Hearth Record

San Jose Hospice Care

A hospice in Pharr, Texas 78577

121 E Park, Ste A, Pharr, Texas 78577. (956) 783-5673.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 8 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Oct 2024. Most serious: Condition-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
Condition-level deficiency
For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.

What did inspectors find?

8 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 46 hospices serving ZIP code 78577 had 6.

The last inspection on record was on Feb 27, 2026: a complaint inspection by the state.

1 deficiency at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

8 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Oct 2024. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

8 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Oct 3, 2024: reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner8 deficiencies
  • Core services (42 CFR 418.64)

    The inspectors’ words, 171 words

    “It is required that hospice “core” services are substantially provided directly by hospice employees in a manner consistent with acceptable standards of practice. “Core” services include nursing services, medical social work, and counseling. THIS IS A CMS CONDITION LEVEL DEFICIENCY. This condition of participation was not met as evidenced by personnel record review and interviews with the Administrator and the Director of Nursing which revealed issues with the agency’s ability to provide core services directly by hospice employees in a manner consistent with acceptable standards of practice in the following areas: Failure to ensure the core services of a spiritual counselor by a hospice employee (the Chaplain (Personnel Record 4) was hired on 10/12/2023 as a 1099 contracted employee) and the Social Worker services by a hospice employee (Personnel Record 3) was hired on 01/25/2024 as a 1099 contracted employee {HCDT.2.I/L587}. The cumulative effect of this deficiency has resulted in the hospice organization’s inability to ensure the provision of quality of care for the Condition of Participation CFR 418.64: Core Services.”

    Rule L0587. Condition-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6)(i))

    The inspectors’ words, 245 words

    “It is required that the documented comprehensive assessment includes a drug profile that contains the patient’s current: Prescription and over-the-counter (OTC) drugs; Supplements; Herbal remedies; and Other alternative treatments that could affect drug therapy. The drug profile is updated per the hospice policy and procedure, but, at minimum, at the time of each comprehensive assessment and/or when new medication is added, or changes are made to existing medication. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 1 of 14 (7%) clinical records reviewed revealed the agency did not ensure the drug profile was updated with changes in the comprehensive assessment. Clinical Record 8: The patient was admitted on 05/02/2024. During the benefit period 05/02/2024 to 07/30/2024 the patient was seen by a licensed vocational nurse on 06/10/2024 who documented that the patient had been seen by the dermatologist a few days prior, no date listed, and new medications were ordered. There was no documented evidence what medications were ordered. On 06/12/2024 patient was seen by the registered nurse, who documented that the patient’s new drug regimen included doxycycline, clobetasol solution, triamcinolone cream, and prednisone. New medications were discussed at the interdisciplinary meeting (IDG); however, no order was generated in electronic medical record, and the medication list was not updated with the new medication. During an interview with the Director of Nurses on 10/03/2024, she stated that she had been trying to audit every record but sometimes she misses one.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Approach to service delivery (42 CFR 418.56(a))

    The inspectors’ words, 210 words

    “It is required that the hospice designates a registered nurse member of the IDG to provide coordination of care; ensure continuous assessment of each patient’s and family’s needs; and ensure the implementation of the interdisciplinary plan of care. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and document review. In 2 of 14 (14%) clinical records reviewed revealed that the agency did not ensure the designated registered nurse IDG member provided coordination of care to ensure continuous assessment of each patient’s and family’s needs and the implementation of the interdisciplinary plan of care. Document 3: The policy titled Hospice Policy and Procedure Manual Interdisciplinary Group (IDG) stated in part “The hospice will designate a Registered Nurse, that is a member of the IDG to facilitate communication about changes in the patient’s status among interdisciplinary group members and the patient’s Attending Physician and facility representatives”. Clinical Record 2: The clinical record revealed that the registered nurse did not ensure that the Plan of Care was updated after the Foley Catheter was removed. Clinical Record 8: The clinical record revealed that the registered nurse did not ensure that the new medications doxycycline 50 mg tabs, clobetasol solution, triamcinolone cream, and prednisone 10 mg were added to the medication list.”

    Rule L0540. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 216 words

    “It is required that the Interdisciplinary Group, in collaboration with the individual’s attending physician (if any), reviews, revises, and documents the individualized care plan: A revised plan of care includes: Information from the patient’s updated comprehensive assessment; Record of the patient’s progress toward the outcomes and goals specified in the plan of care. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 1 of 14 (7%) clinical records reviewed revealed the agency did not ensure a revised plan of care was updated with the comprehensive assessments. Clinical Record 2: The patient elected hospice on 06/22/2024. In the benefit period 06/22/2024 to 09/19/2024, the patient was seen by the registered nurse (RN) on 09/16/2024. The RN documented the patient had a urologist appointment on 09/14/2024 and the foley catheter was removed. There was no documented evidence of an order noted to remove the Foley catheter. The clinical documentation was sent to the interdisciplinary team on 09/25/2024. The plan of Care for the benefit period 09/20/2024 to 12/17/2024 was not updated. The Foley catheter remained on the Plan of Care, and no problems were included to monitor urinary retention. During an interview with the Director of Nurses on 10/03/2024 she stated that she forgot to update the problems on the Plan of Care.”

    Rule L0553. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 230 words

    “It is required that the hospice’s policies and procedures define a system of communication and integration that sustains coordination of services and provides documentation of exchange of information. The policies and procedures ensure that sharing of information occurs between all disciplines providing care and services in all settings and is ongoing whether or not the care and services are provided directly or under arrangement. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and document review. In 1 of 14 (7%) clinical record review revealed the agency did not ensure that the licensed vocational nurse communicated patient changes between all disciplines providing care. Document 2: The policy named Hospice Policy and Procedure Manual Nursing Services states in part “The LVN, supplements the nursing care needs of the patient as provided by the RN and as specified in the plan of care including, ensuring communication of information to appropriate team members.” Clinical Record 8: The patient elected hospice services on 05/02/2024. During the benefit period 05/02/2024 to 07/30/2024 the patient was seen on 06/10/2024 by the licensed vocational nurse (LVN). The LVN documented that the patient had blisters to her upper extremities and that the patient was seen by a dermatologist who ordered new medications. There was no documented evidence in the clinical record that the LVN communicated to the registered nurse about the changes in the patient’s condition.”

    Rule L0557. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2)(ii))

    The inspectors’ words, 164 words

    “It is required that a hospice aide provides services: Included in the plan of care. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review, interview, and observation. In 1 of 7 (14%) clinical record reviews for patients receiving aide services revealed that the aide did not complete task ordered in the aide plan of care. Home Visit 3: During a joint visit with the hospice aide (Personnel Record 2) on 10/02/2024, it was observed that tasks listed on the current aide plan of care for the benefit period 08/01/2024 to 10/29/2024 were not completed. The following tasks were on the plan of care and not completed during the visit, comb hair, lotion, nails clean/file, oral care, and shave. We exited the home together, the aide stated that she needed to leave immediately. During an interview with the Director of Nurses on 10/02/2024 regarding home visit 3, she stated that she did not know why the aide plan of care was not followed.”

    Rule L0626. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(2)(ii))

    The inspectors’ words, 306 words

    “It is required that if a patient revokes the election of hospice care or is discharged from hospice per hospice regulation §418.26 (i.e., no longer terminally ill), the hospice forwards to the patient’s attending physician: A copy of the hospice discharge summary and the patient’s record, if requested. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review, document review and interview. In 2 of 2 (100%) clinical records reviewed in which the patient was a live discharge revealed that that agency did not ensure that a complete discharge summary was completed and provided to the attending physician. Document 1: The agency’s policy titled Hospice Policy and Procedure Manual Discharge from Hospice Care states “If a patient is discharged from hospice, the hospice must forward to the patient’s attending physician, a copy of the following: The hospice Discharge Summary, which includes: a summary of the patient’s stay including treatment, symptoms and pain management, the patient’s current plan of care, the patient’s latest physician orders and any other documentation that will assist in post-discharge continuity of care or that is requested by the attending physician or receiving facility.” Clinical Record 13: The patient elected hospice on 05/13/2024. The patient elected to transfer to another hospice on 06/12/2024. The clinical record contained no evidence of a documented discharge summary, or a discharge summary being sent to the alternate hospice or any care coordination with the alternate hospice. Clinical Record 14: The patient elected hospice on 10/18/2023. The patient revocated services on 03/15/2023. The clinical record contained no evidence of a documented discharge summary, or a discharge summary being sent to the attending physician. During a joint review of the clinical records on 10/03/2024 the Director of Nurses stated that she could not find a discharge summary or any indication that one was sent to the attending physician.”

    Rule L0683. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(3)(i))

    The inspectors’ words, 312 words

    “It is required that the hospice discharge summary provided to a facility receiving a hospice patient for care—or to the patient’s community attending physician upon hospice discharge—includes at least the following: a summary of the patient’s hospice stay, including treatments, symptoms, and pain management; the patient’s current plan of care; the patient’s latest physician orders; any other documentation that will assist in the post-discharge continuity of care or that is requested by the receiving facility or the attending physician. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review, document review and interview. In 2 of 2 (100%) clinical records reviewed in which the patient elected a live discharge revealed that the agency did not ensure that a discharge summary was completed. Document 1: The agency’s policy titled Hospice Policy and Procedure Manual Discharge from Hospice Care states “If a patient is discharged from hospice, the hospice must forward to the patient’s attending physician, a copy of the following: The hospice Discharge Summary, which includes: a summary of the patient’s stay including treatment, symptoms and pain management, the patient’s current plan of care, the patient’s latest physician orders and any other documentation that will assist in post-discharge continuity of care or that is requested by the attending physician or receiving facility.” Clinical Record 14: The patient elected hospice on 10/18/2023. The patient requested a transfer to an alternate hospice on 03/15/2024. The clinical record contained no evidence of a documented discharge summary, Clinical Record 13: The patient elected hospice on 05/13/2024. The patient requested a transfer to an alternate hospice on 06/12/2024. The clinical record contained no evidence of a documented discharge summary, During a joint review of the clinical records on 10/03/2024 the Director of Nurses stated that she could not find a discharge summary and did not know how to generate the discharge summary in the electronic medical record.”

    Rule L0684. Standard-level.

All 3 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Feb 27, 2026Complaint inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited
Nov 11, 2024Follow-up inspection by the Community Health Accreditation PartnerNo deficiencies cited
Oct 3, 2024Reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner8 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Dec 15, 2021.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • Cited at in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 15.3 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 7.1% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 93% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 96% at home, 3% in assisted living.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day15.3 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends7.1%
Visits near death93.0% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • 9 owners or officers are people: Elma Lozano (owns 5% or more directly, 100%); Elma Lozano (corporate officer, 100%); Elma Lozano (corporate director, 100%); Elma Lozano (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); Ivan G Melendez (runs it (operational or managerial control), 100%); Olga L Salinas (runs it (operational or managerial control), 25%); Elma Lozano (runs it (operational or managerial control), 25%); Flor E Martinez (runs it (operational or managerial control), 25%); Alexandro Cabrera (runs it (operational or managerial control), 25%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 8 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 100% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 67.6% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold8 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 46 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 78577, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 6; this one had 8.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.