Hearth Record

Amary Comfort Care, Inc.

A hospice in Houston, Texas 77099

10518 Kipp Way Drive Suite A-1, Houston, Texas 77099. (281) 495-3900.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 26 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2026. Most serious: Condition-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
Condition-level deficiency
For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.

What did inspectors find?

26 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 85 hospices serving ZIP code 77099 had 5.

The last inspection on record was on Apr 22, 2026: a follow-up inspection by The Joint Commission.

5 deficiencies at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

26 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2026. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

26 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Apr 22, 2026: follow-up inspection by The Joint Commission1 deficiency
  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(1)(i))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 1 discharge records reviewed, the hospice surveyor noted that in the discharged chart reviewed no information was sent to the receiving facility. In review of DCRR#1 the patient daughter wanted to discontinue services. The organization did not send a discharge summary to the receiving facility that the patient was going to be staying in. This was discussed with the Director of Nursing and the Administrator.”

    Rule L0682. Standard-level.

Mar 12, 2026: reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission25 deficiencies
  • Quality assessment & performance improvement (42 CFR 418.58)

    The inspectors’ words, 123 words

    “Observed in Leadership Session. In review of QAPI plan and meeting minutes it was noted that the QAPI program did not focus on indicators that are related to improved palliative outcomes. For example, there was no data to support that palliative outcomes were identified or measured. In every area identified as criteria for review the following statement was noted, Continue to review the program quarterly as part of the QAPI program and report to the QAPI committee biannually and the Governing Body annually. There was no evidence that the reviews or audits were conducted for example, on any HR files, Pt. Satisfaction, Hospice Aide services, Counseling services, discharges or revocations or any Patient Quality Indicators. This was reviewed with all leadership and staff.”

    Rule L0559. Condition-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 292 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 4 of 8 patient records reviewed, it was noted that in record review for home visit #2 the aide plan of care was not updated to include an increase in visit frequency from 3 to 5 times per week and did not accurately reflect the patient’s ability to get up to the shower, etc., be transferred, etc as the patient was assessed to be bedbound at start of care. Additionally, the aide care plan indicated that the patient was to be on Standard precautions as well as droplet, contact and airborne precautions and that the diet was to be a regular diet. There was no order or indication for any infection control precautions for this patient and he was on a pureed diet. Lastly the patient was using oxygen on a PRN basis however oxygen precautions were not checked on the aide plan of care. In record review for home visit #3 the most recent aide care plan did not include any type of bath assignment and indicated that the patient was on a tube feeding. The aide was observed performing a bed bath and the patient did not have a g-tube or other tube feeding. In record review #3 it was noted that the aide plan of care for the most recert certification period did not contain a bath assignment. In review of record #5 it was noted that the RN did not complete an aide assignment prior to the aide services beginning. For example, the nurse prepared the aide care plan five days after the aide began providing care. Additionally, once completed the aide assignment was inaccurate and listed appliances, activities and bath that were inappropriate for this patient. This was discussed with the administrator.”

    Rule L0625. Condition-level.

  • Governing body and administrator (42 CFR 418.100(b))

    “Observed in Tracer Activities. The governing body/leadership did not ensure that the following Conditions of Participation were met as determined through observations, documentation and staff interviews: 418.58, 418.76, 418.78, 418.100, 418.104.”

    Rule L0651. Condition-level.

  • Clinical records (42 CFR 418.104)

    The inspectors’ words, 349 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 9 of 12 patient records reviewed, it was noted that the patient records were not maintained in accordance with the standards of practice. For example, in record reviews for HV #1. 2. 3 there were discrepancies in the plan of care, medication profile and frequencies. In DC record reviews #1 and #2 there were incomplete forms, undated forms, and documentation for supervisory visits where there was no aide ordered. In record review for home visit #3 specifically, the patient level of care was documented as continuous care however the patient was on routine care, documentation on the aide care plan stated that the patient had a tube feeding and lived in her home however the patient did not have a g-tube and lived in an ALF and the most current aide care plan did not include any bath assignment, however a complete bed bath visit was observed on survey day two. In record review #1 it was noted that the documentation indicated that the patient was on continuous care however the patient was receiving routine hospice care. In record review #3 there current aide plan of care did not indicate any bath type and therefore the aide notes did not indicate a bath was given however upon discussion with the aide it was noted that a bed bath is given each visit. In record review #4 it was noted that the recertification nursing assessment indicated that the patient was a male however the patient was female. it was noted in DC record review #2 that the RN documented supervisory visits for a specific hospice aide however there were no aide services being provided. In record review #5 it was noted that the aide plan of care indicated a shower was to be given, that the patient had an ostomy, that the patient used a hoyer lift, was able to use a bedpan and dangle at the bedside. None of these items were accurate for this bedbound patient following kyphoplasty surgery and with no ostomy. This was discussed with the director of nursing and administrator.”

    Rule L0670. Condition-level.

  • Federal, state, local laws & regulations (42 CFR 418.116)

    The inspectors’ words, 112 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 7 of 12 patient records reviewed, it was noted that documentation did not support the patient’s right to informed decision making. For example in DCRR#2, the revocation form did not include any documentation of why the patient was revoking and although signed by the POA and nurse, it was not dated. Additionally in this record the ABN form was signed and dated at the start of care. In records for home visit #3 and record reviews #1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 the ABN form was filled in with reasons for discharge and signed and dated at the start of care. This was discussed with the administrator.”

    Rule L0797. Condition-level.

  • EP Testing Requirements (42 CFR 418.113(d)(3)(iii))

    “Observed in Leadership Session. During review of EM plan and discussion with leadership and office staff it was noted that there was no documentation of any evaluation or critique of the exercises to identify opportunities for improvement.”

    Rule E0039. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 219 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 6 of 12 patient records reviewed, it was noted that the plan of care did not include measurable/timed goals. For example, in review of record for HV#1 the following goals were stated, Pt/Cg will verbalize a plan for preventing impaired skin integrity and acute confusion will be reduced to manageable level and Patient/caregiver will verbalize understanding of ordered medications including side effects, importance of taking medications as ordered, and effects to report immediately to health care provider. In record review for HV#2 the following is an example of a goal, Patient will have acute confusion/agitated behaviors reduced to manageable level within the limits of the disease. In HV#3, the following is an example of a goal, Patient/caregivers will verbalize understanding of changing ADL assistance needs with disease progression., however the patient has been bedbound for years with little to no change in ability to perform ADL’s. Additionally for this patient, her primary issue is skin integrity in the perineal area however this problem is not identified on the plan of care. In record review #1 the following goal was stated: Caregivers will demonstrate safe and effective ADL care for patient needs. In record review #2 the following goal was stated: Caregivers will manage incontinence of bowel and/or bladder. This was discussed with the administrator.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(2))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 8 patient records reviewed, with hospice aide services it was noted in review of record for home visit #2 that the plan of care for aide frequencies was incorrect. For example, on the initial plan of care the aide frequency was stated as 3 week 14, 5 week 13. The intended frequency was 3 wk 1, 1 wk 13. This was discussed with administrator.”

    Rule L0547. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 148 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 3 of 12 patient records reviewed, it was noted that in review of record for home visit #2 the plan of care did not include all pertinent information or diagnosis. For example, the only diagnosis was stated as Alzheimer’s disease however during the patient visit the caregiver wife stated that the patient had COPD, Asthma and Emphysema during a bout of coughing observed during the visit, additionally the caregiver stated the patient used oxygen PRN however there were no orders for oxygen in the record. In another example, in review of record #2 it was noted that there were no orders wound care that was documented as performed by the nurse on her recertification assessment. In record review #2 and #6 the order for oxygen was incomplete and did not contain the frequency or route of delivery. This was discussed with the administrator.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Program data (42 CFR 418.58(b)(2)(i))

    “Observed in Document Review. During review of documents it was noted that the organization did not use data to monitor the effectiveness of the program or quality of the care. For example the infection data was inaccurate and not relevant and the occurrence data was also inaccurate. This was confirmed by the leadership.”

    Rule L0564. Standard-level.

  • Executive responsibilities (42 CFR 418.58(e)(2))

    “Observed in Leadership Session. In review of QAPI plan and meeting minutes it was noted that the plan was not organization wide as evidenced by there being no data for the bereavement program, contracted services, DME, and Pharmacy or Volunteer services. This was discussed with the administrator.”

    Rule L0575. Standard-level.

  • Control (42 CFR 418.60(b)(2)(i))

    “Observed in Document Review. In review of infection data reported it was noted that the organization did not appropriately identify infections. For example, chronic constipation was reported as a bowel movement infection. All skin rashes were reported as infections, all wounds were reported as infections without cultures or any evidence of infection. This was discussed with the administrator.”

    Rule L0581. Standard-level.

  • Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(1)(i))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 8 patient records reviewed, with aide services, it was noted that supervisory visits were not made every 14 days. For example, in the past three months there were three different instances, one 17 day period, one 27 day period and one 15 day period. This was discussed with the administrator.”

    Rule L0629. Standard-level.

  • Training (42 CFR 418.78(a))

    “Observed in HR File Review. In review of the only volunteer file it was noted that there was no documentation of any hospice volunteer training, no certificate etc.in the HR file. This was confirmed by the HR staff and discussed with the administrator.”

    Rule L0643. Standard-level.

  • Recruiting and retaining (42 CFR 418.78(c))

    “Observed in Document Review. During discussion with leadership and volunteer coordinator, it was noted that there was no documentation of any recruitment activities over the past three years. This was discussed with the administrator.”

    Rule L0645. Standard-level.

  • Cost saving (42 CFR 418.78(d)(3))

    “Observed in Document Review. During document review and in discussion with leadership staff it was noted that there had been no estimates of the dollar costs that the hospice would have incurred if paid employees occupied the positions over the past three years.”

    Rule L0646. Standard-level.

  • Level of activity (42 CFR 418.78(e))

    “Observed in Document Review. During review of documents and in discussion with leadership staff it was noted that there was no documentation available for the past three years to indicate that volunteer hours equaled or exceeded 5 percent of the total patient care hours of all paid hospice employees and contract staff.”

    Rule L0647. Standard-level.

  • Training (42 CFR 418.100(g)(3))

    “Observed in HR File Review. In 1 of 9 HR files reviewed, it was noted that the medical director competency was last completed in 2022. This was discussed with the administrator.”

    Rule L0663. Standard-level.

  • Initial certification of terminal illness (42 CFR 418.102(b))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 12 patient records reviewed, it was noted that the certification of terminal illness on initial certification was a copy and paste of the admitting nurse narrative note to include receiving the patient on a stretcher and will meet with the wound care nurse on Thursday and did not include physician subjective or objective medical findings or any information about the medical management of the patient’s conditions unrelated to the terminal condition. This was discussed with the administrator.”

    Rule L0667. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 343 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 3 of 8 patient records reviewed, records reviewed with hospice aide services it was noted that the hospice aide visit documentation was inaccurate. For example, in 3 of 3 aide notes reviewed for home visit #2 the documentation indicated that the following baths were performed during the visit; tub, shower, bed bath, chair bath indicated by a check mark in all areas. In review of record for home visit #3 review of 3 of 3 aide notes it was noted that the following baths were performed; bed, shower, chair. In record #5, in 3 of 3 aide notes reviewed indicated that the following baths were performed during the visit; tub, shower, bed bath, chair bath indicated by a check mark in all areas. This was reviewed with the alternate administrator/alt director of nursing. Observed in Patient Home. In 3 of 3 home visits conducted, it was noted that for home visits #1 and #2 the record did not contain accurate medication reconciliation. For example, in record review for HV #1 it was noted that the medication profile stated Lorazepam 1 mg give 1 tablet every 4 hours PRN agitation however the bottle in the home stated Lorazepam 0.5 mg give 1 or 2 tablets every 2 hours PRN. Additionally, the medication profile stated Mirtazipine daily however the wife stated that this mediation was discontinued one month ago. In review of record for HV#2 it was noted that the patient was taking Zinc supplements and Iron supplements daily however neither was on the medication profile. Additionally the mediation profile indicate that the patient was taking Allopurinol however the wife stated that it had been discontinued a week or two ago. In home visit #3 it was noted that the medication profile stated Nystatin Cream was to be applied twice daily. The caregiver stated they did not have any creams to apply however they were using Nystat powder to the vaginal area and this was not on the medication sheet. This was discussed with the administrator and Director of Nursing.”

    Rule L0674. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(1)(ii))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 2 patient records reviewed, it was noted that in both discharged charts reviewed no information was sent to the receiving facility. In review of DCRR#1 the patient was transferred to another hospice per pt. request and no information was sent. In review of DCRR#2 the patient was transferred to the hospital following revocation however no information was sent to the receiving facility. This was discussed with the Director of Nursing.”

    Rule L0682. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(2))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 2 patient records reviewed, it was noted in record review for DC RR #2 that there was no documented discharge summary therefore it was not sent to the physician. This was discussed with the administrator.”

    Rule L0683. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(3)(i))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 2 patient records reviewed, it was noted in record review for DC RR #2 that the discharge summary was not a summary of the patient’s stay including treatments, symptoms and pain management. The only documentation was a narrative statement of the diagnosis and comorbities and where the patient was transferred. In DCRR#1 it was noted that there was no discharge summary documented. This was discussed with the administrator.”

    Rule L0684. Standard-level.

  • Retrieval of clinical records (42 CFR 418.104(f))

    The inspectors’ words, 104 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 6 of 12 patient records reviewed, it was noted that in record reviews #1, 3, 4, 5 and 7 as well as record review for home visit #3 it was noted that there was documentation in the record of a form entitled No Primary Caregiver which indicated that the patient lived alone and had no primary caregiver however all of these patients lived with family members or private round the clock caregivers. The forms were all signed and dated by the patient or POA, the nurse and dated. This was discussed with the administrator and alternate director of nurses.”

    Rule L0685. Standard-level.

  • Criminal background checks (42 CFR 418.114(d)(1))

    “Observed in Document Review. In 1 of 6 contracts reviewed, it was noted that in review of the contract with Tallwood Home Medical Equipment the contract did not contain a stipulation that the outside agency will complete criminal background checks on contracted employees who provide direct patient care or have access to patient records. This was discussed with the Administrator,”

    Rule L0795. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Apr 22, 2026Follow-up inspection by The Joint Commission1 deficiency cited
Mar 12, 2026Reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission25 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Feb 28, 2023.
  • CMS doesn’t list its type of ownership.
  • Cited at in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 9.5 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 10.8% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 77.8% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 85% at home, 15% in assisted living.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day9.5 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends10.8%
Visits near death77.8% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • 8 owners or officers are people: Susan Santos (corporate officer, 100%); Susan Santos (corporate director, 100%); Henry Santos (runs it (operational or managerial control), 100%); Lilibeth Williamson (corporate director, 20%); Lilibeth Williamson (managing employee (on the payroll)); Maricar P Euceda (managing employee (on the payroll)); Maricar P Euceda (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Henry Santos (owns 5% or more directly).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 8 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 81.82% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold8 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 85 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 77099, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 5; this one had 26.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.