Hearth Record

Mclaren Oakland

An acute care hospital in Pontiac, Michigan 48342

50 N Perry St, Pontiac, Michigan 48342. (248) 338-5000.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 20, 2026.

The last 24 months 2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on May 21, 2026: a complaint inspection.

2 deficiencies cited in the last three years, 2 of them under EMTALA, the law requiring an emergency department to examine and stabilise anyone who comes to it.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.

2 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 Dec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNov

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Apr 17, 2024: complaint inspection2 deficiencies
  • Compliance With 489.24

    “COMPLIANCE WITH 489.24 CFR(s): 489.20(l) [The provider agrees,] in the case of a hospital as defined in §489.24(b), to comply with §489.24. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 15195 Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to comply with the requirements of 42 CFR 489.24 [special responsibilities of Medicare hospitals in emergency cases], specifically the failure to provide recipient hospital responsibilities (see A-2411) resulting in the potential for less than optimal outcomes for all psychiatric patients transferred to the facility.”

    Rule A2400. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Recipient Hospital Responsibilities

    The inspectors’ words, 667 words

    “RECIPIENT HOSPITAL RESPONSIBILITIES CFR(s): 489.24(f) A participating hospital that has specialized capabilities or facilities (including, but not limited to, facilities such as burn units, shock-trauma units, neonatal intensive care units, or (with respect to rural areas) regional referral centers, which, for purposes of this subpart, means hospitals meeting the requirements of referral centers found at §412.96 of this chapter) may not refuse to accept from a referring hospital within the boundaries of the United States an appropriate transfer of an individual who requires such specialized capabilities or facilities if the receiving hospital has the capacity to treat the individual. This requirement applies to any participating hospital with specialized capabilities, regardless of whether the hospital has a dedicated emergency department. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 15195 Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow through with the acceptance of 1 (#21) of 1 psychiatric patients who had been transferred and was on-site at this receiving hospital, resulting in delay of treatment and potential for less than optimal outcomes. Findings include: On 4/12/24 at 1645, interview with Physician S at Facility A revealed that Facility B accepted patient #21 then would not let the patient on the psychiatric unit when the patient got there. The staff would not get the receiving psychiatric physician on the phone for further discussion and would not let the patient in the Emergency Department at Facility B. The facility staff sent the patient back to Facility A by ambulance in inclement weather. Medical record review from the transferring Facility A revealed that the patient of concern was a 75-year-old female who was initially brought to Facility A Psychiatric Emergency Department (ED) on 8/23/23 at 1924. The patient’s daughter signed the petition on 8/23/23 due to the patient was increasingly paranoid and acting in a bizarre manner. There was a court “Order for Examination/Transport” signed on 8/23/23 by the judge. Patient #21 required inpatient psychiatric hospitalization but there were no current beds available at Facility A. Arrangements were made to transfer the patient to another Facility B with psychiatric beds available on 8/24/34 at 1103. The patient was transferred by ambulance to the receiving hospital on 8/24/23 at 1600. On 8/24/23 at 1941 the patient was returned by ambulance due to receiving Facility B “refused to accept her due to a staple in the petition (legal paperwork).” On 4/16/24 at approximately 1030, interview with ED Supervisor G from facility B revealed that he did not recall the case. He stated that psychiatric patients either come through the ED or go directly to the psychiatric units. On 4/16/24 at 1130, interview with the Nurse Manager of the Psychiatric Units (adult and geriatric) revealed that she recalled one case where the transferring physician was very upset that they would not take the patient due to staples or holes in the paperwork. On 4/16/24 at 1615, interview with Psychiatric Nurse N from Facility B revealed that she recalled an issue with the petition paperwork for a patient. She stated that the original copy was stapled and they do not accept stapled paperwork. She stated that another nurse talked to the transferring physician as well. Phone interview with Psychiatric Medical Director R revealed that he was made aware of the incident and verified that Facility B did not accept stapled petition paperwork. On 4/17/24 at 1050, phone interview with Psychiatric Nurse O revealed that she had also spoken with the transferring physician. She stated that the facility did not accept petition paperwork that had been stapled. She stated that the ambulance drivers also tried to take the patient to Facility B Emergency Department. Nurse O stated that the Nurse Manager and Medical Director were notified of the situation. On 4/17/24 at approximately 1100, interview with Accreditation Manager A revealed that she could not find the requirement for rejection of a patient due to stapled petition paperwork, nor was there a facility policy/procedure regarding non-acceptance of a psychiatric patient due to stapled petition paperwork.”

    Rule A2411. Standard-level. From a complaint.

All 3 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
May 21, 2026Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Dec 17, 2024Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Apr 17, 2024Complaint inspection2 deficiencies cited

How do patients fare?

  • CMS’s overall for it is 2 of 5.
  • Of the measures behind its , CMS counts against the national value: mortality, 0 better and 0 worse of 5; safety of care, 0 better and 0 worse of 6; readmission, 0 better and 0 worse of 8.
  • Patients rate it 2 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (536 surveys completed, Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): 54% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 46% would definitely recommend it.
  • Infections, compared by CMS with the national benchmark (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): central line bloodstream infections (CLABSI), no different than national benchmark; catheter urinary tract infections (CAUTI), better than the national benchmark; surgical site infections after colon surgery, no different than national benchmark; MRSA bloodstream infections, no different than national benchmark; C. diff infections, better than the national benchmark.
  • CMS’s patient safety composite for serious complications, PSI 90, Jul 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2024: no different than the national value.
  • Deaths within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2025): heart attack 12.9%, heart failure 8.7%, pneumonia 13.3%, COPD 9%, stroke 12.1%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
  • Readmissions within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2023 to Jun 30, 2025): heart attack 14.6%, heart failure 21.8%, pneumonia 16.8%, COPD 19.8%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
  • After outpatient care, compared by CMS: unplanned hospital visits after a colonoscopy, no different than the national rate; hospital admissions after outpatient chemotherapy, no different than the national rate; emergency visits after outpatient chemotherapy, no different than the national rate; unplanned hospital visits after outpatient surgery, no different than expected.
  • Emergency department patients spent a median of 103 minutes there before leaving (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025), and 0% left before being seen.
  • 66% of patients with severe sepsis or septic shock got the care CMS measures, SEP-1 (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025).
  • Medicare’s spending per patient here is 1.04 times the national median (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024).
Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Overall ratingCMS’s overall hospital quality star rating, 1 to 52 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the hospital’s patients (HCAHPS), 1 to 52 of 5

Is it certified, and in good standing?

  • Medicare-certified acute care hospital since Jul 1, 1966.
  • Ownership: voluntary non-profit - private.
  • It is accredited by The Joint Commission, whose surveys stand in for the state’s routine inspections.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
  • It has an inpatient rehabilitation unit of 16 beds, which CMS lists apart as a rehabilitation facility.
  • Voluntary non-profit - Private.
Source:

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals.
  • Not among the hospitals whose Medicare payments CMS cut under the Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program for fiscal year 2026.
  • 2 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated yearly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

What do patients say about their care?

  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
  • In CMS’s patient survey, patients rate how well its nurses communicated 2 of 5.
  • 64% of its health care workers got a flu shot (Oct 1, 2024 to Mar 31, 2025).
Source:

CMS, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital and Timely and Effective Care - Hospital. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Mclaren Health Care Corporation owns 100% directly since Oct 1, 2007.
  • 16 owners or officers are people: Lorenzo A Suter (corporate officer); Lorenzo A Suter (corporate director); Lorenzo A Suter (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Angela Charice Moore (corporate director); Mary Mbiya (corporate director); Leo Bowman (corporate director); Lynn Marcotte (corporate officer); Lynn Marcotte (managing employee (on the payroll)); Lynn Marcotte (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Jacqui Spicer (corporate director); Chad Grant (corporate director); Philip A Incarnati (other role (CMS gives no detail)); Derrick Mcdonald (corporate director); Tony Hain (corporate director); Allen R Prince (corporate director); Kevin Ball (corporate director).
  • CMS’s Provider of Services file records 1 change of ownership.
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospital All Owners and Hospital Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated monthly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Mclaren Health Care CorporationOwns 5% or more directly100%Oct 1, 2007

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 14 hospitals CMS lists in Oakland County, 9 have an overall star rating from CMS: 2 rated 4 of 5, 5 rated 3 of 5, 2 rated 2 of 5.
  • CMS rates this one 2 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals, so none are shown. The one payment cut CMS publishes for each hospital, under its Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program, is shown where it applies.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • Most hospitals are accredited by a private organisation (The Joint Commission, DNV and others) whose routine inspections stand in for the state’s; those reports aren’t public, and QCOR holds only the state’s surveys: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.
  • QCOR says its hospital inspection data are complete only through September 17, 2026, while it moves to a new system.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
  • In its September 2026 release CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for death and readmission rates, though it gives the rates.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.

From the hospital

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospital adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospital will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospital”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.