Hearth Record

Grossmont Hospital

An acute care hospital in La Mesa, California 91942

5555 Grossmont Center Drive Box 58, La Mesa, California 91942. (619) 465-0711.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 20, 2026.

The last 24 months 1 deficiency in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Aug 23, 2024: a complaint inspection.

1 deficiency cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

1 deficiency in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.

1 deficiency by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 Dec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNov

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Aug 23, 2024: complaint inspection1 deficiency
  • Ic Professional Responsibilities Policies

    The inspectors’ words, 2,627 words

    “IC PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES POLICIES CFR(s): Standard: Leadership responsibilities (2) The infection preventionist(s)/infection control professional(s) is responsible for: (i) The development and implementation of hospital-wide infection surveillance, prevention, and control policies and procedures that adhere to nationally recognized guidelines. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 43674 Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the infection prevention control program were implemented by the facility staff when: 1. An Environmental Services (EVS) staff did not perform hand hygiene/handwashing after transferring the bagged trash. 2. A nursing staff did not perform hand hygiene when she entered and exited the patient’s room. 3. An EVS staff did not wear Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) during the cleaning of a contact isolation room. 4. A Food Services staff (FSS) did not follow contact isolation precaution when she entered the contact isolation room. 5. A nursing staff did not disinfect a vitals machine after it was removed from a patient’s room and stored in the equipment storage. 6. A nursing staff did not follow contact isolation precaution when she entered the contact isolation room. 7. A nursing staff did not perform hand hygiene after exiting a patient’s room. 8. Dirty towels were observed under a sink cabinet, in the dialysis (type of treatment that helps body remove extra fluid and waste products from blood when the kidneys are not able to) storage room. 9. A dialysis staff was observed not wearing a Personal Protective Equipment (PPE- equipment worn to minimize exposure to hazards that cause serious workplace illnesses) gown inside a contact isolation room, while setting up a hemodialysis machine. 10. A staff’s personal item was found stored inside a cabinet in the patients’ pantry (room where patients food, utensils are kept). This failure could result in the spread of infection to patients and staff. These deficient practices had the potential to spread the bacteria to other patients, visitors, and staff. Findings: 1. An observation and interview were conducted on 8/20/24 at 3:14 P.M., with EVS staff 11. EVS 11 was observed in the hallway across the trash collection bin area. EVS 11 transferred the trash bag from the trash barrel to the main trash container with bare hands. EVS 11 did not perform hand hygiene and went to push the button of the elevator. EVS 11 stated she did not perform hand hygiene after she touched the trash bag. EVS 11 stated she should have performed hand washing or hand hygiene to prevent the spread of infection. An interview was conducted on 8/23/24 at 8:45 A.M., with Infection Preventionist (IP) 11. IP 11 stated staff should have performed hand washing or hand hygiene after touching and transferring the bagged trash to prevent the spread of infection for the safety of the patient, the visitors, and staff. A review of facility’s policy titled, Hand Hygiene last revised 6/13/24 indicated,”... III. Text: Performance of hand hygiene is required of all team members ... B. If hands are not visibly soiled, use either an SHC-approved ABHR or waterless antiseptic agent or soap and water for routinely decontaminating hands in clinical situations as described: ...6. After contact with inanimate objects in the immediate vicinity of the patient.” 2. Patient 11 was admitted to the facility on 8/16/24 for diagnoses that included left bimalleolar ankle fracture (fracture of foot) per History and Physical dated 8/16/24. An observation and interview were conducted on 8/20/24 at 3:37 P.M., with Registered Nurse (RN) 11. RN 11 was observed inside Patient 11’s room. RN 11 was observed that she did not perform hand hygiene prior to entering and after exiting Patient 11’s room. RN 11 stated she entered and exited Patient 11’s room and was not able perform hand hygiene. RN 11 stated hand hygiene was important to prevent the spread of infection to other patient and staff. An interview was conducted on 8/23/24 at 8:45 A.M., with Infection Preventionist (IP) 11. IP 11 stated every person should have been performing hygiene upon entering and exiting the patient’s room to prevent the spread of infection for the safety of the patient, the visitors, and staff. A review of facility’s policy titled, Hand Hygiene last revised 6/13/24 indicated, “...III. Text: Performance of hand hygiene is required of all team members ... B. If hands are not visibly soiled, use either an SHC-approved ABHR or waterless antiseptic agent or soap and water for routinely decontaminating hands in clinical situations as described: ...1. Upon entry and exit of a patient room/area/surroundings.” 3. Patient 12 was admitted to the facility on 8/16/24 for diagnoses that included acute perichondritis (infection of the ear) per History and Physical dated 8/16/24. An observation was conducted on 8/21/24 at 10:53 A.M., with EVS staff 12 in Patient 12’s room. Posted outside of Patient 12’s room was the signage that indicated, “Contact Precaution ... To Enter: Clean Hands ...Put on and tie gown ... Cover cuffs with gloves ... To Exit: Remove gloves ... Remove gown in the room ... Clean hands ...” EVS 12 was observed inside Patient 12’s room cleaning the room and mapping the floor. EVS 12 did not wear the gown while inside Patient 12’s room. An interview was conducted on 8/23/24 at 8:45 A.M., with the Infection Preventionist (IP) 11. The IP 11 stated staff were expected to wear the appropriate PPE in the isolation room to prevent the spread of infection for the safety of the patient, visitors, and staff. A review of facility’s policy titled, Standard Precaution and Transmission-Based Precautions for Hospitalized Patients last revised 5/31/24 indicated, “ ...II. Text: 3. Contact Precautions: Use contact precautions for patients with known or suspected infections ... 1. PPE Required: Isolation Gown and Gloves. 1. Perform hand hygiene and don clean isolation gown and gloves upon entry into the patient room or cubicle. 3. Prior to exiting patient room or cubicle, doff isolation gown and gloves in a method to prevent self-contamination, and perform hand hygiene.” 4. Patient 13 was admitted to the facility on 8/18/24 with diagnoses that included Weakness and Fall per Emergency Department Provider Note dated 8/18/24. An observation and interview were conducted on 8/21/24 at 9:40 A.M., with the FSS 11 in Patient 13’s room. Posted outside of Patient 13’s room was the signage that indicated, “Contact Precaution ... To Enter: Clean Hands ...Put on and tie gown ... Cover cuffs with gloves ... To Exit: Remove gloves ... Remove gown in the room ... Clean hands ...” The FSS 11 entered and exited Patient 13’s room and did not perform hand hygiene and did not wear the required contact precaution PPE. The FSS 11 stated she did not gown up when she entered the contact isolation room. The FSS 11 stated it was important to wear PPE to prevent the spread of infection for my safety and patient’s safety. An interview was conducted on 8/21/24 at 9:50 A.M., with the Women’s Hospital Observation (WHO) Manager. The WHO Manager stated FSS 11 should have worn the PPE for contact isolation when she entered Patient 13’s room. The WHO Manager stated it was important to wear PPE to control the spread of infection. A review of facility’s policy titled, Standard Precaution and Transmission-Based Precautions for Hospitalized Patients last revised 5/31/24 indicated, “...II. Text: 3. Contact Precautions: Use contact precautions for patients with known or suspected infections ... 1. PPE Required: Isolation Gown and Gloves. 1. Perform hand hygiene and don clean isolation gown and gloves upon entry into the patient room or cubicle. 3. Prior to exiting patient room or cubicle, doff isolation gown and gloves in a method to prevent self-contamination, and perform hand hygiene.” 5. Patient 14 was admitted to the facility on 8/17/24 with diagnoses that included weakness per History and Physical dated 8/17/24. An observation and interview were conducted on 8/21/24 at 11:04 A.M., with Nursing Assistant (NA) 11. NA 11 went out with a vitals machine from Patient 14’s room and did not perform vitals machine cleaning and disinfection. NA 11 stated she should have disinfected the vitals machine before storing it in the equipment room. An interview was conducted on 8/23/24 at 8:45 A.M., with the Infection Preventionist (IP) 11. IP 11 stated staff were expected to clean and disinfect the vital machine prior to leaving the patient room and before storing it the storage room. IP 11 further stated, it was important to do so to prevent the spread of infection for the safety of the patient, visitors, and staff. A facility’s policy titled, Standard Precautions and Transmission-Based Precautions for Hospitalized Patients last reviewed 5/31/2024 indicated, “ ...II. Text: A. Standard Precaution ... 8. Environmental Cleaning: a. Reusable Medical Equipment (RME) and devices must be cleaned and disinfected and maintained according to the manufacturers’ instruction to prevent patient-to-patient transmission of potential infectious material ... c. All patient care equipment used for more than one patient must be cleaned with a hospital-approved disinfectant between patients.” 6. Patient 15 was admitted to the facility on 8/20/24 with diagnoses that included Sepsis due to Pneumonia (Infection of the lung) per History and Physical dated 8/20/24. An observation and interview were conducted on 8/22/24 at 2:16 P.M., with Nursing Assistant (NA) 12 in Patient 15’s room. Posted outside of Patient 15’s room was the signage that indicated “Contact Precaution ... To Enter: Clean Hands ...Put on and tie gown ... Cover cuffs with gloves ... To Exit: Remove gloves ... Remove gown in the room ... Clean hands ...” NA 12 was observed and entered Patient 15’s room and did not perform hand hygiene. NA 12 did not put on the PPE gown when she was inside Patient 15’s room. NA 12 later exited Patient 15’s room and did not perform hand hygiene. NA 12 stated she should have stopped and put on the PPE before entering Patient 15’s room. NA 12 stated it was important to wear the required PPE to prevent the spread of infection and for the safety of everyone. An interview was conducted on 8/23/24 at 8:45 A.M., with the Infection Preventionist (IP) 11. IP 11 stated staff were expected to wear the appropriate PPE in the isolation room to prevent the spread of infection for the safety of the patient, visitors, and staff. A review of facility’s policy titled, Standard Precaution and Transmission-Based Precautions for Hospitalized Patients last revised 5/31/24 indicated, “ ...II. Text: 3. Contact Precautions: Use contact precautions for patients with known or suspected infections ... 1. PPE Required: Isolation Gown and Gloves. 1. Perform hand hygiene and don clean isolation gown and gloves upon entry into the patient room or cubicle. 3. Prior to exiting patient room or cubicle, doff isolation gown and gloves in a method to prevent self-contamination, and perform hand hygiene.” 45063 7. On 8/20/24 at 10:03 A.M., during the initial hospital tour, Registered Nurse (RN)1 was observed exiting patient room (288). RN 1 did not perform hand hygiene. On 8/20/24 at 10:05 A.M., an interview with RN 1 was conducted. RN 1 stated she should had performed hand hygiene right after exiting a patient’s room to prevent cross contamination. On 8/21/24 at 9:35 A.M., an interview with the Unit Manager (UM)1 was conducted. The UM 1 stated RN 1 should have performed hand hygiene right after exiting a patient’s room. The UM 1 stated all nursing staff were expected to perform hand hygiene right after exiting a patient’s room to prevent spread of infection. On 8/23/24 at 8:55 A.M., an interview with the Infection Preventionist (IP) 11 was conducted. IP 11 stated all nursing staff were expected to perform hand hygiene when entering and exiting a patient’s room. IP 11 stated performing hand hygiene will prevent spread of nosocomial infection and cross contamination. During a review of the facility’s policy and procedure (P&P) titled, “Hand Hygiene” revised 6/13/2024, the P&P indicated, “III. Text Performance of hand hygiene is required of all team members ...B ...upon entry and exit of a patient room/area/surroundings...” 8. On 8/20/24 at 10:24 A.M., during the initial hospital tour, an observation at the dialysis storage room was conducted. Three (3) pieces of dirty towels were observed under a sink cabinet in the dialysis storage room. On 8/22/24 at 9:12 A.M., an interview with the Dialysis Charge Nurse (DCN) 1 was conducted. The DCN 1 stated dirty towels should have not been placed under the sink. The DCN 1 stated old, dirty towels were a possible source of infection. On 8/23/24 at 9:15 A.M., an interview with Infection Preventionist (IP) 11 was conducted. IP 11 stated dirty towels should have been placed in dirty linens bag. IP 11 stated dirty linens and towels have moisture and could cause cross contamination. During a review of the Fresenius Kidney Care (FKC- dialysis company, vendor) policy and procedure (P &P) titled, “Storage of Supplies and Supply Expiration Dates for Inpatient Services” dated 7/1/2024, the P&P indicated, “Policy ...Storage areas will be kept clean and in order.” 9. On 8/20/24 at 2:45 P.M., during the initial tour of the hospital, a Dialysis Registered Nurse (DRN) 1 was observed not wearing a Protective Personal Equipment (PPE) gown, while inside a contact isolation room (513). Room 513 was on contact isolation for Pseudomonas (germ found in the environment that can cause infections in the blood, lungs and other parts of the body) and Multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO- bacterias that have become resistant to certain antibiotics). The DRN 1 was setting up a hemodialysis machine. (a machine that filters wastes, salts, and fluid when kidneys are no longer healthy enough to work adequately). On 8/20/24 at 2:55 P.M., an interview with the DRN 1 was conducted. The DRN 1 stated he usually wear a PPE gown inside a contact isolation room. The DRN 1 stated he should have worn a PPE gown to prevent cross contamination. On 8/20/24 at 3:45 P.M., an interview with the Dialysis Charge Nurse (DCN) 1 was conducted. The DCN 1 stated DRN 1 should have worn a PPE gown while inside a contact isolation room (513). The DCN 1 stated the expectation was for all dialysis staff to wear PPE gown while inside a contact isolation room to prevent cross contamination. On 8/23/24 at 9:10 A.M., an interview with Infection Preventionist (IP) 11 was conducted. IP 11 stated all staff should wear proper PPE when entering a contact isolation room. IP 11 stated it was important to wear proper PPE to prevent cross contamination and spread of infections to caregivers and patients. During a review of the facility’s policy and procedure (P&P) titled,” Standard Precautions and Transmission- Based for Hospitalized Patients” revised 5/31/2024, the P&P indicated,” ...II. Text ...2. Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) ...PPE should be worn ...Don PPE upon entry into the patient’s room ...” 45909 10. During an observation of the Medical Intensive Care Unit (MICU) with the Unit Manager (UM) on 8/20/24 at 10:14 A.M. A jug with liquid was found inside the cabinet of the patients’ pantry. An interview was conducted with the UM on 8/20/24 at 2:16 P.M. The UM stated, the jug found inside the pantry belonged to a MICU staff. The UM further stated the personal jug should have been placed in the employee’s locker and should have not been placed inside the patient’s pantry to prevent cross contamination (transfer of harmful substances) to patients and facility staff. An interview was conducted with the Infection Preventionist (IP) 11 on 8/20/24 at 2:30 P.M. IP 11 stated staff’s personal items should not be kept in the patients’ pantry to prevent the transmission of infection to patients and staff. Review of the Food and Drug Administration’s 2022 Food and Safety code section 6-305.11 indicated, “Designation. Street clothing and personal belongings can contaminate food, food equipment, and food-contact surfaces.””

    Rule A0772. Standard-level. From a complaint.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Aug 23, 2024Complaint inspection1 deficiency cited
Jul 24, 2024Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited

How do patients fare?

  • CMS’s overall for it is 4 of 5.
  • Of the measures behind its , CMS counts against the national value: mortality, 0 better and 0 worse of 8; safety of care, 5 better and 0 worse of 7; readmission, 0 better and 2 worse of 11.
  • Patients rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (3,466 surveys completed, Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): 70% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 69% would definitely recommend it.
  • Infections, compared by CMS with the national benchmark (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): central line bloodstream infections (CLABSI), better than the national benchmark; catheter urinary tract infections (CAUTI), better than the national benchmark; surgical site infections after colon surgery, no different than national benchmark; MRSA bloodstream infections, no different than national benchmark; C. diff infections, better than the national benchmark.
  • CMS’s patient safety composite for serious complications, PSI 90, Jul 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2024: no different than the national value.
  • Deaths within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2025): heart attack 11.5%, heart failure 10.2%, pneumonia 13.5%, COPD 9.9%, stroke 10.5%, heart bypass surgery 1.6%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
  • Readmissions within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2023 to Jun 30, 2025): heart attack 14.8%, heart failure 22.8%, pneumonia 18.4%, COPD 20.5%, heart bypass surgery 12.2%, hip or knee replacement 5.3%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
  • After outpatient care, compared by CMS: unplanned hospital visits after a colonoscopy, no different than the national rate; hospital admissions after outpatient chemotherapy, no different than the national rate; emergency visits after outpatient chemotherapy, no different than the national rate; unplanned hospital visits after outpatient surgery, no different than expected.
  • Emergency department patients spent a median of 196 minutes there before leaving (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025), and 2% left before being seen.
  • 79% of patients with severe sepsis or septic shock got the care CMS measures, SEP-1 (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025).
  • Medicare’s spending per patient here is 1.08 times the national median (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024).
Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Overall ratingCMS’s overall hospital quality star rating, 1 to 54 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the hospital’s patients (HCAHPS), 1 to 53 of 5

Is it certified, and in good standing?

  • Medicare-certified acute care hospital since Jul 1, 1966.
  • Ownership: government - hospital district or authority.
  • It is accredited by The Joint Commission, whose surveys stand in for the state’s routine inspections.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
  • It has an inpatient rehabilitation unit of 22 beds, which CMS lists apart as a rehabilitation facility.
  • Government - Hospital District or Authority.
Source:

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals.
  • Not among the hospitals whose Medicare payments CMS cut under the Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program for fiscal year 2026.
  • 1 deficiency cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated yearly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

What do patients say about their care?

  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
  • In CMS’s patient survey, patients rate how well its nurses communicated 3 of 5.
  • 72% of its health care workers got a flu shot (Oct 1, 2024 to Mar 31, 2025).
Source:

CMS, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital and Timely and Effective Care - Hospital. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Sharp Healthcare runs it.
  • 17 owners or officers are people: William E Strukel (corporate officer); Diane Keltner (corporate director); Steven R Allsing (corporate director); Brian S Moore (corporate director); Dee M Ammon (corporate officer); Virginia Hall (corporate director); Ron Oberndorfer (corporate director); Christopher D Howard (corporate director); Christopher D Howard (managing employee (on the payroll)); Howard Levenson (corporate director); Randolph S Lenac (corporate officer); William Evans (corporate officer); William Evans (managing employee (on the payroll)); Brian Potter (corporate director); Ann Goldberg (corporate director); Margaret Watkins (corporate director); John Fonseca (corporate director).
  • CMS’s Provider of Services file records 4 changes of ownership.
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospital All Owners and Hospital Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated monthly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 22 hospitals CMS lists in San Diego County, 16 have an overall star rating from CMS: 4 rated 5 of 5, 9 rated 4 of 5, 2 rated 3 of 5, 1 rated 1 of 5.
  • CMS rates this one 4 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals, so none are shown. The one payment cut CMS publishes for each hospital, under its Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program, is shown where it applies.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • Most hospitals are accredited by a private organisation (The Joint Commission, DNV and others) whose routine inspections stand in for the state’s; those reports aren’t public, and QCOR holds only the state’s surveys: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.
  • QCOR says its hospital inspection data are complete only through September 17, 2026, while it moves to a new system.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
  • In its September 2026 release CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for death and readmission rates, though it gives the rates.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.

From the hospital

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospital adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospital will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospital”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.