Hearth Record

Valley Hospital Medical Center

An acute care hospital in Las Vegas, Nevada 89106

620 Shadow Lane, Las Vegas, Nevada 89106. (702) 388-4000.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 20, 2026.

The last 24 months 2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Feb 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Feb 26, 2026: a complaint inspection.

2 deficiencies cited in the last three years, 2 of them under EMTALA, the law requiring an emergency department to examine and stabilise anyone who comes to it.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Feb 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

2 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Feb 26, 2026: complaint inspection2 deficiencies
  • Compliance With 489.24

    “COMPLIANCE WITH 489.24 CFR(s): 489.20(l) [The provider agrees,] in the case of a hospital as defined in §489.24(b), to comply with §489.24. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 21794 Based on findings at A2406, the facility failed to ensure compliance with Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 489.24.”

    Rule A2400. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Medical Screening Exam

    The inspectors’ words, 1,314 words

    “MEDICAL SCREENING EXAM CFR(s): 489.24(a) & 489.24(c) (a) Applicability of provisions of this section. (1) In the case of a hospital that has an emergency department, if an individual (whether or not eligible for Medicare benefits and regardless of ability to pay) “comes to the emergency department”, as defined in paragraph (b) of this section, the hospital must- (i) Provide an appropriate medical screening examination within the capability of the hospital’s emergency department, including ancillary services routinely available to the emergency department, to determine whether or not an emergency medical condition exists. The examination must be conducted by an individual(s) who is determined qualified by hospital bylaws or rules and regulations and who meets the requirements of §482.55 of this chapter concerning emergency services personnel and direction; and (ii) If an emergency medical condition is determined to exist, provide any necessary stabilizing treatment, as defined in paragraph (d) of this section, or an appropriate transfer as defined in paragraph (e) of this section. If the hospital admits the individual as an inpatient for further treatment, the hospital’s obligation under this section ends, as specified in paragraph (d)(2) of this section. (2)(i) When a waiver has been issued in accordance with section 1135 of the Act that includes a waiver under section 1135(b)(3) of the Act, sanctions under this section for an inappropriate transfer or for the direction or relocation of an individual to receive medical screening at an alternate location do not apply to a hospital with a dedicated emergency department if the following conditions are met: (A) The transfer is necessitated by the circumstances of the declared emergency in the emergency area during the emergency period. (B) The direction or relocation of an individual to receive medical screening at an alternate location is pursuant to an appropriate State emergency preparedness plan or, in the case of a public health emergency that involves a pandemic infectious disease, pursuant to a State pandemic preparedness plan. (C) The hospital does not discriminate on the basis of an individual’s source of payment or ability to pay. (D) The hospital is located in an emergency area during an emergency period, as those terms are defined in section 1135(g)(1) of the Act. (E) There has been a determination that a waiver of sanctions is necessary. (ii) A waiver of these sanctions is limited to a 72-hour period beginning upon the implementation of a hospital disaster protocol, except that, if a public health emergency involves a pandemic infectious disease (such as pandemic influenza), the waiver will continue in effect until the termination of the applicable declaration of a public health emergency, as provided under section 1135(e)(1)(B) of the Act. (c) Use of dedicated emergency department for nonemergency services. If an individual comes to a hospital’s dedicated emergency department and a request is made on his or her behalf for examination or treatment for a medical condition, but the nature of the request makes it clear that the medical condition is not of an emergency nature, the hospital is required only to perform such screening as would be appropriate for any individual presenting in that manner, to determine that the individual does not have an emergency medical condition. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 21794 Based on interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to provide a medical screening examination (MSE) and treatment for 1 of 20 sampled patients (Patient 9). The deficient practice had the potential for further harm when not providing a medical screening and addressing a possible emergency medical condition. Findings include: Patient 9 (P9) arrived at the North 5th Street Emergency Department (ED) with spouse at approximately 11:00 PM of 01/03/2026 requesting medical care for difficulty breathing following an allergic reaction. Review of the ED Log for 01/03/2026, did not contain the name of P9, the chief complaint as the reason for medical care and treatment. The staffing schedules for the night shift on 01/03/2026, revealed there were two registered nurses, one registration/admitting employee, one security officer (Employee 9), and a Licensed Independent Practitioner (LIP) onsite the night of the incident. Review of the EMTALA training records revealed Employee 9 had not completed annual EMTALA training at the time of the incident. On 02/18/2026 at 3:45 PM, P9 confirmed the need for medical attention on 01/03/2026 and arrived at the 5th Street ED at approximately 11:00 PM on 01/03/2026. P9 shared there was a sign in the ED lobby with directions to ring the bell for assistance, but there was no bell available. After several minutes, a security guard presented at the window and informed the spouse and P9 the bell was removed and informed them that it would be a long time until P9 would be triaged and seen by the physician and may want to go to another ED. On 02/19/2026 at 8:05 AM, the spouse of P9 confirmed transporting P9 to the ED at approximately 11:00 PM on 01/03/2026 to obtain medical assistance due to difficulty breathing. The spouse also confirmed that there was no bell available to ring for assistance and the security guard encouraged them to seek care at another ED. The spouse acknowledged contacting 911 from the parking lot of the ED that night for assistance. On 02/19/2026 at 9:50 AM, the mother of, a minor patient who was first taken to the ED on 01/03/2026 confirmed requesting medical assistance for the patient but was informed of a long wait and then proceeded to leave to seek medical care at another facility. The mother indicated witnessing the fire department in the parking lot of the N. 5th Street ED interacting with P9. The mother stated, “she looked very sick”. On 02/24/2026 at 12:02 PM, the ED Charge Nurse confirmed speaking with two uniform firemen on 01/03/2026 and would not have refused care and did not speak to P9. The ED Charge Nurse had not spoken with the security guard in regard to the complaint, or at any time following the incident on 01/03/2026. The North Las Vegas Fire Department EMS Report was obtained on 03/03/2026, which confirmed a 911 call at approximately 11:03 AM on 01/03/2026, and reached the incident address of N. 5th St. North Las Vegas (ED), the address of the ED. The patient information on the report confirmed that it was P9 who requested their assistance. In an Interoffice Memorandum authored by a Fire Captain from the City of North Las Vegas dated 03/03/2026, noted that T58 (Call sign) was dispatched to the ED the N 5th St. North Las Vegas (ED) for a possible anaphylactic shock on 01/3/2026 at approximately 11:04 PM. It was noted P9 was found in a tripod position upon arrival and was treated by obtaining vitals. It was further noted in the Memo P9 and spouse told fire department that they were told P9 was not going to be treated. It was noted in the Memo that the Fire Captain and fire fighter entered the ED to speak with the Charge Nurse. It was noted the Charge Nurse did not tell P9 to leave and it was the patient’s choice to leave. The Charge Nurse finished by saying that she was busy and P9 can come wait in the waiting room. Review of facility policy entitled, EMTALA-Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act, revealed the hospital would provide an individual with an appropriate medical Screening Examination within the capacity of the hospital’s ED. The MSE, including ancillary services routinely available to the ED, were to determine whether an emergency medical condition existed, regardless of the ability to pay, when an individual requested emergency medical care while in the dedicated ED. The facility’s policy titled “Annual Mandatory Education and Employment Requirements” dated January 2025, documented all employees and contract services staff were required to successfully complete mandated education training via the Learning Management System (LMS). Timely completion was required. Complaint #NV00075147”

    Rule A2406. Standard-level. From a complaint.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Feb 26, 2026Complaint inspection2 deficiencies cited
Dec 12, 2025Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited

How do patients fare?

  • CMS’s overall for it is 2 of 5.
  • Of the measures behind its , CMS counts against the national value: mortality, 0 better and 0 worse of 8; safety of care, 3 better and 0 worse of 8; readmission, 0 better and 2 worse of 9.
  • Patients rate it 2 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (376 surveys completed, Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): 56% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 58% would definitely recommend it.
  • Infections, compared by CMS with the national benchmark (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): central line bloodstream infections (CLABSI), better than the national benchmark; catheter urinary tract infections (CAUTI), better than the national benchmark; surgical site infections after colon surgery, no different than national benchmark; MRSA bloodstream infections, no different than national benchmark; C. diff infections, better than the national benchmark.
  • CMS’s patient safety composite for serious complications, PSI 90, Jul 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2024: no different than the national value.
  • Deaths within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2025): heart attack 10%, heart failure 9.8%, pneumonia 12.9%, COPD 8.7%, stroke 14.5%, heart bypass surgery 2.8%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
  • Readmissions within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2023 to Jun 30, 2025): heart attack 14.7%, heart failure 22.8%, pneumonia 18%, COPD 19.9%, heart bypass surgery 10.9%, hip or knee replacement 6%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
  • After outpatient care, compared by CMS: unplanned hospital visits after a colonoscopy, no different than the national rate; unplanned hospital visits after outpatient surgery, no different than expected.
  • Emergency department patients spent a median of 169 minutes there before leaving (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025), and 0% left before being seen.
  • 81% of patients with severe sepsis or septic shock got the care CMS measures, SEP-1 (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025).
  • Medicare’s spending per patient here is 1.13 times the national median (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024).
Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Overall ratingCMS’s overall hospital quality star rating, 1 to 52 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the hospital’s patients (HCAHPS), 1 to 52 of 5

Is it certified, and in good standing?

  • Medicare-certified acute care hospital since Aug 3, 1979.
  • Ownership: proprietary.
  • It is accredited by The Joint Commission, whose surveys stand in for the state’s routine inspections.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
  • Proprietary.
Source:

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals.
  • Not among the hospitals whose Medicare payments CMS cut under the Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program for fiscal year 2026.
  • 2 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated yearly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

What do patients say about their care?

  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
  • In CMS’s patient survey, patients rate how well its nurses communicated 2 of 5.
  • 82% of its health care workers got a flu shot (Oct 1, 2024 to Mar 31, 2025).
Source:

CMS, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital and Timely and Effective Care - Hospital. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Valley Health System, LLC owns 100% directly since Jan 16, 1998.
  • Uhs of Delaware Inc. runs it.
  • 17 owners or officers are people: George H Brunner (corporate officer, 100%); Edward Sim (corporate officer, 100%); Edward Sim (runs it (operational or managerial control), 100%); Katharine M Lyver (corporate officer, 100%); Matthew D Klein (corporate officer, 100%); Steve Filton (corporate officer, 100%); Steve Filton (runs it (operational or managerial control), 100%); Cheryl K Ramagano (corporate officer, 100%); Alan B Miller (owns 5% or more through other companies, 87.6%); James M Coleman (managing employee (under contract), 50%); Edward Sim (corporate director, 33.3%); Matthew D Klein (corporate director, 33.3%); Steve Filton (corporate director, 33.3%); Cristian A Cormier (managing employee (under contract), 0%); Cristian A Cormier (corporate officer, 0%); Ryan Tingey (managing employee (under contract), 0%); Ryan Tingey (corporate officer, 0%).
  • CMS’s Provider of Services file records 1 change of ownership, the latest on Feb 1, 1998.
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospital All Owners and Hospital Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated monthly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Valley Health System, LLCOwns 5% or more directly100%Jan 16, 1998
Universal Health Services Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Jan 16, 1998
Valley Hospital Medical Center Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Feb 11, 2008
Uhs of Delaware Inc.Runs it (operational or managerial control)100%Jan 16, 1998
UHS Holding Company, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Feb 11, 2008

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 26 hospitals CMS lists in Clark County, 14 have an overall star rating from CMS: 1 rated 5 of 5, 3 rated 4 of 5, 4 rated 3 of 5, 6 rated 2 of 5.
  • CMS rates this one 2 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals, so none are shown. The one payment cut CMS publishes for each hospital, under its Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program, is shown where it applies.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • Most hospitals are accredited by a private organisation (The Joint Commission, DNV and others) whose routine inspections stand in for the state’s; those reports aren’t public, and QCOR holds only the state’s surveys: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.
  • QCOR says its hospital inspection data are complete only through September 17, 2026, while it moves to a new system.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
  • In its September 2026 release CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for death and readmission rates, though it gives the rates.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospital

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospital adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospital will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospital”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.