Hearth Record

Angel Wings Hospice Services LLC

A hospice in Weslaco, Texas 78596

923 W Business 83 Ste B, Weslaco, Texas 78596. (956) 647-5261.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 9 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Nov 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

9 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 43 hospices serving ZIP code 78596 had 5.5.

The last inspection on record was on Nov 21, 2024: a reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

9 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Nov 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

9 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Nov 21, 2024: reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission9 deficiencies
  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(5))

    The inspectors’ words, 105 words

    “Observed in Record Review. The HCO failed to conduct and document a patient-specific comprehensive assessment as evidenced by in RR#6 there was no assessment for aspiration risk for a mechanical soft diet for a CVA patient, this was validated and discussed with Assistant Director of Nursing and Administer Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 12 patient records reviewed, The surveyor noted (ARR#10) that the initial social worker assessment indicated that the primary caregiver was experiencing burnout; however, it did not indicate the severity of the stress or an assessment of the need for a different level of care/respite. This was confirmed with the administrator.”

    Rule L0529. Standard-level.

  • Plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 110 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 3 of 12 patient records reviewed, The HCO failed to provide education and training to the patient caregiver based on the patient’s assessed needs as identified in RRHV#2 , patients spouse informed the surveyor that when needed the patients son provides wound care and in chart review there was no education provided to son or identified on plan of care that son would do the wound care. In RR#6 and RR#8, orders were present for Oxygen 2-4 litres via N/C PRN but no education was provided to family on how to dose oxygen. This was discussed and validated with Assistant Director of Nursing and Administrator.”

    Rule L0544. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 158 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 4 of 12 patient records reviewed, The HCO failed to implement an individualized plan of care based on problems identified as in RR #4 aggression and hallucinations identified at SOC but there was no goals for managing symptoms. RR#5 IDG note identified disturbance in sleep patterns, but no goals identified. In RR #6, patient had orders for mechanical soft diet for a CVA patient, but no goal identified for aspiration precautions and in RR#7 patient had nausea 8/10 as identified in the Palliative scale and no goals for assessment or improvement of symptoms. This was discussed and validated with Assistant Director of Nursing and Administrator Observed in Record Review. The surveyor noted (ARR#10) that the plan of care goals on the initial plan of care did not include reasonable time frames for achieving outcomes. All goals were to be met at the end of the certification period. This was confirmed with the administrator.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 264 words

    “Observed in Record Review. The surveyor noted (ARR#10) that there were no interventions to manage the goal: caregiver emotional challenges. The plan of care issue was identified; however, there were no intervention for assisting the caregiver to manage burnout and exhaustion as indicated in the assessment. There were no outcome expectation or time frames for managing the caregiver stress. The goal was to provide support throughout the benefit period. The frequency for the social worker was monthly, as it was for everyone. This was confirmed with the administrator. Observed in Record Review. In 5 of 12 patient records reviewed, The HCO failed to implement the plan of care to include all services needed for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions as seen in RRHV#2 the SN to prefill the medication box weekly was not on the plan of care. RRHV#2 when HHA was getting the patient out of bed to bathe, the surveyor observed a dressing on patients lt upper buttock, when asked the HHA stated that she would change the dressing following the patients shower, in record review there was no order for wound care. In RRHV#3 there was no instructions on the care plan as to who was administering the pre filled medication in the syringes. In RR#5 patient had a g-tube but there was no order for g-tube site care or what measures to take if g-tube falls out. RR#7 orders for oxygen was 3 liter’s via N/C continuous or PRN, no indication identified. This was discussed and validated with Assistant Director of Nursing and Administrator”

    Rule L0546. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 140 words

    “Observed in Individual Tracer. In 5 of 12 patient records reviewed, The HCO failed to implement measurable outcomes anticipated from implementing and coordinating the plan of care as identified in record review. In RRHV#1 goals for pain was to remain at a tolerable level and no timeframe identified. RRHV#3 constipation was identified goal was for elimination needs to be at an acceptable level and the goal for the wound had an appropriate measure but not a reasonable time frame as documented: will decrease in size by 50% by end of cert. An additional goal identified in RR#3: anxiety but measure was to inform of reduced symptoms. In RR #9 initial plan of care, pain and dyspnea was identified as a symptom but time frames were for end of cert.This was discussed and validated with Assistant Director of Nursing and Administrator”

    Rule L0548. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 12 patient records reviewed, The HCO failed to revise plan of care based on new information as identified in RRHV#1, Social worker identified a new POA but there was no plan of care revisions made to discuss advance directives with the POA. This was discussed and validated with the Assistant Director of Nursing and Administrator.”

    Rule L0553. Standard-level.

  • Prevention (42 CFR 418.60(a))

    The inspectors’ words, 125 words

    “Observed in Individual Tracer. In 3 of 3 home visits conducted, The HCO failed to implement the infection prevention and control activities: to perform hand hygiene consistent with policy as evidenced during HV #1 it was observed that the Chaplain did not perform hand hygiene during the home visit, minimally at start and end of visit. During HV#2 the HHA used a bar of soap that was in the bathroom, she turned off the faucet with her hands and did not have any paper towels to dry her hands. During HV#3 the RN did not use hand sanitizer when entering her medical bag after performing vital signs and assessment. This was validated with the Assistant Director of Nursing who was also present for both visits.”

    Rule L0579. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 12 patient records reviewed, The HCO failed to provide written patient care instructions for the hospice aide as identified in RRHV#2, The Home Care Aide Care Plan did not include wound care instructions, as required by policy. This was discussed and validated with the Assistant Director of Nursing and Administrator. 
”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Training (42 CFR 418.100(g)(3))

    “Observed in HR File Review. In 1 of 9 HR files reviewed, The HCO failed go maintain a completed competency assessment as evidenced by Chaplain personnel file review: incomplete competency as none of the individual competencies were identified, only signatures were documented at the bottom of the page, this is a new hire since 8/01/24. This was discussed and validated with the Administrator”

    Rule L0663. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Nov 21, 2024Reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission9 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Sep 17, 2018.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 9.3 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 10.9% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 100% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 100% at home.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day9.3 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends10.9%
Visits near death100.0% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • 7 owners or officers are people: Jose Castillo (owns 5% or more directly, 80%); Jose Castillo (general partner, 80%); Jose Castillo (corporate director, 80%); Jose Castillo (runs it (operational or managerial control), 50%); Jessica Castillo (runs it (operational or managerial control), 25%); Celina Sandoval (runs it (operational or managerial control), 25%); Celina Sandoval (limited partner, 20%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 8 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 98.21% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 59.6% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold8 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 43 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 78596, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 5.5; this one had 9.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.