Hearth Record

Harbor Hospice of Southeast Texas

A hospice in Nederland, Texas 77627

2200 Highway 365, Suite 101, Nederland, Texas 77627. (409) 213-7300.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 5 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Mar 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

5 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 26 hospices serving ZIP code 77627 had 3.

The last inspection on record was on Mar 13, 2026: a reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

5 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Mar 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.

5 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 Dec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNov

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Mar 13, 2026: reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission5 deficiencies
  • Timeframe for completion of assessment (42 CFR 418.54(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 98 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 14 patient records reviewed, it was noted that the initial comprehensive assessment was not completed within five calendar days of the patient electing the hospice benefit. For example in record RRHV#2 the social work assessment was completed on day 8 and there had been no documentation of why the assessment was delayed. In record RRHV#4 there was no social work visit documented in the first month of service with no documentation of why the assessment had not been completed. This was confirmed and discussed with the DPCS and Regional Administrator present.”

    Rule L0523. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6)(i))

    The inspectors’ words, 123 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 14 patient records reviewed, it was noted that the hospice nurse conducted a medication assessment but failed to identify all medications. For example in record RRHV#3 three medications were identified at the medication reassessment that the patient stated she had been using for a long time and they had not been identified at the initial medication assessment. For example in record RRHV#1 two eye drop medications were identified at the medication reassessment that the patient stated she had been using for years and her son stated she had been using for 15 years and they had not been identified at the initial medication assessment. This was confirmed and discussed with the DPCS and Regional Administrator present.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 305 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 11 of 14 patient records reviewed, it was noted that the written plan of care was not individualized with patient goals, time frames, and services required to meet those goals. For example in record RNHV#1 the volunteer and spiritual counselor’s goals were not measurable or individualized. Such as, Orders and careplan will continue to be molded to best support pt and cg. and That the pt and family/will feel spiritual supported while being care for on services. This record also included 3 goals for falls that stated in progress however all target dates were in the past. The POC goals for skin integrity only 2 of 3 patient wounds. This patient had a foley catheter and it was changed monthly however there was not goal or intervention related to the foley catheter care. For example in record RRHV#1 the POC goals for Cancer include pain control, but the only interventions were medications, no non-pharmacologic interventions and the patient was actively using non-pharmacologic methods of pain management. Also in the record’s POC 6 nursing goals all stated in progress and their target dates were all in the past. For example in record RRHV#3 the POC goals were not individualized or measurable Ms ---- will feel her spiritual needs are being met as she has defined and maintain a high level of spiritual and emotional contentment Patient will demonstrate understanding of appropriate use of meds for pain management. For example, in record RRNHV#3 6 goals were in progress however the target dates were all in the past. In record RRNHV#7 the POC included goals and interventions for a volunteer, however the volunteer service had stopped. Records RRHV#2 and RRNHV#2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, and 10 with similar POC issues. This was confirmed and discussed with the DPCS and Regional Administrator present.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 97 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 14 patient records reviewed, it was noted that the organization had not followed the plan of care. For example in record RRNHV#1 the frequency of volunteer visits was not followed in 3 of the past 6 months, one month the volunteer completed 3 visits when 2 were ordered on POC, another month the volunteer completed 5 visits when the POC order was 3 and another month the POC was for 2 volunteer visits and 1 visit was completed. This was confirmed and discussed with the DPCS and Regional Director present.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(3)(i))

    “Observed in Patient Home. In 1 of 14 patient records reviewed, it was noted that the nurse had not completed an effective supervision of the aide. For example in record RRNHV#3 the nurse documented aide supervision that stated that all areas were good, however for the last 5 weeks of the hospice care the aide only completed 11 of 13 visits ordered on the POC. The aide had documented missed visits. This was confirmed and discussed with the DPCS and Regional Administrator present.”

    Rule L0633. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Mar 13, 2026Reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission5 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Nov 1, 2013.
  • Ownership: other.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 7.6 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 6.1% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 94.3% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 72% at home, 4% in assisted living, 16% in a nursing facility, 8% in an inpatient hospice.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day7.6 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends6.1%
Visits near death94.3% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Arfeen Properties, L.P. owns 99% directly since Jul 26, 2012.
  • 4 owners or officers are people: Qamar U Arfeen (owns 5% or more through other companies, 49.5%); Kelley L Arfeen (owns 5% or more through other companies, 49.5%); Vicki Watford (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Karen Carter (managing employee (on the payroll)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Arfeen Properties, L.P.Owns 5% or more directly99%Jul 26, 2012
Hhcs Managers LLCGeneral partner1%Jul 26, 2012

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 82% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 86% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 9 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 99.46% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 34.7% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 54 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold9 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 26 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 77627, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 3; this one had 5.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.