Hearth Record

Harbor Hospice of East Dallas - Fort Worth, LP

A hospice in Dallas, Texas 75246

3900 Junius St Ste 150a, Dallas, Texas 75246. (469) 329-3321.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.

The last 24 months 12 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2026. Most serious: Condition-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
Condition-level deficiency
For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.

What did inspectors find?

12 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 27 hospices serving ZIP code 75246 had 3.

The last inspection on record was on Jul 1, 2026: a follow-up inspection by The Joint Commission.

1 deficiency at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

12 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2026. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

12 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

May 21, 2026: reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission12 deficiencies
  • Governing body and administrator (42 CFR 418.100(b))

    “Observed in Tracer Activities. : There was no evidence that the governing body and leadership had established requirements to support patient care treatment and services as evidenced by a condition level finding at 418.78 volunteer services.”

    Rule L0651. Condition-level.

  • Plan Based on All Hazards Risk Assessment (42 CFR 418.113(a)(1))

    “Observed in Emergency Management Session. During the Emergency Management session it was noted that the organization did not conduct a hazard vulnerability analysis for the current location. For example the HVA included in the plan was for the previous location in Dallas, not the current location in Corsicana many miles away from Dallas. This was confirmed and discussed with the DPCS present.”

    Rule E0006. Standard-level.

  • Patient outcome measures (42 CFR 418.54(e)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 105 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 5 of 14 patient records reviewed, it was noted that the record was incomplete. For example in record RRBR#1 the record did not have any IDG documentation. Record RRNHV#2 the second IDG documentation was incomplete with No current plan of care documented however in the EHR there was a plan of care documented in another area. Record RRNHV#4 there was no SN frequency order. Record RRNHV#6 IDG #1 and RRNHV#7 IDG#2 documentation stated No goals. and No interventions. however there were goals and interventions documented in another part of the record. This was confirmed and discussed with the DPCS present.”

    Rule L0535. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 151 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 8 of 10 patient records reviewed, it was noted that the plan of care was not individualized. For example in record RRHV#1, 11 of 11 goals time frames were identical/the next recertification date. These goals included areas such as the appropriate use of assistive devices, urinary elimination, pain management and improved safety awareness which identical time frames would be inappropriate. Also the record included the incomplete goal Caregiver will be able to demonstrate improved safety awareness as evidenced by:_____. In record RRHV#3, 12 of 12 goals time frames were identical/the next recertification date. The record included goals: Pt/CS will perform ADL’s with optimal ability and Promote skin integrity. In record RRNHV#5 all goal time frames were dated with dates 4-6 months prior to the patient’s admission to the hospice. Record RRNHV#1,2,3,4 and 7 had similar POC goal issues.This was confirmed and discussed with the Administrator/DPCS present.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(2))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 4 of 14 patient records reviewed, it was noted that there was no a statement of the scope and frequency of services necessary to meet the patient and family needs. For example, Record RRNHV#2 the second IDG documentation was incomplete with no frequencies. Record RRNHV#4 there was no SN frequency order. Record RRNHV#6 IDG #1 and RRNHV#7 IDG#2 there were no frequencies. . This was confirmed and discussed with the DPCS present.”

    Rule L0547. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d ))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 3 of 14 patient records reviewed, it was noted that the IDG had not reviewed and revised the POC. Record RRNHV#2 the second IDG documentation was incomplete with no goals and interventions it stated No current plan of care. Record RRNHV#6 IDG #1 and RRNHV#7 IDG#2 there were no goals and interventions they stated No goals. and No interventions. This was confirmed and discussed with the DPCS present.”

    Rule L0552. Standard-level.

  • Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(1)(i))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 6 patient records reviewed, it was noted that the hospice aide supervision not completed every 14 days. For example in record RRHV#3 there was 21 days from the start of aide services to the first documentation of supervision of aide services. Record RRNHV#3 there was 20 days between documentation of supervisory visits. This was confirmed and discussed with the Administrator/DPCS present.”

    Rule L0629. Standard-level.

  • Recruiting and retaining (42 CFR 418.78(c))

    “Observed in Tracer Activities. During review of the volunteer program and discussion with the Volunteer Coordinator and DPCS it was noted that the hospice was not able to demonstrate viable and ongoing efforts to recruit and retain volunteers. For example, the organization documented that there were no volunteers the year 2025 and January to current 2026. The Volunteer Coordinator stated that she was new to the organization February 2026 and discussed plans for recruitment, but was unable to demonstrate that recruitment had taken place.”

    Rule L0645. Standard-level.

  • Cost saving (42 CFR 418.78(d))

    “Observed in Tracer Activities. During review of the Volunteer Program and discussion with the Volunteer Coordinator and DPCS it was noted that there was no cost savings documented. During discussion there have been no volunteers for the year 2025 and January to current 2026, so unable to document cost savings. This was confirmed and discussed with Volunteer Coordinator and DPCS.”

    Rule L0646. Standard-level.

  • Level of activity (42 CFR 418.78(e))

    “Observed in Tracer Activities. During the Volunteer Program review and the Data session it was noted that volunteers did not provide at least 5% of the total patient care hours of all paid hospice employees and contract staff. For example the year 2025 and January to April 2026 volunteers provided 0% of the total patient care hours. This was confirmed and discussed with the DPCS present.”

    Rule L0647. Standard-level.

  • Clinical records (42 CFR 418.104)

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 2 patient records reviewed, for live discharge patients it was noted that the record was inaccurate or contains errors. For example in record RRDC#1 the discharge summary stated the patient had revoked services, there was no revocation document in the record. The last IDG documented stated the patient had transferred to another hospice, there was no transfer document and no transfer order. This was confirmed and discussed with the DPCS present.”

    Rule L0670. Standard-level.

  • Use and mintenance of equipment and supplies (42 CFR 418.106(f)(2))

    “Observed in Patient Home. In 1 of 1 home visits conducted, that included oxygen therapy it was noted that staff did not provide education on the safe storage of oxygen cylinders in the home. For example during visit RRHV#3 there were 3 oxygen tanks free standing in the living room and 1 additional that was on a cart. The visit was attended by both the aide and the RN and neither of these staff members educated on proper storage of oxygen tanks. This was discussed with the DPCS.”

    Rule L0702. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jul 1, 2026Follow-up inspection by The Joint CommissionNo deficiencies cited
May 21, 2026Reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission12 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since May 5, 2017.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • Cited at in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • CMS hasn’t published nursing time from Medicare claims for this hospice.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 73% at home, 27% in a nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Arfeen Properties, L.P. owns 99% directly since Sep 24, 2012.
  • 6 owners or officers are people: Qamar U Arfeen (owns 5% or more through other companies, 50%); Kelley L Arfeen (owns 5% or more through other companies, 50%); Karen Carter (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Bryan Gaspard (corporate officer); Bryan Gaspard (managing employee (on the payroll)); Qamar U Arfeen (corporate officer).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Arfeen Properties, L.P.Owns 5% or more directly99%Sep 24, 2012
Hhcs Managers LLCGeneral partner1%Sep 24, 2012

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS gives no Hospice Care Index for this hospice.
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 27 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 75246, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 3; this one had 12.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.