Hearth Record

Texas Hospice Providers LLC

A hospice in Garland, Texas 75043

2306 Guthrie Road Ste 260h, Garland, Texas 75043. (972) 424-4401.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

2 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 108 hospices serving ZIP code 75043 had 3.

The last inspection on record was on Jun 10, 2025: a recertification inspection by the state.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.

2 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 Dec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNov

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Jun 10, 2025: recertification inspection by the state2 deficiencies
  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(7))

    The inspectors’ words, 760 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to take into consideration an initial bereavement assessment of the needs of the patient’s family and other individuals focusing on the social, spiritual, and cultural factors that could impact their ability to cope with the patient’s death in that the hospice did no conduct an initial bereavement assessment for 6 (#4, #6, #7, #8, #9, #11) of 14 patient records reviewed. The failure placed the patients’ family or other individuals at risk that appropriate bereavement services would not be provided which could result in complicated grief or inadequate coping. Patient #4:Record review of Patient #4’s clinical record revealed an Initial Plan of Care dated 11/30/2023 to 2/27/2024. The Plan of Care indicated that Patient #4 was admitted to services on 11/30/2023. The Plan of Care indicated listed Congestive Heart Failure (heart unable to pump blood to meet the body’s needs) as the terminal diagnosis. Patient #4’s record did not contain an initial bereavement assessment. Patient #6:Record review of Patient #6’s clinical record revealed an Initial Plan of Care dated 3/7/2025 to 6/4/2025. The Plan of Care indicated that Patient #6 was admitted to the agency’s services on 3/7/2025. The Plan of Care did not list the terminal diagnosis but the narrative portion indicated that Patient #6 had a stroke (loss of blood flow to part of the brain which causes brain damage). Patient #6’s record did not contain an initial bereavement assessment. Patient #7:Record review of Patient #7’s clinical record revealed an Initial Plan of Care dated 8/27/2024 to 11/24/2024. The Plan of Care indicated that Patient #7 started on the agency’s service on 8/27/2024The Plan of Care listed Unspecified (congestive) Heart Failure (heart unable to pump blood to meet the body’s needs) as the terminal diagnosis. Patient #7’s record did not contain an initial bereavement assessment. Patient #8:Record review of Patient #8’s clinical record revealed a Plan of Care dated 9/25/2024 to 12/23/2024. The Plan of Care indicated that Patient #8 started on the agency’s services on 9/25/2025. The Plan of Care listed Cerebral Infarction (stroke) as the terminal diagnosis. Patient #8’s clinical record did not contain an initial bereavement assessment. Patient #9:Record review of Patient #9’s clinical record revealed a Plan of Care dated 9/24/2024 to 12/22/2024. The Plan of Care indicated that Patient #9 started on the agency’s services on 9/24/2024. The Plan of Care listed Alzheimer’s Disease (progressive, fatal brain disorder causing memory loss, confusion, and other cognitive decline) as the terminal diagnosis. Patient #9’s clinical record did not contain an initial bereavement assessment. Patient #11:Record review of Patient #11’s clinical record revealed an Initial Plan of Care dated 1/23/2024. The Plan of Care indicated that Patient #11 started on the agency’s services on 1/23/2024. The Plan of Care did not list Patient #11’s terminal diagnosis. Patient #11’s clinical record did not contain an initial bereavement assessment. During an interview on 6/9/2025 at 3:23 p.m. with the Supervising Nurse, the surveyor discussed the initial bereavement assessments were not done. The Supervising Nurse informed the surveyor that the bereavement assessments were not done if the Chaplain did not go. The Supervising Nurse informed the surveyor that some of the patients had declined Chaplain services. The Supervising Nurse informed the surveyor that Patient #4’s initial bereavement assessment should have been done by the previous staff, prior to their acquisition of the company. The Supervising Nurse did not state how it could affect the agency’s patients. The Supervising Nurse stated, “We didn’t realize we had to do an initial bereavement assessment.” During an interview on 6/10/2025 at 1:45 p.m. with the Administrator, Supervising Nurse, and Administrative Assistant, the surveyor reviewed the finding. The agency did not produce any evidence that would change the finding. The surveyor asked if there were any dispute to the finding, the Administrator and Supervising Nurse stated, “No.” Review of the agency’s policy titled “Bereavement,” labeled PC.130, dated 9/1/2024 read in part; “I. Purpose To ensure appropriate bereavement services are provided to Hospice family members, caregivers, and other bereaved persons. II. To facilitate a normal grieving process by providing counseling, coping strategies, and caring interventions to families and/or caregivers. Policy...Procedure I. The Hospice will perform an initial bereavement assessment of the needs of the patient’s family and other care individuals focusing on the social, spiritual, and cultural factors that may impact their ability to cope with the patient’s death as part of the Initial Comprehensive Assessment. A. The bereavement assessment will be completed by the Hospice’s spiritual counselor, social worker (SW), and/or the registered nurse (RN)...””

    Rule L0531. Standard-level.

  • Competency evaluation (42 CFR 418.76(c)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 1,043 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to have individuals that provided hospice aide services, complete a competency evaluation where tasks listed at 42 Code of Federal Regulations Chapter 418, at 418.76(b)(3), (iii), (ix), (x), and (xi) were evaluated by observation of the aide’s performance of the tasks with a patient or pseudo-patient for 2 (Hospice Aide D and Hospice Aide E) of 2 hospice aides where their personnel records were reviewed. The failure placed patients at risk of receiving inadequate or unsafe care from the hospice aides. The 42 Code of Federal Regulations Chapter 418 at 418.76 (b)(3), (i), (iii), (ix), (x) and (xi) listed the following tasks that a registered nurse must observe an aide perform were: (i) Communication skills, including the ability to read, write, and verbally report clinical information to patients, representatives, and caregivers, as well as to other hospice staff; . . . (iii) Reading and recording temperature, pulse, and respiration; . . . (ix) Appropriate and safe techniques in performing personal hygiene and grooming tasks that include— (A) Bed bath; (B) Sponge, tub, and shower bath; (C) Hair shampooing in sink, tub, and bed; (D) Nail and skin care; (E) Oral hygiene; (F) Toileting and elimination; (x) Safe transfer techniques and ambulation; (xi) Normal range of motion and positioning...” Hospice Aide D:Review of Hospice Aide D’s personnel record revealed an application for employment for a hospice aide that was dated 8/29/2024. Hospice Aide D listed previous employment under work history with a hospice agency, and two hospitals. The personnel record contained an orientation checklist dated 8/29/2024. The personnel record contained a job description for a hospice aide that was signed by Hospice Aide D on 8/28/2024. Hospice Aide D’s personnel record did not contain an evaluation by observation of Hospice Aide D performing the tasks for reading and recording temperature, pulse, and respiration; appropriate and safe techniques in performing personal hygiene and grooming tasks that included a bed bath; sponge, tub, and shower bath; Hair shampooing in sink, tub, and bed; nail and skin care; oral hygiene; toileting and elimination; safe transfer techniques and ambulation; and normal range of motion and positioning. Hospice Aide E:Review of Hospice Aide E’s personnel record revealed an application for employment for a certified nurse aide. The application was not dated but indicated that Hospice Aide E was available to begin work on 3/10/2025. Hospice Aide E listed previous employment under work history with two home health agencies. The personnel record contained an orientation checklist dated 3/10/2025. The personnel record contained a job description for a hospice aide that was signed by Hospice Aide E on 3/10/2025. Hospice Aide E’s personnel record did not contain an evaluation by observation of Hospice Aide E performing the tasks for reading and recording temperature, pulse, and respiration; appropriate and safe techniques in performing personal hygiene and grooming tasks that included a bed bath; sponge, tub, and shower bath; Hair shampooing in sink, tub, and bed; nail and skin care; oral hygiene; toileting and elimination; safe transfer techniques and ambulation; and normal range of motion and positioning. Home visits and interviews were conducted on 6/5/2025 to with Patient #6, #12, and #13 Patient #6’s Family Member informed the surveyor that Hospice Aide E visited Patient #6 on Monday, Wednesday, and Fridays. Patient #6’s Family Member informed the surveyor that Hospice Aide E bathed and shampooed Patient #6. Patient #6’s Family Member and Patient #6 informed the surveyor that Hospice Aide E did a good job. Patient #12 informed the surveyor that Hospice Aide D provided services three times a week. Patient #13’s Family Member informed the surveyor that Hospice Aide E provided services on Monday, Wednesday, and Fridays. Patient #13’s family member informed the surveyor that Hospice Aide E bathed Patient #13. During an interview on 6/10/2025 at 12:58 p.m. with the Supervising Nurse, the surveyor requested the hospice aide competency evaluations when they were hired. The surveyor requested the portion of the competency evaluation that was observation of the aide performing the tasks on a patient or pseudo-patient. The Supervising Nurse stated, “We haven’t done that when they (aides) first started with us. I didn’t know it was something we had to do. We haven’t done that.” The surveyor asked how the agency would know if the aides were competent in those tasks. The Supervising Nurse informed the surveyor that the task evaluation was done orally. During an interview on 6/10/2025 at 1:45 p.m. with the Administrator, Supervising Nurse, and Administrative Assistant, the surveyor reviewed the finding. The agency did not produce any evidence that would change the finding. The surveyor asked if there were any dispute to the finding, the Administrator and Supervising Nurse stated, “No.” Review of the agency’s policy titled “Hospice Aide/Homemaker Competency Evaluation,” labeled HR.45, and dated 9/1/2024 read in part; “To establish the competency evaluation for both written and skill demonstration for hospice aides...Definition I. Pseudo-patient means a person trained to participate in a role-play situation, or a computer-based mannequin device. A pseudo-patient must be capable of responding to and interacting with the hospice aide trainee and must demonstrate the general characteristics of the primary patient population serviced by the Hospice in key areas such as age, frailty, functional status, cognitive status and care goals...Policy I. The Hospice will ensure that each hospice aide successfully completes a hospice aide skills and competency evaluation in accordance with federal and state laws and regulations prior to the aide performing care independently. A. The competency evaluation must be performed by a registered nurse (RN) in consultation with other skilled professionals, as appropriate...Procedure I. Hospice Aides...1. The following subject areas must be evaluated by observing an aide’s performance of the task with a patient or pseudo-patient: a. communication, including the ability to read, write, and verbally report clinical information to patients, representatives and caregivers, and other Hospice staff; b. reading and recording temperature, pulse, and respiration; c. Appropriate and safe techniques in performing personal hygiene and grooming tasks, including: (1). bed bath, (2) Sponge, tub, or shower bath, (3) Hair shampooing in sink, tub, and bed, (4) Nail and skin care, (5) Oral hygiene, (6) Toileting and elimination, (7) Normal range of motion and positioning, and (8) Safe transfer techniques and ambulation...””

    Rule L0615. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jun 10, 2025Recertification inspection by the state2 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since May 5, 2022.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 9.3 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 8.9% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 100% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 76% at home, 24% in assisted living.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day9.3 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends8.9%
Visits near death100.0% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • 14 owners or officers are people: Joseph John (owns 5% or more directly, 25%); Joseph John (corporate director, 25%); Joseph John (managing employee (on the payroll), 25%); No Name Given Mohamed Azhar Alfaaz (owns 5% or more directly, 25%); No Name Given Mohamed Azhar Alfaaz (corporate officer, 25%); No Name Given Mohamed Azhar Alfaaz (managing employee (on the payroll), 25%); Mathew Chacko (owns 5% or more directly, 25%); Mathew Chacko (corporate director, 25%); Mathew Chacko (managing employee (on the payroll), 25%); Shijo Karikkottu George (managing employee (under contract), 25%); Shijo Karikkottu George (owns 5% or more directly, 25%); Shijo Karikkottu George (corporate director, 25%); Sarine Thomas (managing employee (on the payroll)); Prince Philip (managing employee (on the payroll)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 9 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 96.67% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold9 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 108 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 75043, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 3; this one had 2.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.