Hearth Record

Beacon Hospice of Georgetown

A hospice in Austin, Texas 78717

16165 Ranch Road 620 North Suite A, Austin, Texas 78717. (512) 443-7100.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 13 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2025. Most serious: Condition-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
Condition-level deficiency
For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.

What did inspectors find?

13 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 37 hospices serving ZIP code 78717 had 5.

The last inspection on record was on Jul 8, 2025: a follow-up inspection by The Joint Commission.

2 deficiencies at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

13 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2025. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.

13 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 Dec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNov

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

May 30, 2025: reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission13 deficiencies
  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(5))

    The inspectors’ words, 343 words

    “Observed in Patient Home. In 3 of 3 home visits conducted, During RRHV# 1, RRHV# 2, and RRHV# 3’s home observations and patient record review it was noted the organization had not ensured staff followed the organization’s Comprehensive Assessment policy no. 2-030.1 that included a physical assessment to include temperature, a skin and other relevant data related to pertinent physical findings and the patient’s terminal illness. For example: review of RRHV# 2’s plan of care revealed the terminal diagnosis of Heart Failure. Review of RRHV# 2’s patient record review revealed a start of care RN comprehensive assessment dated approximately 298 days prior to the surveyor review of the record. Review of RRHV# 2’s once a week SN visit notes revealed no documentation of skin, cardiovascular, respiratory, gastrointestinal, genital urinary, or neurological assessment. Further review of the weekly SN visit notes revealed documentation of vital signs, pain assessment, and medication compliance. During RRHV# 2’s home observation the RN did not physically assess RRHV# 2’s skin and did not assess RRHV# 2’s lung sounds. During RRHV# 1’s home observation RRHV# 1 was observed with a PEG tube with a drainage gauze during the Hospice Aide bed bath. Review of RRHV# 1’s start of care RN comprehensive assessment revealed no documentation of a PEG tube or the skin surrounding the area. In addition, review of RRHV# 1’s plan of care revealed no documentation of a PEG tube. Review of RRHV# 2’s plan of care revealed the terminal diagnosis of Heart Failure. During RRHV# 2’s home observation the RN did not physically assess RRHV# 2’s skin and did not assess lung sounds. Review of RRHV# 2’s patient record revealed SN visits weekly with no documentation of skin, cardiovascular, respiratory, gastrointestinal, genital urinary, or neurological assessment. Further review of the SN visit notes revealed vital signs, pain assessment, and medication compliance. During RRHV# 3’s home observation the Administrator/RN did not have a thermometer at the time of the visit and did not perform a temperature reading. This was reviewed, discussed, and validated with the Regional Director/DON and Administrator/RN.”

    Rule L0529. Condition-level.

  • Governing body and administrator (42 CFR 418.100(b))

    “Observed in Leadership Session. There was no evidence that the governing body and leadership had established requirements to support patient care treatment and services as evidenced by condition level deficiency in Provisions of Care CLD 418.54 Initial and Comprehensive Assessment.”

    Rule L0651. Condition-level.

  • EP Training Program (42 CFR 418.113(d)(1)(i))

    “Observed in HR File Review. In 2 of 7 HR files reviewed with date of hire within the last year, During HR# 7, and HR# 8’s HR files review it was noted the organization had not ensured it provided initial emergency management education and training. Review of HR# 7 and HR# 8’ HR files revealed hired dates less 10 months. Further review of HR# 7 and HR# 8’s’s HR files revealed no documentation of Emergency Management Education. This was reviewed, discussed, and validated with the Regional Director/DON.”

    Rule E0037. Standard-level.

  • Update of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(d))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 14 patient records reviewed, During RRHV# 2’s patient record review it was noted the organization had not ensured the patient was assessed by an RN no less than every 15 days. For example: review of RRHV# 2’s patient record revealed a SN visit note revealed 31 days with no RN assessment completed. This was reviewed, discussed, and validated with the Regional Director/DON.”

    Rule L0533. Standard-level.

  • Patient outcome measures (42 CFR 418.54(e)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 109 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 14 patient records reviewed, During RR# 2’s patient record review it was noted the organization had not ensured it maintained a complete and accurate patient record. For example: review of RR# 2’s paper medical record revealed and oxygen safety risk assessment completed at the start of care with documentation RR# 2 had an oxygen concentration and had an order for oxygen at 2L via nasal cannula and was signed by RR# 2 and the RN. This was discussed, and reviewed with the Administrator/RN that stated RR# 2 never had oxygen in the home and does not now have oxygen in the home.”

    Rule L0535. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 213 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 14 patient records reviewed, During RRHV# 1 and RRHV# 2’s patient records review it was noted the organization had not ensured the plan of care was based on the patient’s goals and the time frames, settings, and services required to meet those goals. For example: review of RRHV# 1’s start of care RN comprehensive assessment revealed documentation that RRHV# 1’s pain goal to be 0 on a scale of 0 to 10. Review of RRHV# 1’s plan of care revealed a pain goal of 4/10. During RRHV# 1’s home observation RRHV# 1 was observed with a PEG tube. Further review of RRHV# 1’s plan of care revealed no documentation of a PEG tube or goal. Review of RRHV# 2’s patient record revealed the terminal diagnosis of heart failure. Review of RRHV# 2’s SN visit notes revealed RRHV# 2 had pain at best mild and at worst moderate with documentation of pain as an active problem. However, review of the current recertification plan of care with revealed no goal for pain. In addition, the start of care comprehensive assessment revealed RRHV# 2 was a risk for falls and the recertification plan of care revealed no safety goal. This was reviewed, discussed, and validated with the Regional Director/DON.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 283 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 4 of 14 patient records reviewed, During RRHV# 1, RR# 1, RRHV# 3, RR# 2’s patient records review it was noted the organization had not ensured the patients’ plans of care included all the services needed for the palliation and management of the terminal diagnosis and related conditions. For example: during RRHV# 1’s home observation RRHV# 1 was observed with a PEG tube. RRHV# 1’s patient representative/Uncle shared all medications are administered via the PEG tube. Review of RRHV# 1’s plan of care revealed no interventions or safety measures related to the PEG tube. Review of RR# 1’s patient record revealed RR# 1’s start of care approximately 60 days prior to the surveyor review of the record. This was reviewed, discussed, and validated with the Administrator/RN and Regional Director/DON. Review of RRHV# 3’s plan of care revealed Hospice Aide interventions and goals. However, RRHV# 3 did not have Hospice Aide services. This was reviewed, discussed, and validated with the Administrator/RN and Regional Director/DON. Review of RR# 1’s plan of care revealed interventions and goals for the Hospice Aide that were in progress. However, further review of the plan of care revealed no Hospice Aide frequency. Further review of RR# 1’s patient record revealed no Hospice Aide visit notes. Review of RR# 2’s patient record revealed the terminal diagnosis of Multi-system degeneration of the autonomic nervous system. Review of RR# 2’s RN start of care comprehensive assessment revealed documentation that RR# 2 required a mechanical diet. However, review of RR# 2’s plan of care revealed no documentation of aspiration precautions. This was discussed with the Administrator/RN and Regional Director/DON that shared RR# 1 did not have Hospice Aide services.”

    Rule L0546. Standard-level.

  • Prevention (42 CFR 418.60(a))

    The inspectors’ words, 322 words

    “Observed in Patient Home. In 2 of 3 home visits conducted, During RRHV# 2 and RRHV# 3’s home observations it was noted the organization had not ensured staff followed organization policy Hand Hygiene that included performing hand hygiene with an organization-approved alcohol-based hand rub and performing hand hygiene after removing gloves. For example: during RRHV# 2’s home observation the RN was observed removing gloves and putting on new gloves approximately 3 times without performing hand hygiene after removing gloves. During RRHV# 3’s home observation the Administrator/RN was observed cleaning hands with a Hand Wipe with Benzalkonium Chloride 0.11% and no alcohol. In addition, the Administrator/RN used the hand wipe at the beginning of the wound dressing change and patient assessment and did not perform hand hygiene again until after the wound dressing change and patient assessment was completed and included multiple glove changes. This was discussed and validated with the Regional Director/DON and Administrator. Observed in Patient Home. In 2 of 2 home visits conducted with vital sign equipment, During RRHV# 2 and RRHV# 3’s home observation it was noted the organization had not ensured staff followed organization policy Bag Technique that included cleaning the reusable equipment with alcohol and/or soap and water prior to returning to the supply bag and performing hand hygiene prior to entering the supply bag. For example: during RRHV# 2’s home observation the RN was observed placing the bag on the floor with a barrier and cleaning the stethoscope, pulse oximetry, and automatic wrist B/P cuff with a Clorox Bleach wipe and placing each piece of the equipment immediately into the supply bag with no contact time/wet time and no hand hygiene performed. During RRHV# 3’s home observation the Administrator/RN was observed completing the patient assessment and placing the vital sign equipment immediately into the supply bag without cleaning the equipment and no hand hygiene performed. This was discussed and validated with the Regional Director/DON and Administrator/RN.”

    Rule L0579. Standard-level.

  • Competency evaluation (42 CFR 418.76(c)(1))

    “Observed in HR File Review. In 1 of 1 Hospice Aide HR files reviewed, During HR# 8’s HR file review it was noted the organization had not ensured the hospice aide completed a competency evaluation before providing patient care. For example: review of HR# 8/Hospice Aide’s HR file revealed no documentation of an initial competency evaluation. Further review of HR# 8’s HR file revealed HR# 8 was hired approximately 11 months prior to the surveyor review of the HR file. This was reviewed, discussed, and validated with the Administrator/DON.”

    Rule L0615. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 98 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 2 patient records reviewed with Hospice Aide services, During RRHV# 1’s home observation it was noted the organization had not ensured the RN prepared complete written patient care instructions for the Hospice Aide. For example: during RRHV# 1’s home observation RRHV# 1 was noted to have a PEG tube with a gauze drainage in place. Review of RRHV# 1’s Hospice Aide patient written instructions revealed no documentation regarding the PEG tube or safety measures related to the PEG tube. This was reviewed, discussed, and validated with the Administrator and Regional Director.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2)(i))

    The inspectors’ words, 102 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 2 patient records reviewed with Hospice Aide, During RRHV# 1’s patient record review it was noted the organization had not ensured the hospice aide provided care, treatment, or services per hospice aide care plan that included documenting the date of the last bowel movement. For example: review of RRHV# 1’s hospice aide visit notes revealed documentation done under Elimination: Document bowel movements; report to RN if no BM in 3 days with no further documentation of what date or how many days since last bowel movement. This was reviewed, discussed, and validated with the Administrator.”

    Rule L0626. Standard-level.

  • Training (42 CFR 418.100(g)(3))

    “Observed in HR File Review. In 1 of 9 HR files reviewed, During HR# 7 HR file review it was noted the organization had not ensured staff were competent to perform their responsibilities. For example: review of HR# 7/RN home visit HR file revealed HR# 7’s date of hire was approximately eight months prior to the surveyor review of the record. Further review of HR# 7’s HR file revealed no documentation of an initial competency assessment. This was reviewed, discussed, and validated with the Regional Director/DON.”

    Rule L0663. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 266 words

    “Observed in Patient Home. In 3 of 3 home visits conducted, During RRHV# 1, RRHV# 2, and RRHV# 3’s home observations it was noted the organization had not ensured the patient record contained information that reflected the patient’s care, treatment, or services. For example: review of RRHV# 1’s medication profile revealed 10 medications to be administered by mouth and one medication with no documented route. Further review of the medication profile revealed five medications to be administered via PEG tube. During RRHV# 1’s home observation RRHV# 1’s patient representative/Uncle shared there was no medication list in the home and all medications were administered via RRHV# 1’s PEG tube. During RRHV# 2’s home observation it was noted the medication profile had promethazine 25 mg that had been discontinued six month prior to the home observation. In addition, RRHV# 2 was currently taking Tylenol 500mg 2 tablets once a day as needed for neck pain, Docusate Sodium 100mg every other day, Docusate Sodium with Sennoside every other day, and Latanoprost eye drops every night for more than nine months prior to the home observation and none of the medications were not present on the medication profile. During RRHV# 3’s home observation the medication reconciliation revealed RRHV# 3 had been taking Dicyclomine 20 mg three times daily and Cephalexin 500 mg at bed time for approximately 30 days prior to the start of care; was taking aspirin 81mg daily and Centrum Silver twice a day. However, Review RRHV# 3’s medication profile revealed no documentation of those medications. This was reviewed, discussed, and validated with the Regional Director/DON and Administrator/RN.”

    Rule L0674. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jul 8, 2025Follow-up inspection by The Joint CommissionNo deficiencies cited
May 30, 2025Reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission13 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since May 3, 2022.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • Cited at in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • CMS hasn’t published nursing time from Medicare claims for this hospice.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 73% at home, 27% in assisted living.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Arfeen Properties, L.P. owns 99% directly since Mar 6, 2013.
  • Hhcs Managers LLC runs it.
  • 8 owners or officers are people: Qamar U Arfeen (owns 5% or more through other companies, 50.5%); Qamar U Arfeen (limited partner, 50.5%); Qamar U Arfeen (runs it (operational or managerial control), 50.5%); Kelley L Arfeen (owns 5% or more through other companies, 49.5%); Kelley L Arfeen (limited partner, 49.5%); Karen Carter (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Theresa Cousins (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Qamar U Arfeen (managing employee (under contract), 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Arfeen Properties, L.P.Owns 5% or more directly99%Mar 6, 2013
Arfeen Properties, L.P.Limited partner99%Mar 6, 2013
Hhcs Managers LLCGeneral partner1%Mar 6, 2013
Hhcs Managers LLCRuns it (operational or managerial control)1%Mar 6, 2013

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS gives no Hospice Care Index for this hospice.
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 37 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 78717, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 5; this one had 13.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.