Hearth Record

Spear Hospice

A hospice in Sugar Land, Texas 77478

77 Sugar Creek Center Blvd #600, Sugar Land, Texas 77478. (832) 521-4137.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 14 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Dec 2024. Most serious: Condition-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
Condition-level deficiency
For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.

What did inspectors find?

14 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 87 hospices serving ZIP code 77478 had 5.

The last inspection on record was on Dec 5, 2024: an initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

2 deficiencies at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

14 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Dec 2024. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

14 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Dec 5, 2024: initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care5 deficiencies
  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 189 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 5 (Patient #3) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions • Duplicate drug therapy • Drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring Patient 3: There is documentation in the medical record that patient was using oxygen. Oxygen is not listed on the medication profile. There is an order for morphine on the medication profile: morphine injection solution 1mg/mL, 1mL every 4 hours PRN. Instructions: 1mg/1mL by mouth every 4 hours as needed for pain/shortness of breath. There is no evidence of correct administration route for this order. In addition, there are physician’s orders in the medical record: 1) morphine sulfate 20mg/mL 0.5-1mL po/sl every 2 hours as needed for shortness of breath or pain. 2) Tylenol suppository 650mg rectally every 4 hours as needed for mild pain or fever. There is no evidence of these medications on the medication profile.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(7))

    The inspectors’ words, 101 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 5 (Patient #3) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment includes a bereavement component which includes the needs of the patient’s family and other individuals focusing on the social, spiritual, and cultural factors that may impact their ability to cope with the patient’s death. Information gathered from the initial bereavement assessment is incorporated into the plan of care and is considered in the bereavement plan of care. Patient 3: Patient was admitted on 11/19/2024. Initial bereavement assessment was dated 11/18/2024. There is no evidence of a bereavement assessment after admission.”

    Rule L0531. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 211 words

    “Upon patient record review, 4 of 5 (Patient #1,2,3,5) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient 1: Identified needs: weakness, fall risk, neuro/confusion, constipation, pain, edema, high risk for skin breakdown, dyspnea. There is no evidence of plans of care with problems, goals and interventions: fall risk, constipation, pain, edema, high risk for skin breakdown. Patient 2: Identified needs: weakness, fall risk, neuro/confusion, constipation, pain, edema, dyspnea. There is no evidence of plans of care with problems, goals and interventions: constipation, dyspnea, edema. Patient 3: Identified needs: oxygen use, respiratory, nutrition/g-tube use (feedings), constipation, weakness, fall risk, pain. There is no evidence of plans of care with problems, goals and interventions: oxygen use, respiratory, nutrition/gtube use (feedings), constipation. Patient 5: Identified needs: fall risk, neuro/confusion, constipation, pain, edema, oxygen use, nutrition/aspiration risk. There is no evidence of plans of care with problems, goals and interventions: pain, edema, oxygen use, nutrition/aspiration risk.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 159 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 5 (Patient #3) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient 3: There is documentation in the medical record that patient was using oxygen. There is no evidence of oxygen on the plan of care. There is an order for morphine on the plan of care: morphine injection solution 1mg/mL, 1mL every 4 hours PRN. Instructions: 1mg/1mL by mouth every 4 hours as needed for pain/shortness of breath. There is no evidence of correct administration route for this order. There are physician’s orders in the medical record: 1) morphine sulfate 20mg/mL 0.5-1mL po/sl every 2 hours as needed for shortness of breath or pain. 2) Tylenol suppository 650mg rectally every 4 hours as needed for mild pain or fever. There is no evidence of these medications on the plan of care.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 147 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 5 (Patient #1,2,4) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services are provided in accordance with the plan of care. Patient 1,4: Patient was admitted to hospice on 11/26/2024. There are multiple orders for MSW and SC visit frequencies written on 11/26/24. Order 1 states (for both disciplines): 1 visit within 5 days of admission and once per month. Order 2 states (for both disciplines): 1 time per month and 1 as needed. There are duplicate frequency orders. Patient 2: Patient was admitted to hospice on 11/26/2024. There are multiple orders for MSW and SC visit frequencies written on 11/26/24. Order 1 states (for both disciplines): 1 visit within 5 days of admission and once per month. Order 2 states (for both disciplines): 1 time per month and 2 as needed. There are duplicate frequency orders.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

Oct 22, 2024: initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care9 deficiencies
  • Furnishing of non-core services (42 CFR 418.70)

    The inspectors’ words, 102 words

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the hospice is in compliance with accepted professional standards and principles for all non-core services which includes physical therapy, occupational therapy and speech-language pathology. Hospice aide notes turned in during survey where signed by the aide and caregiver which were for visit dates in the future for October/November 2024. In addition, volunteer visit notes were not available day 1 of survey but day 2 volunteer notes were made available but incomplete with no name or signature; unable to determine hospice aide visits and volunteer visits were being made and authentication of documentation for non core services.”

    Rule L0601. Condition-level.

  • Organizational environment (42 CFR 418.100)

    “Condition of Participation: Organization and Administration of Services.”

    Rule L0648. Condition-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 199 words

    “Upon patient record review, 4 of 4 (Patient #1, 2, 3, 4) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions • Duplicate drug therapy • Drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring Patient #1: Patient has Dulcolax suppository on med profile, but also has Dulcolax pills in home. Patient does not have Miralax and docusate sodium and reports no longer taking. although remain on med profile. Patient has Acetaminophen tabs on med profile, but suppository in home and not on med profile. Patient #2: Acetaminophen suppositories in home. Tablets on med profile. No Colace in home -no longer taking. RN will obtain order to make prn. Patient #3: Seroquel 25 mg TID is in home and not on med profile. Miralax 17 gm in home and not on med profile. Patient #4: Donepezil 10 mg PO daily and Miralax 7 gm daily PO for constipation are listed on the plan of care, but not on med profile.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 129 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 5 (Patient #1, 2, 3) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patients #1, 2, 3: Miralax 17 gm daily PO for constipation. No diluent included on the order. Patient #1: Patient has Dulcolax pills in home, but only order is for Dulcolax suppository. Patient has Acetaminophen suppository in home, but no order. Patient has orders for Miralax and docusate sodium and reports no longer taking. There is no order to discontinue. Patient #2: Patient has Acetaminophen suppository in home, but no order. Patient #3: Seroquel 25 mg TID and Miralax 17 gm is in home, but there is no order.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 5 (Patient #1) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including equipment and supply needs. Patient #1: During home visit, patient had a hospital bed. There is no DME order for hospital bed in clinical record.”

    Rule L0550. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 5 (Patient #1, 4) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services are provided in accordance with the plan of care. Patient #1, 4: Hospice Aide is providing volunteer services. The order for Volunteer is 3x/week. There were no specific volunteer visit notes for either record during initial record review. Day 2, Admin/DON presented (3) Volunteer notes dated Oct 2, Oct 4, Oct 7, 2024, with no name or signature.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 143 words

    “Upon patient record review 1 of 5 (Patient #1) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a hospice aide provides services that are: • Ordered by the interdisciplinary group • Included in the plan of care • Permitted to be performed under state law by such hospice aide • Consistent with the hospice aide training Patient #1: Hospice Aide Care Plan 6/25/24 and 8/26/24 include frequency of 3/week and assignment for Bed bath everyday except assist to tub/shower weekly. Shower not provided 8/30-9/30/24. Informed agency in mini-exit that there were no notes filed past 9/30. On Day 2 of survey, the Administrator provided additional completed notes, appeared to be signed by hospice aide and caregiver. Dates for the notes/visits provided were: Oct 1, 2, 4, 7, 9, 11, 14, 16, 18, 21, 23, 25, 28, 30, and Nov 1, 2024.”

    Rule L0626. Standard-level.

  • Governing body and administrator (42 CFR 418.100(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 93 words

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the hospice is directed by a Board of Directors/governing body which assumes full legal authority and responsibility for the operation of the hospice. The Administrator holds full responsibility of oversight of the management of documentation of the hospice medical record. The Administrator provided hospice aide notes signed by the aide and caregiver which were for visit dates in the future for October/November 2024. In addition, volunteer visit notes not available day 1 of survey but made available day 2 that were incomplete with no name or signature.”

    Rule L0651. Standard-level.

  • Authentication (42 CFR 418.104(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 166 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 5 (Patient #1,4,5) did not have evidence that all entries are legible, clear, complete, and appropriately authenticated and dated in accordance with the organizations policies and procedures and currently accepted standards of practice. Electronic signatures are acceptable as long the hospice is following appropriate safeguards to prevent unauthorized access to the patient records. Patients #1, 4: There is not evidence of coordination of activities with other members of the IDG, as evidenced by inaccurate documentation in patient medical records for hospice aide services provided for a future date. Patient #4, 5: Discharged patients were discharged by revocation. When reviewing bereavement info, noted “Post death” bereavement assessments with date of death identified as same date as revocation. Also, bereavement care plans were created. Both documents included what appeared to be signature of bereavement coordinator. The administrator reported that the date of death was inaccurately typed and was able to present the original handwritten copy that did not have date of death.”

    Rule L0679. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Dec 5, 2024Initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care5 deficiencies cited
Oct 22, 2024Initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care9 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Jan 8, 2025.
  • CMS doesn’t list its type of ownership.
  • Cited at in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • CMS hasn’t published nursing time from Medicare claims for this hospice.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • CMS’s ownership file has no owners listed for this hospice.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS gives no Hospice Care Index for this hospice.
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 87 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 77478, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 5; this one had 14.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.