Hearth Record

Blueridge Vista Health and Wellness

A psychiatric hospital in Cincinnati, Ohio 45213

5500 Verulam Avenue, Cincinnati, Ohio 45213. (513) 841-3001.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 20, 2026.

The last 24 months 3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2024. Most serious: Condition-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
Condition-level deficiency
For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Jul 3, 2024: a complaint inspection.

3 deficiencies cited in the last three years, 1 of them at condition level, the most serious.

1 deficiency at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2024. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.

3 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 Dec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNov

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Jul 3, 2024: complaint inspection3 deficiencies
  • Nursing Services

    The inspectors’ words, 141 words

    “NURSING SERVICES CFR(s): 482.23 The hospital must have an organized nursing service that provides 24-hour nursing services. The nursing services must be furnished or supervised by a registered nurse. This Condition is not met as evidenced by: 28999 Based on medical record review, facility policy review, review of the Medication Error Listing, review of the facility incident logs, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff administered medications as ordered to the correct patient (A0405) and the facility failed to follow their policy to ensure medication errors were investigated and evaluated for the cause to prevent further errors. This affected Patient #10 and one unidentified patient and had the potential to affect all patients admitted to the hospital. (A0411). The cumulative effects of these systemic practices resulted in the agency’s inability to ensure patient care needs would be met.”

    Rule A0385. Condition-level. From a complaint.

  • Administration Of Drugs

    The inspectors’ words, 1,089 words

    “ADMINISTRATION OF DRUGS CFR(s): 482.23(c)(1), (c)(1)(i) & (c)(2) (1) Drugs and biologicals must be prepared and administered in accordance with Federal and State laws, the orders of the practitioner or practitioners responsible for the patient’s care as specified under §482.12(c), and accepted standards of practice. (i) Drugs and biologicals may be prepared and administered on the orders of other practitioners not specified under §482.12(c) only if such practitioners are acting in accordance with State law, including scope of practice laws, hospital policies, and medical staff bylaws, rules, and regulations. (2) All drugs and biologicals must be administered by, or under supervision of, nursing or other personnel in accordance with Federal and State laws and regulations, including applicable licensing requirements, and in accordance with the approved medical staff policies and procedures. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 28999 Based on medical record review, facility policy review, review of the Medication Error Listing, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff administered medications as ordered to the correct patient. This affected Patient #10 and one unidentified patient and had the potential to affect all patients admitted to the hospital. Findings include: 1.Review of the Medication Error Listing provided by the pharmacy revealed on 05/16/24 a patient was administered medications ordered for another patient. The physician was contacted and the patient was monitored every two hours. Interview with Registered Nurse Staff D via phone on 07/03/24 at 11:54 AM revealed a few months ago she had mistakenly administered medication belonging to Patient #1 to Patient #10. She stated Patient #10 wasn’t wearing a band and there were no pictures on the screen of the patient. Patient #10 answered when she called the name of Patient #1. Staff D stated she administered the medication to Patient #10. She later went in the room of Patient #1 to administer the medication and knew immediately she had made an error. She called the attending physician for Patient #10. The physician ordered staff to monitor the patient, including vital signs. Staff D stated she wrote a progress note in Patient #10’s record every time she monitored the patient. Staff D also stated she completed an incident report and gave it to the Director of Nursing (DON) as required by facility policy. Staff D denied any corrective action or communication from management occurred related to this event. Review of the medical record of Patient #10 revealed an admission to the facility on 05/14/24 at 5:57 PM and a discharge on home at 12:30 PM on 05/17/24. Review of the medication administration record (MAR) revealed Patient #10 was medicated with the antipsychotic Risperdal 0.5 milligrams (mg) on 05/16/24 at 8:28 PM. Review of the progress note on 05/16/24 at 8:56 PM stated the patient was alert and oriented, lying in bed. She stated she felt fine. She drank a cup of water then laid down in bed. Staff will continue to monitor. The patient’s vital signs were within normal limits. Review of a progress note on 05/16/24 at 10:00 PM stated Patient #10 remained alert and oriented with no acute distress. The patient’s gait was noted to be steady when she got up to go to the bathroom. The vital signs were within normal limits. Review of a progress note on 05/17/24 at 2:00 AM revealed Patient #10 was sleeping in bed but was easily aroused. The patient remained alert and oriented. Her vitals signs remained stable. At 4:00 AM the progress note revealed the patient continued to rest in bed, was easily aroused, and denied any ill feelings. Review of medication administration record (MAR) of Patient #1 revealed on 05/16/24 between 8:07 PM and 8:09 PM , medications to be administered included Cogentin (medication used to treat involuntary muscle movements caused by certain psychiatric drugs including antipsychotics) 1 milligram (mg), Atarax (medication used to help control anxiety and tension caused by nervous and emotional conditions) 25 mg, and propranolol (for treat high blood pressure) 40 mg. Review of the medical record of Patient #1 and Patient #10 revealed neither patient had a picture for identification. Interview with the Administrator, Staff A, on 07/03/24 at 12:45 PM revealed she was unaware of this medication error. She stated the former DON was terminated in June due to realizing there were too many instances without follow through. Staff A also confirmed that she discovered the the scanner for medication administration was malfunctioning shortly after the DON was terminated. She stated the problem with the scanner was a server issue and should be repaired soon. Staff A stated nurses should be asking patients to state their name and looking at the picture of the patient taken on admission and scanned into the medical record. Staff A verified neither Patient #10 or Patient #1 had a picture scanned into the medical record to use for patient identification. Staff A stated the nurses should not state the name of the patient but have the patient state their name and date of birth as patients could have the identical name or a name that sounds like another patient. Review of the facility policy titled “Medication Administration,” (Policy Number: MM.52), effective 01/2023, revealed staff nurses (licensed practical and registered) are instructed on the procedure to safely administer medication. The medication administration procedure instructed nurses to positively identify the patient before administering the medication. Scan the patient’s wristband barcode. In the case the patient refused to wear the wrist band check the patients identification with two hospital approved identifiers and when possible ask the patient to state his/her name. Nurses are instructed to report medication administration errors, adverse drug events, and incompatibilities to the attending physician immediately. Review of the policy titled “Incident Reporting and Investigation,” (Policy Number: RM.06), effective 01/2023, revealed the purpose of the incident report was to collect information and document facts concerning the incident, provide a means of evaluating why the incident occurred to avoid similar, future occurrences, and to assist in an investigation to provide adequate information should there be any legal action relative to the incident. The incident report is to be completed as soon as possible after an adverse event and turned into the department director/supervisor before the end of the shift in which the incident occurred. This can include but not limited to a medication error. 2. Review of Medication Error Listing, provided by Staff A on 07/03/24 at 1:55 PM, revealed an entry dated 04/01/24 which identified an unknown patient received Haldol (antipsychotic) 150 mg intramuscular (IM) instead of the ordered 50 mg.”

    Rule A0405. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Reporting Adverse Reactions And Errors

    The inspectors’ words, 1,079 words

    “REPORTING ADVERSE REACTIONS AND ERRORS CFR(s): §482.23(c)(5) - There must be a hospital procedure for reporting transfusion reactions, adverse drug reactions, and errors in administration of drugs. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 28999 Based on medical record review, facility policy review, review of the Medication Error Listing, review of the facility incident logs, and staff interview, the facility failed to follow their policy to ensure medication errors were investigated and evaluated for the cause to prevent further errors. This affected Patient #10 and one unidentified patient and had the potential to affect all patients admitted to the hospital. Findings include: 1.Review of the Medication Error Listing provided by the pharmacy revealed on 05/16/24 a patient was administered medications ordered for another patient. The physician was contacted and the patient was monitored every two hours. Interview with Registered Nurse Staff D via phone on 07/03/24 at 11:54 AM revealed a few months ago she had mistakenly administered medication belonging to Patient #1 to Patient #10. She stated Patient #10 wasn’t wearing a band and there were no pictures on the screen of the patient. Patient #10 answered when she called the name of Patient #1. Staff D stated she administered the medication to Patient #10. She later went in the room of Patient #1 to administer the medication and knew immediately she had made an error. She called the attending physician for Patient #10. The physician ordered staff to monitor the patient, including vital signs. Staff D stated she wrote a progress note in Patient #10’s record every time she monitored the patient. Staff D also stated she completed an incident report and gave it to the Director of Nursing (DON) as required by facility policy. Staff D denied any corrective action or communication from management occurred related to this event. Review of the medical record of Patient #10 revealed an admission to the facility on 05/14/24 at 5:57 PM and a discharge on home at 12:30 PM on 05/17/24. Review of the medication administration record (MAR) revealed Patient #10 was medicated with the antipsychotic Risperdal 0.5 milligrams (mg) on 05/16/24 at 8:28 PM. Review of the progress note on 05/16/24 at 8:56 PM stated the patient was alert and oriented, lying in bed. She stated she felt fine. She drank a cup of water then laid down in bed. Staff will continue to monitor. The patient’s vital signs were within normal limits. Review of a progress note on 05/16/24 at 10:00 PM stated Patient #10 remained alert and oriented with no acute distress. The patient’s gait was noted to be steady when she got up to go to the bathroom. The vital signs were within normal limits. Review of a progress note on 05/17/24 at 2:00 AM revealed Patient #10 was sleeping in bed but was easily aroused. The patient remained alert and oriented. Her vitals signs remained stable. At 4:00 AM the progress note revealed the patient continued to rest in bed, was easily aroused, and denied any ill feelings. Review of medication administration record (MAR) of Patient #1 revealed on 05/16/24 between 8:07 PM and 8:09 PM , medications to be administered included Cogentin (medication used to treat involuntary muscle movements caused by certain psychiatric drugs including antipsychotics) 1 milligram (mg), Atarax (medication used to help control anxiety and tension caused by nervous and emotional conditions) 25 mg, and propranolol (for treat high blood pressure) 40 mg. Review of the medical record of Patient #1 and Patient #10 revealed neither patient had a picture for identification. Interview with the Administrator, Staff A, on 07/03/24 at 12:45 PM revealed she was unaware of this medication error. She stated the former DON was terminated in June due to realizing there were too many instances without follow through. Staff A also confirmed that she discovered the the scanner for medication administration was malfunctioning shortly after the DON was terminated. She stated the problem with the scanner was a server issue and should be repaired soon. Staff A stated nurses should be asking patients to state their name and looking at the picture of the patient taken on admission and scanned into the medical record. Staff A verified neither Patient #10 or Patient #1 had a picture scanned into the medical record to use for patient identification. Staff A stated the nurses should not state the name of the patient but have the patient state their name and date of birth as patients could have the identical name or a name that sounds like another patient. Review of the facility policy titled “Medication Administration,” (Policy Number: MM.52), effective 01/2023, revealed staff nurses (licensed practical and registered) are instructed on the procedure to safely administer medication. The medication administration procedure instructed nurses to positively identify the patient before administering the medication. Scan the patient’s wristband barcode. In the case the patient refused to wear the wrist band check the patients identification with two hospital approved identifiers and when possible ask the patient to state his/her name. Nurses are instructed to report medication administration errors, adverse drug events, and incompatibilities to the attending physician immediately. Review of the policy titled “Incident Reporting and Investigation,” (Policy Number: RM.06), effective 01/2023, revealed the purpose of the incident report was to collect information and document facts concerning the incident, provide a means of evaluating why the incident occurred to avoid similar, future occurrences, and to assist in an investigation to provide adequate information should there be any legal action relative to the incident. The incident report is to be completed as soon as possible after an adverse event and turned into the department director/supervisor before the end of the shift in which the incident occurred. This can include but not limited to a medication error. Review of the facility Incident Log from 05/01/24 through 07/02/24 revealed no medication errors or incidents involving Patient #1 or Patient #10 identified on the log. Interview with Staff A on 07/03/24 at 1:55 PM revealed she was not aware of the incident or it would have been listed on the incident log and would have been investigated. Staff A confirmed that the medication error should have been investigated. 2. Review of Medication Error Listing, provided by Staff A on 07/03/24 at 1:55 PM, revealed an entry dated 04/01/24 which identified an unknown patient received Haldol (antipsychotic) 150 mg intramuscular (IM) instead of the ordered 50 mg. The facility did not provide any evidence of this being investigated.”

    Rule A0411. Standard-level. From a complaint.

All 4 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jul 3, 2024Complaint inspection3 deficiencies cited
May 7, 2024Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Feb 13, 2024Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Dec 21, 2023Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited

How do patients fare?

  • CMS gives no overall : “Data are shown only for hospitals that participate in the Inpatient Quality Reporting (IQR) and Outpatient Quality Reporting (OQR) programs.”
  • CMS publishes no patient survey results for it.
Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Overall ratingCMS’s overall hospital quality star rating, 1 to 5Not rated
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the hospital’s patients (HCAHPS), 1 to 5Not rated

Is it certified, and in good standing?

  • Medicare-certified psychiatric hospital since Mar 30, 2017.
  • Ownership: proprietary.
  • It is accredited by The Joint Commission, whose surveys stand in for the state’s routine inspections.
  • Cited at in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules for hospitals.
  • Proprietary.
Source:

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals.
  • CMS’s HAC Reduction Program file has no result for it: the program covers general acute care hospitals Medicare pays under its inpatient prospective payment system.
  • 3 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated yearly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

What do patients say about their care?

  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
Source:

CMS, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital and Timely and Effective Care - Hospital. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Cinci Psych Holdings, LLC owns 100% directly since Feb 23, 2015.
  • 4 owners or officers are people: Blake Berman (managing employee (on the payroll)); Yitzhak Rosedale (corporate officer); Richard Odenthal (corporate officer); Richard Odenthal (runs it (operational or managerial control)).
  • CMS’s Provider of Services file records no change of ownership.
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospital All Owners and Hospital Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated monthly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Cinci Psych Holdings, LLCOwns 5% or more directly100%Feb 23, 2015
Ronald S Wilheim 2012 Spousal TrustOwns 5% or more through other companiesFeb 23, 2015
I. Rosedale Irrevocable TrustOwns 5% or more through other companiesFeb 23, 2015
Wilheim Family Investment Company, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companiesFeb 23, 2015
Rrw, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companiesFeb 23, 2015
Chs Behavioral Holdings LLCOwns 5% or more through other companiesApr 19, 2023
I. Rosedale Family Investment Company Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companiesFeb 23, 2015
Rosedale Family Investment Company, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companiesFeb 23, 2015
S.l. Rosedale Irrevocable TrustOwns 5% or more through other companiesFeb 23, 2015
R.s. Wilheim Irrevocable TrustOwns 5% or more through other companiesFeb 23, 2015

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 13 hospitals CMS lists in Hamilton County, 8 have an overall star rating from CMS: 1 rated 5 of 5, 5 rated 4 of 5, 2 rated 3 of 5.
  • CMS gives this hospital no overall star rating to compare.
Source:

CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals, so none are shown. The one payment cut CMS publishes for each hospital, under its Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program, is shown where it applies.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • Most hospitals are accredited by a private organisation (The Joint Commission, DNV and others) whose routine inspections stand in for the state’s; those reports aren’t public, and QCOR holds only the state’s surveys: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.
  • QCOR says its hospital inspection data are complete only through September 17, 2026, while it moves to a new system.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.

From the hospital

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospital adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospital will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospital”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.