University Hospitals Ahuja Medical Center
An acute care hospital in Beachwood, Ohio 44122
3999 Richmond Road, Beachwood, Ohio 44122. (216) 593-5511.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 20, 2026.
- 3of 5 CMS’s overall rating
- 3of 5 patient survey rating
- 3 deficiencies cited in the last three years (needs attention)
- 144 beds
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean4
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
- Condition-level deficiency
- For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.
What did inspectors find?
The last inspection on record was on Dec 30, 2025: a complaint inspection.
3 deficiencies cited in the last three years, 1 of them at condition level, the most serious.
1 deficiency at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels
CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
When those deficiencies happened
3 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Sep 2025. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Dec | |||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Sep 24, 2025: complaint inspection2 deficiencies
-
Patient Rights
“PATIENT RIGHTS CFR(s): 482.13 A hospital must protect and promote each patient’s rights. This Condition is not met as evidenced by: 44810 Based on record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure patients were not chemically restrained in a medically induced coma with intubation to manage behaviors. (A0154)”
-
Use Of Restraint Or Seclusion
The inspectors’ words, 1,555 words
“USE OF RESTRAINT OR SECLUSION CFR(s): 482.13(e) Patient Rights: Restraint or Seclusion. All patients have the right to be free from physical or mental abuse, and corporal punishment. All patients have the right to be free from restraint or seclusion, of any form, imposed as a means of coercion, discipline, convenience, or retaliation by staff. Restraint or seclusion may only be imposed to ensure the immediate physical safety of the patient, a staff member, or others and must be discontinued at the earliest possible time. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 44810 Based on record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure patients were not chemically restrained in a medically induced coma with intubation to manage behaviors. This affected one (Patient #1) out of five patients reviewed for restraints. The hospital census was 130. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Patient #1 revealed he arrived at the facility emergency room on 08/16/25 at 5:03 P.M. via ambulance. Patient #1 came to the emergency room after attacking two staff members at his home facility and banging his head on the ground causing a laceration. The laceration required six staples to close. Patient #1 had a past medical history of moderate intellectual disability, antisocial personality disorder, anxiety, borderline personality disorder, and intermittent explosive disorder. Around 7:45 P.M. Patient #1 began demonstrating self-injurious behaviors such as banging his head causing his staples to bleed. Patient #1 was unable to be redirected. To control his behaviors he was placed in soft wrist and ankle restraints and administered the psychotropic medications Geodon and Ativan. Patient #1 was also given a one-on-one sitter. During this time Patient #1 reported he wanted to commit suicide. Psychiatric services were consulted. While restrained Patient #1 continued with self-injurious behaviors such as banging his head off the side rails and threatening to suffocate himself in the bed. Psychiatric services recommended an acute psychiatric stay and began working on placement and involuntary admission forms. During his emergency room stay Patient #1 continued with periods of self-injurious behaviors and behaviors towards others. At one point he pushed a nurse into the wall forcefully. Patient #1 was given additional diagnoses of unspecified psychosis and depression. On 08/18/25, while still in the emergency department, Patient #1 reported he was unable to urinate. Urology assessed Patient #1 in the emergency department and recommended a Foley catheter due to urinary retention. Patient #1 was then admitted to a general medical floor on 08/18/25 around 2:45 P.M. During his brief stay on the general medical floor Patient #1 had numerous behaviors including ripping out one of his staples and throwing it at a nurse. Patient #1 was placed in four-point leather restraints and the decision was made to admit Patient #1 to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) for closer monitoring. Patient #1 was transferred to the ICU on 08/18/25 at 7:00 P.M.. Once in the ICU Patient #1 was not able to be redirected, treated with medications, and while in four-point leather restraints he headbutted a nurse. The decision was made to place Patient #1 in medical sedation with intubation to protect staff and himself. Patient #1 was administered Propofol (a sedative-hypnotic anesthesia medication) and intubated on 08/18/25 at 11:47 P.M. Review of the physician progress note dated 08/19/25 at 12:44 P.M. notes the patient has exhibited violent behavior toward staff, prompting transfer to the ICU for chemical restraint in order to protect staff and patient from physical harm. Chemical restraint agents required to provide protection to patient and staff, warranted intubation for airway protection. Following the sedation and intubation Patient #1’s discharge plan was admission to the facility’s main campus where he could be extubated with psychiatric services onsite, however a bed was not yet available. The staff did attempt extubation of Patient #1 during his stay but each time he began pulling at his endotracheal tube attempting to self-extubate as he woke up. On 08/21/25 Patient #1 began running a fever and experiencing tachycardia. Patient #1 was treated with Tylenol and medications to control his heart rate which in turn lowered his blood pressure. On 08/23/25 at 3:48 A.M. Patient #1 was transferred to the facility’s main hospital still intubated and in a medically induced coma. During a telephone interview on 09/17/25 at 7:39 A.M., Registered Nurse (RN) Staff O stated she was working in the emergency department when Patient #1 came in for a head injury. She reported about a half hour into his care he reported he wanted to kill himself. She reported this changed the trajectory of his care. Psychiatric services were consulted and Patient #1 began banging his head reopening his stitches. Patient #1 was medicated, which did not work, then he was restrained in four-point restraints. While in restraints Patient #1 was still banging his head off the bed rails and threatening to suffocate himself in the bed. Patient #1 was given a one-to-one sitter. During a telephone interview on 09/17/25 at 9:11 A.M., RN Staff P stated she was the charge nurse on duty when Patient #1 was admitted from the emergency department to the general medical floor. She reported the plan was to get Patient #1 to urinate on his own and be released to a psychiatric facility for further care. Patient #1 was placed in a bed closest to the nursing station and he arrived on the unit with a one-on-one sitter. When Patient #1 arrived on the unit he was not using restraints. Patient #1 was cooperative and pleasant but unable to answer questions about his medical history. Patient #1 then began hitting his head and was able to be verbally deescalated. However, he quickly began hitting his head again. A Code Violet (an emergency situation where an individual is violent or combative) was called. He was placed in soft restraints and given medications for his behaviors. Another Code Violet was called after Patient #1 violently kicked an aide from his home facility who had been staying with him in the emergency department. Patient #1 began shaking the bed in an attempt to flip it. The physician consulted with the psychiatric provider and the intensive care physician. It was decided Patient #1 could benefit from closer monitoring. A plan was put into place for Patient #1 to be admitted to the intensive care unit. Staff P reported during his stay on her unit she had numerous conversations with Patient #1 about what therapeutic measures they could take to divert his behavior. Patient #1 reported he liked music. Staff P made sure a radio was placed in his room playing music he requested. Patient #1 also reported he did not like certain pillows and she replaced them with ones he liked. Staff P reported Patient #1 was calm and cooperative and able to verbalize his needs, but then would suddenly shove a spoon down his throat. During an interview on 09/17/25 at 1:02 P.M., ICU Physician Staff S confirmed she was working in the ICU when Patient #1 was admitted on 08/18/25 and provided care for him until discharged on 08/23/25. Staff S revealed when Patient #1 arrived on the unit he was very aggressive towards staff and headbutted a nurse while in four-point leather restraints. Due to his history of assaulting an emergency room nurse, a floor nurse, and now headbutting another nurse, the decision was made, with consultation from the psychiatrist, for Patient #1 to be sedated and intubated. Staff S reported the plan was to get Patient #1 medicated with his regular medications. He had been accepted to their main campus ICU where he could be extubated with staff equipped to handle his mental crisis. Staff S confirmed Patient #1 had three to four attempts to extubate during his stay in the ICU. Each time Patient #1 was attempting to self-extubate when the Propofol was decreased. On 08/22/25, while still intubated and sedated, Patient #1 developed suspected neuro malignant syndrome and supportive treatment was initiated. Patient #1 had all symptoms except for rigidity. During this time a bed became available at the main campus and Patient #1 was eventually transferred. Staff S confirmed mechanical ventilation and sedation is not a common practice to control patient behaviors, but Patient #1 was an extraordinary patient and required it to maintain the safety of him and the staff. During an interview on 09/17/25 at 1:22 P.M., Chief Medical Officer Staff C stated the plan for Patient #1 was get his urology situation resolved and get him to a psychiatric facility for further treatment. She reported his behaviors were erratic and he was sent to the ICU for closer monitoring and to be able to receive his medications reliably. Patient #1 was sedated and intubated due to his agitation, self-injurious behavior, and staff safety. Review of the facility policy titled “Use of Restraints and Seclusion Adults and Pediatrics,” dated October 2022, revealed a chemical restraint is a drug or medication when it is used as a restriction to manage the patient’s behavior or restrict the patient’s freedom of movement and is not a standard treatment or dosage for the patient’s condition. The hospital uses the least restrictive form of restraint or seclusion that protects physical safety of the patient, staff, or others. Chemical restraint is used only in the adult emergency department with ketamine administration.”
Dec 13, 2023: complaint inspection1 deficiency
-
Rn Supervision Of Nursing Care
The inspectors’ words, 308 words
“RN SUPERVISION OF NURSING CARE CFR(s): 482.23(b)(3) A registered nurse must supervise and evaluate the nursing care for each patient. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 31597 Based on medical record review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a registered nurse evaluated the nursing care for one of eight medical records reviewed for pain (Patient #1). The total sample was 10 records. The facility’s census was 131. Findings include: Review of the policy titled, Pain Management, Adult, approved 09/2023, revealed patients are screened for the presence of pain upon inpatient admission, during an emergency department visit, and at a visit to an ambulatory clinic that conducts risk screens (see Adult Patient Risk Screening (Outpatient), CP-131). If pain is present, a pain assessment is completed. Use a pain assessment scale/tool that is appropriate for age, development, and cognitive ability of the patient. Includes current and prior pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions, including opioid use, for pain management and its impact on current reported pain and treatment interventions. Pain assessment consists of pain: Location; Intensity; and Description (i.e. quality, associated symptoms, etc.). Review of Patient #1’s medical record revealed he was evaluated in the facility’s emergency department on 10/18/23 for complaints of abdominal pain. Patient #1’s pain assessments were as follows: Date Time Level Location 10/18/23 5:05 AM 10 - 10/18/23 10:55 AM 10 - 10/18/23 5:15 PM 0 - 10/18/23 11:34 PM 9 - 10/19/23 3:05 AM 9 - 10/19/23 1:09 PM 8 - 10/19/23 7:58 PM 7 - 10/20/23 12:07 AM 10 - 10/20/23 5:15 AM 10 - The pain documentation did not include the location of Patient #1’s pain. On 12/13/23 at 7:41 AM, the findings were shared with Staff C in an interview and confirmed. On 12/13/23 at 1:59 PM, the findings were shared with Staff A in an interview and confirmed.”
All 6 inspections in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 30, 2025 | Complaint inspection | No deficiencies cited |
| Oct 15, 2025 | Complaint inspection | No deficiencies cited |
| Sep 24, 2025 | Complaint inspection | 2 deficiencies cited |
| Nov 5, 2024 | Complaint inspection | No deficiencies cited |
| Jun 20, 2024 | Complaint inspection | No deficiencies cited |
| Dec 13, 2023 | Complaint inspection | 1 deficiency cited |
How do patients fare?
- CMS’s overall CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System. for it is 3 of 5.
- Of the measures behind its CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System., CMS counts against the national value: mortality, 1 better and 0 worse of 8; safety of care, 2 better and 0 worse of 7; readmission, 0 better and 3 worse of 9.
- Patients rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (1,851 surveys completed, Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): 68% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 70% would definitely recommend it.
- Infections, compared by CMS with the national benchmark (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): central line bloodstream infections (CLABSI), better than the national benchmark; catheter urinary tract infections (CAUTI), no different than national benchmark; surgical site infections after colon surgery, no different than national benchmark; MRSA bloodstream infections, no different than national benchmark; C. diff infections, better than the national benchmark.
- CMS’s patient safety composite for serious complications, PSI 90, Jul 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2024: no different than the national value.
- Deaths within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2025): heart attack 11.4%, heart failure 9.2%, pneumonia 12.7%, COPD 9.2%, stroke 13.1%, heart bypass surgery 1.9%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
- Readmissions within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2023 to Jun 30, 2025): heart attack 14.4%, heart failure 21.8%, pneumonia 19.3%, COPD 19.4%, heart bypass surgery 10.3%, hip or knee replacement 6.3%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
- After outpatient care, compared by CMS: unplanned hospital visits after a colonoscopy, no different than the national rate; unplanned hospital visits after outpatient surgery, no different than expected.
- Emergency department patients spent a median of 244 minutes there before leaving (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025), and 2% left before being seen.
- 48% of patients with severe sepsis or septic shock got the care CMS measures, SEP-1 (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025).
- Medicare’s spending per patient here is 1.01 times the national median (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024).
CMS, Hospital General Information, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital, Healthcare Associated Infections - Hospital, Timely and Effective Care - Hospital and Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary - Hospital. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Complications and Deaths - Hospital and Unplanned Hospital Visits - Hospital. Released Sep 30, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Overall ratingCMS’s overall hospital quality star rating, 1 to 5 | 3 of 5 |
| Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the hospital’s patients (HCAHPS), 1 to 5 | 3 of 5 |
Is it certified, and in good standing?
- Medicare-certified acute care hospital since Mar 1, 2011.
- Ownership: voluntary non-profit - private.
- It is accredited by DNV, whose surveys stand in for the state’s routine inspections.
- Cited at For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules for hospitals.
- Voluntary non-profit - Private.
CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Has it been penalized?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals.
- Not among the hospitals whose Medicare payments CMS cut under the Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program for fiscal year 2026.
- 3 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated yearly.
CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
What do patients say about their care?
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
- In CMS’s patient survey, patients rate how well its nurses communicated 3 of 5.
- 72% of its health care workers got a flu shot (Oct 1, 2024 to Mar 31, 2025).
CMS, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital and Timely and Effective Care - Hospital. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who owns it?
- University Hospitals Health System Inc. owns 100% directly since Oct 1, 2010.
- University Hospitals Health System Inc. runs it.
- 5 owners or officers are people: William Benoit (corporate officer); William Benoit (managing employee (on the payroll)); Michelle Gallucci (corporate officer); Cliff Andrew Megerian (corporate officer); Cliff Andrew Megerian (corporate director).
- CMS’s Provider of Services file records no change of ownership.
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Hospital All Owners and Hospital Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated monthly.
CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Organisation | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| University Hospitals Health System Inc. | Owns 5% or more directly | 100% | Oct 1, 2010 |
| University Hospitals Health System Inc. | Runs it (operational or managerial control) | 100% | Mar 1, 2011 |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 18 hospitals CMS lists in Cuyahoga County, 14 have an overall star rating from CMS: 4 rated 5 of 5, 6 rated 4 of 5, 4 rated 3 of 5.
- CMS rates this one 3 of 5.
CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals, so none are shown. The one payment cut CMS publishes for each hospital, under its Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program, is shown where it applies.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- Most hospitals are accredited by a private organisation (The Joint Commission, DNV and others) whose routine inspections stand in for the state’s; those reports aren’t public, and QCOR holds only the state’s surveys: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.
- QCOR says its hospital inspection data are complete only through September 17, 2026, while it moves to a new system.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
- In its September 2026 release CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for death and readmission rates, though it gives the rates.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospital General Information (xubh-q36u).
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital.
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Healthcare Associated Infections - Hospital (77hc-ibv8).
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Complications and Deaths - Hospital (ynj2-r877).
Released Sep 30, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Unplanned Hospital Visits - Hospital (632h-zaca).
Released Sep 30, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Timely and Effective Care - Hospital (yv7e-xc69).
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary - Hospital (rrqw-56er).
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program (yq43-i98g).
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated yearly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities (Hospital_and_other.DATA.Q3_2026.csv).
Released Oct 14, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies (Hospital_2567s_2010_to_2026YTD.xlsx).
Released Oct 20, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospital All Owners (Hospital_All_Owners_2026.09.29.csv).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospital Enrollments (Hospital_Enrollments_2026.09.29.csv).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.
From the hospital
The public record above comes first. Anything the hospital adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospital will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospital”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.