Hearth Record

Franciscan Health Indianapolis

An acute care hospital in Indianapolis, Indiana 46237

8111 S Emerson Ave, Indianapolis, Indiana 46237. (317) 528-5000.

  • Medicare payments cut under the HAC Reduction Program (fiscal year 2026)
CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 20, 2026.

The last 24 months 4 deficiencies in 4 months of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Aug 25, 2026: a complaint inspection.

4 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

4 deficiencies in 4 months of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.

4 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 Dec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNov

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Aug 25, 2026: complaint inspection1 deficiency
  • Admission, Transfer, And Discharge Rights

    The inspectors’ words, 1,266 words

    “ADMISSION, TRANSFER, AND DISCHARGE RIGHTS CFR(s): §482.58(b)(2) Admission, transfer, and discharge rights (§483.5 definition of transfer and discharge, §483.15(c)(1), (c)(2)(i), (c)(2)(ii), (c)(3), (c)(4), (c)(5), and (c)(7)) • §483.5: definition of transfer and discharge: Transfer and discharge includes movement of a resident to a bed outside of the certified facility whether that bed is in the same physical plant or not. Transfer and discharge does not refer to movement of a resident to a bed within the same certified facility. • §483.15(c)(1): Facility requirements— (i) The facility must permit each resident to remain in the facility, and not transfer or discharge the resident from the facility unless— (A) The transfer or discharge is necessary for the resident’s welfare and the resident’s needs cannot be met in the facility; (B) The transfer or discharge is appropriate because the resident’s health has improved sufficiently so the resident no longer needs the services provided by the facility; (C) The safety of individuals in the facility is endangered due to the clinical or behavioral status of the resident; (D) The health of individuals in the facility would otherwise be endangered; (E) The resident has failed, after reasonable and appropriate notice, to pay for (or to have paid under Medicare or Medicaid) a stay at the facility. Non-payment applies if the resident does not submit the necessary paperwork for third party payment or after the third party, including Medicare or Medicaid, denies the claim and the resident refuses to pay for his or her stay. For a resident who becomes eligible for Medicaid after admission to a facility, the facility may charge a resident only allowable charges under Medicaid; or (F) The facility ceases to operate. (ii)The facility may not transfer or discharge the resident while the appeal is pending, pursuant to §431.230 of this chapter, when a resident exercises his or her right to appeal a transfer or discharge notice from the facility pursuant to §431.220(a)(3) of this chapter, unless the failure to discharge or transfer would endanger the health or safety of the resident or other individuals in the facility. The facility must document the danger that failure to transfer or discharge would pose. • §483.15(c)(2)(i) Documentation in the resident’s medical record must include: (A) The basis for the transfer per paragraph (c)(1)(i) of this section. (B) In the case of paragraph (c)(1)(i)(A) of this section, the specific resident need(s) that cannot be met, facility attempts to meet the resident needs, and the service available at the receiving facility to meet the need(s). • §483.15(c)(2)(ii) The documentation required by paragraph (c)(2)(i) of this section must be made by— (A) The resident’s physician when transfer or discharge is necessary under paragraph (c)(1)(A) or (B) of this section; and (B) A physician when transfer or discharge is necessary under paragraph (c)(1)(i)(C) or (D) of this section. • §483.15(c)(3): Notice before transfer. Before a facility transfers or discharges a resident, the facility must— (i) Notify the resident and the resident’s representative(s) of the transfer or discharge and the reasons for the move in writing and in a language and manner they understand. The facility must send a copy of the notice to a representative of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman. (ii) Record the reasons for the transfer or discharge in the resident’s medical record in accordance with paragraph (c)(2) of this section; and (iii) Include in the notice the items described in paragraph (c)(5) of this section. • §483.15(c)(4): Timing of the notice. (i) Except as specified in paragraphs (c)(4)(ii) and (8) of this section, the notice of transfer or discharge required under this section must be made by the facility at least 30 days before the resident is transferred or discharged. (ii) Notice must be made as soon as practicable before transfer or discharge when— (A) The safety of individuals in the facility would be endangered under paragraph (c)(1)(i)(C) of this section; (B) The health of individuals in the facility would be endangered, under paragraph (c)(1)(i)(D) of this section; (C) The resident’s health improves sufficiently to allow a more immediate transfer or discharge, under paragraph (c)(1)(i)(B) of this section; (D) An immediate transfer or discharge is required by the resident’s urgent medical needs, under paragraph (c)(1)(i)(A) of this section; or (E) A resident has not resided in the facility for 30 days. • §483.15(c)(5): Contents of the notice. The written notice specified in paragraph (c)(3) of this section must include the following: (i) The reason for transfer or discharge; (ii) The effective date of transfer or discharge; (iii)The location to which the resident is transferred or discharged; (iv) A statement of the resident’s appeal rights, including the name, address (mailing and email), and telephone number of the entity which receives such requests; and information on how to obtain an appeal form and assistance in completing the form and submitting the appeal hearing request; (v) The name, address (mailing and email) and telephone number of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman; (vi) For nursing facility residents with intellectual and developmental disabilities or related disabilities, the mailing and email address and telephone number of the agency responsible for the protection and advocacy of individuals with developmental disabilities established under Part C of the Developmental Disabilities Assistance and Bill of Rights Act of 2000 (Pub. L. 106-402, codified at 42 U.S.C. 15001 et seq.); and (vii)For nursing facility residents with a mental disorder or related disabilities, the mailing and email address and telephone number of the agency responsible for the protection and advocacy of individuals with a mental disorder established under the Protection and Advocacy for Mentally Ill Individuals Act. • §483.15(c)(7): Orientation for transfer or discharge. A facility must provide and document sufficient preparation and orientation to residents to ensure safe and orderly transfer or discharge from the facility. This orientation must be provided in a form and manner that the resident can understand. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 48704 Based on document review and interview, the facility failed to complete transfer forms in 2 of 10 (Patient 1 and 4) medical records reviewed. Findings include: 1. Facility policy titled Discharge Planning and Transfer Procedure, PolicyStat ID 18398017, last revised 07/01/2025, Discharge Planning Processes indicated under AA. Assembling Transfer Packet and Completing Patient Transfer Envelope Form: 1. The following is to be completed when patients are transferred to another facility (i.e. new campus location, extended care facility, subacute rehab, acute care hospital etc.):, c. Complete “Authorization for Transfer”, have patient, family, SO (significant other) sign it. 2. Review of patient 1’s medical record (MR) indicated the following: a. The patient was admitted on 07/01/2026 for comprehensive rehabilitation including physical, occupational, and speech therapy. b. On 07/04/2026, P1’s (Nurse Practitioner) note indicated that Facility #2’s (Acute Care Facility) neurosurgery provider requested patient to be transferred to Facility #2. P1 ordered patient’s discharge to another health care facility at 10:42 p.m. MR indicated that patient was discharged at 11:15 p.m. c. Medical record lacked documentation of Authorization for Transfer form. 3. Review of Patient 4’s MR indicated the following: a. The patient was admitted on 07/12/2026 for comprehensive rehabilitation including physical, occupational, and speech therapy. b. On 07/20/2026, MR indicated that patient was discharged to an acute care rehabilitation hospital. c. Medical record lacked documentation of Authorization for Transfer form. 4. Interview with A3 (Administrative Director of Quality) on 08/19/2026 at approximately 3:45 p.m. confirmed the policy indicated that a transfer form should be completed for patients who are transferred to another facility or long term care facility. A3 confirmed patient 1 and patient 4 lacked transfer forms.”

    Rule A1564. Standard-level. From a complaint.

Feb 19, 2026: complaint inspection1 deficiency
  • Emergency Services Policies

    The inspectors’ words, 354 words

    “EMERGENCY SERVICES POLICIES CFR(s): 482.55(a)(3) [If emergency services are provided at the hospital --] (3) The policies and procedures governing medical care provided in the emergency service or department are established by and are a continuing responsibility of the medical staff. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 48704 Based on document review and interview, the facility failed to follow policy for patients leaving against medical advice in 1 of 10 (Patient 5) medical records reviewed. Findings include: 1. Facility policy titled Discharge Against Medical Advice and/or Patient Absconded Procedure, PolicyStat ID 18779116, last reviewed 12/2/2025 indicated under Procedure: B. Against Medical Advice (AMA) Discharge: When any patient insists on leaving the hospital AMA, patient care personnel will implement the following interventions. 3. Notify the staff / attending physician / advanced practice provider (APP) if the patient continues to insist on leaving. Every attempt will be made to encourage the patient to wait. The physician / APP may elect to do one of the following: a. Release the patient AMA. and 7. Obtain patient’s signature on the Refusal of Advised Medical Care form, #11-10701. 2. Review of Patient 5’s medical record indicated the following: a. The patient arrived at the emergency department on 10/20/2025 at 6:33 p.m. with a chief complaint of urinary urgency and frequency. b. At 10:16 p.m. P1’s (Physician Assistant) provider note indicated nursing notified provider that patient 5 left AMA and the provider did not speak to the patient about risks of leaving AMA. c. At 10:20 p.m. N3’s (Registered Nurse) note indicated the patient was frustrated with waiting times and wanted to leave; patient given AMA papers to sign and educated on risks of leaving AMA. d. At 10:31 p.m. medical record indicated patient left and was discharged; N3 marked the patient’s disposition as AMA. e. Medical record lacked documentation of the Refusal of Advised Medical Care form. 3. Interview with A4 (Emergency Department Director) on 02/18/2026 at approximately 12:40 p.m. confirmed only providers can counsel patients on the risks of leaving AMA and patient 5’s medical record lacked documentation of the Refusal of Advised Medical Care form.”

    Rule A1104. Standard-level. From a complaint.

Aug 19, 2025: complaint inspection1 deficiency
  • Rn Supervision Of Nursing Care

    The inspectors’ words, 687 words

    “RN SUPERVISION OF NURSING CARE CFR(s): 482.23(b)(3) A registered nurse must supervise and evaluate the nursing care for each patient. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 48704 Based on document review and interview, nursing services failed to document Morse Fall Risk Score assessment upon admission in 5 of 10 (patients 4, 5, 6, 9, and 10) medical records reviewed and failed to document the nurse’s review of the fall risk predictive score on the fall risk assessment in 6 of 10 (patients 2, 3, 6, 8, 9, and 10) medical records reviewed. Findings include: 1. Facility policy titled, Fall Precautions Procedure, PolicyStat ID 17599893, last revised on 07/23/2025, indicated under Risk Assessment: The nurse will assess and/or review fall risk and document interventions at the following times: A. Within four (4) hours of arrival/admission., B. Once per shift with a minimum of twice in a calendar day. 2. Review of patient 2’s medical record indicated the following: a. The patient was admitted on 08/15/2025. b. Medical record lacked documentation of the nurse’s review of the fall risk predictive score on the fall risk assessment on 08/16/2025 night shift and on 08/17/2025 day shift. c. The patient was discharged on 08/18/2025. 3. Review of Patient 3’s medical record indicated the following: a. The patient was admitted on 07/29/2025. b. Medical record lacked documentation of the nurse’s review of the fall risk predictive score on the fall risk assessment on 08/01/2025 night shift, and on 08/03/2025 day shift and night shift. c. The patient was discharged on 08/06/2025. 4. Review of patient 4’s medical record indicated the following: a. The patient was admitted on 07/29/2025. b. Medical record lacked documentation of the Morse Fall Risk Score assessment upon admission. c. The patient was discharged on 07/31/2025. 5. Review of patient 5’s medical record indicated the following: a. The patient was admitted on 07/26/2025. b. Medical record lacked documentation of the Morse Fall Risk Score assessment upon admission. c. The patient was discharged on 08/05/2025. 6. Review of patient 6’s medical record indicated the following: a. The patient was admitted on 07/24/2025. b. Medical record lacked documentation of the Morse Fall Risk Score assessment upon admission. c. Medical record lacked documentation of the nurse’s review of the fall risk predictive score on the fall risk assessment on 07/24/2025 night shift, and on 07/25/2025 day shift and night shift. d. The patient was discharged on 07/26/2025. 7. Review of patient 8’s medical record indicated the following: a. The patient was admitted on 07/31/2025. b. Medical record lacked documentation of the nurse’s review of the fall risk predictive score on the fall risk assessment on 08/02/2025 day shift, on 08/10/2025 day shift, on 08/11/2025 day shift, and on 08/12/2025 day shift and night shift. c. The patient is a current patient. 8. Review of patient 9’s medical record indicated the following: a. The patient was admitted on 07/26/2025. b. Medical record lacked documentation of the Morse Fall Risk Score assessment upon admission. c. Medical record lacked documentation of the nurse’s review of the fall risk predictive score on the fall risk assessment on 07/29/2025 day shift. d. The patient was discharged on 07/31/2025. 9 Review of patient 10’s medical record indicated the following: a. The patient was admitted on 07/26/2025. b. Medical record lacked documentation of the Morse Fall Risk Score assessment upon admission. c. Medical record lacked documentation of the nurse’s review of the fall risk predictive score on the fall risk assessment on 07/27/2025 day shift, on 07/29/2025 day shift, and on 08/02/2025 day shift. d. The patient was discharged on 08/04/2025. 10. Interview with A2 (Accreditation Specialist) on 08/18/2025 at approximately 6:00 p.m. confirmed the following: a. The nursing fall education indicated inpatient nursing completes the Morse Fall Risk Score for patients within 4 hours of admission. b. Patients 4, 5, 6, 9, and 10’s medical records lacked documentation of the Morse Fall Risk Score upon admission. c. Patients 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, and 10’s Medical record lacked documentation of the nurse’s review of the fall risk predictive score on the fall risk assessment.”

    Rule A0395. Standard-level. From a complaint.

Sep 4, 2024: complaint inspection1 deficiency
  • Rn Supervision Of Nursing Care

    The inspectors’ words, 380 words

    “RN SUPERVISION OF NURSING CARE CFR(s): 482.23(b)(3) A registered nurse must supervise and evaluate the nursing care for each patient. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 48061 Based on document review and interview, facility nursing staff failed to bathe a patient daily, failed to document completed or refused daily bathing and failed to complete and document twice daily dressing changes as ordered by physician for 1 of 10 medical records reviewed. (P1) Findings include: 1. The facility policy titled, “Standard of Care for the Adult Medical Surgical Patient Guideline”, PolicyStat ID 14245172, last revised 9/12/2023, indicated under: Routine Interventions and Reassessment Standards for Medical Surgical Patient: 19. For all MS patients, bathing supplies are to be offered if ambulatory or a bath provided once daily and PRN. Document when completed or “if patient refuses or declines.” Refer to facility level policy. 2. The facility policy titled, “Skin Assessment and Management Procedure”, PolicyStat ID 14879041, last revised 2/5/2024, indicated under Documentation: Document all skin assessments/interventions on electronic/paper/unit specific flowsheet. Epic documentation should follow the identified format: A. Admission skin assessment and management documentation will include: 5. The following categories should be documented for each Wound LDA: b. Wound Assessments Elements to be documented (as applicable): 19. Dressing changed. 3. Review of MR for P1 indicated a prior order dated 7/18/24 at 5:42 pm indicated P1 was to receive twice daily dressing changes to his/her left inner elbow. Provider order dated 7/19/24 at 1:33 pm indicated P1 was to receive twice daily dressing changes to wounds on his/her right Achilles, right posterior calf, and right posterior ankle. P1’s MR lacked documentation of a second dressing change to the left inner elbow, right Achilles, right posterior calf, and right posterior ankle for dates 7/19/24-7/24/24. MR documentation for P1 lacked documented completed bath or refusal for dates 7/20/24, 7/21/24, 7/23/24, and 7/24/24. 4. In interview on 9/3/24 at approximately 1:15 pm with A5 (Nurse Manager) confirmed P1 should have been, but was not offered a bath daily/bathed daily nor were baths charted as completed or refused on 7/20/24, 7/21/24, 7/23/24 and 7/24/24 and should have been. A5 confirmed dressing changes to P1’s left inner elbow, right posterior calf, right Achilles, and right ankle should have been completed twice daily but were not.”

    Rule A0395. Standard-level. From a complaint.

All 8 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Aug 25, 2026Complaint inspection1 deficiency cited
Aug 24, 2026Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Feb 19, 2026Complaint inspection1 deficiency cited
Jan 29, 2026Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Aug 19, 2025Complaint inspection1 deficiency cited
Feb 26, 2025Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Dec 26, 2024Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Sep 4, 2024Complaint inspection1 deficiency cited

How do patients fare?

  • CMS’s overall for it is 4 of 5.
  • Of the measures behind its , CMS counts against the national value: mortality, 0 better and 0 worse of 8; safety of care, 1 better and 1 worse of 7; readmission, 1 better and 2 worse of 10.
  • Patients rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (478 surveys completed, Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): 75% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 77% would definitely recommend it.
  • Infections, compared by CMS with the national benchmark (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): central line bloodstream infections (CLABSI), better than the national benchmark; catheter urinary tract infections (CAUTI), no different than national benchmark; surgical site infections after colon surgery, no different than national benchmark; surgical site infections after abdominal hysterectomy, no different than national benchmark; MRSA bloodstream infections, no different than national benchmark; C. diff infections, better than the national benchmark.
  • CMS’s patient safety composite for serious complications, PSI 90, Jul 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2024: no different than the national value.
  • Deaths within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2025): heart attack 11.3%, heart failure 9.5%, pneumonia 15.1%, COPD 8.1%, stroke 7%, heart bypass surgery 3.2%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
  • Readmissions within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2023 to Jun 30, 2025): heart attack 14%, heart failure 19.4%, pneumonia 19.2%, COPD 19.6%, heart bypass surgery 9.8%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
  • After outpatient care, compared by CMS: unplanned hospital visits after a colonoscopy, no different than the national rate; hospital admissions after outpatient chemotherapy, no different than the national rate; emergency visits after outpatient chemotherapy, no different than the national rate; unplanned hospital visits after outpatient surgery, no different than expected.
  • Emergency department patients spent a median of 212 minutes there before leaving (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025), and 2% left before being seen.
  • 52% of patients with severe sepsis or septic shock got the care CMS measures, SEP-1 (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025).
  • Medicare’s spending per patient here is 0.99 times the national median (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024).
Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Overall ratingCMS’s overall hospital quality star rating, 1 to 54 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the hospital’s patients (HCAHPS), 1 to 53 of 5

Is it certified, and in good standing?

  • Medicare-certified acute care hospital since May 3, 2006.
  • Ownership: voluntary non-profit - church.
  • It is accredited by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care (ACHC), whose surveys stand in for the state’s routine inspections.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
  • It has an inpatient rehabilitation unit of 22 beds, which CMS lists apart as a rehabilitation facility.
  • Voluntary non-profit - Church.
Source:

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals.
  • CMS cut its Medicare payments by 1% for fiscal year 2026 under the Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program, which does so for the quarter of hospitals that fare worst on conditions patients get in hospital.
  • 4 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated yearly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

On record, newest first
DateWhatDetail
Medicare payment reduction (HAC Reduction Program)Fiscal year 2026: 1% of Medicare payments

What do patients say about their care?

  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
  • In CMS’s patient survey, patients rate how well its nurses communicated 3 of 5.
  • 86% of its health care workers got a flu shot (Oct 1, 2024 to Mar 31, 2025).
Source:

CMS, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital and Timely and Effective Care - Hospital. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Franciscan Alliance Inc. owns 100% directly since Oct 20, 1995.
  • 21 owners or officers are people: Amy S Herron (corporate director, 100%); Amy S Herron (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); Ann K Magiera (corporate director, 0%); Steven Beck (corporate director); Madonna Rougeau (corporate director, 0%); Terence Mieling (corporate director); Thomas Parent (corporate director); Marilyn Oliver (corporate director, 0%); Kevin D Leahy (corporate director, 0%); Anna F. Hoefer (corporate director); Maria Salyer (corporate director); Margaret Mary Mitchel (corporate director); Ernest Iannotta (corporate director, 0%); Lethia M Leveille (corporate director, 0%); Jane M Klein (corporate director); Catherine C Nielsen (corporate director, 0%); Allan Gillespie (corporate director, 0%); Hilton Hudson (corporate director, 0%); Calvin Bellamy (corporate director); Marlene Shapley (corporate director, 0%); Randall M Todd (corporate director).
  • CMS’s Provider of Services file records 3 changes of ownership.
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospital All Owners and Hospital Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated monthly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Franciscan Alliance Inc.Owns 5% or more directly100%Oct 20, 1995

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 14 hospitals CMS lists in Marion County, 8 have an overall star rating from CMS: 1 rated 4 of 5, 6 rated 3 of 5, 1 rated 2 of 5.
  • CMS rates this one 4 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals, so none are shown. The one payment cut CMS publishes for each hospital, under its Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program, is shown where it applies.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • Most hospitals are accredited by a private organisation (The Joint Commission, DNV and others) whose routine inspections stand in for the state’s; those reports aren’t public, and QCOR holds only the state’s surveys: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.
  • QCOR says its hospital inspection data are complete only through September 17, 2026, while it moves to a new system.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
  • In its September 2026 release CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for death and readmission rates, though it gives the rates.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.

From the hospital

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospital adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospital will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospital”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.