Hearth Record

Living Hope Hospice Dallas

A hospice in Richardson, Texas 75080

1801 Gateway Blvd, Ste 105, Richardson, Texas 75080. (214) 509-6500.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Oct 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

2 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 91 hospices serving ZIP code 75080 had 3.

The last inspection on record was on Oct 30, 2024: a recertification inspection by the state.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Oct 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

2 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Oct 30, 2024: recertification inspection by the state2 deficiencies
  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 1,199 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure that care was provided according to the Interdisciplinary Group (IDG) written plan of care in 6 of 10 patients (Patients #1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8) did not receive Chaplain services as written in the plan of care. This failure could have placed the agency’s former hospice patients at risk of a decline in health from not receiving the necessary care and treatment. The agency has not had an active patient since November 2023. The findings included: Closed record reviews:1. Closed record review of Patient #4’s plan of care for certification period 04/18/2022 through 06/13/2022 revealed a start of care date 04/18/2022 with a terminal diagnosis of Alzheimers disease (Alzheimers disease is a brain disorder that slowly destroys memory and thinking skills and, eventually, the ability to carry out the simplest tasks.) and orders for the Chaplain to visit one time a month. Further review of the clinical record revealed the Chaplain conducted 2 visits (05/02/22 and 05/16/22) for the month of 05/22 and 2 visits (06/06/22 and 06/13/22) for the month of 06/22. The clinical record did not contain documentation as to why 2 extra visits were provided. Review of IDG meetings revealed the following:IDG meeting dated 04/21/22 read in part, “;...Chaplain report...getting all plans together, will have a better report next week ...Changes to goals/POC: no changes at this time...”IDG meeting dated 05/05/22 read in part, “;...Chaplain report: ...High risk bereavement...Changes to goals/POC: no changes at this time...”IDG meeting dated 05/19/22 read in part, “;...Chaplain report: no changes needs being met...Changes to goals/POC: no changes at this time...”IDG meeting dated 06/02/22 read in part, “;...Chaplain report: no visits performed...Changes to goals/POC: no changes at this time...” 2. Closed record review of Patient #5’s plan of care for certification period 10/17/2022 through 12/15/2022 revealed a start of care date 04/20/2022 with a terminal diagnosis of Unspecified systolic (congestive) heart failure (When the heart functions poorly as a pump and does not circulate blood adequately via the circulatory system to meet the demands of the body the term cardiovascular insufficiency is sometimes used. This generally leads to the syndrome of heart failure.) orders for the Chaplain to visit one time a month. Further review of the clinical record revealed the Chaplain conducted 3 visits (11/02/22, 11/16/22 and 11/30/22) for the month of 11/22 and 2 visits (06/06/22 and 06/13/22) for the month of 06/22. The clinical record did not contain documentation as to why 2 extra visits were provided.Review of IDG meetings revealed the following:IDG meeting dated 10/19/22 read in part, “;...Chaplain report: no visits performed...Changes to goals/POC: none...”IDG meeting dated 1/05/22 read in part, “;...Chaplain report: ...patient accepting of chaplain visits...Changes to goals/POC: none...”IDG meeting dated 11/16/22 read in part, “;...Chaplain report: no issues identified...Changes to goals/POC: none...”IDG meeting dated 11/30/22 read in part, “;...Chaplain report: no issues identified ...Changes to goals/POC: none...”IDG meeting dated 12/14/22 read in part, “;...Chaplain report: no issues identified ...Changes to goals/POC: DC instead of recertification as patient is not terminally ill...” 3. Closed record review of Patient #7’s plan of care for certification period 11/16/2022 through 02/13/2023 revealed a start of care date 08/18/2022 with a terminal diagnosis of Unspecified systolic (congestive) heart failure (When the heart functions poorly as a pump and does not circulate blood adequately via the circulatory system to meet the demands of the body the term cardiovascular insufficiency is sometimes used. This generally leads to the syndrome of heart failure.) and orders for the Chaplain to visit one time a week and 3 visits as needed. Further review of the clinical record revealed the Chaplain conducted no visits for the week of 11/20-11/26, no visits for the week of 12/04-12/10, no visits for the week of 12/18-12/24, no visits for 4 weeks 12/25-01/21, no visits for 2 weeks 01/29-02/13. The clinical record did not contain documentation as to why ordered visits were not provided.Review of IDG meetings revealed the following:IDG meeting dated 12/14/22 read in part, “;...Chaplain report: no issues identified... Changes to goals/POC: no changes needed ...”IDG meeting dated 12/28/22 read in part, “;...Chaplain report: no visits performed...Changes to goals/POC: no changes needed...”IDG meeting dated 01/25/23 read in part, “;...Chaplain report: no visits performed...Changes to goals/POC: no changes needed...”IDG meeting dated 02/08/23 read in part, “;...Chaplain report: patient has concerns of death and dying. Accepting of my services...Changes to goals/POC: no changes needed...” 4. Closed record review of Patient #8’s plan of care for certification period 02/07/2023 through 04/07/2023 revealed a start of care date 02/07/2023 with a terminal diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease, unspecified (Alzheimers disease is a brain disorder that slowly destroys memory and thinking skills and, eventually, the ability to carry out the simplest tasks.) and orders for the Chaplain to visit one time a week for a duration of one week. Further review of the clinical record revealed the Chaplain conducted a visit on 02/08. The Chaplain also made a visit on 02/24. The clinical record did not contain documentation as to why 1 extra visit was provided.Review of IDG meetings revealed the following:IDG meeting dated 02/09/23 read in part, “;...Chaplain report: ...until discussing with chaplain her concerns and then she started to feel better...Changes to goals/POC: no changes needed ...”IDG meeting dated 03/09/23 read in part, “;...Chaplain report: no issues identified...Changes to goals/POC: no changes needed ...” During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 10/29/2024 at 4:29 PM, the surveyor reviewed the above findings. This surveyor requested the DON review records in the event this surveyor might have missed documentation. During an interview the DON stated she did not have any additional information for the services not being provided according to the plan of care. The DON stated, “;Me and the IDG. We were all new to hospice and was trying to figure it out. I dont know what happened, I dont have an answer for why the frequencies were not followed. I believe some of the frequencies were entered in the plan of care in error typos. The POC was confusing to me about how to do the frequencies.” The surveyor asked if the DON requested additional training. The DON stated “;No.” During an interview with the Chaplain on 10/30/2024 at 12:30 PM, the surveyor reviewed the above findings. This surveyor asked the Chaplain did he get a weekly schedule. The Chaplain stated, “;No. The DON would tell me how often to visit the patients or sometimes someone from the office would tell me how often to visit. I informed the office when I had missed visits.” Review of agency policy, dated 042120, quoted in part, “TX.12 Interdisciplinary Group, Coordination of Care and Services.... A. Plan of Care 1. All hospice care and services furnished to patients/families will follow an individualized written POC...”Review of agency policy, dated 042120, quoted in part, “TX.9 Plan of Care and Process...A. A registered nurse coordinates the implementation of the plan of care for each Patient and is responsible for insuring the following...5. Care coordination and case management, both internal and with other health care providers involved. 6. Ongoing evaluation and assessment, with recommendations to the IDG on modification to the POC.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Counseling services (42 CFR 418.64(d)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 329 words

    “Based on record review and interview the agency failed to develop a bereavement plan of care for up to one year after the patient’s death for 2 of 2 patients who died. Citing Patients #11 and #12. This failure could place the bereaved at risk for not having their bereavement needs met after the death of a loved one. Findings: Patient chart reviews on reflected the following: Review of the medical record for patient #11 revealed a date of death as 05/12/2022. Further review of the medical record revealed that there was no bereavement plan of care developed. Review of the medical record for patient #12 revealed a date of death as 01/06/2023. Further review of the medical record revealed that there was no bereavement plan of care developed. In an interview with Chaplain A on 10/30/2024 at 12:41 PM, the surveyor reviewed the above findings with Chaplain A. The surveyor asked Chaplain A where the bereavement plan of cares could be found. Chaplain A stated, “I didnt know a bereavement plan of care was supposed to be done. We were all new to hospice and was trying to learn what all was supposed to be done. I did make visits after death and the office sent cards to the families. The surveyor asked if the visits were documented. Chaplain A stated, “;No.” In an interview with the Administrator on 10/30/2024 at 12:55 PM, the surveyor reviewed the above findings with the Administrator. regarding why there was no bereavement plan of care for the above clients. The Administrator stated, “;No the Chaplain did not know to make a bereavement plan of care. He did make visits and calls to families afterwards.” Review of agency policy, dated 101215, quoted in part, “TX.32 Pre and Post Bereavement...Policy: C. Following the death, the Agency will develop and implement the bereavement plan of care...Procedure...F. The bereavement plan of care will be developed and implemented following the death according to individual risk assessment score...””

    Rule L0596. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Oct 30, 2024Recertification inspection by the state2 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Oct 7, 2021.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • CMS hasn’t published nursing time from Medicare claims for this hospice.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • 7 owners or officers are people: Tiju Thomas (owns 5% or more directly, 50%); Tiju Thomas (corporate director, 50%); John Thomas (owns 5% or more directly, 50%); John Thomas (corporate director, 50%); John Thomas (managing employee (on the payroll), 50%); Sunanda Cherukuri (managing employee (on the payroll)); Christopher Minor (managing employee (on the payroll)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS gives no Hospice Care Index for this hospice.
  • 95% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 91 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 75080, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 3; this one had 2.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.