Hearth Record

Chilton Medical Center

An acute care hospital in Pompton Plains, New Jersey 07444

97 West Parkway, Pompton Plains, New Jersey 07444. (973) 831-5000.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 20, 2026.

The last 24 months 2 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Mar 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Aug 27, 2026: a complaint inspection.

2 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

2 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Mar 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.

2 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 Dec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNov

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Mar 4, 2026: complaint inspection1 deficiency
  • Patient Rights: Free From Abuse/Harassment

    The inspectors’ words, 1,185 words

    “PATIENT RIGHTS: FREE FROM ABUSE/HARASSMENT CFR(s): 482.13(c)(3) The patient has the right to be free from all forms of abuse or harassment. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 51555 Based on facility policy, medical record review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to implement its policy for the reporting of alleged abuse in one of one medical records reviewed where abuse was alleged (Patient (P)1). Findings include: Facility policy titled, “Elder and Vulnerable Adult Abuse”, effective 2/13/23, stated, “Executive Summary: It is the policy of [facility name] to identify, treat, and report suspected elder/vulnerable adult abuse in full compliance with the Adult Protective Services Act of the State of New Jersey... Procedure... Reporting Procedures: 1. A health care professional ... who has reasonable cause to believe that a vulnerable adult is the subject of abuse, neglect, or exploitation will report the information to the county adult protective services provider. 2. Any other person who has reasonable cause to believe that a vulnerable adult is the subject of abuse, neglect, or exploitation will report the information to the county adult protective services provider. 3. The report will be made to the adult protective services provider in the county in which he/she resides. 4. The vulnerable adult who is suspected of being abused, neglected, or exploited and is a resident in a non-community setting (... assisted living facility, long-term care facility...) will be reported to the New Jersey Office of the Ombudsman ... 5. The social worker assigned to the patient’s unit is responsible for coordinating or serving as a liaison between the facility and the adult protective services provider and may serve as the designee of the healthcare professional in making the report to the county adult protective services provider. 6. The social worker and/or practice manager of the practitioner practice will serve as a liaison between the practice and adult protective services and may serve as the designee of the healthcare professional in making the report to the county adult protective services provider... Appendix A Signs and Symptoms of Abuse The patient: 1. Admits to past or present abuse.” A review of P1’s medical record was conducted in the presence of S2 and S3, and revealed the following: On 12/26/25 at 2:40 PM, P1 arrived at the ED with a complaint of fall and altered mental status. P1 was admitted with a diagnosis of fall, intracranial hemorrhage, and severe protein-calorie malnutrition. On 12/29/25 at 1:35 PM, a “CM [Case Management]/SW [Social Work] Re-Assessment” noted, entered by S10, stated, “... Social worker was made aware by CM [name] that during [his/her] assessment of the patient [he/she] had disclosed to her an incident that happened within the facility [sending facility]. This was also discussed with patients [son/daughter] that was at bedside, and they are aware of the incident per patient. CM [name] encouraged patients [son/daughter] to call [facility name] to discuss with them about the incident. Per the son and patient, they stated CM [name] that they all are in agreement for patient to return to [facility name] once medically cleared for discharge. Social worker sent clinical updates and will continue to follow for discharge planning and anything else related to facility incident.” On 12/30/25 at 12:58 PM, a “CM/SW Discharge Planning” note was entered by S10, and stated, “Care management team informed by RN [Registered Nurse]] that patient informed her about facility incident at [facility name] too. Bedside visit made to patient who presented AAOx2/3 [awake, alert, and oriented times 2-3], very pleasant, not presenting in pain and excited about getting out of hospital today. Patient continues to inform staff about incident that happened at facility but not presenting fearful/ stated ok to return to facility today. Patient stated that [he/she] wanted to make sure it did not happen to [him/her] again or anyone else. Patients [son/daughter] [name] present at bedside as well and confirmed patients’ story has been consistent but they were thankful for the ombudsmen information in which they stated they would file a report and also that [facility name] facility was notified of this incident as well. [name] stated facility would also be speaking with [facility name] too. Patient cleared for discharge today.” P1 was discharged on 12/30/26 at 7:40 PM. The medical record lacked evidence that staff reported the alleged abuse to Adult Protective Services in accordance with its policy. This was confirmed with S2 and S3 on 3/4/26 at 2:12 PM. During an interview on 3/4/26 at 1:21 PM, regarding the alleged incident documented in P1’s medical record, S10 stated, “the case manager heard from the patient’s (P1’s) nurse that the patient’s story was consistent. The patient stated that two staff members, dressed in all black, entered [his/her] room at 2:00 AM - 3:00 AM and attacked [him/her]. I went into the patient’s room to do discharge planning, and the patient said [he/she] ‘thinks it happened’. The patients [son/daughter] just wanted to see what we could do about it. I gave the family information for calling the ombudsman and offered to call the facility, but the family refused... I called the facility and spoke with [name] to give them a heads up about the allegation of abuse.” An interview was conducted with S8 on 3/4/26 at 10:57 AM. When asked what the process is when a patient is suspected of abuse, S8 stated, “we report it to the social worker, the social worker will contact the facility and give the family the ombudsman’s phone number. We will write a note, but don’t put specific details. The social worker will talk to the family and document it all into a progress note. When it comes to reporting, it depends on the family, if the family wants us to report it or not.” S5 stated, “the nurse will let leadership know and it is all collaborative.” During interview on 3/4/26 at 11:04 AM, S4 explained, abuse is a reportable event and should be put into “origami” (reporting system). S4 stated, “the nurse should let nursing management, the supervisor, and security know. It may have to go to the police. The social work team will do a complete assessment.” On 3/4/26 at 12:32 PM, when asked to explain what happened with patient (P)1, S2 stated, “the [child] demanded we [the facility] call the police and have the long-term care [LTC] staff arrested. We gave the family members the ombudsman contact information to call and told the family to call [the LTC facility] and submit a complaint. We spoke with the patients [child].” An interview was conducted with S9 on 3/4/26 at 1:10 PM. During interview S9 stated, “a couple days after admission, [P1] said that he was abused at the facility. We let social work know. Social work gave the family the information for the ombudsman and called the facility.” On 3/4/26 at 2:12 PM, when asked to confirm if the police and/or adult protective services were notified of this alleged abuse, S2 stated, “the police were not notified, APS was not notified. We did not suspect abuse, and the family just wanted information on how to contact ombudsman.””

    Rule A0145. Standard-level. From a complaint.

Nov 21, 2024: complaint inspection1 deficiency
  • Emergency Services Policies

    The inspectors’ words, 650 words

    “EMERGENCY SERVICES POLICIES CFR(s): 482.55(a)(3) [If emergency services are provided at the hospital --] (3) The policies and procedures governing medical care provided in the emergency service or department are established by and are a continuing responsibility of the medical staff. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 48060 Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that: 1) pain assessments are performed and documented during triage according to facility policy in four (4) out of 10 medical records reviewed [Patient (P) 1, 2, 5, and 9]; 2) interventions to alleviate or lessen pain are implemented according to facility policy in one (1) out of 10 medical records reviewed (P7). Findings include: 1. Facility policy titled, “Emergency Department Triage,” effective date: 12/27/2022, states, “ ...Procedure: 1. Quick Triage: ... a. Components of quick triage include: ... ii. Vital Signs/Pain ...” On 11/21/24 at 2:00 PM, P1, P2, P5, and P9’s medical records (MR) were reviewed and revealed the following: P1 arrived at the facility’s Emergency Department (ED) on 10/28/24 at 18:41 (6:41 PM) with a chief complaint of abdominal pain. Vital Signs obtained during triage at 19:01 (7:01 PM) lacked evidence of a documented pain assessment. P2 arrived at the facility’s ED on 11/21/24 at 11:17 AM with a chief complaint of abdominal pain. P2’s triage was started at 11:18 AM and his/her vital signs (temperature, blood pressure, pulse, respirations and oxygenation) were taken at 11:23 AM. P2 was evaluated by the provider at 12:12 PM. P2’s medical record lacked evidence of a documented pain assessment during triage. P5 arrived to the facility’s ED on 10/28/24 at 5:56 PM with a chief complaint of assault. P5’s vital signs (temperature, pulse, respirations and oxygenation) were taken at 6:26 PM. The medical record lacked documentation of a pain assessment during triage. P9 arrived at the facility’s ED on 10/21/24 at 5:27 PM with a chief complaint of back pain. P9’s vital signs (temperature, pulse, respiration, blood pressure, and oxygenation) were taken at 5:29 PM. The MR lacked documentation of a pain assessment during triage. 49174 2. Facility policy, titled, “Pain Assessment/Management,” effective date 1/10/23, states, “...1. Emergency Department (ED) Pain Assessment a. Personnel: The ED nurse will work in conjunction with the practitioners to evaluate a patient’s level of pain and implement non-pharmacological as well as pharmacological treatments to alleviate or lessen the pain...c. Pain will be assessed initially and routinely. This pain assessment will be documented in the medical record. The nurse will escalate a report of new or different pain...” On 11/21/24 a review of P7’s medical record was conducted and revealed the following: P7 arrived to the facility’s ED on 6/10/24 at 4:15 PM with a chief complaint of back pain, headache, and motor vehicle crash. P7’s triage was started at 4:29 PM. P7 had a pain assessment complete at 4:31 PM and he/she rated his/her pain as a “7- Severe pain.” At 7:08 PM, P7’s ED nurse documented in the “ED Notes” that P7 “...no longer want[ed] to wait to be seen by a provider...” P7 left the hospital at 7:12 PM. The medical record lacked documentation that P7’s pain was treated or re-assessed. On 11/21/24 at 1:30 PM, an interview with Staff (S) 6, (Registered Nurse), was conducted. S6 explained that pain should be assessed during triage and if the patient is in a significant amount of pain, he/she would alert the physician and document the interaction in the medical record. On 11/21/24 at 3:43 PM, an interview with S2, (ED Director), was conducted. S2 explained that pain should be assessed “at triage” and reassessed depending on the condition and severity. S2 also stated that the ED nurses “should be” documenting pain with vital signs. These findings were reviewed with and confirmed with S2 and S3 (Risk Relations Manager) on 11/21/24 at 3:43 PM.”

    Rule A1104. Standard-level. From a complaint.

All 3 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Aug 27, 2026Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Mar 4, 2026Complaint inspection1 deficiency cited
Nov 21, 2024Complaint inspection1 deficiency cited

How do patients fare?

  • CMS’s overall for it is 5 of 5.
  • Of the measures behind its , CMS counts against the national value: mortality, 2 better and 0 worse of 7; safety of care, 1 better and 0 worse of 6; readmission, 4 better and 0 worse of 9.
  • Patients rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (1,482 surveys completed, Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): 68% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 68% would definitely recommend it.
  • Infections, compared by CMS with the national benchmark (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): central line bloodstream infections (CLABSI), no different than national benchmark; catheter urinary tract infections (CAUTI), no different than national benchmark; surgical site infections after colon surgery, no different than national benchmark; MRSA bloodstream infections, no different than national benchmark; C. diff infections, better than the national benchmark.
  • CMS’s patient safety composite for serious complications, PSI 90, Jul 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2024: no different than the national value.
  • Deaths within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2025): heart attack 11.7%, heart failure 7.4%, pneumonia 13.6%, COPD 7.2%, stroke 9.4%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
  • Readmissions within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2023 to Jun 30, 2025): heart attack 13.7%, heart failure 18.7%, pneumonia 16.2%, COPD 19.4%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
  • After outpatient care, compared by CMS: unplanned hospital visits after a colonoscopy, no different than the national rate; hospital admissions after outpatient chemotherapy, no different than the national rate; emergency visits after outpatient chemotherapy, no different than the national rate; unplanned hospital visits after outpatient surgery, no different than expected.
  • Emergency department patients spent a median of 207 minutes there before leaving (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025), and 2% left before being seen.
  • 77% of patients with severe sepsis or septic shock got the care CMS measures, SEP-1 (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025).
  • Medicare’s spending per patient here is 1.14 times the national median (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024).
Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Overall ratingCMS’s overall hospital quality star rating, 1 to 55 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the hospital’s patients (HCAHPS), 1 to 53 of 5

Is it certified, and in good standing?

  • Medicare-certified acute care hospital since Jul 1, 1966.
  • Ownership: voluntary non-profit - private.
  • It is accredited by The Joint Commission, whose surveys stand in for the state’s routine inspections.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
  • Voluntary non-profit - Private.
Source:

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals.
  • Not among the hospitals whose Medicare payments CMS cut under the Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program for fiscal year 2026.
  • 2 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated yearly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

What do patients say about their care?

  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
  • In CMS’s patient survey, patients rate how well its nurses communicated 4 of 5.
  • 94% of its health care workers got a flu shot (Oct 1, 2024 to Mar 31, 2025).
Source:

CMS, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital and Timely and Effective Care - Hospital. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • 5 owners or officers are people: Joseph Michael Walter (corporate officer, 100%); Joseph Michael Walter (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); Mary Sheilah O’halloran (corporate officer); Laura Ann Kelly (corporate officer); Saad Ehtisham (corporate officer).
  • CMS’s Provider of Services file records no change of ownership.
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospital All Owners and Hospital Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated monthly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 4 hospitals CMS lists in Morris County, 3 have an overall star rating from CMS: 2 rated 5 of 5, 1 rated 2 of 5.
  • CMS rates this one 5 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals, so none are shown. The one payment cut CMS publishes for each hospital, under its Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program, is shown where it applies.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • Most hospitals are accredited by a private organisation (The Joint Commission, DNV and others) whose routine inspections stand in for the state’s; those reports aren’t public, and QCOR holds only the state’s surveys: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.
  • QCOR says its hospital inspection data are complete only through September 17, 2026, while it moves to a new system.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
  • In its September 2026 release CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for death and readmission rates, though it gives the rates.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.

From the hospital

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospital adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospital will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospital”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.