Hearth Record

River City Hospice of Texas, L.L.C.

A hospice in San Antonio, Texas 78229

6523 Moss Oak Dr, San Antonio, Texas 78229. (210) 858-9138.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 8 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Dec 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

8 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 101 hospices serving ZIP code 78229 had 4.

The last inspection on record was on Dec 12, 2024: a reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

8 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Dec 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

8 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Dec 12, 2024: reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission8 deficiencies
  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(5))

    The inspectors’ words, 114 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 10 patient records reviewed, The organization failed to conduct and document a patient-specific comprehensive assessment and reassessment that identifies the patient’s need for hospice care and services. For example: on review of RRHV#1 there were physicians orders for wound care to the Rt Heel (unstageable) and Lt Heel (stage 3) yet in the nursing documentation there was only documentation of assessment of the Left Heel weekly as required. There was documentation of assessment of the Rt Heel noted in the record twice in October, once in November and again in December where it was documented as healed. This observation was reviewed with the Alt. Director of Nursing.”

    Rule L0529. Standard-level.

  • Patient outcome measures (42 CFR 418.54(e)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 96 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 10 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to ensure a complete and accurate patient record. On review of RRHV#1, the most recent wound care documentation specified the assessment of a Lt Heel wound yet the documentation of the dressing change performed was noted to be for the Rt. Heel. There was no documentation noted for the right heel to clarify why it was conflicting. This conflicting documentation was also noted on multiple additional notes in the latest benefit period. This observation was reviewed with the Administrator and Alt. DON.”

    Rule L0535. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 159 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 10 of 10 patient records reviewed, The organization failed to ensure the plan of care was based on the patient’s individualized goals that were specific, measurable, and time-bound. Throughout all active records reviewed there was a lack of the plan of care goals being specific, measurable and time-bound. For example: in RRHV#1 a goal read Pain will be managed at a level acceptable to the patient per certification period and Patient/caregiver will verbalize/demonstrate appropriate pain management per certification period. In RRHV#2 an example was Patient will follow an effective bowel program to prevent/relieve constipation throughout cert. In RRHV#3 a goal was Patient will have safety needs met while on hospice services. In RRNHV#5 a goal read Changes in neurologic status will be addressed appropriately per certification period. Further examples can be seen in all active records RRNHV#4,RRNHV#6, RRNHV#7, RRNHV#8, RRNHV#9 and RRNHV#10. These observations were reviewed with the Administrator, and Alt. Director of Nursing.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 258 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 7 of 10 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to ensure the plan of care included all services needed for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. On review of RRHV#2 there was documentation of a urinary tract infection with antibiotics ordered yet the issue was not reflected on the plan of care. In RRHV#3 during the home observation the patient noted issues with nausea, vomiting and the inability to eat as desired. She noted antiemetics has been ordered yet there was no care plan to guide the care. Further there was documentation of growing lesions/masses to the patient’s chest yet the issue was not reflected in the care planning process. In RRNHV#4 documentation noted a skin infection to the elbow yet no care plan to guide its care. In RRNHV#6 there was documentation of an eye infection but no care plan to guide the care. In RRNHV#7 the patient was noted to have skin cancer wound/lesions, issues with gout that required colchicine, and was taking insulin for diabetes yet the care plan did not reflect the issues documented in the record. In RRNHV#8 there was documentation of an APS referral for issues noted in the home but no care plan guiding the care. In RRNHV#10 there was documentation of lab draws for CBC, CMP, and UA C&S and medication for BPH was increased for symptom control, yet the issues were not reflected in the care plans. These observations were reviewed with the Administrator, and Alt Director of Nursing.”

    Rule L0546. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 171 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 10 patient records reviewed, The organization failed to ensure the plan of care included all services needed for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions to include drugs and treatments necessary to meet the patients needs. On review of RRNHV#7 there were oxygen orders that noted a range of O2 2-10 liters per nasal cannula continuous yet there were no specific instructions to guide the patient to know when to use what liter flow. In RRNHV#10 there were multiple as needed pain medications of Tramadol 50mg and Hydrocodone 5/325 mg every 6 hours as needed and Morphine 0.25 ml sublingual every 2 hours as needed yet there were no specific instructions to guide the patient/caregiver to know which medication to choose for which situation. Further the oxygen order had a range of 5-10 liters per minute but no specific instruction to guide the user in liter flow selection. These observations were reviewed with the Administrator, and Als Director of Nursing.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Prevention (42 CFR 418.60(a))

    The inspectors’ words, 124 words

    “Observed in Patient Home. In 1 of 3 home visits conducted, the organization failed to implement the infection prevention and control activities it had planned. For example: on home observation for RRHV#1 the RN missed multiple opportunities to perform hand hygiene per the organization policy and current guidelines. The RN performed the patient assessment with gloves and then without doffing gloves and performing hand hygiene was noted to access the nursing bag multiple times, document on computer, and cleanse equipment. Further, the RN while performing wound care removed the existing dressing, cleansed the wound, replaced the dressing, and went back to performing patient care all without removing gloves and performing hand hygiene. These observations were reviewed with the RN, the Administrator, and Alt. DON.”

    Rule L0579. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 130 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 3 of 6 patient records reviewed, The organization failed to ensure the Registered Nurse provided written patient care instructions for the hospice aide. For example: on review of RRHV#1 the documentation showed the patient with bilateral heel wounds with wound care dressings, however there were no written care instruction for the hospice aide on how to handle the dressings while providing care. In RRHV#3 there was documentation that the patient had growing cancerous lesions/masses to the chest, yet there were no instruction to guide the Aide on bathing or providing care around the area of the lesions/masses In RRNHV#10 the patient had Oxygen in the home yet the Aide assignment did not include oxygen precautions. These observations were reviewed with the Alt Director of Nursing.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(7))

    The inspectors’ words, 117 words

    “Observed in Patient Home. In 2 of 3 home visits conducted, the organization failed to ensure the patient record contain information that reflected the patient’s care, treatment, and services. On home observation for RHV#1 during the RN’s medication reconciliation, it was noted that the Lorazepam in the home was oral liquid concentrate and the caregiver noted that the liquid concentrate was what was being given yet the medication profile had listed Lorazepam pills. In RRHV#2 during medication reconciliation the bottle for Trazadone in the home was for 50 mg and the wife confirmed she was giving 50mg yet the medication profile reflected 100mg tabs to be given. This observation was reviewed with the Administrator, and Alt DON.”

    Rule L0678. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Dec 12, 2024Reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission8 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Feb 14, 2012.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 11.1 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 6.4% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 94.8% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 78% at home, 21% in assisted living, 1% in a nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day11.1 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends6.4%
Visits near death94.8% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • 4 owners or officers are people: Janet Montagne (owns 5% or more directly, 100%); Janet Montagne (corporate director, 100%); Janet Montagne (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); Janet Montagne (corporate officer).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • In CMS’s survey of family caregivers (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 84% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 80% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 100% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 58.8% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 101 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 78229, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 4; this one had 8.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.