Allied Hospice
A hospice in Sugar Land, Texas 77478
12808 W Airport Blvd. Suite 375, Sugar Land, Texas 77478. (346) 857-6738.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.
- 18 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- Not rated family caregiver rating
- 7of 10 CMS’s Hospice Care Index
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
- Condition-level deficiency
- For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.
What did inspectors find?
18 deficiencies cited in the last three years
The middle of the 87 hospices serving ZIP code 77478 had 5.
The last inspection on record was on Feb 28, 2025: a follow-up inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.
1 deficiency at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
When those deficiencies happened
18 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2025. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Jan 15, 2025: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care18 deficiencies
-
IDG, care planning, coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56)
“Condition of Participation: Interdisciplinary Group, Care Planning, and Coordination of Services. L536”
-
Rights of the patient (42 CFR 418.52(c)(1))
“Upon patient record review, 1 of 14(Patient #10) did not have evidence that the patient has received effective pain management and symptom control from the hospice for conditions related to the terminal illness. Patient #10: During the initial assessment, the RN did not document the patient’s self identified pain threshold, but described the patients pain at a level 7. There was no evidence of any interventions to this pain assessment.”
-
Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))
The inspectors’ words, 148 words
“Upon patient record review, 3 of 14 (Patient #1, 2, 7) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions • Duplicate drug therapy • Drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring Patient #1: Miralax does not contain reconstitution instructions. Amoxicillin 875/125mg one daily for 5 days was started on 07/12/24 but was never discontinued. Azithromycin was started at 250mg daily for 3 days on 07/12/24 and was never discontinued. Patient #2: The patient medication list includes Norco 10/325mg . The medication is listed as PRN, however, there is no listed frequency. Patient #7: The patient is on oxygen. Oxygen is not included on the medication list.”
-
Approach to service delivery (42 CFR 418.56(a)(1))
The inspectors’ words, 285 words
“Upon patient record review, 3 of 14 (Patients #7, 8, 10) did not have evidence that a Registered Nurse is designated to ensure continuous assessment of the patient and family’s needs and to coordinate activities with other members of the interdisciplinary group (IDG). The IDG must work together and is responsible for supervision of the care and service for each patient and family. Patient #7: On 08/22/24, patient caregiver called stating patient was having symptoms of a UTI. Doctor ordered Cipro. There was no nursing assessment completed. No follow up call or nurse visit for 7 days on 08/29/24. On 10/10/24, the nurse documented that the caregiver reported new excoriation on sacrum. No assessment performed, however, nurse ordered for aide to apply zinc at brief changes. On 10/17/24, Nurse saw patient again. Caregiver describes a stage one pressure area on sacrum. No physical assessment done by nurse. On 10/22/24 the nurse visited again, where caregiver reported area was resolved. There was not any evidence of this area ever being assessed by nurse. Patient #8: On 12/16/24, the patient caregiver complained of insomnia during a nurse visit. The doctor prescribed Ambien, a controlled substance. No follow up phone call or visit from a nurse occurred until 12/23/24 (7 days). Patient #10: This patient was admitted on 01/03/25. The nurse documented that the patient complained of depression, fear, hopelessness, and suicidal ideation. There was no follow up on suicidal ideation until nurse visit on 01/06/25. It was also on 01/06/25 that a social worker did an initial assessment, though there was no evidence of a self harm assessment being performed or of follow up being completed on any of the psychosocial complaints documented from initial nurse visit.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))
The inspectors’ words, 572 words
“Upon patient record review, 10 of 14 (Patient #1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient #1: The neurological plan of care does not include goals or interventions for seizures. There is no interventions or goals for GI, including constipation. There are no interventions or goals for MSW or for spiritual care. Patient #2: The plan of care for this patient does not show evidence of interventions or goals for pain. There are no interventions or goals for Cardiac, which is the patients primary diagnosis. There are also no interventions or goals for Ascites and liver disease with frequent need for paracentesis, or fall precautions. The Respiratory plan of care addresses oxygen use, however, patient is a smoker and there are no interventions or goals related to smoking with oxygen use. The respiratory plan of care does not include interventions or goals for nebulizer or suction machine use. There are no interventions or goals for MSW or for spiritual care. Patient #3: The plan of care does not include interventions or goals for anticoagulation use or bleeding precautions. There are no interventions or goals for MSW or for spiritual care. Patient #4: The plan of care does not include interventions or goals for pain, liver disease, cardiac, oxygen use, and there are no interventions or goals for MSW or for spiritual care. Patient #5: The plan of care does not include interventions or goals for oxygen use, seizures, pain with opiate use, GU with urinary retention, sleep/insomnia, nausea and vomiting, anticoagulant use and bleeding precautions, and there are no interventions or goals for MSW or for spiritual care. Patient #6: The plan of care does not include interventions or goals for constipation, depression/anxiety, diabetes, pain with opiate use, nutrition with megace, sleep/insomnia, anticoagulant use and bleeding precautions, and there are no interventions or goals for MSW or for spiritual care. Patient #7: The plan of care does not include interventions or goals for anticoagulant use or bleeding precautions, diabetes, constipation, infection, neurological disease with primary diagnosis of cerebral infarct, and there are no interventions or goals for MSW or for spiritual care Patient #8: The plan of care does not include interventions or goals for neurological as primary diagnosis is cerebral infarct. There are no interventions or goals for anticoagulant use and bleeding precautions, pain, constipation, or sleep/insomnia. There are no interventions or goals for MSW or for spiritual care. Patient #9: The plan of care does not include interventions or goals for primary diagnosis of senile degeneration of the brain. There are no interventions or goals for cardiac with edema, pain with daily opiates, frequent UTI’s, and there are no interventions or goals for MSW or for spiritual care Patient #10: The plan of care does not include interventions or goals for patient primary diagnosis of Huntington’s disease. there are no interventions or goals for pain, fall risk, respiratory, or sleep and insomnia. There are no interventions or goals for MSW or spiritual care including interventions or goals related to suicidal ideation.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))
“Upon patient record review, 3 of 14 (Patient #1,2,7) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient #1: Miralax does not contain reconstitution instructions. Patient #2: The order for Norco 10/325mg . The medication is listed as PRN, however, there is no listed frequency. Patient #7: The patient is on oxygen with no evidence of order for oxygen.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))
The inspectors’ words, 237 words
“Upon patient record review, 10 of 14 (Patients #1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including equipment and supply needs. Patient #1: The plan of care does not include supplies. Patient is using briefs, gloves, and lotion. Patient #2: There are no supplies or DME identified on the plan of care. Patient #3: There are no supplies or DME identified on the plan of care. Patient #4: There are no supplies or DME identified on the plan of care. Patient #5: The only DME listed on the plan of care is the oxygen concentrator. The cane and nebulizer are not on the plan of care. Patient #6: The only DME listed on the plan of care is the oxygen concentrator. The cane and nebulizer are not on the plan of care. Patient #7: The only DME listed on the plan of care is the oxygen. The plan of care does not include the bed or the walker. There are no supplies identified on the plan of care. Patient #8: There are no supplies or DME identified on the plan of care. Patient #9: There are no supplies or DME identified on the plan of care. Patient #10: There are no supplies or DME identified on the plan of care.”
-
Competency evaluation (42 CFR 418.76(c))
The inspectors’ words, 210 words
“Upon personnel record review, 1 of 13 (Personnel #10) did not have evidence in the personnel file that the following competency assessment was performed by the aide with a patient: (This standard applies to all Hospice Aides providing care/service who are directly employed by the hospice or through a contractual agreement.) ·Communication skills, including the ability to read, write, and verbally report clinical information to patients, caregivers, and other hospice staff. ·Reading and recording temperature, pulse, and respiration ·Safe transfer techniques and ambulation. ·Normal range of motion and positioning ·Appropriate and safe techniques in personal hygiene and grooming that include-- ·(A) Bed bath ·(B) Sponge, tub, and shower bath ·(C) Shampoo, sink, tub, and bed ·(D) Nail and skin care ·(E) Oral hygiene ·(F) Toileting and elimination The other subject areas in this section may be evaluated through written examination, oral examination or after observation of a Hospice Aide with a patient. Personnel #10: The personnel file showed that all competencies were verbal and there was no evidence that appropriate and safe techniques for (A) Bed bath, (B) Sponge, tub, and shower bath, (C) Shampoo, sink, tub, and bed, (D) Nail and skin care, (E) Oral hygiene, or (F) Toileting and elimination was performed on an actual or pseudo patient.”
-
Training (42 CFR 418.100(g)(2))
“Upon personnel record review, 2 of 13 (Personnel #3, 4) did not have evidence that the hospice employees have received orientation on their specific job requirements. Personnel #3: The DON personnel file did not contain a job specific orientation/competency for a registered nurse. The DON has been doing RN visits on patients. Personnel #4: The alternate DON personnel file does not contain a job specific orientation or competency for DON/ALT DON”
-
Training (42 CFR 418.100(g)(3))
“Upon personnel record review, 3 of 13 (Personnel #2, 3, 4) did not have evidence that a skills competency assessment, specific to each discipline had been conducted for all personnel including volunteers initially during orientation. Personnel #2: The file did not contain evidence of a skills competency assessment for volunteer coordinator or bereavement coordinator. Personnel #3: The file did not contain evidence of a skills competency assessment for a registered nurse. Personnel #4: The file did not contain evidence of a skills competency assessment for ALT DON.”
-
Authentication (42 CFR 418.104(b))
“Upon patient client record review, 14 of 14 (Patients #1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14) did not have evidence that all entries are legible, clear, complete, and appropriately authenticated and dated in accordance with the organizations policies and procedures and currently accepted standards of practice. Electronic signatures are acceptable as long the hospice is following appropriate safeguards to prevent unauthorized access to the patient records. Patients 1-14: Patients signed blank ABN and Revocation, as well as transfer forms upon admission to hospice.”
-
Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(2))
“Upon client record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #12) did not have evidence that if a patient revokes the election of hospice care or is discharged from hospice in accordance with §418.26, the hospice must forward to the patient’s attending physician: • A copy of the hospice discharge summary • The patient’s clinical record, if requested Patient #12: The record does not contain evidence that the discharge summary was sent to a physician.”
-
Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(3))
“Upon client record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #12) did not have evidence that the discharge summary includes all required information. Patient #12: The discharge summary did not include proof of the patient plan of care.”
-
Administration of drugs and biologicals (42 CFR 418.106(d)(1))
The inspectors’ words, 150 words
“Upon patient record review, 3 of 14 (Patients #2, 7, 8) did not have evidence in the patient record that the interdisciplinary group, as part of the review of the plan of care, determines the ability of the patient and/or family to safely self-administer drugs and biologicals to the patient in his or her home. If the patient and/or family are not capable of safely administering drugs and biologicals in the home, the hospice must address this issue in the patient’s plan of care. Patient#2: Upon initial assessment, RN did not assess the patient’s or the caregiver’s ability of safe administration of medication. Patient#7: Upon initial assessment, RN did not assess the patient’s or the caregiver’s ability of safe administration of medication. patient #8: Upon initial assessment, although RN assessed that patient was not able to safely administer medications, they did not assess the caregiver’s ability to safely administer medications.”
-
Personnel qualification (42 CFR 418.114(b)(4))
“Upon personnel record review, 1 of 13 (Personnel #8 ) did not have evidence that all Speech Therapy Services are provided by a qualified licensed Speech-Language Pathologist (SLP) or Audiologist in accordance with the state’s Speech-Language Pathology Practice Act and the hospice’s policies and procedures and/or job descriptions. Personnel #8: There was no evidence of the current license for the contract ST.”
-
Personnel qualification (42 CFR 418.114(b)(5))
“Upon personnel record review, 1 of 13 (Personnel #7 ) did not have evidence all Occupational Therapy Services are provided by a qualified licensed Occupational Therapist (OT) in accordance with the state’s Occupational Therapy Practice Act and the hospice’s policies and procedures and/or job descriptions. Personnel #7: There was no evidence of the current license for the contract OT.”
-
Personnel qualification (42 CFR 418.114(b)(7))
“Upon personnel record review, 1 of 13 (Personnel # 6) did not have evidence all Physical Therapy Services are provided by a qualified licensed Physical Therapist (PT) in accordance with the state’s Physical Therapy Practice Act and the hospice’s policies and procedures and/or job descriptions. Personnel #6: There was no evidence of the current license for the contract PT.”
-
Criminal background checks (42 CFR 418.114(d)(1))
“Upon personnel record review, 3 of 13 (Personnel #6,7,8) did not have evidence the hospice obtained a criminal background check on all contracted individuals who have direct patient care and access to patient records. The agency was unable to produce therapy files.”
All 2 inspections in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 28, 2025 | Follow-up inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care | No deficiencies cited |
| Jan 15, 2025 | Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care | 18 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified hospice since Feb 20, 2019.
- Ownership: for-profit.
- Cited at For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules.
CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Has anything been proven against it?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who does the caring?
- From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 9.6 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 2.6% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 83.3% of patients who died.
- Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 100% at home.
CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | This provider |
|---|---|
| Nurse care minutes per routine home care day | 9.6 min |
| Skilled nursing minutes at weekends | 2.6% |
| Visits near death | 83.3% of patients who died |
Who owns it?
- 11 owners or officers are people: Michael Ani (owns 5% or more directly, 60%); Michael Ani (corporate officer, 60%); Jestina Bangura (corporate officer, 60%); Michael Ani (corporate director, 40%); Michael Ani (managing employee (on the payroll), 40%); Jestina Bangura (owns 5% or more directly, 40%); Jestina Bangura (corporate director, 40%); Karen X Thampoe (managing employee (under contract)); Jianlin Zhou (corporate officer); Jianlin Zhou (managing employee (on the payroll)); Kohisha Blaylock (managing employee (on the payroll)).
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.
What do families say?
- CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
- CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 7 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
- 90.63% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025).
CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5 | Not rated |
| Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold | 7 of 10 |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 87 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 77478, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 5; this one had 18.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Deficiencies, 3 years |
|---|---|
| Altus Hospice | 10 |
| Harbor Hospice of Richmond, LP | 10 |
| Vitalcaring Group | 0 |
| Acura Hospice Care LLC | Not given |
| White Orchid Hospice | 14 |
| Trucare Hospice and Palliative Services | 7 |
| Heart to Heart Hospice of Sugar Land | 6 |
| Allied Hospice This hospice | 18 |
| Pax Et Vita Hospice Agency, LLC | 1 |
| Citizens Palliative Care LLC | 25 |
| City Hospice & Palliative Care, LLC | 4 |
| Saint Daniel Palliative Care Inc. | 5 |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
- Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice General Information (yc9t-dgbk).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Provider Data (252m-zfp9).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, CAHPS Hospice Survey (gxki-hrr8).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR hospice inspection reports (Hospice Survey Reports - Oct 2021 through Sep 2026.xlsx).
Released Oct 23, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice All Owners (e983965e-1603-4cb8-82b5-c40090e380d1).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Enrollments (25704213-e833-4b8b-9dbc-58dd17149209).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice ZIP Data (95rg-2usp).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.
From the hospice
The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.