Hearth Record

Excellent Hospice and Palliative Care

A hospice in Houston, Texas 77084

18600 S Parkview Dr Apt 2124, Houston, Texas 77084. (800) 379-8952.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 5 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2025. Most serious: Condition-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
Condition-level deficiency
For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.

What did inspectors find?

5 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 111 hospices serving ZIP code 77084 had 5.

The last inspection on record was on Jul 28, 2025: a follow-up inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner.

1 deficiency at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

5 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2025. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

5 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Jun 18, 2025: reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner5 deficiencies
  • IDG, care planning, coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56)

    The inspectors’ words, 216 words

    “It is required that the hospice designates an Group or groups who, in consultation with the patient’s attending physician, prepare a written plan of care (POC) for each patient. The plan of care specifies the hospice care and services necessary to meet the specific needs of the patient and family identified in the comprehensive assessment, relative to the terminal illness and related conditions. THIS IS A CMS CONDITION LEVEL DEFICIENCY This CONDITION was not met as evidenced by a review of clinical records agency policy and interview revealed that the hospice failed to ensure that the designated registered nurse (RN) member of the IDG provided care coordination, continuous assessment of each patient’s and family’s needs, and the implementation of the interdisciplinary plan of care. [HCPC.19.I/418.56(a)/L540]; and that the IDT failed to review the individualized plan of care as frequently as the patient’s condition required, but no less than every 15 calendar days every fifteen days [HCPC.22.I/L552/418.56(d)]. The cumulative effect of these deficiencies has resulted in the hospice organization’s inability to ensure the provision of quality of care for the Condition of Participation CFR 418.56: Interdisciplinary Group, Care Planning, and Coordination of Services. The collective deficient practice illustrated systemic process failures that had the potential to affect all patients receiving hospice care and services from the agency.”

    Rule L0536. Condition-level.

  • Approach to service delivery (42 CFR 418.56(a))

    The inspectors’ words, 470 words

    “It is required that the hospice designates a registered nurse member of the IDG to provide coordination of care, ensure continuous assessment of each patient’s and family’s needs, and ensure the implementation of the interdisciplinary plan of care. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 3 of 4 (75%) clinical record review revealed the agency did not ensure that the designated registered nurse (RN) member of the IDG provided care coordination, continuous assessment of each patient’s and family’s needs, and the implementation of the interdisciplinary plan of care. CLINICAL RECORD 2: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 07/22/2022, benefit period 07/22/2022-10/19/2022, DX unspecified severe protein-calorie malnutrition. The following services were ordered: SN 1X week, Spiritual Counselor 1X month; and Social Worker 1X month. The RN completed the comprehensive assessment on 07/22/2022. The initial accreditation site visit ended on 07/28/2022. The clinical record review lacked evidence of an Interdisciplinary Group being conducted after July 20, 2022. There was no documented evidence of any visit activity, IDG review, care plan updates, or discharge plan documented from 07/23/2024 through the time of this review, on 06/30/2025. The clinical record review revealed no evidence that the designated RN coordinated care to ensure all disciplines provided the services ordered by the IDG (Interdisciplinary Group), ensured a continuous assessment of the patients’ and families’ needs, and ensured the implementation of the interdisciplinary plan of care and discharge plan. CLINICAL RECORD 3: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 06/13/2022, DX Hypertensive Heart Disease with Heart Failure. A discharge order included that this patient was discharged to a non-contracted facility on 08/02/022. The clinical record review lacked evidence of an Interdisciplinary Group being conducted after July 20, 2022, an updated plan of care, and a discharge plan. The clinical record review revealed no evidence that the designated RN provided care coordination for services ordered by the IDG ensured a continuous assessment of the patient’s needs, and implementation of the interdisciplinary plan of care and discharge plan. CLINICAL RECORD 4: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 06/13/2022, DX Hypertensive Heart Disease with Heart Failure. A discharge order included that the patient was discharged on 07/29/2022 following an emergency room visit. The clinical record review lacked evidence of an Interdisciplinary Group care plan updates or a discharge plan, and a discharge plan. The clinical record review revealed no evidence that the designated RN provided care coordination for discharge planning by the IDG, and implementation of the interdisciplinary plan of care. During an interview on 06/30/2025, the Director of Nurses (Personnel Record 6) stated that she does not know what happened to the clinical record of these patients, as she was not in management at the time. No additional documentation was presented before the conclusion of the site visit on 06/30/2025.”

    Rule L0540. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 433 words

    “It is required that the Interdisciplinary Group, in collaboration with the individual’s attending physician (if any), reviews, revises, and documents the individualized care plan no less frequently than every 15 calendar days. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 3 of 4 (75%) clinical record review of patients who elected the hospice benefit revealed the agency did not ensure that the Interdisciplinary Group reviewed, revised, and documented the individualized care plan as frequently as the patient’s condition required, but no less frequently than every 15 days. CLINICAL RECORD 2: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 07/22/2022, benefit period 07/22/2022-10/19/2022, DX Unspecified severe protein-calorie malnutrition. There was no documented evidence of any visit activity after the RN comprehensive assessment on 07/22/2022. There was no documented evidence that the Interdisciplinary Group meeting was held conducted after July 20, 2022. The clinical record review revealed that this patient is no longer active; however, there was no documentation of any visit activity after the initial comprehensive assessment on 07/22/2022; or a discharge plan from 07/23/2022 to the time of this site visit on 06/30/2025. There was no documented evidence that the IDG reviewed, or updated the care plan at least every 15 days. CLINICAL RECORD 3: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 06/13/2022, DX Hypertensive Heart Disease with Heart Failure. A discharge order included that this patient was discharged to a non-contracted facility on 08/02/022. There was no documented evidence of any visit activity after the initial comprehensive survey ended on 06/18/2022. There was no documented evidence that the Interdisciplinary Group meeting was held conducted after July 20, 2022. The clinical record review did not contain evidence that the Interdisciplinary Group updated or revised the plan of care to support the discharge prior to the discharge. CLINICAL RECORD 4: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 06/13/2022, DX Hypertensive Heart Disease with Heart Failure. A discharge order included that the patient was discharged on 07/29/2022 following an emergency room visit. There was no documented evidence of any visit activity or a discharge plan after the initial comprehensive survey ended on 06/18/2022. The clinical record review did not contain evidence that the Interdisciplinary Group updated or revised the plan of care to support the discharge prior to the discharge. During an interview on 06/30/2025, The Director of Nurses (Personnel Record 6) stated that she does not know what happened to the clinical record of these patients, as she was not in management at the time. No additional documentation was presented before the conclusion of the site visit on 06/30/2025.”

    Rule L0552. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(2)(i))

    The inspectors’ words, 281 words

    “It is required that if a patient revokes the election of hospice care or is discharged from hospice per hospice regulation §418.26 (i.e., no longer terminally ill), the hospice forwards to the patient’s attending physician a copy of the hospice discharge summary and the patient’s record, if requested. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 3 of 3 (100%) applicable records reviewed for patient’s who were discharged live from Hospice care revealed that the hospice did not ensure that the discharge summary was forwarded the attending physician. CLINICAL RECORD 2: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 07/22/2022. There was not evidence of a discharge summary and discharge date. There was no documentation that mentioned a discharge plan, of an actual discharge date. it was unknown when the patient was discharged. The clinical record did not contain evidence that a discharge summary was sent to the attending physician. CLINICAL RECORD 3: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 06/13/2022. The patient was discharged to a non-contracted facility on 08/02/2022. The clinical record did not contain evidence that a discharge summary was sent to the attending physician. CLINICAL RECORD 4: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 06/13/2022. The patient was discharged on 7/29/2022 following an emergency room visit. The clinical record did not contain evidence that a discharge summary was sent to the physician. During an interview on 06/30/2025, the Director of Nurses (Personnel Record 6) stated that she does not know what happened to the clinical records of these patients, as she was not in management at the time. No additional documentation was presented before the conclusion of the site visit on 06/30/2025.”

    Rule L0683. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(3)(i))

    The inspectors’ words, 280 words

    “It is required that the hospice discharge summary provided a facility receiving a hospice patient for care—or to the patient’s community attending physician upon hospice discharge—includes at least the following a summary of the patient’s hospice stay, including treatments, symptoms, and pain management, the patient’s current plan of care, the patient’s latest physician orders, and any other documentation that will assist in the post-discharge continuity of care or that is requested by the receiving facility or the attending physician. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 3 of 3 (100%) applicable records reviewed for patients requiring a discharge summary revealed that the hospice did not ensure that a discharge summary was completed. CLINICAL RECORD 2: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 07/22/2022. The discharge date was unknown and was not documented in the clinical record. There was no documented evidence that the discharge summary was completed. CLINICAL RECORD 3: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 06/13/2022. The patient was discharged on 08/02/2022 to a non-contracted facility. There was no documented evidence that the discharge summary was completed. CLINICAL RECORD 4: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 06/13/2022, and it is unknown when the patient was discharged. The patient was discharged on 07/29/2022 following a visit to the emergency room. There was no documented evidence that the discharge summary was completed. During an interview on 06/30/2025, the Director of Nurses (Personnel Record 6) stated that she does not know what happened to the clinical record of these patients, as she was not in management at the time. No additional documentation was presented before the conclusion of the site visit on 06/30/2025.”

    Rule L0684. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jul 28, 2025Follow-up inspection by the Community Health Accreditation PartnerNo deficiencies cited
Jun 18, 2025Reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner5 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Jul 28, 2022.
  • CMS doesn’t list its type of ownership.
  • Cited at in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • CMS hasn’t published nursing time from Medicare claims for this hospice.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 100% at home.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • CMS’s ownership file has no owners listed for this hospice.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS gives no Hospice Care Index for this hospice.
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 111 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 77084, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 5; this one had 5.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.