Mercy Hospital St Louis
An acute care hospital in Saint Louis, Missouri 63141
615 New Ballas Road, Saint Louis, Missouri 63141. (314) 251-6000.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 20, 2026.
- 4of 5 CMS’s overall rating
- 3of 5 patient survey rating
- 3 deficiencies cited in the last three years (needs attention)
- 859 beds
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean4
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
- Condition-level deficiency
- For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.
What did inspectors find?
The last inspection on record was on Apr 30, 2026: a complaint inspection.
3 deficiencies cited in the last three years, 1 of them at condition level, the most serious.
1 deficiency at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels
CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
When those deficiencies happened
3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2024. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Dec | |||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Jul 11, 2024: complaint inspection3 deficiencies
-
Patient Rights
The inspectors’ words, 152 words
“PATIENT RIGHTS CFR(s): 482.13 A hospital must protect and promote each patient’s rights. This Condition is not met as evidenced by: 40189 Based on observation, interview, record review, policy review and video review, the hospital failed to: - Ensure the safety of all patients when they failed to appropriately investigate and educate all staff in response to the attempted suicide (to cause one’s own death) of one current patient (#17) of one self-report reviewed. (A-0145) - Ensure the safety of all patients when they failed to remove contraband (items that are illegal, forbidden, or that can be used to harm self or others) from one current patient’s room (#17) on suicide precautions (SP, precautions taken to ensure patients are safe and free of self-injury or self-harm) of four patients on suicide precautions observed. (A-0144) These failures resulted in a systemic failure and noncompliance with 42 CFR 482.13 Condition of Participation: Patient’s Rights.”
-
Patient Rights: Care In Safe Setting
The inspectors’ words, 490 words
“PATIENT RIGHTS: CARE IN SAFE SETTING CFR(s): 482.13(c)(2) The patient has the right to receive care in a safe setting. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 50151 Based on observations, policy review and interviews, the hospital failed to provide care in a safe setting for one (#17) out of 4 patients observed on suicide precautions (SP, precautions taken to ensure patients are safe and free of self-injury or self-harm), when they allowed a visitor to bring personal belongings to the patient’s bedside. This failure placed the safety of all patients and visitors at risk. Findings included: Review of the hospital’s policy titled, “STL ADMIN Suicidal Patients: Admission Assessment, Level of Care, and Suicide Precautions Policy,” dated 06/20/24, showed the patient is not allowed to keep personal belongings with them. Items may be sent home with family or sent with Public Safety to be secured in a locked area. Observation on 07/02/24 at 9:10 AM, in Trauma Neuro ICU (an intensive care unit devoted to the care of patients with immediately life-threatening nervous system problems) showed Patient #17’s visitor had her personal belongings with her at the patient’s bedside. During an interview on at 07/01/24 at 3:00 PM, Staff H, RN, stated that the policy for patients on suicide precautions was that they were allowed visitors, but the visitors are not allowed to bring their belongings into the patient room. Visitors were instructed to leave their belongings in their vehicles, at the nurse’s station or outside of the patient’s room. During an interview on 07/02/24 at 9:25 AM, Patient #17’s sister, stated that since her brother was admitted to the hospital, she had been allowed to bring her purse and other personal belongings into the room. She was never stopped and instructed to leave her belongings outside of the room. During an interview on 07/02/24 at 3:10 PM, Staff SS, Nurse Educator, stated that the policy did not specifically state that visitors were not allowed to bring their belongings into the room of a patient on suicide precautions. Staff were educated that visitors along with the and/or patient were not allowed to have personal belongings at the patient’s bedside. During an interview on 07/02/24 at 9:00 AM, Staff EE, Nurse Manager, stated that visitors were not allowed to bring personal items into a patient’s room when suicide precautions are ordered. During an interview on 07/02/24 at 9:05 AM, Staff Y, RN, stated that patients on suicide precautions were allowed visitors, but the visitors were not allowed to bring any personal items into the patient’s room. The visitor would be asked to leave their items outside of the room. During an interview on 07/02/24 at 9:15 AM, Staff Z, RN, stated that patients on suicide precautions were allowed to have visitors, but visitors were not allowed to bring any of their belongings into the room. They were required to leave their personal belongings outside of the patient’s room. 40189 50496”
-
Patient Rights: Free From Abuse/Harassment
The inspectors’ words, 1,276 words
“PATIENT RIGHTS: FREE FROM ABUSE/HARASSMENT CFR(s): 482.13(c)(3) The patient has the right to be free from all forms of abuse or harassment. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 50151 Based on interview, record review, policy review and video review, the hospital failed to appropriately investigate and educate all staff in response to the attempted suicide (to cause one’s own death) of one current patient (#17) of one self-report reviewed. This failed practice placed all patients admitted to the hospital at increased risk for their safety. Findings included: Review of the hospital’s policy titled, “Performing Event Reviews (Root Cause Analysis [RCA, a tool to help study events where patient harm or undesired outcomes occurred in order to find the root cause]),” dated 08/16/22 showed: - An RCA provided a structured and facilitated team process where root causes, of an event that resulted in an undesired outcome, are identified. - An event review process focused on identifying breakdowns in processes and systems. - Corrective actions are developed, from the identified root causes, to prevent future events. - Serious reportable events are reviewed by the hospital’s event review process. - An RCA focused on process and/ or performance improvement. - It is expected that designated timelines for the event review process are followed. - The action items determined the duration and frequency of post-event review follow-up. Review of the hospital’s policy titled, “Patient Safety Evaluation System (PSES),” dated 07/02/24 showed: - Patient safety activities are performed where patient cases, events or issues are reviewed and opportunities for improvements are identified. - Safety events are reported, by staff involved, the day the event occurred or the day it was discovered. - Patient safety events are investigated thoroughly. Review of the hospital’s undated safety event report for Event ID: 390855, showed: - The house manager was notified by Staff XX, ICU Supervisor, that Patient #17 had been able to push past his sitter and run out of his Medical-Surgical ICU room. - Patient #17 had a one-to-one (1:1, continuous visual contact with close physical proximity) sitter and was being constantly observed. - The two co-workers, Staff KKKK, PCT, and Staff IIII, RN, who witnessed the event, provided written statements. Review of video surveillance from the stairwell for 06/20/24, showed: - At 1:48:17 AM, Patient #17 is observed running up to the seventh floor, ignored the chain placed to prevent continued access up to the eighth floor and proceeds to the eighth floor. - At 1:48:45 AM, Staff IIII, RN, Staff DDDD, RN and Staff KKKK, PCT, arrived on the seventh floor and are observed looking up to the eighth floor attempting to locate the patient. - At 1:49:21 AM. Staff IIII and Staff DDDD are observed waving their hands and talking to Patient #17. Staff IIII removed the chain and started up the stairs to the eighth floor. - A 1:49:36 AM, Patient #17 is observed falling from the eighth floor to the seventh; Staff HHHH arrived on the scene. - At 1:50:00 AM, the door to the seventh floor is opened and staff within the stairwell, yelled out to seventh floor staff for assistance - At 1:50:55 AM, Staff DDDD moves to the patient’s head and bends down; Staff HHHH is on the phone. - At 1:52:47 AM, the rapid response team nurse arrives on the scene. - At 1:55:39 AM, a code blue (emergency situation where a patient’s heart or breathing has stopped and staff quickly respond to attempt to restore the heartbeat or breathing) cart arrives and the defibrillator (a device that controls the heartbeat by applying an electric current to the chest wall or heart) pads are placed on Patient #17’s chest. - At 1:56:39 AM, Patient #17 is log-rolled onto a sheet and removed from the stairwell. Review of the hospital’s document, “RCA Summary for RCA 2445,” dated 06/20/24, showed: - On 06/19/24 at 8:37 AM, Patient #17 was medically cleared for discharge to behavioral health. - At 11:04 AM, behavioral health (BH) was consulted. - At 1:14 PM, a BH assessment was performed. Patient #17 met criteria for inpatient BH treatment with a high risk for suicide. - On 06/20/24 at approximately 1:50 AM, Patient #17 pushed past his sitter, Staff KKKK, Patient Care Technician (PCT), and ran to the stairwell at the back of the unit. - Staff KKKK yelled for help and a Behavioral Intervention Response Team (BIRT, a rapid response of team members trained in BH de-escalation [the reduction of the intensity of a conflict or potentially violent situation]) was called overhead. - Patient #17 ran up the stairs to the eighth floor and was observed, by nursing staff, intentionally falling from the eighth floor down to the seventh floor. - At 3:12 AM Patient #17 was transferred to the Trauma-Neuro ICU (an intensive care unit devoted to the care of patients with immediately life-threatening nervous system problems) Unit. Patient #17’s sister was notified of the event that occurred. - At 3:25 AM all computed tomography (CT, a combination of x-rays [test that creates pictures of the structures inside the body-particularly bones] and a computer to produce detailed images of blood vessels, bones, organs and tissues in the body) scans were negative for any acute (sudden onset) findings. - No opportunities for improvement were identified prior to survey. - No staff education had been provided at the time of the survey. During an interview on at 07/01/24 at 1:45 PM, Staff G, Medical-Surgical ICU Nurse Manager, stated that they had not performed an RCA on the event that occurred with Patient #17 on 06/20/24. Staff G stated that there had not been any opportunities for improvement identified, all the precautions had been in place. She stated that they completed a debriefing immediately following the event and offered emotional assistance to the staff involved. She stated there had not been any education provided to staff following the event. During an interview on 07/02/24 at 9:25 AM, the complainant (Patient #17’s sister), stated the hospital’s president spoke to her several days after the event. He informed her that the hospital would be doing an investigation into the event. She has not been updated on the progress of the investigation. During a telephone interview on 07/09/24 at 2:55 PM, Staff XX, ICU Supervisor, stated that after the event, education was not provided to staff about caring for patients on suicide precautions (SP, precautions taken to ensure patients are safe and free of self-injury or self-harm) During an interview on 07/09/24 at 3:35 PM, Staff B, Quality Management Director, stated that when a serious event occurs, an RCA was performed. A patient safety team was formed which included, patient relations, administration, and other staff involved. When the patient safety team met, a leader and group facilitator was assigned. An RCA was to be performed within a few weeks after an event. When an RCA has been completed, the findings were reported to the Sentinel Event (actual events that could or did cause patient harm) Committee. The Sentinel Event Committee determined how much follow-up was required to resolve the RCA. The patient safety team and those involved in the RCA reported back to the Sentinel Event committee until they were satisfied with the completion of the RCA’s action items. During an interview on 07/10/24 at 12:50 PM, Staff DDDD, RN, stated she believed the staff, provided to sit with high-risk suicide patients would benefit from additional education related to suicide precautions. She noticed that the sitters did not remain as close to the patient as they should be or closely observe them. Staff DDDD stated no education had been provided prior to the survey. 40189”
All 9 inspections in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 30, 2026 | Complaint inspection | No deficiencies cited |
| Apr 9, 2026 | Complaint inspection | No deficiencies cited |
| Feb 2, 2026 | Complaint inspection | No deficiencies cited |
| Aug 20, 2025 | Complaint inspection | No deficiencies cited |
| Jul 16, 2025 | Complaint inspection | No deficiencies cited |
| May 14, 2025 | Complaint inspection | No deficiencies cited |
| Oct 24, 2024 | Complaint inspection | No deficiencies cited |
| Jul 11, 2024 | Complaint inspection | 3 deficiencies cited |
| Nov 16, 2023 | Complaint inspection | No deficiencies cited |
How do patients fare?
- CMS’s overall CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System. for it is 4 of 5.
- Of the measures behind its CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System., CMS counts against the national value: mortality, 3 better and 0 worse of 8; safety of care, 3 better and 0 worse of 8; readmission, 1 better and 1 worse of 11.
- Patients rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (1,572 surveys completed, Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): 73% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 78% would definitely recommend it.
- Infections, compared by CMS with the national benchmark (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): central line bloodstream infections (CLABSI), better than the national benchmark; catheter urinary tract infections (CAUTI), better than the national benchmark; surgical site infections after colon surgery, no different than national benchmark; surgical site infections after abdominal hysterectomy, no different than national benchmark; MRSA bloodstream infections, no different than national benchmark; C. diff infections, better than the national benchmark.
- CMS’s patient safety composite for serious complications, PSI 90, Jul 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2024: no different than the national value.
- Deaths within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2025): heart attack 11.8%, heart failure 7.7%, pneumonia 11.8%, COPD 8.8%, stroke 9.3%, heart bypass surgery 3.1%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
- Readmissions within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2023 to Jun 30, 2025): heart attack 16%, heart failure 23.7%, pneumonia 18.8%, COPD 20.1%, heart bypass surgery 11.4%, hip or knee replacement 7.2%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
- After outpatient care, compared by CMS: unplanned hospital visits after a colonoscopy, no different than the national rate; hospital admissions after outpatient chemotherapy, no different than the national rate; emergency visits after outpatient chemotherapy, no different than the national rate; unplanned hospital visits after outpatient surgery, no different than expected.
- Emergency department patients spent a median of 220 minutes there before leaving (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025), and 4% left before being seen.
- 74% of patients with severe sepsis or septic shock got the care CMS measures, SEP-1 (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025).
- Medicare’s spending per patient here is 1.01 times the national median (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024).
CMS, Hospital General Information, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital, Healthcare Associated Infections - Hospital, Timely and Effective Care - Hospital and Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary - Hospital. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Complications and Deaths - Hospital and Unplanned Hospital Visits - Hospital. Released Sep 30, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Overall ratingCMS’s overall hospital quality star rating, 1 to 5 | 4 of 5 |
| Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the hospital’s patients (HCAHPS), 1 to 5 | 3 of 5 |
Is it certified, and in good standing?
- Medicare-certified acute care hospital since Jul 1, 1966.
- Ownership: voluntary non-profit - private.
- It is accredited by The Joint Commission, whose surveys stand in for the state’s routine inspections.
- Cited at For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules for hospitals.
- Voluntary non-profit - Private.
CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Has it been penalized?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals.
- Not among the hospitals whose Medicare payments CMS cut under the Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program for fiscal year 2026.
- 3 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated yearly.
CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
What do patients say about their care?
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
- In CMS’s patient survey, patients rate how well its nurses communicated 3 of 5.
- 94% of its health care workers got a flu shot (Oct 1, 2024 to Mar 31, 2025).
CMS, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital and Timely and Effective Care - Hospital. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who owns it?
- Mercy Health East Communities owns 100% directly since Sep 1, 2009.
- 10 owners or officers are people: John M Mohart (corporate director, 0%); Dominic M Meldi (corporate director, 0%); Denise Scoffic (corporate officer, 0%); Stacie Farnam (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); David J Meiners (corporate officer, 0%); Jennifer Brown (corporate officer, 0%); Jonathan Tyler Sturgeon (corporate officer, 0%); Jonathan Tyler Sturgeon (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Patricia Gelbach (corporate director, 0%); David G Argueta (corporate director, 0%).
- CMS’s Provider of Services file records no change of ownership.
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Hospital All Owners and Hospital Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated monthly.
CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Organisation | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercy Health | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Dec 10, 2007 |
| Mercy Health East Communities | Owns 5% or more directly | 100% | Sep 1, 2009 |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 12 hospitals CMS lists in St. Louis County, 9 have an overall star rating from CMS: 3 rated 5 of 5, 4 rated 4 of 5, 1 rated 3 of 5, 1 rated 2 of 5.
- CMS rates this one 4 of 5.
CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals, so none are shown. The one payment cut CMS publishes for each hospital, under its Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program, is shown where it applies.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- Most hospitals are accredited by a private organisation (The Joint Commission, DNV and others) whose routine inspections stand in for the state’s; those reports aren’t public, and QCOR holds only the state’s surveys: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.
- QCOR says its hospital inspection data are complete only through September 17, 2026, while it moves to a new system.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
- In its September 2026 release CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for death and readmission rates, though it gives the rates.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospital General Information (xubh-q36u).
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital.
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Healthcare Associated Infections - Hospital (77hc-ibv8).
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Complications and Deaths - Hospital (ynj2-r877).
Released Sep 30, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Unplanned Hospital Visits - Hospital (632h-zaca).
Released Sep 30, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Timely and Effective Care - Hospital (yv7e-xc69).
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary - Hospital (rrqw-56er).
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program (yq43-i98g).
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated yearly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities (Hospital_and_other.DATA.Q3_2026.csv).
Released Oct 14, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies (Hospital_2567s_2010_to_2026YTD.xlsx).
Released Oct 20, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospital All Owners (Hospital_All_Owners_2026.09.29.csv).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospital Enrollments (Hospital_Enrollments_2026.09.29.csv).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.
From the hospital
The public record above comes first. Anything the hospital adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospital will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospital”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.