Hearth Record

Hearth Hospice

A hospice in Chattanooga, Tennessee 37402

811 Broad St, Suite 100, Chattanooga, Tennessee 37402. (423) 531-6555.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 11 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

11 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 9 hospices serving ZIP code 37402 had 10.

The last inspection on record was on May 23, 2025: an initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

11 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

11 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

May 23, 2025: initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care11 deficiencies
  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 196 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 27 (Patient #6,7,13) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions • Duplicate drug therapy • Drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring Patient 6: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon admission and continuous RN routine assessments that indicated the patient uses BiPap at night. There was no evidence that BiPap oxygen orders were added to the current medication list. Corrected on site. Patient 7: The nursing documentation indicated that patient had Miralax in the home and it was being used to help treat constipation. No evidence that Miralax was added to current medication list. Corrected on site Patient 13: The medication list contains 2 entries for Lorazepam. The first entry is for Lorazepam every 4 hours via J-tube. The second entry is for Lorazepam every 6 hours applied topically. No evidence that instructions were given on when to use which form of Lorazepam. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(7))

    The inspectors’ words, 258 words

    “Upon patient record review, 7 of 27 (Patient #8,9,11,12,13,15,19) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment includes a bereavement component which includes the needs of the patient’s family and other individuals focusing on the social, spiritual, and cultural factors that may impact their ability to cope with the patient’s death. Information gathered from the initial bereavement assessment is incorporated into the plan of care and is considered in the bereavement plan of care. Patient 8: No evidence that the bereavement risk assessment was completed within 5 days of election of benefits. Admitted on 01/01/2025, completed during the survey, 05/20/2025 Patient 9: No evidence that the bereavement risk assessment was completed within 5 days of election of benefits. Admitted on 12/09/2024, completed during the survey, 05/20/2025 Patient 11: No evidence that the bereavement risk assessment was completed within 5 days of election of benefits. Admitted on 06/26/2024, completed during the survey, 05/20/2025. Patient 12: No evidence that the bereavement risk assessment was completed within 5 days of election of benefits. Patient admitted on 11/18/2024, completed during the survey, 05/20/2025. Patient 13: No evidence that the bereavement risk assessment was completed within 5 days of election of benefits. Patient admitted on 10/04/2024, completed on 05/15/2025 Patient 15: No evidence that the bereavement risk assessment was completed within 5 days of election of benefits. Patient admitted on 01/09/2025, completed on 05/13/2025. Patient 19: No evidence that the bereavement risk assessment was completed within 5 days of election of benefits. Patient admitted on 10/27/2024 completed on 11/12/2024”

    Rule L0531. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 199 words

    “Upon patient record review, 4 of 27 (Patient #6,7,9,13) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient 6: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon admission and continuous RN routine assessments that indicated the patient uses BiPap at night. There was no evidence of an order for BiPap on the current plan of care. Corrected on site. Patient 7: The nursing documentation indicated that patient had Miralax in the home and was being used to help treat constipation. No evidence of an order for Miralax was received. Corrected on site. Patient 9: The current plan of care contains wound care orders for barrier cream to be applied the area of sheering on the inner thighs. No evidence that a frequency was included with the order. Corrected on site Patient 13: The medication list contains 2 entries for Lorazepam. The first entry is for Lorazepam every 4 hours via J-tube. The second entry is for Lorazepam every 6 hours applied topically. No evidence that instructions were given on when to use which form of Lorazepam. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))

    The inspectors’ words, 150 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 27 (Patient #1,17,19) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including equipment and supply needs. Patient 1: The medical record indicated that the patient uses a Hoyer lift daily for mobility. No evidence that the Hoyer lift was listed on the current DME list. Corrected on site. Patient 17: The medical record indicated that the patient uses a Hoyer lift with transfers. Aide plan of care contains instructions for a Hoyer lift to be used when transferring. No evidence that the Hoyer lift was listed on the current DME list. Corrected on site. Patient 19: The medical record indicated that agency was providing wound care supplies for the patient. No evidence that the wound care supplies was included on the current supply list. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0550. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 190 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 27 (Patient #15,20) did not have evidence in the patient record that hospice aide assignments and duties are: • Assigned to a specific patient by a registered nurse that is a member of the interdisciplinary group • Written patient care instructions for a hospice aide must be prepared by a Registered Nurse who is responsible for the supervision of a hospice aide as specified under paragraph (h) of 418.76 • There is evidence in the patient record that the plan of care; indicate what tasks are to be done by the Aide and the frequency of these tasks. The use of “PRN” or “per patient choice”, for any task, whether personal care or non-personal care tasks, are not acceptable Patient 15: The aide plan of care has orders for the aide to shower the patient at the request of the pt/caregiver as needed. No evidence that a frequency was assigned. Corrected on site. Patient 20: The aide plan of care has orders for the aide to shower and shampoo as needed. No evidence that a frequency was assigned to either task. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 188 words

    “Upon patient record review 2 of 27 (Patient #9, 17) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a hospice aide provides services that are: • Ordered by the interdisciplinary group • Included in the plan of care • Permitted to be performed under state law by such hospice aide • Consistent with the hospice aide training Patient 9: The medical records has missed visit notes for the aide visit on 01/23//2025 for aide missed visit due to “CNA called in”, missed aide visit on 03/04/24 due to “staff illness”, missed aide visit on 04/29/25 due to “staff illness”. No evidence that CG/patient refused the visit or an order was received to decrease frequency for those weeks. Patient 17: The aide plan of care has orders for the aide and to perform a complete bed bath every Thursday and to perform a shower on every Tuesday. The documentation indicated that the aide completed both task on 01/09/25, 01/14, 01/16, 01/28, 01/30, 02/04, 02/06, 02/11, 02/20, 2/25, 03/04, 03/06, 03/11, 03/13, 03/18, 03/20, 03/25, 03/27, 04/01, 04/03, 04/08, 04/10, 04/15, 04/17, 04/22, 04/24, 04/29, 05/01, 05/06, 05/08.”

    Rule L0626. Standard-level.

  • Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(1))

    “Upon patient record review 1 of 27 (Patient #19) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a Registered Nurse made an on-site visit to the patient’s home no less frequently than every 14 days to assess the quality of care and services provided by the hospice aide and to ensure that services ordered by the hospice interdisciplinary group meet the patient’s needs. Patient 19: No evidence that an RN completed an on-site visit every 14 days between 03/17/2025 and 04/09/2025, 23 days between supervised visits.”

    Rule L0629. Standard-level.

  • Level of activity (42 CFR 418.78(e))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the annual report documents the use of volunteers providing day to day administrative and/or direct patient care services in an amount that, at a minimum, equals 5 percent of the total patient care hours of all paid hospice employees and contract personnel. The documentation indicated that the volunteer percentage for the provider number 2024 was 3.41%.”

    Rule L0647. Standard-level.

  • Authentication (42 CFR 418.104(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 91 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 27 (Patient #10) did not have evidence that all entries are legible, clear, complete, and appropriately authenticated and dated in accordance with the organizations policies and procedures and currently accepted standards of practice. Electronic signatures are acceptable as long the hospice is following appropriate safeguards to prevent unauthorized access to the patient records. Patient 10: The medical record contained nursing clinical notes that were copied and pasted to several nursing assessments. The nursing notes written on 04/03/25, 04/08, 04/11, and 04/15 were the same note.”

    Rule L0679. Standard-level.

  • Hospice plan of care (42 CFR 418.112(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 96 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 27 (Patient #19) did not have evidence that a written hospice plan of care is established and maintained in consultation with SNF/NF or ICF/IID representatives. All hospice care provided is in accordance with this hospice plan of care. Patient 19: The plan of care has RN visits ordered as one visit a week. No evidence that a SN visit occurred during the week 0f 03/23/25. No evidence that the visit was missed at the request of the patient/caregiver or that the MD ordered a change in frequency for the week.”

    Rule L0773. Standard-level.

  • Hospice plan of care (42 CFR 418.112(d)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 134 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 27 (Patient #9,19) did not have evidence that the hospice plan of care identifies the care and services that are needed and specifically identify which provider (nursing facility or hospice) is responsible for performing the respective functions that have been agreed upon and included in the hospice plan of care. Patient 9: The current plan of care contains wound care orders for barrier cream to be applied to the area of sheering on the inner thighs. No evidence that those orders identified who is responsible performing the wound care, hospice staff or facility staff. Corrected on site Patient 19: Wound care orders on the plan care. No evidence that the order included who is responsible for performing the wound care, hospice staff or facility staff. Corrected on site”

    Rule L0774. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
May 23, 2025Initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care11 deficiencies cited
Oct 31, 2024Recertification inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Mar 22, 2013.
  • Ownership: other.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 12 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 4.9% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 97% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 54% at home, 29% in assisted living, 17% in a nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day12.0 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends4.9%
Visits near death97.0% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Care Hospice, Inc. owns 100% directly since Feb 11, 2021.
  • 11 owners or officers are people: John B Hunter (owns 5% or more through other companies, 9.42%); Donald K Zeigler (managing employee (under contract)); Jesse Reo Moore (corporate officer); Jesse Reo Moore (managing employee (on the payroll)); Jennifer N Evans (managing employee (on the payroll)); Bart K Valdez (corporate officer); Bart K Valdez (managing employee (on the payroll)); Grant Brown (corporate officer); Grant Brown (managing employee (on the payroll)); Dana K Reid (corporate officer); Dana K Reid (managing employee (on the payroll)).
  • A private-equity firm is among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Care Hospice, Inc.Owns 5% or more directly100%Feb 11, 2021
Care Hospice Acquisition, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Feb 11, 2021
Hospice Care Buyer, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Feb 11, 2021
Hospice Care Holdings, L.P.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Feb 11, 2021
Hospice Care Intermediate I, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Feb 11, 2021
Hospice Care Intermediate II, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Feb 11, 2021
Thl Equity Fund VIII Investors (Hospice Care), L.P.Owns 5% or more through other companies29.16%Feb 11, 2021
Thomas H. Lee Parallel Fund VIII, L.P.Owns 5% or more through other companies27.44%Feb 11, 2021
Thomas H. Lee Equity Fund VIII, L.P.Owns 5% or more through other companies15.07%Feb 11, 2021

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 85% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 88% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 99.18% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 82.2% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 54 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 9 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 37402, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 10; this one had 11.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.