Mount Sinai West
An acute care hospital in New York, New York 10019
1000 Tenth Avenue, New York, New York 10019. (212) 523-4000.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 20, 2026.
- 4of 5 CMS’s overall rating
- 2of 5 patient survey rating
- 4 deficiencies cited in the last three years (needs attention)
- 1028 beds
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean4
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
- Condition-level deficiency
- For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.
What did inspectors find?
The last inspection on record was on Nov 22, 2024: a complaint inspection.
4 deficiencies cited in the last three years, 1 of them at condition level, the most serious.
1 deficiency at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels
CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
When those deficiencies happened
4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Mar 2024. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Dec | |||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Mar 11, 2024: complaint inspection4 deficiencies
-
Patient Rights
“PATIENT RIGHTS CFR(s): 482.13 A hospital must protect and promote each patient’s rights. This Condition is not met as evidenced by: 33919 Based on medical record (MR) review, document review, and interview, the facility failed to maintain a safe environment for patients. This failure placed all patients at risk for serious harm, injury, or death. Findings: - The facility failed to assess patients for fall risk upon Emergency Department (ED) presentation. (See Tag A-0144)”
-
Patient Rights: Care In Safe Setting
The inspectors’ words, 906 words
“PATIENT RIGHTS: CARE IN SAFE SETTING CFR(s): 482.13(c)(2) The patient has the right to receive care in a safe setting. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 33919 Based on medical record (MR) review, document review and interview, the facility failed to assess patients for fall risk upon Emergency Department (ED) presentation, in six (6) of fifteen (15) MRs. The facility’s failure to assess, identify, and implement preventative fall measures resulted in a serious adverse outcome for Patient #1, and placed all patients at risk for serious harm, injury, or death. Findings: The facility policy and procedure (P&P) titled, “Nursing Management of Fall and Injury Reduction in the Adult Patient in the Emergency Department [ED],” last dated 1/2024, directed the ED Registered Nurse (RN) to “complete Risk Screen: Kinder 1 Fall Risk Assessment.” The policy stated the “Purpose” of the Fall Risk Assessment was “the responsibility of the Emergency Department (ED) Registered Nurse (RN) in identifying patients whose safety is at risk, and in implementing interventions to prevent falls and falls with injury.” Review of Patient #1’s MR identified that on 1/20/2024, Patient #1 presented to the ED after a fall at home. Patient #1 was evaluated and discharged home on 1/21/2024 at 6:53AM. Five (5) hours and 20 minutes after ED discharge, on 1/21/2024 at 12:13PM, Patient #1 returned to the ED after a second fall at home and sustaining a dislocated finger. Patient #1 was evaluated, and a Computed Tomography Scan of the Head (CTH) resulted negative. Patient #1 was admitted to the hospital for falls at 4:01PM. On 1/22/2024 at 8:11AM, while still in the ED awaiting an inpatient bed, Patient #1 sustained an unwitnessed fall. A Computed Tomography Scan of the Head (CTH) performed at 9:23AM revealed a significant intracranial bleed (brain bleed) and Patient #1 was brought to the operating room (OR) at 10:28AM for a Craniotomy (an operation to open the skull to access the brain for surgical repair). Patient #1 never regained consciousness and was removed from life support on 1/24/2024 at 5:56 PM. Patient #1’s MR lacked documented evidence that the required ED Kinder 1 Fall Risk Assessment was completed when Patient #1 returned to the ED on 1/21/2024 at 12:13PM. The MR also lacked documented evidence that a fall risk assessment was completed after Patient #1 was admitted on 1/21/2024 at 4:01PM. There was no documented evidence that fall prevention interventions were implemented for Patient #1 prior to their sustained fall in the ED on 1/22/2024 at 8:11AM. The same lack of ED Kinder Fall Risk Assessments was identified in the MRs of Patient #s 3, 6, 7, 11, and 15. Per interview of Staff C (Associate Director of Nursing Informatics) on 2/15/2024 at 10:41AM, Staff C confirmed these findings and stated that the Kinder Fall Risk Assessment should be performed on every patient presenting to the ED. During interview of Staff B (Vice President/VP of Regulatory and Quality) on 2/15/2024 at 11:15AM, Staff B acknowledged these findings. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was identified on 2/16/2024 at 11:45AM for the facility’s failure to assess patients for fall risk. The facility’s failure to assess, identify, and implement preventative fall measures for at-risk patients resulted in a serious adverse outcome for Patient #1. The facility provided an IJ Removal Plan to survey staff on 2/16/2024 at 3:13PM. The plan stated the following: Beginning 2/16/2024, all nursing staff facility wide and currently working, and all nursing staff prior to the start of their shift, would be re-educated on the following: - All Emergency Department RNs would be educated on the “Nursing Management of Fall and Injury Reduction in the Adult Patient in the Emergency Department” policy, to include emphasis on identifying, assessing, implementing, and documenting protective measures for patients at risk for falls in the ED. - All Medical-Surgical and Critical Care RNs would be in-serviced on the “Fall Prevention and Injury Reduction in the Inpatient Adult” policy, to include emphasis on identifying, assessing, implementing, and documenting protective measures for inpatients at risk for falls. - All RNs would be in-serviced on the “Post Fall Event Management” policy, to include a post fall huddle completion and occurrence event reporting completion. The re-education would be delivered by Nurse Managers and Educators, and re-education progress monitored/tracked by the Director of Nursing Quality. In addition, all occurrence reporting and initial investigations would be conducted and documented within 48 hours of the event, and a monthly Fall Event Report would be reported to the hospital Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee. The IJ was removed on 2/20/2024 at 2:00PM, based on the onsite verification of the IJ Removal Plan which included: (a) Interviews conducted on 2/20/2024 with senior leadership, and review of education documentation and staff work schedules, confirmed that facility staff not yet in-serviced were not permitted to return to work until the in-service education was completed. (b) Review of in-service Attendance Records/Attestations verified the number of staff captured/re-educated. (c) Observations and interviews of staff in the patient care units, including the ED verified staff’s knowledge/re-education of the Fall Risk policies. (d) Review of medical records verified completion of the Kinder Fall Risk Assessments for ED patients, and the Morse Fall Risk Assessments for Inpatients. As of 2:00 PM on 2/20/2024, 100% of nursing staff that worked since the IJ was identified on 2/16/2024 had completed their re-education training. A hospital-wide total of 91.2% of nursing staff had completed the re-education.”
-
Rn Supervision Of Nursing Care
The inspectors’ words, 211 words
“RN SUPERVISION OF NURSING CARE CFR(s): 482.23(b)(3) A registered nurse must supervise and evaluate the nursing care for each patient. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 47355 Based on medical record (MR) review, document review, and interview, in 1 (one) of 3 (three) MRs, nursing staff did not perform a post-fall event note, as per facility policy. This lapse in post fall documentation potentially placed patients at risk for subsequent falls. Findings: The facility policy and procedure (P&P) titled, “Post Fall Event Management,” last revised 01/2023, directed nursing staff to document a post-fall assessment/event note in the electronic health record (EHR) after a patient fall. A SafetyNet (an incident reporting system application used to report adverse events/occurrences) Incident Report, dated 12/2/2023 at 3:40PM, identified Patient #5 had sustained an unwitnessed fall on 12/2/2023 at 2:30PM. Review of Patient #5’s MR identified no documented evidence of a post-fall event note, as per facility policy. In addition, there was no documented evidence that Patient #5 sustained a fall and was evaluated/treated after the fall event. During interview of Staff E (Informatics Registered Nurse/RN) on 02/15/2024 at 10:43AM, Staff E confirmed these findings. Staff E stated that they also reviewed Patient #5’s MR and could not locate any post fall event notes.”
-
Supervision Of Contract Staff
The inspectors’ words, 387 words
“SUPERVISION OF CONTRACT STAFF CFR(s): 482.23(b)(6) All licensed nurses who provide services in the hospital must adhere to the policies and procedures of the hospital. The director of nursing service must provide for the adequate supervision and evaluation of all nursing personnel which occur within the responsibility of the nursing service, regardless of the mechanism through which those personnel are providing services (that is, hospital employee, contract, lease, other agreement, or volunteer). This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 47355 Based on medical record (MR) review, document review, and interview, nursing staff failed to: (A) Investigate fall occurrences as per facility policy, in two (2) of three (3) MRs; and (B) Update patients’ plan of care after a fall event, in one (1) of three (3) MRs. These failures potentially placed patients at risk for serious injury or harm. Findings for (A): The facility policy and procedure (P&P) titled, “Patient Safety Occurrence/Event Reporting,” last reviewed 04/2023, directed nursing management to review safety occurrences and events for accuracy, change the status of the report to “Being Reviewed,” and complete the manager review section within 14 days. A SafetyNet (an incident reporting system application used to report adverse events/occurrences) Incident Report, dated 11/30/2023 at 2:01PM, identified Patient #4 sustained an unwitnessed fall on 11/30/2023 at 1:17PM. The manager review section of the report was not completed. In addition, the event was reviewed 11 (eleven) weeks after the incident report was filed, and was incomplete. A SafetyNet Incident Report, dated 12/2/2023 at 3:40PM, identified Patient #5 sustained an unwitnessed fall on 12/2/2023 at 2:30PM. The manager review section of the report was not completed. In addition, the event was reviewed 10 (ten) weeks after the incident report was filed, and was incomplete. During interview of Staff B (Vice President/VP of Regulatory and Quality) on 2/15/2024 at 2:54PM, Staff B confirmed these findings. Findings for (B): The facility P&P titled, “Post Fall Event Management,” last reviewed 01/2023, directed nursing staff to update patients’ Plans of Care after a fall. Review of Patient #4’s MR identified that Patient #4 had an unwitnessed fall on 11/30/2023. There was no documented evidence that Patient #4’s plan of care was updated after the fall event. During interview of Staff B (VP of Regulatory and Quality) on 2/15/2024 at 9:50AM, Staff B confirmed these findings.”
All 3 inspections in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 22, 2024 | Complaint inspection | No deficiencies cited |
| Mar 11, 2024 | Complaint inspection | 4 deficiencies cited |
| Nov 24, 2023 | Complaint inspection | No deficiencies cited |
How do patients fare?
- CMS’s overall CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System. for it is 4 of 5.
- Of the measures behind its CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System., CMS counts against the national value: mortality, 3 better and 0 worse of 8; safety of care, 3 better and 0 worse of 8; readmission, 1 better and 3 worse of 11.
- Patients rate it 2 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (450 surveys completed, Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): 59% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 62% would definitely recommend it.
- Infections, compared by CMS with the national benchmark (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): central line bloodstream infections (CLABSI), better than the national benchmark; catheter urinary tract infections (CAUTI), better than the national benchmark; surgical site infections after colon surgery, better than the national benchmark; surgical site infections after abdominal hysterectomy, worse than the national benchmark; MRSA bloodstream infections, no different than national benchmark; C. diff infections, better than the national benchmark.
- CMS’s patient safety composite for serious complications, PSI 90, Jul 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2024: no different than the national value.
- Deaths within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2025): heart attack 9.8%, heart failure 6.1%, pneumonia 11.7%, COPD 7.5%, stroke 10.3%, heart bypass surgery 1.7%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
- Readmissions within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2023 to Jun 30, 2025): heart attack 15.1%, heart failure 22%, pneumonia 19.5%, COPD 21.5%, heart bypass surgery 10.2%, hip or knee replacement 5.6%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
- After outpatient care, compared by CMS: unplanned hospital visits after a colonoscopy, no different than the national rate; hospital admissions after outpatient chemotherapy, no different than the national rate; emergency visits after outpatient chemotherapy, no different than the national rate; unplanned hospital visits after outpatient surgery, no different than expected.
- Emergency department patients spent a median of 272 minutes there before leaving (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025), and 2% left before being seen.
- 63% of patients with severe sepsis or septic shock got the care CMS measures, SEP-1 (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025).
- Medicare’s spending per patient here is 1.01 times the national median (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024).
CMS, Hospital General Information, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital, Healthcare Associated Infections - Hospital, Timely and Effective Care - Hospital and Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary - Hospital. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Complications and Deaths - Hospital and Unplanned Hospital Visits - Hospital. Released Sep 30, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Overall ratingCMS’s overall hospital quality star rating, 1 to 5 | 4 of 5 |
| Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the hospital’s patients (HCAHPS), 1 to 5 | 2 of 5 |
Is it certified, and in good standing?
- Medicare-certified acute care hospital since Jul 1, 1966.
- Ownership: voluntary non-profit - church.
- It is accredited by The Joint Commission, whose surveys stand in for the state’s routine inspections.
- Cited at For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules for hospitals.
- It has an inpatient rehabilitation unit of 65 beds, which CMS lists apart as a rehabilitation facility.
- Voluntary non-profit - Church.
CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Has it been penalized?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals.
- Not among the hospitals whose Medicare payments CMS cut under the Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program for fiscal year 2026.
- 4 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated yearly.
CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
What do patients say about their care?
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
- In CMS’s patient survey, patients rate how well its nurses communicated 2 of 5.
- 84% of its health care workers got a flu shot (Oct 1, 2024 to Mar 31, 2025).
CMS, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital and Timely and Effective Care - Hospital. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who owns it?
- 27 owners or officers are people: Denis Donegan (corporate officer, 100%); Denis Donegan (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); Denis Donegan (runs it (operational or managerial control), 100%); Eric Mindich (corporate director); Frank Bisignano (corporate director); John S Winkleman (corporate director); Susan Cullman (corporate director); John A Levin (corporate director); Robert Savage (corporate director); Joel S. Ehrenkranz (corporate director); Richard A Friedman (corporate director); James E Flynn (corporate director); Thomas W Strauss (corporate director); Joel Picket (corporate director); James Neary (corporate director); William Wright (corporate director); Henry M Calderon (corporate director); James S Tisch (corporate director); John B Hess (corporate director); Steven Hochberg (corporate director); Peter W May (corporate director); Judith O Rubin (corporate director); Louis Pell (corporate director); Timothy Day (corporate director); James Gogel (corporate director); Michael Zimmerman (corporate director); Michael Minikes (corporate director).
- CMS’s Provider of Services file records 1 change of ownership.
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Hospital All Owners and Hospital Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated monthly.
CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 16 hospitals CMS lists in New York County, 11 have an overall star rating from CMS: 4 rated 5 of 5, 2 rated 4 of 5, 3 rated 3 of 5, 2 rated 2 of 5.
- CMS rates this one 4 of 5.
CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals, so none are shown. The one payment cut CMS publishes for each hospital, under its Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program, is shown where it applies.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- Most hospitals are accredited by a private organisation (The Joint Commission, DNV and others) whose routine inspections stand in for the state’s; those reports aren’t public, and QCOR holds only the state’s surveys: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.
- QCOR says its hospital inspection data are complete only through September 17, 2026, while it moves to a new system.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
- In its September 2026 release CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for death and readmission rates, though it gives the rates.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospital General Information (xubh-q36u).
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital.
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Healthcare Associated Infections - Hospital (77hc-ibv8).
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Complications and Deaths - Hospital (ynj2-r877).
Released Sep 30, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Unplanned Hospital Visits - Hospital (632h-zaca).
Released Sep 30, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Timely and Effective Care - Hospital (yv7e-xc69).
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary - Hospital (rrqw-56er).
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program (yq43-i98g).
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated yearly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities (Hospital_and_other.DATA.Q3_2026.csv).
Released Oct 14, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies (Hospital_2567s_2010_to_2026YTD.xlsx).
Released Oct 20, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospital All Owners (Hospital_All_Owners_2026.09.29.csv).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospital Enrollments (Hospital_Enrollments_2026.09.29.csv).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.
From the hospital
The public record above comes first. Anything the hospital adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospital will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospital”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.