Hearth Record

Silverado Hospice- Austin

A hospice in Austin, Texas 78744

1701 Directors Blvd Ste 410, Austin, Texas 78744. (512) 827-6895.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.

The last 24 months 13 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

13 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 35 hospices serving ZIP code 78744 had 4.

The last inspection on record was on Sep 18, 2026: a follow-up inspection by The Joint Commission.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

13 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

13 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Aug 14, 2026: reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission13 deficiencies
  • Notice of rights and responsibilities (42 CFR 418.52(a)(1))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 19 of 19 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to inform the patient’s of their rights both orally and in writing. In HOSRRHV #1-#4, HOSRRNHV #1-#10, HOSRRDC #1-#2, and HOSRRBRV #1-#3 the organization gave the patients the rights in writing there was no documentation that they had been reviewed with the patient’s or caregivers verbally. This was reviewed and validated with the DCPS.”

    Rule L0502. Standard-level.

  • Rights of the patient (42 CFR 418.52(c)(1))

    “Observed in Patient Home. In 1 of 4 home visits conducted, the surveyor observed that the nurse failed to assess the patient’s pain during the home visit. In HOSRRHV #4 the patient complained of hand pain. Per the organization’s pain assessment policy the nurse did not use a validated tool to assess the pain score. She did not assess what made the pain better or worse, the quality of pain and duration. This was reviewed and validated with the DCPS. .”

    Rule L0512. Standard-level.

  • Timeframe for completion of assessment (42 CFR 418.54(b))

    “Observed in Regulatory Review. In 2 of 19 patient records reviewed, the surveyor observed that the Chaplain failed to complete their initial assessment within five days after the election of hospice. In HOSRRHV #2 the Chaplain completed the initial comprehensive assessment on day 7. In HOSRRNHV #2 the Chaplain completed the initial comprehensive assessment on day 8. This was reviewed and validated with the Quality Manager.”

    Rule L0523. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(5))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 19 patient records reviewed, a suicide risk assessment was not completed per agency policy. In HOSRRHV #3 the MSW entered a suicide risk care plan as the patient made the comment, I would be better off dead. Per the agency policy a Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale should have been completed. This was reviewed and validated with the QAPI Manager.”

    Rule L0529. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 561 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 10 of 19 patient records reviewed, the nurse surveyor observed that the organization failed to plan the patient’s care by entering care plans specific to their care in the plan of care. In HOSRRHV #1 the patient documented in IDT that the patient had dysphagia and had lost 14 lbs., she was a fall risk, she was on 4 medications for constipation, and she was on 2 medications prophylactically for urinary tract infections. No care plans were entered for these problems noted. in HOSRRHV #4 the patient was on an anticoagulant and the nursing plan of care did not include a care plan. In HOSRRNHV #1 the patient had dysphagia and there was no care plan entered on aspiration risk. In HOSRRNHV #3 the patient has a diagnosis of depression and also on an antidepressant and there was no care plan entered for depression. In HOSRRNHV #4 the patient was assessed for pain, and had diagnosis and taking medications for seizures and depression and there were no care plans entered into the plan of care. In HOSRRNHV #8 the patient was on an anticoagulant and there was no bleeding care plan entered. In HOSRRNHV #9 the patient was on 2 liters of continuous oxygen and there was no oxygen safety care plan entered. In HOSRRNHV #10 in IDT it was noted that the patient was being treated for depression and anxiety and had aspiration issues and there were no care plans addressing these issues in the plan of care. In HOSRRBRV #1 the patient had a urinary tract infection while on service and was on an anticoagulant and there was no care plan addressing the infection or bleeding precautions. In HOSRRBRV #3 the patient had an upper respiratory infection, and eye infection and a urinary tract infection and placed on new medications for each and none included a care plan on the POC. This was reviewed and validated with the QAPI Manager. Observed in Patient Home. In 2 of 19 patient records reviewed, the nurse surveyor observed that the medication list had duplicate and as needed medications without a clear indication when to take one over the other. In HOSRRHV #1 the patient had two orders for Quetiapine Fumarate . One order stated for the patient to take 50mg 1/2 tablet twice a day and the other order stated 50 mg 1 tablet once a day. It was not clear if the patient could take both of the medications for 75 mg. In talking with the medication aide at the facility, the 1/2 tablet is taken in the morning and at noon and the full tablet is taken at bedtime. This patient also had a duplicate order for pain medication. The patient had an order for Morphine Sulfate 20 mg /ml every 2 hours as needed for pain, and Ibuprofen 200 mg one tablet every 6 hours as needed for pain. It is not clear when the patient should take one over the other for pain. In HOSRRNHV #3 the patient had an order for Acetaminophen 325 mg one tablet every 6 hours for mild to moderate pain and Tramadol 50 mg one tablet every 6 hours for mild to moderate pain. It is not clear when the patient should take one medications over the other for pain. This was reviewed and validated with the DCPS.”

    Rule L0546. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(3))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 19 patient records reviewed, the plan of care was not based on patient identified needs. For example the hospice surveyor observed that the patient requested a volunteer; however, volunteer services were not ordered on the plan of care and patient did not receive those services. This was reviewed and validated with the DCPS.”

    Rule L0548. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 229 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 12 of 19 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to notify the provider or IDG of missed visits. In HOSRRHV #1 on one visit in June and one visit in July were missed by the HHA. In HOSRRHV #2 there were 3 missed visits since start of care. In HOSRRHV #3 there were 3 missed visit one each for May, June and July. In HOSRRHV #4 there was one missed visit in April and one in May. In HOSRRNHV #1 there were a total of 3 missed visits one each for April, May, and July. In HOSRRNHV #3 there was 1 missed HHA visit in May and 2 in July. In HOSRRNHV #6 there was a missed HHA visit in December, January, and May. In HOSRRNHV #7 there were 23 missed visits from April to August for the HHA. In HOSRRNHV #8 there were 2 missed visits in May and one in July for the HHA. In HOSRRNHV #9 there were 10 missed visits for the HHA from May to July. In HOSRRBRV #2 there were 3 visits missed in where patient was unavailable and 1 visit was missed due to the observance of the holiday. In HOSRRBRV #3 there were 2 missed visited as patient refused and one holiday observation visit that was missed. This was reviewed and validated with the QAPI Manager.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 249 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 8 of 19 patient records reviewed, where home health aide services were provided the HOS surveyor noted that the aide assignment did not include specific precautions. In HOSRRHV #1 the patient had a diagnosis of seizures, she was on medications for the diagnosis and the home health aide assignment did not include this as a precaution. In HOSRRHV #2 the patient had a diagnosis of seizures and had a wound and there were not precautions entered into the aide assignment nor were there instructions as to what to do with the wound when bathing the patient. In HOSRRHV #4 the patient was on an anticoagulant and 2 liters of Oxygen continuous. There were no bleeding precautions entered into the assignment and there were no instructions of what the aide should do with the oxygen when showering the patient. In HOSRRNHV #1 the aide assignment was inaccurate, it included bleeding precautions and the patient was not on an anticoagulant. In HOSRRNHV #2 the patient was an aspiration risk and this was not in the aide assignment as a precaution. In HOSRRNHV #5 the patient was a fall and seizure precaution and these were not entered into the aide assignment. In HOSRRNHV #8 the patient was on an anticoagulant and the aide assignment did not include bleeding precautions. In HOSRRBRV #1 the patient was on an anticoagulant and the aide assignment did not include the bleeding precaution. This was reviewed and validated with the QAPI Manager.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Governing body and administrator (42 CFR 418.100(b))

    “Observed in Tracer Activities. Leadership did not implement policies and procedures as evidenced by condition level findings related to provision of care (418.56, 418.104) and rights (418.52).”

    Rule L0651. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(7))

    The inspectors’ words, 122 words

    “Observed in Patient Home. In 1 of 4 home visits conducted, the surveyor observed that the medication list was found to be inaccurate. In HOSRRHV #4 the patient had the following medications on the medication list that she was no longer taking; Diclofenac Sodium 1% gel one inch as needed for edema, Chloroseptic spray 1.4% one spray every 2 hours as needed, and Estradiol 1% vaginal cream three times a week. The following medications were inaccurate: Hydroxyzine 10 mg tablet one time a day, the patient is getting this three times a day, Hydrocodone Acetaminophen 7.5-325 mg one tablet three times a day but patient is taking it four times a day for pain. This was reviewed and validated with the DCPS.”

    Rule L0678. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(1)(i))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 2 patient records reviewed, where the patient was discharged, the hospice surveyor observed that the discharge summary was not provided to the receiving agency. For example in HOSRRDC #1 the discharge summary was not sent to the receiving hospital. This was reviewed and validated with the QAPI Manager.”

    Rule L0682. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(2)(i))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 2 patient records reviewed, where the patient was discharged, the hospice surveyor observed that the discharge summary was not provided to the community provider. For example in HOSRRDC #2 the discharge summary was not sent to the community provider when the patient revoked. This was reviewed and validated with the QAPI Manager.”

    Rule L0683. Standard-level.

  • Use and mintenance of equipment and supplies (42 CFR 418.106(f)(2))

    “Observed in Patient Home. In 1 of 4 home visits conducted, the organization failed to instruct patient on safe storage of oxygen. The surveyor observed in HOSRRHV #4 that the patient had 6 portable oxygen tanks that were not secured. The RN did not provide education during the visit to reinforce the safety of securing the tanks. This was reviewed and validated with the DCPS.”

    Rule L0702. Standard-level.

All 4 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Sep 18, 2026Follow-up inspection by The Joint CommissionNo deficiencies cited
Aug 14, 2026Reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission13 deficiencies cited
Dec 31, 2024Complaint inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited
Feb 21, 2024Complaint inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Sep 18, 2014.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 10.1 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 7.7% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 93.7% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 27% at home, 56% in assisted living, 15% in a nursing facility, 2% in a skilled nursing facility, 1% elsewhere.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day10.1 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends7.7%
Visits near death93.7% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Silverado Senior Living Holdings Inc. owns 100% directly since Nov 19, 2004.
  • 18 owners or officers are people: Loren B Shook (corporate officer, 50%); Loren B Shook (corporate director, 50%); Loren B Shook (managing employee (on the payroll), 50%); Loren B Shook (runs it (operational or managerial control), 50%); Loren B Shook (owns 5% or more through other companies, 17.53%); Angela Dey Collins (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Angela Dey Collins (runs it (operational or managerial control), 0%); Anil Rathi (managing employee (under contract), 0%); Catherine Quinn Davis (corporate director, 0%); Catherine Quinn Davis (managing employee (on the payroll)); Kimberly Sommer (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Carmin Tomassi (corporate officer, 0%); Carmin Tomassi (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); John C Lewis (corporate director); Wayne Sanner (corporate officer, 0%); Wayne Sanner (corporate director, 0%); Wayne Sanner (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Brian Stern (corporate director).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Silverado Senior Living Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more directly100%Nov 19, 2004
Silverado Shareholders LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies90.07%Jun 1, 2025
Rlh Silverado LPOwns 5% or more through other companies47.12%Jun 1, 2025
Richard Riordan Administrative TrustOwns 5% or more through other companies26.01%Jun 1, 2025
C Shook TrustOwns 5% or more through other companies12.58%Jun 1, 2025
Nancy Smith Family TrustOwns 5% or more through other companies9.29%Jun 1, 2025

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 79% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 88% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 99.01% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 66.7% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 53 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 35 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 78744, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 4; this one had 13.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.