Hearth Record

North Vista Hospital

An acute care hospital in North Las Vegas, Nevada 89030

1409 East Lake Mead Blvd, North Las Vegas, Nevada 89030. (702) 649-7711.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 20, 2026.

The last 24 months 2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Feb 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Feb 9, 2024: a complaint inspection.

2 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Feb 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.

2 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 Dec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNov

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Feb 9, 2024: complaint inspection2 deficiencies
  • Medical Staff - Bylaws And Rules

    The inspectors’ words, 128 words

    “MEDICAL STAFF - BYLAWS AND RULES CFR(s): 482.12(a)(4) [The governing body must] approve medical staff bylaws and other medical staff rules and regulations. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 21794 Based on document review and interview, the facility failed to review the Medical Staff Bylaws at least biennially. This deficient practice placed the facility at risk for unsafe medical staff practices. A review of the hospital’s Medical Staff Bylaws revealed the last date the Bylaws were approved was in 04/2020. Page 70 in the Medical Staff Bylaws documented, bylaws shall be reviewed at least biennially. On 02/09/2024, the Director of Medical Staff Services confirmed the most recent date of adoption or approval of the hospital’s Medical Staff Bylaws occurred during the month and year of 04/2020.”

    Rule A0048. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Patient Rights: Restraint Or Seclusion

    The inspectors’ words, 326 words

    “PATIENT RIGHTS: RESTRAINT OR SECLUSION CFR(s): 482.13(e)(16)(i) When restraint or seclusion is used, there must be documentation in the patient’s medical record of the following: The 1-hour face-to-face medical and behavioral evaluation if restraint or seclusion is used to manage violent or self-destructive behavior. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 21794 Based on record review, document review and interview, the facility failed to ensure when a restraint or seclusion was used to manage violent or self-destructive behavior, there must be documentation in the patient’s record of a one hour face-to-face medical and behavioral evaluation. A Nurse’s Note dated 09/05/2023 at 4:51 AM, documented after two separate injections of Zyprexa 10 mg, the patient continued to be aggressive towards staff and during an intervention with hospital security. Patient 15 was placed in both upper and lower extremity restraints at 10:53 PM. A physician order was obtained via phone order at 11:11 PM on 09/04/2023. Patient 15 remained in restraints for 4 hours, with evidence of 15 minute visual checks documented. Patient 15’s clinical record lacked documented evidence a face-to-face evaluation had been conducted, assessing both the medical and behavioral condition of the patient by a qualified Registered Nurse or by a physician. Documentation contained in a Nurse’s Note dated 09/05/2023 at 4:51 AM, revealed the patient was again placed in restraints for aggression following the patient’s release after the expiration of the first 4 hour order. The hospital’s policy entitled Restraints: Violent Behavior or Seclusion documented, a face-to-face evaluation is to be conducted no later than one (1) hour after the initiation of the intervention. This interview should be conducted by a physician, another licensed Independent Practitioner (LIP) or a trained Registered Nurse. On 02/06/2024, the Performance Improvement Coordinator acknowledged a one (1) hour face-to-face evaluation should have been conducted following the restraint and seclusion of a violent patient which should assess four areas and would have included both the patient’s behavior and medical conditions.”

    Rule A0184. Standard-level. From a complaint.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Feb 9, 2024Complaint inspection2 deficiencies cited

How do patients fare?

  • CMS’s overall for it is 3 of 5.
  • Of the measures behind its , CMS counts against the national value: mortality, 0 better and 0 worse of 4; safety of care, 1 better and 0 worse of 5; readmission, 0 better and 1 worse of 4.
  • Patients rate it 2 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (411 surveys completed, Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): 59% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 62% would definitely recommend it.
  • Infections, compared by CMS with the national benchmark (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): central line bloodstream infections (CLABSI), better than the national benchmark; catheter urinary tract infections (CAUTI), no different than national benchmark; surgical site infections after colon surgery, no different than national benchmark; MRSA bloodstream infections, no different than national benchmark; C. diff infections, better than the national benchmark.
  • CMS’s patient safety composite for serious complications, PSI 90, Jul 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2024: no different than the national value.
  • Deaths within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2025): heart failure 8.5%, pneumonia 16.7%, COPD 9.3%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
  • Readmissions within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2023 to Jun 30, 2025): heart attack 14.8%, heart failure 22.9%, pneumonia 18%, COPD 22.3%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
  • Emergency department patients spent a median of 131 minutes there before leaving (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025), and 2% left before being seen.
  • 80% of patients with severe sepsis or septic shock got the care CMS measures, SEP-1 (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025).
  • Medicare’s spending per patient here is 1.14 times the national median (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024).
Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Overall ratingCMS’s overall hospital quality star rating, 1 to 53 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the hospital’s patients (HCAHPS), 1 to 52 of 5

Is it certified, and in good standing?

  • Medicare-certified acute care hospital since Jul 21, 2021.
  • Ownership: voluntary non-profit - private.
  • It is accredited by DNV, whose surveys stand in for the state’s routine inspections.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
  • Voluntary non-profit - Private.
Source:

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals.
  • Not among the hospitals whose Medicare payments CMS cut under the Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program for fiscal year 2026.
  • 2 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated yearly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

What do patients say about their care?

  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
  • In CMS’s patient survey, patients rate how well its nurses communicated 1 of 5.
  • 67% of its health care workers got a flu shot (Oct 1, 2024 to Mar 31, 2025).
Source:

CMS, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital and Timely and Effective Care - Hospital. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Prime Healthcare Services North Vista LLC owns 100% directly since Jan 22, 2015.
  • 6 owners or officers are people: Elliott Kay (corporate officer, 0%); Elliott Kay (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Steven Aleman (other role (CMS gives no detail), 0%); Christopher Doan (corporate officer); Vincenzo Variale (corporate officer, 0%); Vincenzo Variale (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%).
  • CMS’s Provider of Services file records 1 change of ownership.
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospital All Owners and Hospital Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated monthly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Prime Healthcare Services North Vista LLCOwns 5% or more directly100%Jan 22, 2015
Prime Healthcare Services, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Jan 22, 2015
Prime Healthcare Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Jan 22, 2015

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 26 hospitals CMS lists in Clark County, 14 have an overall star rating from CMS: 1 rated 5 of 5, 3 rated 4 of 5, 4 rated 3 of 5, 6 rated 2 of 5.
  • CMS rates this one 3 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals, so none are shown. The one payment cut CMS publishes for each hospital, under its Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program, is shown where it applies.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • Most hospitals are accredited by a private organisation (The Joint Commission, DNV and others) whose routine inspections stand in for the state’s; those reports aren’t public, and QCOR holds only the state’s surveys: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.
  • QCOR says its hospital inspection data are complete only through September 17, 2026, while it moves to a new system.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
  • In its September 2026 release CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for death and readmission rates, though it gives the rates.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.

From the hospital

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospital adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospital will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospital”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.