Hearth Record

Wvuhs Home Care

A hospice in Clarksburg, West Virginia 26301

2673 Davisson Run Road, Clarksburg, West Virginia 26301. (681) 342-3200.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 6 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

6 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 6 hospices serving ZIP code 26301 had 0.5.

The last inspection on record was on Jan 21, 2026: a complaint inspection by the state.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

6 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

6 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Apr 11, 2025: reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission6 deficiencies
  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(5))

    The inspectors’ words, 109 words

    “Observed in Individual Tracer. In 3 of 18 patient records reviewed, it was noted that the organization did not ensure that patient specific comprehensive assessments included all required information. For example, during a review of the medical record for HosRRHV#2, the clinician documented the presence of a wound at the patient’s right buttocks. The wound assessment did not include the condition of the wound bed, and surrounding tissue. Example #2: During a review of the medical record(s) for RRNHV#3, and RRNHV#4, it was noted that the comprehensive assessment did not include the initial bereavement risk assessment. This observation was reviewed with the Quality Director – Home Health and Hospice.”

    Rule L0529. Standard-level.

  • Plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 96 words

    “Observed in Individual Tracer. In 1 of 6 patient records reviewed it was noted that the organization did not ensure patient education and training was provided based on the patient’s assessed needs. For example, during a review of the medical record for HosRRHV#2, it was noted that a clinician documented that the patient’s caregiver performed wound care treatment in the start of care assessment. However, there was no documented evidence that the patient’s caregiver received education and training related to wound care treatment. This observation was reviewed with the Quality Director - Home Health and Hospice.”

    Rule L0544. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 477 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 5 of 18 patient records reviewed, it was noted that the organization did not ensure that the plan of care goals included outcome measures for specific care activities. For example, during a review of the medical record for HosRRHV#1, the following goal statement(s) were noted: “Patient/caregiver/family will demonstrate understanding of and ability to manage respiratory symptoms at end of life” and “Patient/caregiver will verbalize understanding of fall risk areas in the home and strategies to prevent future falls”. The goal statement(s) were not individualized to the patients specific needs and did not include a method to measure the effectiveness of problem interventions. In addition, the stated timeframe of “…at end of life” is not a realistic measurement to assess the implementation of problem interventions. Example #2: During a review of the medical record for HosRRHV#2, it was noted that the patient’s terminal illness diagnosis was Hepatic failure. The plan of care did not include a goal statement to evaluate the response, to care, treatment, and services related to Hepatic failure. In addition, the following goal statement was noted: “Patients incisions, wounds, or drain site will show healing”. The goal statement was not individualized to the patient’s specific needs and did not include a method to measure the effectiveness of problem interventions. Example #3: During a review of the medical record for HosRRHV#3, the following goal statements were noted: “The patient/caregiver family will verbalize and demonstrate ability to manage the patient’s anxiety throughout hospice care” and “The patient/caregiver will verbalize understanding of fall risk areas in the home and strategies to prevent future falls”. The goal statement(s) were not individualized to the patient’s specific needs and did not include a method to measure the effectiveness of problem interventions. The stated timeframe of “…throughout hospice care” is not a realistic measurement to assess the implementation of problem interventions. Example #4: During a review of the medical record for HosRRHV#4, it was noted that the patient’s terminal illness diagnosis was Cerebral Atherosclerosis Dementia, unspecified Dementia severity. The plan of care did not include a goal statement to evaluate the response, to care, treatment, and services related to Cerebral Atherosclerosis Dementia, unspecified Dementia severity. In addition, the following goal statement was noted: “Patient/caregiver will verbalize understanding of fall risk areas in the home and strategies to prevent future falls”. The goal statement was not individualized to the patient’s specific needs and did not include a method to measure the effectiveness of problem interventions. Example #5: During a review of the medical record for HosRRNHV#2, the following goal statement was noted: “Patients incisions, wounds, or drain site will show healing”. The goal statement was not individualized to the patient’s specific needs and did not include a method to measure the effectiveness of problem interventions. This observation was reviewed with the Quality Director - Home Health and Hospice.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 225 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 3 of 18 patent records reviewed, it was noted that the organization did not ensure that the plan of care was revised when the patient’s condition changed. For example, during a review of the medical record for HosRRHV#3, it was noted that the patient experienced a fall with injury during week 3 and week 4 of the 1st benefit period. The plan of care was not updated with interventions to maintain patient safety, and strategies to prevent injury. Example #2: During a review of the medical record for HosRRNHV#2, during week 4 of the 1st benefit period, the following treatment orders were noted: “Family member/Caregiver to perform dressing change to coccyx Other Daily, and PRN for soiled/non-adherent dressing, Dressing change to consist of: remove old dressing (May soak with saline prior to removing as needed. Cleanse wound.” The treatment order did not specify if this wound was to be covered with some type of dressing material or left open to air. Example #3: A review of the medical record for HosRRNHV#4, revealed that during the comprehensive assessment update a clinician documented the patient had 2 falls with no injury. The plan of care was not updated with interventions to maintain patient safety, and strategies to prevent injury. This observation was reviewed with the Quality Director – Home Health and Hospice.”

    Rule L0546. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(3)(i))

    The inspectors’ words, 91 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 2 discharge records reviewed, it was noted that a discharge/transfer summary that included all required information was not completed. For example, a review of the medical records for HosRRDC#1 and HosRRDC#2, revealed no evidence that a discharge summary including the following information was documented: 1) A summary of the patient’s stay, including treatments, symptoms, and pain management, 2) The patient’s current plan of care, and 3) The patient’s latest physician orders. This observation was reviewed with the Quality Director - Home Health and Hospice.”

    Rule L0684. Standard-level.

  • Use and mintenance of equipment and supplies (42 CFR 418.106(f)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 98 words

    “Observed in Individual Tracer. In 1 of 6 patient records reviewed it was noted that the organization did not ensure that an evaluation of patient education and training was provided when required. For example, during a review of the medical record for HosRRHV#2, it was noted that a clinician documented that the patient’s caregiver performed wound care treatment in the start of care assessment. However, there was no documented evidence that an evaluation of the patient’s caregiver to perform the wound care treatment was performed. This observation was reviewed with the Quality Director – Home Health and Hospice.”

    Rule L0702. Standard-level.

All 3 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jan 21, 2026Complaint inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited
May 22, 2025Follow-up inspection by The Joint CommissionNo deficiencies cited
Apr 11, 2025Reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission6 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Feb 10, 1987.
  • Ownership: non-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 14.5 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 7.6% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 94.6% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 69% at home, 6% in assisted living, 6% in a nursing facility, 17% in a skilled nursing facility, 2% in a hospital, 1% in an inpatient hospice.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day14.5 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends7.6%
Visits near death94.6% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • CMS’s ownership file has no owners listed for this hospice.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 84% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 86% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 97.42% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 55.4% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 54 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 6 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 26301, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 0.5; this one had 6.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

The 6 hospices CMS lists serving ZIP code 26301
PlaceDeficiencies, 3 years
Wvuhs Home Care This hospice6
Hospicecare, Inc.3
West Virginia Caring0
Hospice of Barbour County1
Adoration Hospice0
Amedisys Hospice Care0

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.