Sahara Hospice Care LLC
A hospice in Sugar Land, Texas 77498
140 Eldridge Rd , Suite- B 1, Sugar Land, Texas 77498. (281) 313-0085.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.
- 12 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- Not rated family caregiver rating
- 6of 10 CMS’s Hospice Care Index
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
- Condition-level deficiency
- For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.
What did inspectors find?
12 deficiencies cited in the last three years
The middle of the 74 hospices serving ZIP code 77498 had 5.
The last inspection on record was on Sep 3, 2024: a follow-up inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner.
1 deficiency at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
When those deficiencies happened
12 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Sep 2024. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Sep 3, 2024: follow-up inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner7 deficiencies
-
Timeframe for completion of assessment (42 CFR 418.54(b))
The inspectors’ words, 182 words
“It is required that the hospice Interdisciplinary Group, in consultation with the individual’s attending physician (if any), completes an initial comprehensive assessment no later than five (5) calendar days after the election of hospice care, in accordance with CMS §418.24–the elements of the hospice care election statement. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 1 of 5 (20%) clinical records reviewed revealed that the agency did not ensure that the IDG team completed an initial assessment no later than 5 days after the election of hospice care. Clinical Record 2: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 08/09/2024 with a diagnosis of Vascular Dementia. There was no social work visit documented in the clinical record. Upon further review of the record there was no documented evidence of an initial psychosocial assessment and not documentation explaining why the visit was not competed. An internal audit was conducted by a consultant where this issue was identified, and a performance improvement plan has been initiated with follow up from the consulted to occur on 09/03/2024, 09/17/2024, and 10/08/2024.”
-
Plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(b))
The inspectors’ words, 221 words
“It is required that hospice care and services provided to patients and families follow the individualized plan of care established by: The hospice IDG in collaboration with the attending physician (if any); The patient or patient representative if any of them so desire; The primary caregiver in accordance with the patient’s needs if any of them so desire. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 1 of 5 (20%) clinical records reviewed revealed that the agency did not ensure that a plan of care was written by the IDG group. Clinical Record 2: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 08/09/2024 with a diagnosis of Vascular Dementia. The Director of Nursing stated that on admission a plan of care was written as if a doctor’s order and sent to the doctor for signature, then the plan of care is generated at the first IDG meeting after admission. This should have taken place on 08/26/2024. During review of the clinical record there was no documented evidence of a plan of care or IDG meetings completed. The director of nursing stated that the EMR has been having some issues and making updates that have affected some documentation to show up. She stated that she and the consultant are working with EMR vendor to resolve these issues.”
-
Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))
The inspectors’ words, 244 words
“It is required that the Interdisciplinary Group, in collaboration with the individual’s attending physician (if any), reviews, revises, and documents the individualized care plan as frequently as the patient’s condition requires; but no less frequently than every 15 calendar days. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 1 of 5 (20%) clinical records reviewed revealed that the agency did not ensure that the IDG group did not review, revise, or document the individualized care plan no less frequently than every 15 days or as the patient’s condition requires it. Clinical Record 1: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 08/19/2024, with a diagnosis of Alzheimer’s Disease. The clinical record review revealed documented evidence of a care plan and an IDT meeting on the same date. However, no further documentation of any subsequent IDT meetings or updated care plans was found. In an interview, the Director of Nursing indicated that documentation from an IDT meeting held on 08/30/2024, should be present in the record, yet no such documentation was located. Clinical Record 2: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 08/09/2024. During review of the clinical record there was no documented evidence of an IDT meeting taking place for this patient. In an interview with the director of nursing, she stated their IDG meeting took place on 08/16/2024 and 08/30/2024 with the next one due on 09/13/2024. She was unable to provide the documentation for 08/16/2024 or 08/30/2024.”
-
Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))
The inspectors’ words, 255 words
“It is required that hospice aides are assigned to a specific patient by a registered nurse who is a member of the Interdisciplinary Group. Written patient care instructions for a hospice aide are prepared by a RN who is responsible for the supervision of the hospice aide. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 1 of 4 (25%) clinical records reviewed revealed that the agency did not ensure specific instructions were included on the aide plan of care. Clinical Record 1: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 08/19/2024 with a diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease. The patient had aide services ordered on the plan of care for 3 times a week. The plan of care developed and written by the RN included as needed tasks for foot care, back rub, nail care, partial bath or shower, shave, assist with bedpan and assist with bedside commode. The aide care plan lacked specific instructions for the aide. Clinical Record 3: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 08/20/2024 with a diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease. The plan of care ordered aides 5 times a week. The plan of care developed and written by the RN included as needed tasks for foot care, back rub, nail care, partial bath or shower, shave, light housekeeping, assist with bedpan and assist with bedside commode. The aide care plan lacked specific instructions for the aide. During the joint record review and interview with the clinical manager, she said they did use the as needed orders.”
-
Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(7))
The inspectors’ words, 242 words
“It is required that a patient clinical record containing past and current findings is maintained for each hospice patient. The record contains correct clinical information that is available to the patient’s attending physician and hospice staff. The record may be maintained electronically or on paper. The patient’s record includes, at a minimum, physician orders. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 1 of 5 (20%) clinical record reviewed revealed that the agency did not ensure that the clinical record included physician orders. Clinical Record 2: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 08/09/2024 with a diagnosis of Vascular Dementia. On the initial RN comprehensive assessment, the RN documented assessment of wounds and wound care completed, “On the left buttock area, the patient has some scattered stage 2 pressure injuries. SN cleansed the area with normal saline and applied hydrocolloid dressing over it. The skin tear on the left elbow measures 2 cm X 1.0 cm X 0.1 cm and the right-hand skin tear measures 1.5 cm X 1.0 cm X 0.1 cm. SN cleansed the area with the normal saline, applied triple antibiotic and covered with foam dressing. Patient tolerated it well.” During further review of the clinical record there was no evidence of a physician’s order for wound care. In an interview with the director of nursing she stated the order should have been in the chart or listed on the plan of care.”
-
Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(1)(i))
The inspectors’ words, 201 words
“It is required that if the care of a hospice patient is transferred to a Medicare/Medicaid certified facility, the hospice forwards to the receiving facility a copy of the hospice discharge summary described in HCDT 40.I; and the patient’s record, if requested. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 1 of 1 (100%) clinical record of a discharged patient revealed that the agency did not ensure that the discharge summary or patients record was forwarded to the receiving facility. THIS IS A CONTINUED REQUIRED ACTION Clinical Record 5: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 08/21/2023 with a diagnosis of Alzheimer’s Disease. On 08/29/2024 the family made the decision to revoke hospice services due to the patient was sent to the hospital for aggressive treatment. There was no documented evidence that the agency made any communication with the hospital or that a discharge summary had been sent. During the interview with the director of nursing she stated that the patient went to the hospital for IV antibiotics, and she could not provide any documentation that report was called or that any documents were sent to the receiving facility. THIS IS A CONTINUED REQUIRED ACTION”
-
Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(3)(i))
The inspectors’ words, 272 words
“It is required that the hospice discharge summary provided to a facility receiving a hospice patient for care—or to the patient’s community attending physician upon hospice discharge—includes at least the following, a summary of the patient’s hospice stay, including treatments, symptoms, and pain management, the patient’s current plan of care, the patient’s latest physician orders, and any other documentation that will assist in the post-discharge continuity of care or that is requested by the receiving facility or the attending physician. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 1 of 1 (100%) clinical record that was discharged revealed that the agency did not ensure that a discharge summary was completed. THIS IS A CONTINUED REQUIRED ACTION Clinical Record 5: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 08/21/2023 with a diagnosis of Alzheimer’s Disease. On 08/29/2024 the family made the decision to revoke hospice services due to the patient was sent to the hospital for aggressive treatment. There was no documented evidence that the agency completed a discharge summary including a summary of the patient’s hospice stay, including treatments, symptoms, and pain management, the patient’s current plan of care, the patient’s latest physician orders, and any other documentation requested. In an interview with the director of nursing she was unable to provide documentation of a discharge summary for this patient. During the interview with the director of nursing she stated that the patient went to the hospital for IV antibiotics, and she could not provide any documentation that report was called or that any documents were sent to the receiving facility. THIS IS A CONTINUED REQUIRED ACTION”
Jul 26, 2024: reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner5 deficiencies
-
Volunteers (42 CFR 418.78)
The inspectors’ words, 160 words
“It is required that Volunteers are used in day-to-day administrative and/or direct patient care roles. Volunteer services provided to patients/families are in a defined role and under the supervision of a designated hospice employee. Volunteer services are noted in the plan of care and documented in the patient record, including the time spent. THIS IS A CMS CONDITION LEVEL DEFICIENCY. This Condition of Participation was not met as evidenced by a review of clinical records, document review, and interview which revealed the hospice: Failed to ensure the patients had a volunteer needs assessment, and volunteer plan of care with task for the volunteers to perform {HCDT.21. I/L644}. The cumulative effect of these systemic problems resulted in the hospice agency’s inability to ensure the provision of quality health care in a safe environment for the condition of participation CFR 418.78: Volunteers. The deficient practice illustrated systemic process failures that had the potential to affect all patients cared for by the agency.”
-
Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6)(i))
The inspectors’ words, 393 words
“It is required that the documented comprehensive assessment includes a drug profile that contains the patient’s current prescription and over-the-counter (OTC) drugs. The drug profile is updated per the hospice policy and procedure, but, at minimum, at the time of each comprehensive assessment and/or when new medication is added, or changes are made to existing medication. This standard was not met as evidenced by document review, interview and observation. In 2 of 14 (14%) medication profiles for active hospice patients reviewed revealed that the hospice agency did not ensure that the patient’s drug profile contained the patient’s current prescription and over-the-counter drugs. The hospice agency did not ensure the patient’s drug profile was updated per the hospice policy and procedure. Document 2: Policy 8.20.1 (Revised June 2019), titled, Medication Reconciliation, stated in part, medications ordered while the patient is receiving care will be compared to the medication list/profile. The medication list will be updated with each new or changed medication. Home Visit 1: The hospice election of benefit was 04/19/2023 and the patient resided in an assisted living facility (ALF). During the home visit (Home Visit 1, Clinical Record 1) with the Chaplain (Personnel Record 7) on 07/25/2024 the medication profile was reviewed. The agency medication profile listed an Acetaminophen rectal suppository of 650 mg per rectum every six hours as needed for pain and Lorazepam oral 0.5 mg every 2-3 hours as needed for anxiety. The medications were ordered on 12/15/2022. The Acetaminophen and Lorazepam was not listed on the facility medication profile. Home Visit 2: The hospice election of benefit was 04/01/2024 and the patient resided in an assisted living facility (ALF). During the home visit (Home Visit 2, Clinical Record 2) with the registered nurse (RN) (Personnel Record 6) on 07/25/2024, The hospice medication profile reviewed on 07/25/2024 listed Lasix oral 20 mg daily at 9 am. The medication was ordered on 07/02/2024. The hospice medication profile listed Atropine Sulfate Ophthalmic Solution 1% give one drop under the tongue once daily as needed and Rytary oral extended release 48.75-195 mg at 8 am, 12 pm, 4 pm, and 8 pm. Both the Atropine and Rytary were ordered on 06/21/2024. The Lasix, Atropine, and Rytary medications were not listed on the facility medication profile. During an interview on 07/25/2024, the Director of Nursing agreed the medication profiles has not been reconciled.”
-
Role (42 CFR 418.78(b))
The inspectors’ words, 375 words
“It is required that volunteers are used in day-to-day administrative and/or direct patient care roles. Volunteer services provided to patients/families are in a defined role and under the supervision of a designated hospice employee. Volunteer services are: Noted in the plan of care. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review, document review and interview. In 2 of 4 (50%) clinical records reviewed for patients receiving volunteer services revealed that the hospice agency did not ensure the patients had a volunteer needs assessment, and volunteer plan of care with task for the volunteers to perform. Document 2: Agency 4.24.3., titled, Volunteer Services, stated in part, volunteer duties may include patient care activities that must be evident in the patient’s plan of care. Patient care activities allowed are emotional support, companionship and practical assistance, errands, meals, housekeeping tasks, and minimum patient comfort measures and transportation. Clinical Record 1: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 04/19/2023. Volunteer services were ordered on 05/13/2024 at a frequency of once a quarter. The patient received volunteer visits on 05/16/2024 and 05/30/2024. The patient volunteer documented that the patient’s nails were cut, new colors polished, and massaged hands. There was no documented evidence that the volunteer coordinator completed a volunteer needs assessment, no volunteer assigned task for the volunteer to complete on the patient volunteer visits and was not included in the plan of care. Clinical Record 2: The patient elected their hospice benefit on 04/01/2024. Volunteer services were ordered on 04/01/2024 at a frequency of one time a month. The patient has received volunteer visits on 04/09/2024 and 06/04/2024. The patient volunteer documented that the patient’s nails were cut and massage oil was applied to the patient’s arms and legs. There was no documented evidence that the volunteer coordinator completed a volunteer needs assessment, no volunteer assigned task for the volunteer to complete on the patient volunteer visits and was not included in the plan of care. During an interview on 07/26/2024, the Administrator/Volunteer Coordinator agreed that the patient volunteer had been cutting the patient’s nails as documented in the clinical records. The Administrator/Volunteer Coordinator also stated he would be educating the patient volunteer on what allowable tasks a patient volunteer may perform with the patients.”
-
Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(1)(i))
The inspectors’ words, 232 words
“It is required that if the care of a hospice patient is transferred to a Medicare/Medicaid-certified facility, the hospice forwards to the receiving facility a copy of the hospice discharge summary described in HCDT 40.I. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review, document review and interview. In 1 of 1 (100%) clinical records reviewed for patients transferred to another Medicare/Medicaid-certified facility revealed that the hospice agency did not ensure a copy of the hospice discharge summary was forwarded to the receiving Medicare/Medicaid-certified facility. Document 3: Policy 9.29.1 (Revised 2019), titled, Discharge Summary, stated in part, if the care of a patient is transferred to another Medicare/Medicaid-certified facility, the hospice will forward, to the receiving facility, a copy of the hospice discharge summary. Clinical Record 12: The patient elected their hospice benefit and start of care on 08/18/2023. The patient was discharged from the hospice agency due to transferring to Medicare/Medicaid certified facility on 09/26/2023. The clinical record included a documented live discharge note dated 09/26/2023. There was no documented evidence that a hospice discharge summary was completed and forwarded to the receiving facility, During an interview on 07/26/2024, the Director of Nursing agreed that a discharge summary had not been completed or forwarded to the receiving facility. The Director of Nursing stated that the receiving facility transferred the patient without them being made aware until a week later.”
-
Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(3)(i))
The inspectors’ words, 190 words
“It is required that the hospice discharge summary provided to a facility receiving a hospice patient for care or to the patient’s community attending physician upon hospice discharge includes at least the following: a summary of the patient’s hospice stay, including treatments, symptoms, and pain management. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review, document review and interview. In 1 of 1 (100%) clinical records reviewed for patients discharge revealed that the hospice agency did not ensure that the hospice discharge summary was completed and included a summary of the patient’s hospice stay, including treatments, symptoms, and pain management. Document 2: Policy 9.29.1 (Revised June 2019), titled, Discharge Summary, stated in part, that the hospice discharge summary will include a summary of the patient’s stay including treatments, symptoms, and pain management. Clinical Record 12: The patient elected their hospice benefit and start of care on 08/18/2023. The patient later transferred to another hospice on 09/26/2023. There was no documented evidence that the hospice discharge summary had been completed. During an interview on 07/26/2024, the Director of Nursing agreed that the hospice discharge summary had not been completed.”
All 2 inspections in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 3, 2024 | Follow-up inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner | 7 deficiencies cited |
| Jul 26, 2024 | Reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner | 5 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified hospice since Nov 24, 2018.
- Ownership: for-profit.
- Cited at For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules.
CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Has anything been proven against it?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who does the caring?
- From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 12.1 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 2.9% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 86.4% of patients who died.
- Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 94% at home, 6% in assisted living.
CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | This provider |
|---|---|
| Nurse care minutes per routine home care day | 12.1 min |
| Skilled nursing minutes at weekends | 2.9% |
| Visits near death | 86.4% of patients who died |
Who owns it?
- 4 owners or officers are people: Robin George (owns 5% or more directly, 100%); Robin George (corporate director, 100%); Robin George (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); Laxman R Kalvakuntla (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%).
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.
What do families say?
- CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
- CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 6 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
- 57.38% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 55% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5 | Not rated |
| Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold | 6 of 10 |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 74 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 77498, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 5; this one had 12.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Deficiencies, 3 years |
|---|---|
| Sahara Hospice Care LLC This hospice | 12 |
| Altus Hospice | 10 |
| Allstar Hospice | 15 |
| Harbor Hospice of Richmond, LP | 10 |
| Vitalcaring Group | 0 |
| White Orchid Hospice | 14 |
| Heart to Heart Hospice of Sugar Land | 6 |
| Allied Hospice | 18 |
| Pax Et Vita Hospice Agency, LLC | 1 |
| Hospice Care Team Inc. | 0 |
| Houston Hospice | 4 |
| Vitas Healthcare of Texas L P | 4 |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
- Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice General Information (yc9t-dgbk).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Provider Data (252m-zfp9).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, CAHPS Hospice Survey (gxki-hrr8).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR hospice inspection reports (Hospice Survey Reports - Oct 2021 through Sep 2026.xlsx).
Released Oct 23, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice All Owners (e983965e-1603-4cb8-82b5-c40090e380d1).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Enrollments (25704213-e833-4b8b-9dbc-58dd17149209).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice ZIP Data (95rg-2usp).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.
From the hospice
The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.