Hearth Record

Lac/Rancho Los Amigos National Rehabilitation Ctr

An acute care hospital in Downey, California 90242

7601 East Imperial Highway, Downey, California 90242. (562) 401-7022.

  • Medicare payments cut under the HAC Reduction Program (fiscal year 2026)
CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 20, 2026.

The last 24 months 3 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Aug 6, 2026: a complaint inspection.

3 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

3 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.

3 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 Dec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNov

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Aug 6, 2026: complaint inspection2 deficiencies
  • Patient Rights: Restraint Or Seclusion

    The inspectors’ words, 295 words

    “PATIENT RIGHTS: RESTRAINT OR SECLUSION CFR(s): 482.13(e)(4)(i) The use of restraint or seclusion must be-- (i) in accordance with a written modification to the patient’s plan of care. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 39199 Based on interview and record review, the hospital failed to ensure the plan of care for one of six sampled patients (Patient 3) was updated to reflect the use of restraints. This failure posed a risk for substandard patient outcomes. Findings: Review of the hospital’s P&P titled Violent and Non-Violent Restraints dated 1/22/25, showed documentation should be done according to the regulatory and agencies standards. Clinical staff must document the following: * Initiate the Risk for Injury Related to Restraint, Interdisciplinary Plan of Care (IPOC) to justify the use of restraint. On 8/6/26 at 1148 hours, medical record review for Patient 3 was initiated with Assistant Nursing Director 1, Assistant Nursing Director 2, and the Clinical Instructor. Patient 3’s medical record showed the patient was admitted to the hospital on 12/23/25, and discharged on 1/16/26. Review of the Inpatient Progress Note dated 1/15/26 at 2310 hours, showed Patient 3 was restrained after becoming increasingly agitated, unable to be redirected, and physically assaultive, including hitting, scratching, and biting staff. Review of Patient 3’s physician order dated 1/15/26 at 2054 hours, showed an order to apply hard restraints to all four extremities due to physical abuse toward others. Review of Patient 3’s medical record showed the restraints were applied on 1/15/26 at 2030 hours, and removed at 2125 hours. However, further review of Patient 3’s medical record did not show Patient 3’s plan of care was updated to reflect the use of restraints. On 8/6/26, Assistant Nursing Director 1, Assistant Nursing Director 2, and the Clinical Instructor verified the findings.”

    Rule A0166. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Patient Rights: Restraint Or Seclusion

    The inspectors’ words, 352 words

    “PATIENT RIGHTS: RESTRAINT OR SECLUSION CFR(s): 482.13(e)(10) The condition of the patient who is restrained or secluded must be monitored by a physician, other licensed practitioner or trained staff that have completed the training criteria specified in paragraph (f) of this section at an interval determined by hospital policy. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 39199 Based on interview and record review, the staff failed to assess and monitor one of six sampled patients (Patient 3) while the patient was in restraints. This failure had the potential to result in unsafe care for the patient. Findings: Review of the hospital’s P&P titled Violent and Non-Violent Restraints dated 1/22/25, showed: * A staff member will remain with the patient while on restraints and monitor the patient every 15 minutes for behavioral health patient activity, restraint type, restraint location, signs of injury, and respiratory rate. * Documentation should be done according to the regulatory and agencies standards. Clinical staff must document the following: Patient monitoring. On 8/6/26 at 1148 hours, review of Patient 3’s medical record was conducted with Assistant Nursing Director 1, Assistant Nursing Director 2, and the Clinical Instructor. Patient 3’s medical record showed the patient was admitted to the hospital on 12/23/25, and discharged on 1/16/26. Review of the Inpatient Progress Note dated 1/15/26 at 2310 hours, showed Patient 3 was restrained after becoming increasingly agitated, unable to be redirected, and physically assaultive, including hitting, scratching, and biting staff. Review of Patient 3’s physician order dated 1/15/26 at 2054 hours, showed an order to apply hard restraints to all four extremities due to physical abuse toward others. Review of Patient 3’s medical record showed the restraints were applied on 1/15/26 at 2030 hours, and removed at 2125 hours. However, review of Patient 3’s medical record did not show that staff completed the required assessments and monitoring during the restraint episode. The record contained no documentation showing the patient’s respiratory rate was monitored every 15 minutes. On 8/6/26, during the concurrent interview and record review, Assistant Nursing Director 1, Assistant Nursing Director 2, and the Clinical Instructor verified the findings.”

    Rule A0175. Standard-level. From a complaint.

Jan 28, 2026: complaint inspection1 deficiency
  • Patient Rights: Informed Decision

    The inspectors’ words, 517 words

    “PATIENT RIGHTS: INFORMED DECISION CFR(s): 482.13(b)(3) The patient has the right to formulate advance directives and to have hospital staff and practitioners who provide care in the hospital comply with these directives, in accordance with §489.100 of this part (Definition), §489.102 of this part (Requirements for providers), and §489.104 of this part (Effective dates). This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 38660 Based on an interview and record review, the hospital failed to ensure that advance directive information was provided for one of two sampled patients (Patient 1) as requested to formulate the Advance Directive. This had the potential for the patient’s decisions regarding health care and treatment options not being honored. Findings: During a review of the hospital’s P&P titled, “Advance Health Care Directives” dated 1/17/25, the P&P showed * Advance Health Care Directive or Advance Directive means either an individual health care instruction or a power of attorney for health care. * Individual Health Care Instruction or Individual Instruction means a patient’s written or oral direction concerning a health care decision. * Inpatient Admission Procedure: - During the admission process, nurses are required to ask and document in the electronic health record (EHR) if the patient has an advance directive for: adults over the age of 18 or emancipated minors; responsible for adults who were cognitively impaired or mentally incompetent. - If the response is “no,” the staff shall ask the patient if they wish to receive further information on the advance directive. If the patient requests more information: provide a brochure on Advance Health Care Directives and/or advise the patient or relative that information on Advance Health Care Directives is available through closed-circuit television and/or refer to the Social Work Department for further information. * Social Work Procedure: - When requested by the patient, family, or staff, the social worker offers information/assistance with Advance Health Care Directives to patients who did not have Advance Health Care Directives on file. - Refer patients to physicians for information regarding their health care choices as requested. - Document in the Social Work Progress Note of the medical record all actions taken regarding Advance Health Care Directives. During a review of Patient 1’s medical record on 1/28/26, Patient 1’s medical record showed the patient was admitted to the hospital on 10/24/25. During a review of the Admission History Adult in the EHR, the Advance Directives (AD) tab showed Patient 1 did not have an advance directive and wished to receive further information about the advance directive. A referral was made to the social worker. During a review of Patient 1’s medical records, the medical records did not show Patient 1 received any information about the advance directive. During a concurrent interview and record review with the CSW Supervisor and the Clinical Nursing Director on 1/28/26 at 1436 hours, the CSW Supervisor stated that all patients without AD were referred to CSW, who assisted capable patients who wished to complete their AD by explaining and giving them the form to apply for the AD. The CSW Supervisor verified Patient 1 did not receive information about the advance directive.”

    Rule A0132. Standard-level. From a complaint.

All 3 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Aug 6, 2026Complaint inspection2 deficiencies cited
Jan 28, 2026Complaint inspection1 deficiency cited
Sep 19, 2024Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited

How do patients fare?

  • CMS’s overall for it is 3 of 5.
  • Of the measures behind its , CMS counts against the national value: mortality, 0 better and 0 worse of 1; safety of care, 0 better and 0 worse of 4; readmission, 0 better and 0 worse of 1.
  • Patients rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (159 surveys completed, Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): 76% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 76% would definitely recommend it.
  • Infections, compared by CMS with the national benchmark (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): central line bloodstream infections (CLABSI), no different than national benchmark; catheter urinary tract infections (CAUTI), worse than the national benchmark; C. diff infections, no different than national benchmark.
  • CMS’s patient safety composite for serious complications, PSI 90, Jul 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2024: no different than the national value.
  • Medicare’s spending per patient here is 1.03 times the national median (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024).
Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Overall ratingCMS’s overall hospital quality star rating, 1 to 53 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the hospital’s patients (HCAHPS), 1 to 53 of 5

Is it certified, and in good standing?

  • Medicare-certified acute care hospital since Jul 1, 1997.
  • Ownership: government - local.
  • It is accredited by The Joint Commission, whose surveys stand in for the state’s routine inspections.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
  • It has an inpatient rehabilitation unit of 100 beds, which CMS lists apart as a rehabilitation facility.
  • Government - Local.
Source:

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals.
  • CMS cut its Medicare payments by 1% for fiscal year 2026 under the Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program, which does so for the quarter of hospitals that fare worst on conditions patients get in hospital.
  • 3 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated yearly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

On record, newest first
DateWhatDetail
Medicare payment reduction (HAC Reduction Program)Fiscal year 2026: 1% of Medicare payments

What do patients say about their care?

  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
  • In CMS’s patient survey, patients rate how well its nurses communicated 3 of 5.
  • 69% of its health care workers got a flu shot (Oct 1, 2024 to Mar 31, 2025).
Source:

CMS, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital and Timely and Effective Care - Hospital. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • 2 owners or officers are people: Aries Jefferson Limbaga (managing employee (on the payroll)); Emmanuel M Igtanloc (managing employee (on the payroll)).
  • CMS’s Provider of Services file records no change of ownership.
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospital All Owners and Hospital Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated monthly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 88 hospitals CMS lists in Los Angeles County, 69 have an overall star rating from CMS: 7 rated 5 of 5, 19 rated 4 of 5, 21 rated 3 of 5, 13 rated 2 of 5, 9 rated 1 of 5.
  • CMS rates this one 3 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals, so none are shown. The one payment cut CMS publishes for each hospital, under its Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program, is shown where it applies.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • Most hospitals are accredited by a private organisation (The Joint Commission, DNV and others) whose routine inspections stand in for the state’s; those reports aren’t public, and QCOR holds only the state’s surveys: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.
  • QCOR says its hospital inspection data are complete only through September 17, 2026, while it moves to a new system.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.

From the hospital

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospital adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospital will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospital”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.