide diets in accordance with the patient’s physiological needs/disease state ...Policy: The Food and Nutrition Services department provides therapeutic diets as prescribed by the physicians. Procedure: A. patient is provided with the appropriate therapeutic diet as prescribed by his/her physician.””

    Rule A0629. Standard-level. From a complaint.

All 12 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Sep 3, 2026Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Oct 6, 2025Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Sep 11, 2025Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Aug 11, 2025Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Feb 18, 2025Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Dec 17, 2024Complaint inspection2 deficiencies cited
Nov 19, 2024Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
May 14, 2024Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Jan 10, 2024Complaint inspection1 deficiency cited
Jan 8, 2024Complaint inspection2 deficiencies cited
Nov 20, 2023Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Nov 6, 2023Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited

How do patients fare?

  • CMS’s overall for it is 2 of 5.
  • Of the measures behind its , CMS counts against the national value: mortality, 1 better and 0 worse of 8; safety of care, 1 better and 0 worse of 7; readmission, 0 better and 5 worse of 9.
  • Patients rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (719 surveys completed, Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): 69% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 68% would definitely recommend it.
  • Infections, compared by CMS with the national benchmark (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): central line bloodstream infections (CLABSI), no different than national benchmark; catheter urinary tract infections (CAUTI), better than the national benchmark; surgical site infections after colon surgery, no different than national benchmark; MRSA bloodstream infections, no different than national benchmark; C. diff infections, better than the national benchmark.
  • CMS’s patient safety composite for serious complications, PSI 90, Jul 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2024: no different than the national value.
  • Deaths within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2025): heart attack 11.6%, heart failure 7.9%, pneumonia 14.3%, COPD 9.1%, stroke 14.3%, heart bypass surgery 2.5%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
  • Readmissions within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2023 to Jun 30, 2025): heart attack 16.3%, heart failure 20.4%, pneumonia 18.3%, COPD 20.3%, heart bypass surgery 12.8%, hip or knee replacement 7.5%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
  • After outpatient care, compared by CMS: unplanned hospital visits after a colonoscopy, no different than the national rate; unplanned hospital visits after outpatient surgery, no different than expected.
  • Emergency department patients spent a median of 114 minutes there before leaving (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025), and 0% left before being seen.
  • 68% of patients with severe sepsis or septic shock got the care CMS measures, SEP-1 (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025).
  • Medicare’s spending per patient here is 1.09 times the national median (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024).
Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Overall ratingCMS’s overall hospital quality star rating, 1 to 52 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the hospital’s patients (HCAHPS), 1 to 53 of 5

Is it certified, and in good standing?

  • Medicare-certified acute care hospital since Aug 3, 1976.
  • Ownership: proprietary.
  • It is accredited by The Joint Commission, whose surveys stand in for the state’s routine inspections.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
  • It has an inpatient rehabilitation unit of 18 beds, which CMS lists apart as a rehabilitation facility.
  • Proprietary.
Source:

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals.
  • Not among the hospitals whose Medicare payments CMS cut under the Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program for fiscal year 2026.
  • 5 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated yearly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

What do patients say about their care?

  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
  • In CMS’s patient survey, patients rate how well its nurses communicated 2 of 5.
  • 50% of its health care workers got a flu shot (Oct 1, 2024 to Mar 31, 2025).
Source:

CMS, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital and Timely and Effective Care - Hospital. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Columbia North Texas Healthcare System LP owns 99.99% directly since Jun 16, 2015; Columbia North Texas Subsidiary Gp LLC owns 0.01% directly since Jun 16, 2015.
  • 7 owners or officers are people: Eric D Smith (managing employee (under contract)); David A Villagran (corporate officer); David A Villagran (corporate director); David A Villagran (managing employee (on the payroll)); John Hoover (corporate officer); John Hoover (corporate director); John Hoover (managing employee (on the payroll)).
  • CMS’s Provider of Services file records 2 changes of ownership, the latest on Jun 1, 1997.
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospital All Owners and Hospital Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated monthly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
HCA Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%May 26, 2010
HCA Healthcare Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Aug 29, 2011
Columbia-Sdh Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%May 26, 2010
Healthtrust Inc. - the Hospital CompanyOwns 5% or more through other companies100%May 26, 2010
Columbia North Texas Healthcare System LPOwns 5% or more directly99.99%Jun 16, 2015
Columbia North Texas Healthcare System LPLimited partner99.99%Jun 16, 2015
HCA Squared LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies26.63%Oct 24, 2011
Hospital Corp LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies26.63%Jan 1, 2010
HCA Health Services of Texas Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies20.82%Jan 1, 2010
Healthserv Acquisition LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies20.82%Jan 1, 2010
Medical City Dallas Hospital Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies19.52%Jun 1, 2016
Galtex LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies19.52%Jun 1, 2016
Frisco Holding IIOwns 5% or more through other companies16.3%Feb 6, 2026
Hercules Holding IIOwns 5% or more through other companies14.4%Feb 6, 2026
Brownsville-Valley Regional Medical Center, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies6.04%Jan 1, 2010
Hti Hospital Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies6.04%Jan 1, 2010
Sa Medical Center Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies5.28%Jan 1, 2010
Notco, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies5.01%Jan 1, 2010
Columbia North Texas Subsidiary Gp LLCOwns 5% or more directly0.01%Jun 16, 2015
Columbia North Texas Subsidiary Gp LLCGeneral partner0.01%Jun 16, 2015

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 30 hospitals CMS lists in Tarrant County, 17 have an overall star rating from CMS: 3 rated 5 of 5, 9 rated 4 of 5, 2 rated 3 of 5, 3 rated 2 of 5.
  • CMS rates this one 2 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals, so none are shown. The one payment cut CMS publishes for each hospital, under its Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program, is shown where it applies.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • Most hospitals are accredited by a private organisation (The Joint Commission, DNV and others) whose routine inspections stand in for the state’s; those reports aren’t public, and QCOR holds only the state’s surveys: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.
  • QCOR says its hospital inspection data are complete only through September 17, 2026, while it moves to a new system.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
  • In its September 2026 release CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for death and readmission rates, though it gives the rates.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.

From the hospital

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospital adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospital will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospital”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.