Hearth Record

Serenity Hospice

A hospice in Bastrop, Texas 78602

2604 Hwy 71 E, Building B, Bastrop, Texas 78602. (512) 985-6107.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 11 deficiencies in 3 months of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

11 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 35 hospices serving ZIP code 78602 had 4.

The last inspection on record was on Jul 15, 2026: a complaint inspection by the state.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

11 deficiencies in 3 months of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.

11 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 Dec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNov

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Jul 15, 2026: complaint inspection by the state2 deficiencies
  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 388 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to include an updated plan of care in the clinical record for 1 of 4 patient records (Pt #1) for which records were reviewed.This failure placed Pt #1 at risk of receiving irrelevant and inadequate care. Findings Included:Review of the clinical record for Patient #1 revealed a start of care date of 01/14/2026. Review of the clinical record for the time period 04/14/2026-06/12/2026 revealed an individualized plan of care for Patient #1 was not included.An interview was conducted on 07/13/2026 at 12:37 P.M. with the Administrator. Documentation of the plan of care for Patient #1 for the time period 04/14/2026-6/12/2026 was requested for review. The Administrator reviewed the record and confirmed there was no POC in the EMR. The Administrator contacted RN- B and asked if he completed the POC. The Administrator ended the call and advised RN- B was going to look at his notes and call back. Surveyor asked if the agency routinely reviewed clinical records to ensure all documentation was complete and accurate. The Administrator stated, “No, not now. It will be the DON’s responsibility in the future.” Surveyor asked why it was important for each patient to have an individualized plan of care. The Administrator stated, “To ensure safe and individualized care is provided to each patient.” Review of the agency’s Policy and Procedure Manual included a policy titled “Plan of Care Process,PC.30, Last Reviewed:09/01/24,” which read in part, “I. All hospice care and services furnished to patients and their families will follow an individualized written POC established by the Hospice Interdisciplinary Group/Team (IDG/IDT) in collaboration with the Attending Physician (if any), the patient or representative, and the primary caregiver, if any of them so desire, and in accordance with the patient’s needs. II. The Hospice will develop an individualized written POC for each patient. The POC must reflectpatient and family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The POC will include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. III. The Hospice will review and revise patient care in accordance with changes in the patient’s condition; spiritual status, psychosocial status, residential environment; patient’s response to care; and changes that have occurred regarding diagnosis, treatment, medications, precautions, and limitations.””

    Rule L0672. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.112(e)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 689 words

    “Based on record review and interviews, the agency failed to provide a skilled nursing facility or nursing facility with the patient’s advance directives specific to the patient for 1 of 4 patients (Patient #3) for which records were reviewed. The agency failed to obtain the patient’s Out of Hospital Do Not Resuscitate form and provide it to the facility to post in the patient’s room. Failure to provide a copy of the patient’s advance directives caused the facility to contact emergency medical services during the patient’s physical decline. Patient #1 died during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. This failure may have caused extreme physical distress to Patient #3 and caused extreme emotional distress to the patient’s family members. Findings Included:Review of the clinical record for Patient #3 revealed a start of care date of 04/09/2025 with a diagnosis of Cancer. Review of patient consent forms dated 04/09/2025, revealed page 3 of 5, “I have signed an Advance Directive.” Review of the SN admission summary comments dated 04/09/2025 read, “She has an OOHDNR.” Review of a LNSW visit note dated 04/15/2025 read, “Pt has an OOHDNR and funeral arrangements have been made.”Further review of the clinical record for Patient #3 revealed a SN visit note dated 04/30/2025 which read, “Received call from RNCM at 17:46 on 04/30/2025 in regards to the expiring of Patient #3. Arrived at 18:10. Upon arrival BPD and EMS present, due to facility no being able to provide DNR, life saving measures were performed. Patients/Patient’s FM present, as well as (Police Officer). BPD did not have a case number to provide. Ambu bag removed that was left by EMS per (FM) request. Funeral home was notified.” A telephone interview was conducted on 07/14/2026 at 10:09 a.m. with FM- B. Surveyor reviewed the allegations in the intake and asked if there was any additional information she would like to provide. FM- B stated, “We had a DNR but it was never given to the facility. It was supposed to be posted in her room but it wasn’t. When I got there, my 99 ½ year old mother was laying on the floor, intubated with electrodes stuck all over her. I was so upset. She was so lively and just wanted to pass away peacefully.” An interview was conducted on 07/14/2026 at 2:51 p.m. with the ASN regarding the allegations in intake #1012384. The clinical record was reviewed and the ASN confirmed it was documented that Patient #3 had an OOH DNR. The ASN searched the record and was not able to find a copy of the document. The ASN stated “We didn’t get a copy of the DNR. That is why the patient was given CPR.” An interview was conducted on 07/14/2026 at 3:20 p.m. with the Administrator regarding the allegations in Intake #1012384. The Administrator acknowledged the agency failed to obtain a copy of the patient’s OOH DNR and did not provide it to ALF- D. Surveyor asked why the document was not provided to the ALF. The Administrator stated, “I don’t know. We were under different management then. The nurse RN- A) that would have been responsible tor that is no longer with the agency.” The nurse’s (RN- A) contact information was requested. Surveyor asked what harm may have been caused due to the failure. The Administrator stated, “The patient underwent unnecessary life saving measures and the family did not have the peaceful and comfortable passing for their loved one that they expected.” A telephone interview was attempted on 07/15/2026 at 10:53 a.m. with RN- A regarding the allegations in Intake #1012384. There was no answer and voicemail was not set up.Review of the agency’s Policy and Procedure Manual revealed a policy titled, “Expected Patient Death, PC.55, reviewed:09/01/24”, which read, “The organization will follow the patient’s advance directives completed according to the advance directives requirement of the jurisdiction of the state in which the patient resides. A written No Not Resuscitate (DNR) order or Out of Hospital DNR, signed by the patient’s physician (or other authorized independent practitioner), must be on file in the patient’s clinical record and made part of the admission folder in the patient’s home.””

    Rule L0781. Standard-level. From a complaint.

Mar 8, 2024: complaint inspection by the state1 deficiency
  • Counseling services (42 CFR 418.64(d)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 329 words

    “Based on record review and interview the agency failed to provide bereavement services to 22 of 22 family members or caregivers (Family 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21 and 22) on the agencys bereavement list. Failure to provide bereavement services to family or caregivers after the death of a loved one may have caused the bereaved additional emotional stress and feelings of not being supported by the hospice agency. Surveyor reviewed the agencys bereavement list for the time period 06/09/2023 - 02/26/2024. There were 22 individuals on the list: Family 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21 and 22. Surveyor conducted an interview on 03/08/2024 at 11:00 a.m. with the Alternate Administrator. Surveyor requested to review documentation of bereavement activities for the families of the individuals on the bereavement list. The Alternate Administrator stated the agency did not provide bereavement services to anyone. The Surveyor asked who was responsible for completing bereavement activities. The Alternate Administrator stated, “;[SW- A] was the bereavement coordinator but she is gone.” The Alternate Administrator stated the CH was the current bereavement coordinator. Review of the agencys online policies and procedures revealed a policy titled, “;Bereavement, PC.130, Reviewed:110(0)121” which read, “;The hospice will have an organized program for the provision of bereavement services furnished under the supervision of a qualified professional with experience or education in grief and/or loss counseling. The purpose of the bereavement program is to facilitate a normal grieving process by providing counseling, coping strategies, and caring interventions to families and caregivers. The program will provide referrals to appropriate community resources to those who may be experiencing pathologic grief. The hospice will make bereavement services available to the family and other individuals in the bereavement plan of care (POC) before, and for up to one year following the death of the patient.””

    Rule L0596. Standard-level. From a complaint.

Feb 8, 2024: reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner8 deficiencies
  • Timeframe for completion of assessment (42 CFR 418.54(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 203 words

    “It is required that the hospice Interdisciplinary Group, in consultation with the individual’s attending physician (if any), completes an initial comprehensive assessment no later than five (5) calendar days after the election of hospice care, in accordance with CMS §418.24–the elements of the hospice care election statement. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review, document review, and interview. In 1 of 14 (7%) clinical records reviewed revealed that the agency did not ensure the comprehensive assessment included an initial bereavement assessment. Document 3: Policy PC.130. Bereavement (dated 11/01/2021), “stated in part, “Procedure I. The Hospice will perform an initial bereavement assessment of the needs of the patient’s family and other care individuals focusing on the social, spiritual, and cultural factors that may impact their ability to cope with the patient’s death as part of the Initial Comprehensive Assessment.” Clinical Record 11: The patient elected hospice benefit on 01/16/2024 and died 01/28/2024. The record lacked a completed initial bereavement assessment as part of the comprehensive assessment. The Administrator/Owner/Medical Director/Volunteer Coordinator, Director of Nursing/Registered Nurse, and Alternate Director of Nursing/Registered Nurse stated in an interview on 02/07/2024 that the agency did not ensure the comprehensive assessment included an initial bereavement assessment.”

    Rule L0523. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(7))

    The inspectors’ words, 245 words

    “It is required that the comprehensive assessment includes an initial bereavement assessment of the needs of the patient’s family and other individuals, focusing on the social, spiritual, and cultural factors that may impact their ability to cope with the patient’s death. Information gathered from the initial bereavement assessment is incorporated into the plan of care and considered in the bereavement plan of care. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review, document review, and interview. In 2 of 14 (14%) Clinical Records reviewed, revealed that the agency did not ensure the comprehensive assessment included an initial bereavement assessment. Document 3: Policy PC.130. Bereavement (dated 11/01/2021), “stated in part, “Procedure I. The Hospice will perform an initial bereavement assessment of the needs of the patient’s family and other care individuals focusing on the social, spiritual, and cultural factors that may impact their ability to cope with the patient’s death as part of the Initial Comprehensive Assessment.” Clinical Record 7: Patient elected hospice benefit on 02/02/2024. There was no documented evidence of an initial bereavement assessment as part of the comprehensive assessment. Clinical Record 11: Patient elected hospice benefit on 01/16/2024 and died 01/28/2024. There was no documented evidence of an initial bereavement assessment as part of the comprehensive assessment. The Administrator/Owner/Medical Director/Volunteer Coordinator, Director of Nursing/Registered Nurse, and Alternate Director of Nursing/Registered Nurse stated in an interview on 02/07/2024 that the agency did not ensure the comprehensive assessment included an initial bereavement assessment.”

    Rule L0531. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 329 words

    “It is required that the Interdisciplinary Group, in collaboration with the individual’s attending physician (if any), reviews, revises, and documents the individualized care plans as frequently as the patient’s condition requires; but no less frequently than every 15 calendar days. A revised plan of care includes information from the patient’s updated comprehensive assessment and record of the patient’s progress toward the outcomes and goals specified in the plan of care. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review, document review, and interview. In 5 of 14 (36%) clinical records reviewed revealed that the agency did not ensure the patients individualized care plan was reviewed every 15 days. Document 2: Policy PC.40 “Interdisciplinary Group Roles and Responsibilities (Dated 01/012/2024).” stated in part, “IV. IDG/IDT meetings will be held during the course of patient care to monitor and evaluate the patient’s interdisciplinary POC progress, at least every 15 days, or more frequently if warranted by the patient’s condition.” Clinical Record 1: The Interdisciplinary Group (IDG) documented review and revision of the patients individualized care plans in IDG on 06/08/2023, and 07/06/2023 (28 days). Clinical Record 5: The Interdisciplinary Group (IDG) documented review and revision of the patients individualized care plans in IDG on 06/08/2023, and 07/06/2023 (28 days). Clinical Record 6: The Interdisciplinary Group (IDG) documented review and revision of the patients individualized care plans in IDG on 06/08/2023, and 07/06/2023 (28 days). Clinical Record 12: The Interdisciplinary Group (IDG) documented review and revision of the patients individualized care plans in IDG on 06/8/23, and 7/06/23. 28 days apart and 13 days past required 15 days minimum. Clinical Record 13: The Interdisciplinary Group (IDG) documented review and revision of the patients individualized care plans in IDG on 06/08/2023, and 07/06/2023 (28 days) The Administrator/Owner/Medical Director/Volunteer Coordinator, Director of Nursing/Registered Nurse, and Alternate Director of Nursing/Registered Nurse stated in an interview on 02/06/2024 that the agency did not ensure the patients individualized care plan was reviewed every 15 days.”

    Rule L0552. Standard-level.

  • Prevention (42 CFR 418.60(a))

    The inspectors’ words, 459 words

    “It is required that the hospice follows accepted standards of practice to prevent the transmission of infections and communicable disease, including the use of standard precautions, such as hand hygiene, use of gloves, mask, eye protection, or face shield depending on anticipated exposure, safe handling of equipment in the patient’s care environment if it is likely to have been contaminated with body fluids, safe handling of soiled items in the patient’s care environment, and other requirements of applicable state and federal law and regulation. This standard was not met as evidenced by document review, interview, and observation. In 2 of 2 (100%) Home visits observed, revealed that the agency did not ensure adherence to infection control requirements including the use of standard precautions, such as hand hygiene, safe handling of equipment in the patient’s care environment, and safe handling of soiled items in the patient’s care environment. Document 1: Policy IC.60 (dated 01/18/2024) stated in part. “III. Bag Technique. E. The bag is placed on a clean, safe surface in the home, close to the patient and near a source of water, if possible. If this is not possible, a barrier (i.e., newspaper, paper towel, small trash bag, etc.) is to be placed under the bag. Bags should never be placed on the floor.... J. When the visit is completed, reusable equipment is cleaned using alcohol, disinfectant wipe and/or antimicrobial soap and water as appropriate, hands are washed, and equipment and supplies are returned to the bag.” Home Visit 1: During home visit observation on 02/06/2024 it was observed that the registered nurse (RN) (Personnel Record 1) brought a visit bag into the patient (Clinical Record 1) home and was observed placing bag on patients’ bed without protective barrier. The RN proceeded taking equipment (stethoscope, pulse oximeter, blood pressure cuff and thermometer) from that bag and placed the equipment on patient’s bed without protective barrier. The RN placed the equipment (stethoscope, pulse oximeter, blood pressure cuff and thermometer) back into the bag without cleaning it. Home Visit 3: During home visit observation on 2/06/2024 it was observed that the RN (Personnel Record 1) brought a visit bag into the Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) and was observed placing the bag on patients’ bedside table without a protective barrier. The RN proceeded taking equipment (stethoscope, pulse oximeter, blood pressure cuff and thermometer) from the bag, and placed the equipment on patient’s bed without protective barrier. Furthermore, the RN placed the equipment (stethoscope, pulse oximeter, blood pressure cuff and thermometer) back into the bag without cleaning it. The Administrator/Owner/Medical Director/Volunteer Coordinator, Director of Nursing/Registered Nurse, and Alternate Director of Nursing/Registered Nurse stated in an interview on 02/06/2024 that the RN did not follow the required bag technique to prevent transmission of infection.”

    Rule L0579. Standard-level.

  • Counseling services (42 CFR 418.64(d)(1)(iv))

    The inspectors’ words, 311 words

    “It is required that counseling services include an organized program for providing bereavement services delivered by or under the supervision of a qualified professional with experience or education in grief or loss counseling. Bereavement services are available to the family and other individuals up to one (1) year following the death of the patient. Bereavement counseling extends to residents of a SNF/NF (skilled nursing facility/nursing facility) or ICF/IDF (intermediate care facility/intellectual disability facility) when appropriate and identified in the bereavement plan of care. The bereavement services reflect the needs of the bereaved per a bereavement plan of care that includes the types of bereavement services to be offered, and the frequency of service delivery. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review, document review, and interview. In 1 of 2 (50%) clinical records reviewed, revealed that the agency did not ensure the development of a bereavement plan of care that included the type of bereavement services to be offered and the frequency of service delivery. Document 3: Policy PC. 130 “Bereavement (Dated 11/01/2021).” stated in part, “Procedure VII. After the death of the patient: The Bereavement Coordinator will complete a follow-up assessment and develop a POC for bereavement services based on the re-assessment and the family and/or caregiver’s willingness to receive services. This POC will be discussed at the next IDG/IDT meeting.” Clinical Record 12: The post death Interdisciplinary Group Meeting on 12/06/2023 identified the need for bereavement services. The clinical record did not include documented evidence of a bereavement assessment or bereavement plan of care with the type of services or frequency of services. The Administrator/Owner/Medical Director/Volunteer Coordinator, Director of Nursing/Registered Nurse, and Alternate Director of Nursing/Registered Nurse stated in an interview on 02/07/2024 that bereavement program needs to develop a plan of care to the define and include the bereavement services being provided. services being provided.”

    Rule L0596. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 435 words

    “It is required that hospice aides are assigned to a specific patient by a registered nurse who is a member of the Interdisciplinary Group. Written patient care instructions for a hospice aide are prepared by an RN who is responsible for the supervision of the hospice aide. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review, document review and interview. In 4 of 12 (33%) clinical records reviewed of patient’s receiving hospice aide services revealed that the hospice agency did not ensure that the hospice aide care plan provided specific instructions to the aide. Clinical Record 1: The aide plan of care created by the Registered Nurse (RN) was dated 05/10/2023 and updated 11/23/2023, and 01/05/2024, for aide services 2 times a week. The assigned hospice aide the tasks stated, “Personal Care: Complete Bed Bath every visit... Partial Bath/Shower every visit... Complete Shower every visit.” The plan did not provide clear instructions to the hospice aide regarding the type of bath, allowing the aide to make decisions outside of the aide’s scope of practice. Clinical Record 3: The aide plan of care created by the RN dated 06/15/2023 and updated 09/13/2023 for aide services 3 times a week. The assigned hospice aide the tasks stated, “Personal Care: Complete Bed Bath every visit... Partial Bath/Shower every visit... Complete Shower every visit.” The plan did not provide clear instructions to the hospice aide regarding the type of bath, allowing the aide to make decisions outside of the aide’s scope of practice. Clinical Record 4: The aide plan of care created by the RN dated 06/19/2023 and updated 09/17/2023 for aide services 3 times a week. The hospice aide the tasks stated, “Personal Care: Complete Bed Bath every visit... Partial Bath/Shower every visit... Complete Shower every visit.” The plan did not provide clear instructions to the hospice aide regarding the type of bath, allowing the aide to make decisions outside of the aide’s scope of practice. Clinical Record 8: The aide plan of care created by the RN dated 04/14/2023 and updated 11/10/2023 for aide services 3 times a week. The hospice aide plan of care tasks stated, “Personal Care: Complete Bed Bath every visit... Partial Bath/Shower every visit... Complete Shower every visit.” The plan did not provide clear instructions to the hospice aide regarding the type of bath, allowing the aide to make decisions outside of the aide’s scope of practice. The Administrator/Owner/Medical Director/Volunteer Coordinator, Director of Nursing/Registered Nurse, and Alternate Director of Nursing/Registered Nurse stated in an interview on 02/07/2024 that the hospice aide care plan needed clear instructions for the aide to follow.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Recruiting and retaining (42 CFR 418.78(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 134 words

    “It is required that the hospice documents and demonstrates viable and ongoing efforts to recruit and retain volunteers. In a joint review of the Volunteer Program manual with the Administrator/Owner/Medical Director/Volunteer Coordinator and Volunteer on 02/07/2024 it was revealed that the agency had no documentation of volunteer recruitment efforts. The Administrator/Owner/Medical Director/Volunteer Coordinator and Volunteer stated that the agency did not ensure ongoing volunteer recruitment activity, and this is why recruitment efforts have not been documented. In a joint review of the Volunteer Program manual with the Administrator/Owner/Medical Director/Volunteer Coordinator and Volunteer on 2/7/24 it was revealed that the agency had no documentation of volunteer recruitment efforts. The Administrator/Owner/Medical Director/Volunteer Coordinator and Volunteer stated that the agency did not ensure ongoing volunteer recruitment activity, and this is why recruitment efforts have not been documented.”

    Rule L0645. Standard-level.

  • Training (42 CFR 418.100(g)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 316 words

    “It is required that the hospice assesses the skills and competencies of all individuals providing care, including volunteers providing services and, as necessary, provides in-service training and education programs where required. The hospice has written policies and procedures describing the method(s) of assessing competency and maintains a written description of the in-service training provided during the previous 12 months. This standard was not met as evidenced by document review, interview, and personnel record review. In 4 of 9 (44%) records reviewed revealed the agency did not ensure all individuals that provided care to agency patients had completed the initial skills competencies as per the agency Staff Competency Policy Document 4: Policy HR.10. Staff Competency (Dated 10/01/2021), “stated in part, “Policy I. The Hospice will provide for competency assessments by qualified individuals on hire and annually to assess direct care staff’s basic skill levels for all staff providing care, including paraprofessionals and professionals...Procedure V. The competency evaluation and/or checklist will be completed and retained in the staff’s personnel file.” Personnel Record 1: The Registered Nurse (RN) was hired on 01/17/2023. As of 02/08/2024, the record lacked evidence of an initial skills competency for the registered nurse position. Personnel Record 4: The Master of Social Work (MSW) was hired on 01/03/2024. As of 02/08/2024, the record lacked evidence of an initial skills competency for the social worker position. Personnel Record 5: The Chaplain/Bereavement Coordinator (BC) was hired on 11/29/2023. As of 02/08/2024, The record lacked evidence of an initial skills competency for the Chaplain and BC roles. Personnel Record 6: The Volunteer was hired on 07/22/2023. As of 02/08/2024, the record lacked evidence of an initial skills competency for the volunteer position. The Administrator/Owner/Medical Director/Volunteer Coordinator, Director of Nursing/Registered Nurse, and Alternate Director of Nursing/Registered Nurse stated in an interview on 02/08/2024 that the agency did not ensure documentation of initial skills competencies as per the agency policy.”

    Rule L0663. Standard-level.

All 3 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jul 15, 2026Complaint inspection by the state2 deficiencies cited
Mar 8, 2024Complaint inspection by the state1 deficiency cited
Feb 8, 2024Reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner8 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Nov 17, 2016.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 3 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 6.5 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 5% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 72.7% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 90% at home, 5% in assisted living, 2% in a nursing facility, 4% in a skilled nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day6.5 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends5%
Visits near death72.7% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Serenity Hospice Atx Texas LLC runs it.
  • 6 owners or officers are people: Justin Yarmark (managing employee (under contract), 100%); Robert J Dougherty (managing employee (under contract), 100%); Justin Yarmark (owns 5% or more through other companies, 75%); James S Mamary (owns 5% or more through other companies, 25%); Justin Yarmark (corporate director); Tabitha Osborn (managing employee (on the payroll)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Serenity Hospice Atx Texas LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Dec 1, 2024
Serenity Hospice Atx Texas LLCRuns it (operational or managerial control)100%Nov 1, 2024
Karmic Industri, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies75%Dec 1, 2024

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 6 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 88.89% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 45.9% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold6 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 35 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 78602, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 4; this one had 11.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.