Hearth Record

Ochsner Medical Center - Baton Rouge

An acute care hospital in Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70816

17000 Medical Center Dr, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70816. (225) 752-2470.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 20, 2026.

The last 24 months 2 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Sep 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Sep 26, 2024: a complaint inspection.

2 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

2 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Sep 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.

2 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 Dec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNov

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Sep 26, 2024: complaint inspection1 deficiency
  • Discharge Planning Evaluation

    The inspectors’ words, 1,006 words

    “DISCHARGE PLANNING EVALUATION CFR(s): The discharge planning evaluation must be included in the patient’s medical record for use in establishing an appropriate discharge plan and the results of the evaluation must be discussed with the patient (or the patient’s representative). This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 48051 Based on policy review, record review and interview, the hospital failed to include a discharge plan evaluation in the patient’s medical record for use in establishing an appropriate discharge plan and the results of the evaluation being discussed with the patient. This deficient practice was evidenced by failure to assist/provide 1 (#1) of 20 (#1 - #20) patients with a discharge plan for follow-up care. Findings: A review of hospital policy, “Scope of Social Services,” Number: OHS.CASEM.OS.004, with an effective date of 10/19/2022, revealed in part: V. Procedure: Services Available: Post Hospital/Emergency Department (Discharge) Planning: b. If unable to return to home environment, help patient and family to address response to life change and prepare for an alternate plan such as boarding home, nursing home, or other facility. c. Educating of and assisting to obtain any appropriate services for which the patient may be eligible. d. Assure patient/caregiver understanding and involvement in discharge plan and arrangement of post discharge services. Crisis Intervention: b. Assess the situation as to the resources and action needed to resolve the immediate crisis. c. Implement the most reasonable plan to resolve the crisis. This may require the assistance of community agencies. Information and Referral: a. Give agency names, numbers and eligibility criteria to the patients, families and staff for accessing services. b. Directly contact a resource on behalf of an individual for the purpose of obtaining a service. A medical record review of Patient #1 revealed in part the patient arriving to the emergency department (ED) on 09/13/2024 at 12:22 a.m. via EMS (emergency medical services). EMS report revealed in part, Patient #1 was found naked, sitting in the driveway of an unknown residence, with strange inexplicable behaviors and slow response. EMS report indicated law enforcement was told by Patient #1 that he had ingested something. The patient was held in the ED for approximately 9 hours where he was examined, lab work obtained, medically monitored and observed by a sitter at bedside. This facility was able to located contact information for Patient #1 from prior medical records. The medical records reflected a prior psychiatric history with the patient’s last known group home and case worker telephone number. Attempts to contact each were unsuccessful. Note entry at 6:21 a.m. revealed S7RN sending message to SW (social worker) and CN (charge nurse). Note entry at 7:36 a.m. revealed S6MD initiating a consult to social work (case management). Note entry at 8:33 am by S6MD revealed ED disposition to discharge and at 8:36 a.m. S6MD printed the After Visit Summary (AVS). The medical record did not reveal any documentation of case management (CM) involvement until 8:51 a.m., when S11CM was assigned. Note entry for 9:47 a.m. revealed in part, Patient #1 had been provided an AVS, it was reviewed with verbalization of understanding and the patient was discharged via cab (Lyft). CM note entry at 9:47 a.m. revealed in part S10CM spoke with the patient’s group home and case worker, the patient was unable to return due to sexually aggressive and violent behavior. The case worker was going to follow up with APS (possibly Adult Protective Services) on this day to inform the patient was not appropriate for group home setting as he could not manage medications, continues to leave the group house and the patient was violent. The case worker further indicated she would follow up with this facility’s CM once she made contact with APS and it was determined where the patient should be discharged. CM updated the ED charge nurse with this information and was notified the patient had been discharged. A review of Provider Note entered and signed on 09/14/2024 at 6:20 pm by S6MD and dated for 09/13/2024 at 8:36 am revealed, “Patient re-evaluated, no complaints, urine normal, he is at his baseline mental status, has history of TBI and extensive psych history, he does not appear gravely disabled, no SI (suicidal ideations) or HI (homicidal ideations), nothing to suggest PEC (physicians emergency certificate), he currently resided in group home, group home contacted without any answer, social work consulted to assist with group home placement and discharge.” S6MD’s Discharge Diagnosis: Chronic mental disability; Substance abuse; Housing issue. S6MD’s Clinical impression: Awaiting action for housing (this information was typed in bold print); Chronic mental illness; Lives in group home. A review of the facility’s log for Lyft (cab) services revealed in part, an entry for Patient #1 on 09/13/2024, without a time indicated, with the destination address of 153 N. 17th Street, Baton Rouge. This address matches the complainants address and is the location Patient #1 was found stumbling on the side walk and confused according to complaint narrative. This complaint narrative revealed in part, the patient was speaking incoherently with eyes wide open as if he was still very medicated and he had no recollection of how he got to the hospital. On 09/30/2024 at 1:40 p.m. an on-site attempt by this surveyor to obtain a medical record from this facility was unsuccessful as there was no history of Patient #1’s name and date of birth ever being seen at this clinic. Review of the AVS did not reveal any information related to after care instruction - housing, follow up for mental disabilities, substance abuse or the above mentioned address listed as Lyft’s destination for Patient #1. In an interview on 09/25/2024 at 2:10 p.m. S10CM confirmed the above mentioned CM notes, the patient was discharged without information related to follow up resources to potentially assist in his current condition and the patient was transported to a facility that was mentioned as a possible destination, however it had not been confirmed the patient should be sent there and it was not listed as a resource on Patient #1’s AVS.”

    Rule A0808. Standard-level. From a complaint.

Dec 12, 2023: complaint inspection1 deficiency
  • Patient Safety

    The inspectors’ words, 367 words

    “PATIENT SAFETY CFR(s): 482.21(a), (c)(2), (e)(3) (a) Standard: Program Scope (1) The program must include, but not be limited to, an ongoing program that shows measurable improvement in indicators for which there is evidence that it will ... identify and reduce medical errors. (2) The hospital must measure, analyze, and track ...adverse patient events ... (c) Program Activities ..... (2) Performance improvement activities must track medical errors and adverse patient events, analyze their causes, and implement preventive actions and mechanisms that include feedback and learning throughout the hospital. (e) Executive Responsibilities, The hospital’s governing body (or organized group or individual who assumes full legal authority and responsibility for operations of the hospital), medical staff, and administrative officials are responsible and accountable for ensuring the following: ... (3) That clear expectations for safety are established. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 48051 Based on record review and interview the hospital failed to measure, analyze, and track all patient adverse events in the quality assessment and improvement program. This deficient practice is evidenced by failure of the facility to measure, analyze, and track all incidents involving bedbugs in multiple patient care areas and staff lounge areas of the hospital. Findings: A record review of or area); 07/24/2023 - Emergency Department (no documented room or area); 08/29/2023 - 4th floor (no documented room ordocumentation completed by Company #C and provided by S4EOC revealed Company #C had been on-site and treated for bed bugs on 10 different occasions during the prior 4 months. This documentation revealed the pest treatments being performed in the following areas: 07/21/2023 - 4th floor (no documented room area); 09/11/2023 - Serenity Room (staff lounge); 09/26/2023 - Serenity Room (staff lounge); 10/12/2023 - Serenity Room (staff lounge); 10/19/2023 - 4th floor (no documented room or area); 11/20/2023 - 4th floor (no documented room or area); 12/02/2023 - 4th floor (no documented room or area) and Emergency Department #G; and 12/05/2023 - 4th floor-Room #E, Emergency Department-#G, and 2nd floor Rooms #A and #B. In an interview on 12/12/2023 at 8:30 a.m. S3DPI confirmed the Performance Improvement Team had not formally measured, analyzed, and/or tracked patient adverse events related to the bed bug incidents and treatments.”

    Rule A0286. Standard-level. From a complaint.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Sep 26, 2024Complaint inspection1 deficiency cited
Dec 12, 2023Complaint inspection1 deficiency cited

How do patients fare?

  • CMS’s overall for it is 4 of 5.
  • Of the measures behind its , CMS counts against the national value: mortality, 0 better and 0 worse of 7; safety of care, 1 better and 0 worse of 6; readmission, 0 better and 0 worse of 9.
  • Patients rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (554 surveys completed, Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): 69% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 68% would definitely recommend it.
  • Infections, compared by CMS with the national benchmark (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): central line bloodstream infections (CLABSI), no different than national benchmark; catheter urinary tract infections (CAUTI), no different than national benchmark; surgical site infections after colon surgery, no different than national benchmark; MRSA bloodstream infections, no different than national benchmark; C. diff infections, better than the national benchmark.
  • CMS’s patient safety composite for serious complications, PSI 90, Jul 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2024: no different than the national value.
  • Deaths within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2025): heart attack 12.5%, heart failure 12.6%, pneumonia 13.6%, COPD 10.8%, stroke 12.6%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
  • Readmissions within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2023 to Jun 30, 2025): heart attack 13.9%, heart failure 19.5%, pneumonia 16.7%, COPD 19.6%, heart bypass surgery 11.6%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
  • After outpatient care, compared by CMS: unplanned hospital visits after a colonoscopy, no different than the national rate; hospital admissions after outpatient chemotherapy, no different than the national rate; emergency visits after outpatient chemotherapy, no different than the national rate; unplanned hospital visits after outpatient surgery, no different than expected.
  • Emergency department patients spent a median of 197 minutes there before leaving (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025), and 2% left before being seen.
  • 58% of patients with severe sepsis or septic shock got the care CMS measures, SEP-1 (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025).
  • Medicare’s spending per patient here is 0.99 times the national median (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024).
Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Overall ratingCMS’s overall hospital quality star rating, 1 to 54 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the hospital’s patients (HCAHPS), 1 to 53 of 5

Is it certified, and in good standing?

  • Medicare-certified acute care hospital since Mar 27, 1985.
  • Ownership: voluntary non-profit - private.
  • It is accredited by The Joint Commission, whose surveys stand in for the state’s routine inspections.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
  • Voluntary non-profit - Private.
Source:

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals.
  • Not among the hospitals whose Medicare payments CMS cut under the Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program for fiscal year 2026.
  • 2 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated yearly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

What do patients say about their care?

  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
  • In CMS’s patient survey, patients rate how well its nurses communicated 3 of 5.
  • 84% of its health care workers got a flu shot (Oct 1, 2024 to Mar 31, 2025).
Source:

CMS, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital and Timely and Effective Care - Hospital. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Ochsner Clinic Foundation owns 100% directly since Jan 1, 2008.
  • Ochsner Clinic Foundation runs it.
  • 6 owners or officers are people: Peter C November (corporate officer); Charles D Daigle (corporate officer); Charles D Daigle (managing employee (on the payroll)); Charles D Daigle (runs it (operational or managerial control)); James M Molloy (corporate officer); Timothy L. Riddell (corporate officer).
  • CMS’s Provider of Services file records 4 changes of ownership, the latest on Feb 1, 2005.
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospital All Owners and Hospital Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated monthly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Ochsner Clinic FoundationOwns 5% or more directly100%Jan 1, 2008
Ochsner Clinic FoundationRuns it (operational or managerial control)100%Jan 1, 2008

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 13 hospitals CMS lists in E. Baton Rouge Parish, 5 have an overall star rating from CMS: 2 rated 4 of 5, 3 rated 3 of 5.
  • CMS rates this one 4 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals, so none are shown. The one payment cut CMS publishes for each hospital, under its Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program, is shown where it applies.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • Most hospitals are accredited by a private organisation (The Joint Commission, DNV and others) whose routine inspections stand in for the state’s; those reports aren’t public, and QCOR holds only the state’s surveys: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.
  • QCOR says its hospital inspection data are complete only through September 17, 2026, while it moves to a new system.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
  • In its September 2026 release CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for death and readmission rates, though it gives the rates.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.

From the hospital

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospital adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospital will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospital”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.