Hearth Record

Brytelyte Homecare LLC

A hospice in Houston, Texas 77063

9950 Westpark Dr Ste 440, Houston, Texas 77063. (800) 960-1415.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.

The last 24 months 13 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Oct 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

13 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 69 hospices serving ZIP code 77063 had 5.5.

The last inspection on record was on Oct 10, 2024: an initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

13 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Oct 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

13 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Oct 10, 2024: initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care13 deficiencies
  • Timeframe for completion of assessment (42 CFR 418.54(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 111 words

    “Upon patient record review 8 of 16 (Patient #1, #2, #3,#4,#6, #10, #11, #12) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice interdisciplinary group, in consultation with the individual’s attending physician (if any), completed the comprehensive assessment no later than 5 calendar days after the election of hospice care. Patient #1, #3, #4, #6, #10: There was no evidence of a psychosocial assessment completed within 5 days of the admission. Patient #2, #12: There was no evidence of a psychosocial assessment or spiritual assessment completed within 5 days of the admission. Patient #11: There was no evidence of a spiritual assessment completed within 5 days of the admission.”

    Rule L0523. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 188 words

    “Upon patient record review, 4 of 16 (Patient #2,#4,#5, #9) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions • Duplicate drug therapy • Drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring Patient #2: The MD recertification narrative indicated the patient was using oxygen at 2L per NC. However, there was no evidence of O2 2L per NC on the medication profile. Patient #4: The written Cert by the MD indicated the patient was on O2 2L NC. There was no evidence of O2 on the medication profile. Patient #5: Per the MD Cert and the admission assessment both dated 4-7-23, the patient was using O2 up to 3L per NC. There was no evidence of O2 on the medication profile. Patient #9: Per the MD Cert on 05-07-24 the patient was using O2 at 2L NC. There was no evidence that O2 was on the medication profile.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(7))

    The inspectors’ words, 100 words

    “Upon patient record review, 5 of 16 (Patient #2, #3, #4, #6, #12) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment includes a bereavement component which includes the needs of the patient’s family and other individuals focusing on the social, spiritual, and cultural factors that may impact their ability to cope with the patient’s death. Information gathered from the initial bereavement assessment is incorporated into the plan of care and is considered in the bereavement plan of care. Patient #2, #3, #4, #6, #12: There was no evidence of a bereavement assessment completed within 5 days.”

    Rule L0531. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    “Upon patient record review, 4 of 16 (Patient #4,#5,#6,#9) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient #4,#5,#6,#9: The HIS indicated a bowel regimen was part of the plan of care and emergency kit was ordered, but there was no evidence of an order for stool softner.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 94 words

    “Upon patient record review 1 of 16 (Patient #2) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a Registered Nurse made an on-site visit to the patient’s home no less frequently than every 14 days to assess the quality of care and services provided by the hospice aide and to ensure that services ordered by the hospice interdisciplinary group meet the patient’s needs. Patient #2:There was no evidence of an aide supervisory visit by the RN after 06/04/24 until 08/05/24 while the aide continued to visit the patient 2 x per week.”

    Rule L0629. Standard-level.

  • Initial certification of terminal illness (42 CFR 418.102(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 129 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 16 (Patient #8) did not have evidence that the medical director or physician designee provides written certification that it is anticipated that the patient’s life expectancy is 6 months or less if the illness runs its normal course. The physician must consider the following when making this determination: • The primary terminal condition • Related diagnosis • Current subjective and objective medical findings • Current medication and treatment orders • Information about the medical management of any of the patient’s conditions unrelated to the terminal illness Patient #8: There was no evidence of a narrative which included subjective and objective clinical findings, current medication and treatment orders, or medical management of the patient’s condition on the written certification for BP 02-14-22 - 05-14-22.”

    Rule L0667. Standard-level.

  • Recertification of the terminal illness (42 CFR 418.102(c))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 16 (Patient #13) did not have evidence that before the recertification period for each patient, the medical director or physician designee must review the patient’s clinical information and provide written documentation that it is anticipated that the patient’s life expectancy is 6 months or less. Patient #13: There was no evidence of a date after the MD signature on the written certification and F2F documentation for cert period starting 09-29-23.”

    Rule L0668. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(5))

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 16 (Patient #1,14) did not have evidence that each patient record contains Physician certification and recertification of terminal illness. Patient #1: There was no date evidenced after the MD signature on the verbal or written certification statements for the admission. Patient #14: There was no evidence of a date after the MD signature for cert period starting 05-06-24.”

    Rule L0676. Standard-level.

  • Authentication (42 CFR 418.104(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 97 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 16 (Patient #5,#11) did not have evidence that all entries are legible, clear, complete, and appropriately authenticated and dated in accordance with the organizations policies and procedures and currently accepted standards of practice. Electronic signatures are acceptable as long the hospice is following appropriate safeguards to prevent unauthorized access to the patient records. Patient #5: There was no evidence of a date for the MSW signature on the MSW assessment of 4-10-23. Patient #11: There was no evidence of a date after the signature of the MSW for assessment of 01-17-23.”

    Rule L0679. Standard-level.

  • Retention of records (42 CFR 418.104(d))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence of patient records were retained for a minimum of six years from the date of the most recent discharge or the death of the patient. Due to no active patients and no bereaved upon arrival at survey site, I asked client for records from last survey in 2021 which included a bereaved patient. The agency was unable to obtain the records before my departure instructing me that obtaining records from storage required 14 days advance notification.”

    Rule L0681. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 16 (Patient #4) did not have evidence that the hospice forwarded a summary and a copy of the patient record, if requested, to a facility when transferring the patient to that facility. Patient #4: There is no evidence the hospice forwarded a transfer summary to the transferring facility.”

    Rule L0682. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(2))

    “Upon patient record review, 4 of 16 (Patient #6, #7, #8, #14) did not have evidence that if a patient revokes the election of hospice care or is discharged from hospice in accordance with §418.26, the hospice must forward to the patient’s attending physician: • A copy of the hospice discharge summary • The patient’s clinical record, if requested Patient #6, #7, #8, #14: There is no evidence of a discharge summary forwarded to the attending physician.”

    Rule L0683. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(3))

    “Upon patient record review, 14 of 16 (Patient #1, #2, #3, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, #10, #11, #12, #13, #14, #15) did not have evidence that the discharge summary includes all required information. Patient #1, #2, #3, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, #10, #11, #12, #13 #14, #15: There is no evidence of a discharge summary that included a summary of care and treatments, or the latest MD orders.”

    Rule L0684. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Oct 10, 2024Initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care13 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Sep 3, 2021.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 0 nurse care minutes per routine home care day.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 100% at home.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day0.0 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekendsNot given
Visits near deathNot given

Who owns it?

  • CMS’s ownership file has no owners listed for this hospice.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS gives no Hospice Care Index for this hospice.
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 69 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 77063, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 5.5; this one had 13.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.