Hearth Record

Eternal Faith Hospice

A hospice in Richmond, Texas 77063

300 Jackson St, Richmond, Texas 77063. (726) 246-0161.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 7 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2026. Most serious: Condition-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
Condition-level deficiency
For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.

What did inspectors find?

7 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 69 hospices serving ZIP code 77063 had 5.5.

The last inspection on record was on Aug 18, 2026: a recertification inspection by the state.

2 deficiencies at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

7 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2026. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

7 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Aug 18, 2026: recertification inspection by the state7 deficiencies
  • Core services (42 CFR 418.64)

    The inspectors’ words, 248 words

    “Based on observation, record review, and interview, the hospice failed to maintain compliance with this Condition of Participation to provide all core services directed by the hospice consistent with acceptable standards of practice to include nursing services, medical social services and counseling services to any patients on services or admitted to the hospice in that: The hospice failed to provide nursing care and services by or under the supervision of a registered nurse and failed to ensure nursing services met the needs of the patient as identified in the patient’s initial assessment, comprehensive assessment, and updated assessments when the hospice failed to provide entry to HHSC surveyor during attempted survey on 8/18/26. (Refer to L 0591) The hospice failed to ensure medical social services were provided to patients and their families by a qualified social worker, under the direction of a physician, and based on the patients’ psychosocial assessment and the patients’ and families identified needs and acceptance of services, when the hospice failed to provide HHSC surveyor entry during attempted survey on 8/18/26. (Refer to L 0594)The hospice failed to provide counseling services to the patients and patients’ families to assist the patients and their families in minimizing the stress and problems that arise from terminal illness, related conditions, and the dying process when the hospice failed to provide HHSC surveyor entry during attempted survey on 8/18/26. (Refer to L 595) FindingsRefer to L0591- Nursing servicesRefer to L0594 - Medical Social ServicesRefer to L0595 - Counseling Services”

    Rule L0587. Condition-level.

  • Organizational environment (42 CFR 418.100)

    The inspectors’ words, 209 words

    “Based on records reviews and interviews, the hospice failed to maintain compliance with this Condition of Participation to organize, manage, and administer its resources to provide the hospice care and services to patients, caregivers and families necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions in that: The hospice failed to be engaged in providing nursing services, medical social services, physician services, counseling services including spiritual counseling, dietary counseling, and bereavement counseling, hospice aide, volunteer, and homemaker services, physical therapy, occupational therapy, and speech-language pathology services, short-term inpatient care, medical supplies (including drugs and biologicals) and medical appliances in accordance with acceptable standards, when the hospice failed to provide entry to HHSC surveyor during attempted survey on 8/18/26. (Refer to L0652) The hospice failed to make nursing services, physician services, drugs and biologicals routinely available to patients on a 24-hour basis 7 days a week and other covered services must be made available on a 24-hour basis when reasonable and necessary to meet the needs of the patient and family, when the hospice failed to provide entry to HHSC surveyor during attempted survey on 8/18/26. (Refer to L0653) Refer to L0652 - ServicesRefer to L0653 - Services (Nursing services, physician services, and drugs and biologicals)”

    Rule L0648. Condition-level.

  • Nursing services (42 CFR 418.64(b)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 862 words

    “Based on observation, records reviews, and interviews, the hospice failed to provide nursing care and services by or under the supervision of a registered nurse and failed to ensure nursing services met the needs of the patient as identified in the patient’s initial assessment, comprehensive assessment, and updated assessments. In that, An attempted visit was made on 8/18/2026 at Address A and the hospice failed to provide entry to HHSC to survey and ensure agency compliance with this regulation. This failure places patients at risk of not having their nursing needs met or their services not being appropriately supervised and places potential patients and families at risk of not receiving the support services needed during the patients’ end of life. Review of hospice’s account page in Texas Unified license Information Portal (TULIP - a database utilized by the State of Texas to maintain licensing, demographic information, complaints, and self-reported incidents for home health and hospice agencies) on 08/18/2026 at 8:00am revealed hospice Agency’s contact information as: Hospice A’s address, Hospice’s phone# A, Hospice’s operational hours as 11am – 5pm. Monday through Friday and Hospice CCN. The hospice as an ADS in Address# B and a Phone# B.Further review of the agency’s information revealed Deemed Status expired on 8/14/2026.Review of the Hospice’s IQIES account on 8/18/2026 revealed hospice’s CCN and address was same as shown in Hospice’s TULIP account.An observation on 8/18/2026 at 11:10 AM revealed that the agency’s address was located in a professional building at Address A. Upon arrival, the surveyor observed a large white banner hanging on the building that read, “office space for lease.” The surveyor proceeded to walk to the main door of the office and knocked on the glass door three times. The door was locked, and there was no name or signage indicating the presence of the agency. Furthermore, no furniture could be seen inside, and no lights could be observed from the outside.On 8/18/2026 at 11:20 AM, the surveyor called the agency’s Phone #A as indicated in TULIP. A female individual answered the call and introduced herself as the office manager. The surveyor stated the purpose of the call and asked for the administrator. Office Manager #1 stated that she was the manager of the location at Address B and not at Address A but noted that she would reach out to the staff at Address A because they might have been out in the community conducting visits. The surveyor stated that the office appeared to be permanently closed and even had a lease sign hanging on the building. Office Manager #1 did not respond to the statement directly but instead stated that she would either return the surveyor’s call herself or have another person do so.On 8/18/2026 at 11:55 AM, the Hospice Agency’s Regional Vice President of Operations (VP) called the surveyor. He stated that he had been informed that a state surveyor was at Address A attempting to conduct a survey, and he noted that the office “was not doing business anymore.” When the surveyor asked what had happened to the patients and the staff at Address A, VP stated that he would find out. He added that he was currently in the area and could meet the surveyor in 30 minutes. He further noted that he would not be able to let the surveyor inside the office because it was closed. The surveyor agreed to the meeting.An interview was conducted on 8/18/2026 at approximately 12:30 PM on the sidewalk beside Address A. During the interview, VP stated that the agency’s office at Address A had been no longer in business since March of 2026, and that there were no patients. VP added that the agency had been unable to change the location because the agency’s account in PECOS (which is the secure online database and management system operated by CMS) had been locked since December of 2025. VP further noted that agency Address A and Address B were supposed to have been merged into a single office. The agency had tried to notify HHSC, but because the PECOS account was locked out, it did not allow them to change the address. When the surveyor asked for the contact information of the Administrator and Alternate Administrator listed on the agency’s TULIP account, VP stated that they no longer worked for the company. VP did not state the exact date the administrative staff had left the agency, but added that, as of that moment, the agency was in the process of replacing them.On 8/18/2026 at around 12:50 pm the surveyor handed the letters of Inability to Perform a Federal and State Survey by an HHSC representative and had VP signed the “Acknowledgement of Receipt” forms. Surveyor informed VP that surveyor will still be in the area until about 1:10 pm to wait for the 2 hours arrival window.Surveyor left the location Address A at 1:10 PM unable to conduct a recertification survey, and therefore was unable to determine whether nursing care and hospice services were provided by or under the supervision of a registered nurse, and whether the nursing needs of hospice patients were identified and met through the initial, comprehensive, and updated assessments.””

    Rule L0591. Standard-level.

  • Medical social services (42 CFR 418.64(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 850 words

    “Based on observation, records reviews, and interviews, the hospice failed to provide medical social services by or under the supervision of a social worker and failed to ensure social services met the needs of the patient as identified in the patient’s initial assessment, comprehensive assessment, and updated assessments. In that, An attempted visit was made on 8/18/2026 at Address A and the hospice failed to provide entry to HHSC to survey and ensure agency compliance with this regulation. This failure places patients at risk of not having their social services met or their services not being appropriately supervised and places potential patients and families at risk of not receiving the psychosocial services needed during the patients’ end of life. Review of hospice’s account page in Texas Unified license Information Portal (TULIP - a database utilized by the State of Texas to maintain licensing, demographic information, complaints, and self-reported incidents for home health and hospice agencies) on 08/18/2026 at 8:00am revealed hospice Agency’s contact information as: Hospice A’s address, Hospice’s phone# A, Hospice’s operational hours as 11am – 5pm. Monday through Friday and Hospice CCN. The hospice as an ADS in Address# B and a Phone# B.Further review of the agency’s information revealed Deemed Status expired on 8/14/2026.Review of the Hospice’s IQIES account on 8/18/2026 revealed hospice’s CCN and address was same as shown in Hospice’s TULIP account.An observation on 8/18/2026 at 11:10 AM revealed that the agency’s address was located in a professional building at Address A. Upon arrival, the surveyor observed a large white banner hanging on the building that read, “office space for lease.” The surveyor proceeded to walk to the main door of the office and knocked on the glass door three times. The door was locked, and there was no name or signage indicating the presence of the agency. Furthermore, no furniture could be seen inside, and no lights could be observed from the outside.On 8/18/2026 at 11:20 AM, the surveyor called the agency’s Phone #A as indicated in TULIP. A female individual answered the call and introduced herself as the office manager. The surveyor stated the purpose of the call and asked for the administrator. Office Manager #1 stated that she was the manager of the location at Address B and not at Address A, but noted that she would reach out to the staff at Address A because they might have been out in the community conducting visits. The surveyor stated that the office appeared to be permanently closed and even had a lease sign hanging on the building. Office Manager #1 did not respond to the statement directly but instead stated that she would either return the surveyor’s call herself or have another person do so.On 8/18/2026 at 11:55 AM, the Hospice Agency’s Regional Vice President of Operations (VP) called the surveyor. He stated that he had been informed that a state surveyor was at Address A attempting to conduct a survey, and he noted that the office “was not doing business anymore.” When the surveyor asked what had happened to the patients and the staff at Address A, VP stated that he would find out. He added that he was currently in the area and could meet the surveyor in 30 minutes. He further noted that he would not be able to let the surveyor inside the office because it was closed. The surveyor agreed to the meeting.An interview was conducted on 8/18/2026 at approximately 12:30 PM on the sidewalk beside Address A. During the interview, VP stated that the agency’s office at Address A had been no longer in business since March of 2026, and that there were no patients. VP added that the agency had been unable to change the location because the agency’s account in PECOS (which is the secure online database and management system operated by CMS) had been locked since December of 2025. VP further noted that agency Address A and Address B were supposed to have been merged into a single office. The agency had tried to notify HHSC, but because the PECOS account was locked out, it did not allow them to change the address. When the surveyor asked for the contact information of the Administrator and Alternate Administrator listed on the agency’s TULIP account, VP stated that they no longer worked for the company. VP did not state the exact date the administrative staff had left the agency, but added that, as of that moment, the agency was in the process of replacing them.On 8/18/2026 at around 12:50 pm the surveyor handed the letters of Inability to Perform a Federal and State Survey by an HHSC representative and had VP signed the “Acknowledgement of Receipt” forms. Surveyor informed VP that surveyor will still be in the area until about 1:10 pm to wait for the 2 hours arrival window.Surveyor left the location Address A at 1:10 PM unable to conduct a recertification survey and therefore unable to verify if the Hospice routinely provides substantially all core services in a manner consistent with acceptable standards of practice including nursing services, medical social services and counseling.””

    Rule L0594. Standard-level.

  • Counseling services (42 CFR 418.64(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 854 words

    “Based on observation, records reviews, and interviews, the hospice failed to provide counselling to the patients and patient’s family and failed to ensure counselling services met the needs of the patient as identified in the patient’s initial assessment, comprehensive assessment, and updated assessments. In that, An attempted visit was made on 8/18/2026 at Address A and the hospice failed to provide entry to HHSC to survey and ensure agency compliance with this regulation. This failure places patients at risk of not having their counselling services met or their services not being appropriately supervised and places potential patients and families at risk of not receiving the counselling needed during the patients’ end of life. Review of hospice’s account page in Texas Unified license Information Portal (TULIP - a database utilized by the State of Texas to maintain licensing, demographic information, complaints, and self-reported incidents for home health and hospice agencies) on 08/18/2026 at 8:00am revealed hospice Agency’s contact information as: Hospice A’s address, Hospice’s phone# A, Hospice’s operational hours as 11am – 5pm. Monday through Friday and Hospice CCN. The hospice as an ADS in Address# B and a Phone# B.Further review of the agency’s information revealed Deemed Status expired on 8/14/2026.Review of the Hospice’s IQIES account on 8/18/2026 revealed hospice’s CCN and address was same as shown in Hospice’s TULIP account.An observation on 8/18/2026 at 11:10 AM revealed that the agency’s address was located in a professional building at Address A. Upon arrival, the surveyor observed a large white banner hanging on the building that read, “office space for lease.” The surveyor proceeded to walk to the main door of the office and knocked on the glass door three times. The door was locked, and there was no name or signage indicating the presence of the agency. Furthermore, no furniture could be seen inside, and no lights could be observed from the outside.On 8/18/2026 at 11:20 AM, the surveyor called the agency’s Phone #A as indicated in TULIP. A female individual answered the call and introduced herself as the office manager. The surveyor stated the purpose of the call and asked for the administrator. Office Manager #1 stated that she was the manager of the location at Address B and not at Address A, but noted that she would reach out to the staff at Address A because they might have been out in the community conducting visits. The surveyor stated that the office appeared to be permanently closed and even had a lease sign hanging on the building. Office Manager #1 did not respond to the statement directly but instead stated that she would either return the surveyor’s call herself or have another person do so.On 8/18/2026 at 11:55 AM, the Hospice Agency’s Regional Vice President of Operations (VP) called the surveyor. He stated that he had been informed that a state surveyor was at Address A attempting to conduct a survey, and he noted that the office “was not doing business anymore.” When the surveyor asked what had happened to the patients and the staff at Address A, VP stated that he would find out. He added that he was currently in the area and could meet the surveyor in 30 minutes. He further noted that he would not be able to let the surveyor inside the office because it was closed. The surveyor agreed to the meeting.An interview was conducted on 8/18/2026 at approximately 12:30 PM on the sidewalk beside Address A. During the interview, VP stated that the agency’s office at Address A had been no longer in business since March of 2026, and that there were no patients. VP added that the agency had been unable to change the location because the agency’s account in PECOS (which is the secure online database and management system operated by CMS) had been locked since December of 2025. VP further noted that agency Address A and Address B were supposed to have been merged into a single office. The agency had tried to notify HHSC, but because the PECOS account was locked out, it did not allow them to change the address. When the surveyor asked for the contact information of the Administrator and Alternate Administrator listed on the agency’s TULIP account, VP stated that they no longer worked for the company. VP did not state the exact date the administrative staff had left the agency, but added that, as of that moment, the agency was in the process of replacing them.On 8/18/2026 at around 12:50 pm the surveyor handed the letters of Inability to Perform a Federal and State Survey by an HHSC representative and had VP signed the “Acknowledgement of Receipt” forms. Surveyor informed VP that surveyor will still be in the area until about 1:10 pm to wait for the 2 hours arrival window.Surveyor left the location Address A at 1:10 PM unable to conduct a recertification survey and therefore unable to verify if the Hospice made counseling services available to the patient and family to assist the patient and family in minimizing the stress and problems that arise from the terminal illness, related conditions, and the dying process.””

    Rule L0595. Standard-level.

  • Services (42 CFR 418.100(c)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 892 words

    “Based on observation, records reviews, and interviews, the hospice failed to be engaged in providing Nursing services, Medical social services, Physician services, Counseling services including spiritual counseling, dietary counseling, and bereavement counseling, Hospice aide, volunteer, and homemaker services, Physical therapy, occupational therapy, and speech-language pathology services, Short-term inpatient care, Medical supplies (including drugs and biologicals) and medical appliances in accordance with acceptable standards. In that:An attempted visit was made on 8/18/2026 at Address A and the hospice failed to provide entry to HHSC to survey and ensure agency compliance with this regulation. This failure hindered HHSC Survey process and placed hospice patients at risk of receiving substandard hospice care and services. Review of hospice’s account page in Texas Unified license Information Portal (TULIP - a database utilized by the State of Texas to maintain licensing, demographic information, complaints, and self-reported incidents for home health and hospice agencies) on 08/18/2026 at 8:00am revealed hospice Agency’s contact information as: Hospice A’s address, Hospice’s phone# A, Hospice’s operational hours as 11am – 5pm. Monday through Friday and Hospice CCN. The hospice as an ADS in Address# B and a Phone# B.Further review of the agency’s information revealed Deemed Status expired on 8/14/2026.Review of the Hospice’s IQIES account on 8/18/2026 revealed hospice’s CCN and address was same as shown in Hospice’s TULIP account.An observation on 8/18/2026 at 11:10 AM revealed that the agency’s address was located in a professional building at Address A. Upon arrival, the surveyor observed a large white banner hanging on the building that read, “office space for lease.” The surveyor proceeded to walk to the main door of the office and knocked on the glass door three times. The door was locked, and there was no name or signage indicating the presence of the agency. Furthermore, no furniture could be seen inside, and no lights could be observed from the outside.On 8/18/2026 at 11:20 AM, the surveyor called the agency’s Phone #A as indicated in TULIP. A female individual answered the call and introduced herself as the office manager. The surveyor stated the purpose of the call and asked for the administrator. Office Manager #1 stated that she was the manager of the location at Address B and not at Address A, but noted that she would reach out to the staff at Address A because they might have been out in the community conducting visits. The surveyor stated that the office appeared to be permanently closed and even had a lease sign hanging on the building. Office Manager #1 did not respond to the statement directly but instead stated that she would either return the surveyor’s call herself or have another person do so.On 8/18/2026 at 11:55 AM, the Hospice Agency’s Regional Vice President of Operations (VP) called the surveyor. He stated that he had been informed that a state surveyor was at Address A attempting to conduct a survey, and he noted that the office “was not doing business anymore.” When the surveyor asked what had happened to the patients and the staff at Address A, VP stated that he would find out. He added that he was currently in the area and could meet the surveyor in 30 minutes. He further noted that he would not be able to let the surveyor inside the office because it was closed. The surveyor agreed to the meeting.An interview was conducted on 8/18/2026 at approximately 12:30 PM on the sidewalk beside Address A. During the interview, VP stated that the agency’s office at Address A had been no longer in business since March of 2026, and that there were no patients. VP added that the agency had been unable to change the location because the agency’s account in PECOS (which is the secure online database and management system operated by CMS) had been locked since December of 2025. VP further noted that agency Address A and Address B were supposed to have been merged into a single office. The agency had tried to notify HHSC, but because the PECOS account was locked out, it did not allow them to change the address. When the surveyor asked for the contact information of the Administrator and Alternate Administrator listed on the agency’s TULIP account, VP stated that they no longer worked for the company. VP did not state the exact date the administrative staff had left the agency, but added that, as of that moment, the agency was in the process of replacing them.On 8/18/2026 at around 12:50 pm the surveyor handed the letters of Inability to Perform a Federal and State Survey by an HHSC representative and had VP signed the “Acknowledgement of Receipt” forms. Surveyor informed VP that surveyor will still be in the area until about 1:10 pm to wait for the 2 hours arrival window.Surveyor left the location Address A at 1:10 PM unable to conduct a recertification survey “and therefore unable to verify that the Hospice was primarily engaged in providing the following care and services and in a manner that is consistent with accepted standards of practice: (i) Nursing services. (ii) Medical social services. (iii) Physician services. (iv) Counseling services, including spiritual counseling, dietary counseling, and bereavement counseling. (v) Hospice aide, volunteer, and homemaker services. (vi) Physical therapy, occupational therapy, and speech-language pathology services. (vii) Short-term inpatient care. (viii) Medical supplies (including drugs and biologicals) and medical appliances.””

    Rule L0652. Standard-level.

  • Services (42 CFR 418.100(c)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 835 words

    “Based on observation, records reviews, and interviews, the hospice failed to ensure nursing services, physician services, drugs and biologicals routinely available to patients on a 24-hour basis 7 days a week. In that: An attempted visit was made on 8/18/2026 at Address A and the hospice failed to provide entry to HHSC to survey and ensure agency compliance with this regulation. This failure hindered HHSC Survey process and placed hospice patients at risk of receiving substandard hospice care and services. Review of hospice’s account page in Texas Unified license Information Portal (TULIP - a database utilized by the State of Texas to maintain licensing, demographic information, complaints, and self-reported incidents for home health and hospice agencies) on 08/18/2026 at 8:00am revealed hospice Agency’s contact information as: Hospice A’s address, Hospice’s phone# A, Hospice’s operational hours as 11am – 5pm. Monday through Friday and Hospice CCN. The hospice as an ADS in Address# B and a Phone# B.Further review of the agency’s information revealed Deemed Status expired on 8/14/2026.Review of the Hospice’s IQIES account on 8/18/2026 revealed hospice’s CCN and address was same as shown in Hospice’s TULIP account.An observation on 8/18/2026 at 11:10 AM revealed that the agency’s address was located in a professional building at Address A. Upon arrival, the surveyor observed a large white banner hanging on the building that read, “office space for lease.” The surveyor proceeded to walk to the main door of the office and knocked on the glass door three times. The door was locked, and there was no name or signage indicating the presence of the agency. Furthermore, no furniture could be seen inside, and no lights could be observed from the outside.On 8/18/2026 at 11:20 AM, the surveyor called the agency’s Phone #A as indicated in TULIP. A female individual answered the call and introduced herself as the office manager. The surveyor stated the purpose of the call and asked for the administrator. Office Manager #1 stated that she was the manager of the location at Address B and not at Address A, but noted that she would reach out to the staff at Address A because they might have been out in the community conducting visits. The surveyor stated that the office appeared to be permanently closed and even had a lease sign hanging on the building. Office Manager #1 did not respond to the statement directly but instead stated that she would either return the surveyor’s call herself or have another person do so.On 8/18/2026 at 11:55 AM, the Hospice Agency’s Regional Vice President of Operations (VP) called the surveyor . He stated that he had been informed that a state surveyor was at Address A attempting to conduct a survey, and he noted that the office “was not doing business anymore.” When the surveyor asked what had happened to the patients and the staff at Address A, VP stated that he would find out. He added that he was currently in the area and could meet the surveyor in 30 minutes. He further noted that he would not be able to let the surveyor inside the office because it was closed. The surveyor agreed to the meeting.An interview was conducted on 8/18/2026 at approximately 12:30 PM on the sidewalk beside Address A. During the interview, VP stated that the agency’s office at Address A had been no longer in business since March of 2026, and that there were no patients. VP added that the agency had been unable to change the location because the agency’s account in PECOS (which is the secure online database and management system operated by CMS) had been locked since December of 2025. VP further noted that agency Address A and Address B were supposed to have been merged into a single office. The agency had tried to notify HHSC, but because the PECOS account was locked out, it did not allow them to change the address. When the surveyor asked for the contact information of the Administrator and Alternate Administrator listed on the agency’s TULIP account, VP stated that they no longer worked for the company. VP did not state the exact date the administrative staff had left the agency, but added that, as of that moment, the agency was in the process of replacing them.On 8/18/2026 at around 12:50 pm the surveyor handed the letters of Inability to Perform a Federal and State Survey by an HHSC representative and had VP signed the “Acknowledgement of Receipt” forms. Surveyor informed VP that surveyor will still be in the area until about 1:10 pm to wait for the 2 hours arrival window.Surveyor left the location Address A at 1:10 PM unable to conduct a recertification survey and therefore unable to verify that nursing services, physician services, and drugs and biologicals (as specified in §418.106) were made routinely available on a 24-hour basis 7 days a week and other covered services were made available on a 24-hour basis when reasonable and necessary to meet the needs of the patient and family.””

    Rule L0653. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Aug 18, 2026Recertification inspection by the state7 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Aug 14, 2023.
  • CMS doesn’t list its type of ownership.
  • Cited at in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • CMS hasn’t published nursing time from Medicare claims for this hospice.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • 6 owners or officers are people: Nidhu Narayan Kurup (owns 5% or more directly, 100%); Nidhu Narayan Kurup (corporate officer, 100%); Nidhu Narayan Kurup (corporate director, 100%); Nidhu Narayan Kurup (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); Vijay Korimilli (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); Joel Ada (managing employee (on the payroll)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS gives no Hospice Care Index for this hospice.
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 69 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 77063, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 5.5; this one had 7.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.