Hearth Hospice
A hospice in Chattanooga, Tennessee 37402
811 Broad St, Suite 100, Chattanooga, Tennessee 37402. (423) 531-6555.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.
- 11 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- 4of 5 family caregiver rating
- 10of 10 CMS’s Hospice Care Index
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
11 deficiencies cited in the last three years
The middle of the 9 hospices serving ZIP code 37402 had 10.
The last inspection on record was on May 23, 2025: an initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
When those deficiencies happened
11 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
May 23, 2025: initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care11 deficiencies
-
Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))
The inspectors’ words, 196 words
“Upon patient record review, 3 of 27 (Patient #6,7,13) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions • Duplicate drug therapy • Drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring Patient 6: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon admission and continuous RN routine assessments that indicated the patient uses BiPap at night. There was no evidence that BiPap oxygen orders were added to the current medication list. Corrected on site. Patient 7: The nursing documentation indicated that patient had Miralax in the home and it was being used to help treat constipation. No evidence that Miralax was added to current medication list. Corrected on site Patient 13: The medication list contains 2 entries for Lorazepam. The first entry is for Lorazepam every 4 hours via J-tube. The second entry is for Lorazepam every 6 hours applied topically. No evidence that instructions were given on when to use which form of Lorazepam. Corrected on site.”
-
Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(7))
The inspectors’ words, 258 words
“Upon patient record review, 7 of 27 (Patient #8,9,11,12,13,15,19) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment includes a bereavement component which includes the needs of the patient’s family and other individuals focusing on the social, spiritual, and cultural factors that may impact their ability to cope with the patient’s death. Information gathered from the initial bereavement assessment is incorporated into the plan of care and is considered in the bereavement plan of care. Patient 8: No evidence that the bereavement risk assessment was completed within 5 days of election of benefits. Admitted on 01/01/2025, completed during the survey, 05/20/2025 Patient 9: No evidence that the bereavement risk assessment was completed within 5 days of election of benefits. Admitted on 12/09/2024, completed during the survey, 05/20/2025 Patient 11: No evidence that the bereavement risk assessment was completed within 5 days of election of benefits. Admitted on 06/26/2024, completed during the survey, 05/20/2025. Patient 12: No evidence that the bereavement risk assessment was completed within 5 days of election of benefits. Patient admitted on 11/18/2024, completed during the survey, 05/20/2025. Patient 13: No evidence that the bereavement risk assessment was completed within 5 days of election of benefits. Patient admitted on 10/04/2024, completed on 05/15/2025 Patient 15: No evidence that the bereavement risk assessment was completed within 5 days of election of benefits. Patient admitted on 01/09/2025, completed on 05/13/2025. Patient 19: No evidence that the bereavement risk assessment was completed within 5 days of election of benefits. Patient admitted on 10/27/2024 completed on 11/12/2024”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))
The inspectors’ words, 199 words
“Upon patient record review, 4 of 27 (Patient #6,7,9,13) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient 6: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon admission and continuous RN routine assessments that indicated the patient uses BiPap at night. There was no evidence of an order for BiPap on the current plan of care. Corrected on site. Patient 7: The nursing documentation indicated that patient had Miralax in the home and was being used to help treat constipation. No evidence of an order for Miralax was received. Corrected on site. Patient 9: The current plan of care contains wound care orders for barrier cream to be applied the area of sheering on the inner thighs. No evidence that a frequency was included with the order. Corrected on site Patient 13: The medication list contains 2 entries for Lorazepam. The first entry is for Lorazepam every 4 hours via J-tube. The second entry is for Lorazepam every 6 hours applied topically. No evidence that instructions were given on when to use which form of Lorazepam. Corrected on site.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))
The inspectors’ words, 150 words
“Upon patient record review, 3 of 27 (Patient #1,17,19) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including equipment and supply needs. Patient 1: The medical record indicated that the patient uses a Hoyer lift daily for mobility. No evidence that the Hoyer lift was listed on the current DME list. Corrected on site. Patient 17: The medical record indicated that the patient uses a Hoyer lift with transfers. Aide plan of care contains instructions for a Hoyer lift to be used when transferring. No evidence that the Hoyer lift was listed on the current DME list. Corrected on site. Patient 19: The medical record indicated that agency was providing wound care supplies for the patient. No evidence that the wound care supplies was included on the current supply list. Corrected on site.”
-
Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))
The inspectors’ words, 190 words
“Upon patient record review, 2 of 27 (Patient #15,20) did not have evidence in the patient record that hospice aide assignments and duties are: • Assigned to a specific patient by a registered nurse that is a member of the interdisciplinary group • Written patient care instructions for a hospice aide must be prepared by a Registered Nurse who is responsible for the supervision of a hospice aide as specified under paragraph (h) of 418.76 • There is evidence in the patient record that the plan of care; indicate what tasks are to be done by the Aide and the frequency of these tasks. The use of “PRN” or “per patient choice”, for any task, whether personal care or non-personal care tasks, are not acceptable Patient 15: The aide plan of care has orders for the aide to shower the patient at the request of the pt/caregiver as needed. No evidence that a frequency was assigned. Corrected on site. Patient 20: The aide plan of care has orders for the aide to shower and shampoo as needed. No evidence that a frequency was assigned to either task. Corrected on site.”
-
Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2))
The inspectors’ words, 188 words
“Upon patient record review 2 of 27 (Patient #9, 17) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a hospice aide provides services that are: • Ordered by the interdisciplinary group • Included in the plan of care • Permitted to be performed under state law by such hospice aide • Consistent with the hospice aide training Patient 9: The medical records has missed visit notes for the aide visit on 01/23//2025 for aide missed visit due to “CNA called in”, missed aide visit on 03/04/24 due to “staff illness”, missed aide visit on 04/29/25 due to “staff illness”. No evidence that CG/patient refused the visit or an order was received to decrease frequency for those weeks. Patient 17: The aide plan of care has orders for the aide and to perform a complete bed bath every Thursday and to perform a shower on every Tuesday. The documentation indicated that the aide completed both task on 01/09/25, 01/14, 01/16, 01/28, 01/30, 02/04, 02/06, 02/11, 02/20, 2/25, 03/04, 03/06, 03/11, 03/13, 03/18, 03/20, 03/25, 03/27, 04/01, 04/03, 04/08, 04/10, 04/15, 04/17, 04/22, 04/24, 04/29, 05/01, 05/06, 05/08.”
-
Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(1))
“Upon patient record review 1 of 27 (Patient #19) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a Registered Nurse made an on-site visit to the patient’s home no less frequently than every 14 days to assess the quality of care and services provided by the hospice aide and to ensure that services ordered by the hospice interdisciplinary group meet the patient’s needs. Patient 19: No evidence that an RN completed an on-site visit every 14 days between 03/17/2025 and 04/09/2025, 23 days between supervised visits.”
-
Level of activity (42 CFR 418.78(e))
“Upon observation, there was no evidence the annual report documents the use of volunteers providing day to day administrative and/or direct patient care services in an amount that, at a minimum, equals 5 percent of the total patient care hours of all paid hospice employees and contract personnel. The documentation indicated that the volunteer percentage for the provider number 2024 was 3.41%.”
-
Authentication (42 CFR 418.104(b))
The inspectors’ words, 91 words
“Upon patient record review, 1 of 27 (Patient #10) did not have evidence that all entries are legible, clear, complete, and appropriately authenticated and dated in accordance with the organizations policies and procedures and currently accepted standards of practice. Electronic signatures are acceptable as long the hospice is following appropriate safeguards to prevent unauthorized access to the patient records. Patient 10: The medical record contained nursing clinical notes that were copied and pasted to several nursing assessments. The nursing notes written on 04/03/25, 04/08, 04/11, and 04/15 were the same note.”
-
Hospice plan of care (42 CFR 418.112(d))
The inspectors’ words, 96 words
“Upon patient record review, 1 of 27 (Patient #19) did not have evidence that a written hospice plan of care is established and maintained in consultation with SNF/NF or ICF/IID representatives. All hospice care provided is in accordance with this hospice plan of care. Patient 19: The plan of care has RN visits ordered as one visit a week. No evidence that a SN visit occurred during the week 0f 03/23/25. No evidence that the visit was missed at the request of the patient/caregiver or that the MD ordered a change in frequency for the week.”
-
Hospice plan of care (42 CFR 418.112(d)(1))
The inspectors’ words, 134 words
“Upon patient record review, 2 of 27 (Patient #9,19) did not have evidence that the hospice plan of care identifies the care and services that are needed and specifically identify which provider (nursing facility or hospice) is responsible for performing the respective functions that have been agreed upon and included in the hospice plan of care. Patient 9: The current plan of care contains wound care orders for barrier cream to be applied to the area of sheering on the inner thighs. No evidence that those orders identified who is responsible performing the wound care, hospice staff or facility staff. Corrected on site Patient 19: Wound care orders on the plan care. No evidence that the order included who is responsible for performing the wound care, hospice staff or facility staff. Corrected on site”
All 2 inspections in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2025 | Initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care | 11 deficiencies cited |
| Oct 31, 2024 | Recertification inspection by the state | No deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified hospice since Mar 22, 2013.
- Ownership: other.
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency or CMS’s most serious finding: the place’s failure to meet a rule caused, or was likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment or death to someone in its care. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 489.3. on record in the last three years.
CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Has anything been proven against it?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who does the caring?
- From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 12 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 4.9% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 97% of patients who died.
- Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 54% at home, 29% in assisted living, 17% in a nursing facility.
CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | This provider |
|---|---|
| Nurse care minutes per routine home care day | 12.0 min |
| Skilled nursing minutes at weekends | 4.9% |
| Visits near death | 97.0% of patients who died |
Who owns it?
- Care Hospice, Inc. owns 100% directly since Feb 11, 2021.
- 11 owners or officers are people: John B Hunter (owns 5% or more through other companies, 9.42%); Donald K Zeigler (managing employee (under contract)); Jesse Reo Moore (corporate officer); Jesse Reo Moore (managing employee (on the payroll)); Jennifer N Evans (managing employee (on the payroll)); Bart K Valdez (corporate officer); Bart K Valdez (managing employee (on the payroll)); Grant Brown (corporate officer); Grant Brown (managing employee (on the payroll)); Dana K Reid (corporate officer); Dana K Reid (managing employee (on the payroll)).
- A private-equity firm is among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Organisation | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Care Hospice, Inc. | Owns 5% or more directly | 100% | Feb 11, 2021 |
| Care Hospice Acquisition, Inc. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Feb 11, 2021 |
| Hospice Care Buyer, Inc. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Feb 11, 2021 |
| Hospice Care Holdings, L.P. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Feb 11, 2021 |
| Hospice Care Intermediate I, Inc. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Feb 11, 2021 |
| Hospice Care Intermediate II, Inc. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Feb 11, 2021 |
| Thl Equity Fund VIII Investors (Hospice Care), L.P. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 29.16% | Feb 11, 2021 |
| Thomas H. Lee Parallel Fund VIII, L.P. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 27.44% | Feb 11, 2021 |
| Thomas H. Lee Equity Fund VIII, L.P. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 15.07% | Feb 11, 2021 |
What do families say?
- Family caregivers rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 85% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 88% would definitely recommend it.
- CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
- 99.18% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 82.2% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5 | 4 of 5 |
| Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold | 10 of 10 |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 9 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 37402, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 10; this one had 11.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Deficiencies, 3 years |
|---|---|
| Hearth Hospice This hospice | 11 |
| Hospice of Chattanooga Holdings, LLC | 14 |
| Amedisys Hospice, An Adventa Company | 10 |
| Gentiva | 14 |
| Caris Healthcare | 1 |
| Pruitthealth Hospice-Calhoun | 1 |
| Gentiva | 20 |
| Adoration Home Health & Hospice Care East Tennesse | 2 |
| Gentiva I | 7 |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
- Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice General Information (yc9t-dgbk).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Provider Data (252m-zfp9).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, CAHPS Hospice Survey (gxki-hrr8).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR hospice inspection reports (Hospice Survey Reports - Oct 2021 through Sep 2026.xlsx).
Released Oct 23, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice All Owners (e983965e-1603-4cb8-82b5-c40090e380d1).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Enrollments (25704213-e833-4b8b-9dbc-58dd17149209).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice ZIP Data (95rg-2usp).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.
From the hospice
The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.