Hearth Record

Gentiva

A hospice in Chattanooga, Tennessee 37403

930 Mccallie Ave., Chattanooga, Tennessee 37403. (423) 892-3737.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 14 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Feb 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

14 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 6 hospices serving ZIP code 37403 had 12.

The last inspection on record was on Feb 12, 2026: an initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

14 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Feb 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

14 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Feb 12, 2026: initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care13 deficiencies
  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 117 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 14 (Patients #3,#5,#6) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications. Patient 3: During home visit medication reconciliation, the facility and hospice medication profiles did not match. The facility profile did not contain nitroglycerin as needed. Patient 5: During home visit medication reconciliation, the patient’s caregiver stated they do not have Tylenol and Mucinex in the home, and the patient does not take Claritin, meloxicam, and mirabegron. Patient 6: During home visit medication reconciliation, the patient’s caregiver stated they have Tylenol 500 mg tablets instead of 325 mg tablets, and the patient no longer takes scheduled Lantus since facility stay.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 161 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 14 (Patients #3,#9) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient 3: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon admission identifying patient history of falls. There was no evidence of problems, goals, and interventions related to fall safety included in the plan of care. Corrected on site with plan of care update. Patient 9: The plan of care included problems, goals, and interventions related to anticoagulant use and risk for bleeding. There was no evidence the patient had a prescription for an anticoagulant currently or in the past. Corrected on site with plan of care update.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 102 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 14 (Patients #5,#6) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient 5: During home visit medication reconciliation, the patient’s caregiver stated they do not have Tylenol and Mucinex in the home, and the patient does not take Claritin, meloxicam, and mirabegron. Patient 6: During home visit medication reconciliation, the patient’s caregiver stated they have Tylenol 500 mg tablets instead of 325 mg tablets, and the patient no longer takes scheduled Lantus since facility stay.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))

    The inspectors’ words, 147 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 14 (Patients #7,#8,#10) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including equipment and supply needs. Patient 7: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon admission identifying patient use of a hospital bed and bedrails. There was no evidence of orders for the DME included in the plan of care. Patient 8: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon admission identifying patient use of a walker and shower chair. There was no evidence of orders for the DME included in the plan of care. Patient 10: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon admission identifying patient use of a walker, and use of a wheelchair 12/4/25 and commode 12/9/25. There was no evidence of orders for the DME included in the plan of care.”

    Rule L0550. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 92 words

    “Upon client record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #2) did not have evidence that the IDG in collaboration with the attending physician reviewed, revised and documents the individualized plan as frequently as the patient’s condition requires but no less frequently then every 15 calendar days. Patient 2: The medical record contained a change of physician form identifying the patient’s POA elected a community physician as attending physician 9/22/25. There was no evidence of collaboration with the attending physician for creating and updated the plan of care no less than every 15 days.”

    Rule L0552. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #7) did not have evidence that a revised plan of care includes information from the patient’s updated comprehensive assessment and must note the patient’s progress towards outcome/goals from the plan of care. Patient 7: The medical record contained nursing documentation 1/23/26 identifying patient had a fall. There was no evidence the plan of care was updated to include problems, goals, and interventions related to fall safety.”

    Rule L0553. Standard-level.

  • Counseling services (42 CFR 418.64(d)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 102 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 14 (Patients #11,#12) did not have evidence the hospice offers bereavement counseling that includes: • Making bereavement services available to the family and other individuals in the bereavement plan of care up to 1 year following the death of the patient. Bereavement counseling also extends to residents of a SNF/NF or ICF/IID when appropriate and identified in the bereavement plan of care • Ensuring that bereavement services reflect the needs of the bereaved Patients 11,12: The bereavement care plans contained tasks to send sympathy cards and memorial service invitations. There was no evidence of tasks completed.”

    Rule L0596. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2))

    “Upon patient record review 1 of 14 (Patient #5) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a hospice aide provides services that are: • Ordered by the interdisciplinary group • Included in the plan of care Patient 5: The medical record contained an order for aide visits three times per week. There was no evidence of third visits completed the weeks of 12/21/25 and 1/4/26.”

    Rule L0626. Standard-level.

  • Training (42 CFR 418.100(g)(2))

    “Upon personnel record review, 1 of 14 (Personnel #4) did not have evidence that the hospice employees have received orientation on their specific job requirements. Personnel 4: There was no evidence the employee received orientation to job requirements.”

    Rule L0662. Standard-level.

  • Training (42 CFR 418.100(g)(3))

    “Upon personnel record review, 1 of 14 (Personnel #4) did not have evidence that a skills competency assessment, specific to each discipline had been conducted for all personnel including volunteers initially during orientation. Personnel 4: There was no evidence of a skills competency assessment completed.”

    Rule L0663. Standard-level.

  • Medical director contract (42 CFR 418.102(a))

    “Upon contract review, 1 of 6 (Alternate Medical Director contract) did not have evidence of a contract to fulfill the role of alternate medical director. The agency had former contracts for the physician to act as a consulting physician and an addendum referencing a contract as Medical Director written 12/1/2022, but the agency could not locate a current contract to identify the physician was in agreement to have responsibility of alternate medical director.”

    Rule L0666. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(2))

    “Upon patient client record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #10) did not have evidence that each patient record contains: • Signed election statement in accordance with 418.24 Patient 10: The medical record contained an election form identifying patient elected to receive the Notification of Hospice Non-Covered Items upon admission 12/2/25. There was no evidence the agency provided the addendum.”

    Rule L0673. Standard-level.

  • Inpatient care provided under arrangements (42 CFR 418.108(c)(2))

    “Upon inpatient contract review, 1 of 6 (CHI hospital GIP contract) did not have evidence that the inpatient provider has established patient care policies consistent with those of the hospice and agrees to abide by the palliative care protocols and plan of care established by the hospice for its patients.”

    Rule L0712. Standard-level.

Nov 14, 2024: complaint and recertification inspection by the state1 deficiency
  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 277 words

    “Based on agency policy review, Hospice Item Set (HIS) Manual, medical record review and interview, the agency failed to implement a bowel regimen for 2 patients (#2 and #3) of11 patients reviewed for opioid medications. Review of the agency policy, “;Comprehensive Assessment,” revised 2019 revealed “;...An assessment of the need for a bowel regimen when the patient has been prescribed opioids...” Review of the HIS Manual Section N: Rationale showed “;...Opioids are commonly used in the management of pain and other symptoms. Constipation is one of the most common opioid-related adverse effects...Patients do not develop a tolerance to opioid-induced constipation; clinical guidelines recommend prophylactic bowel regimens...” Medical record review revealed Patient #2 was admitted to the agency on 11/4/2024 with diagnoses including Malignant Neoplasm of Transverse Colon, Neoplasm of Liver and Hepatic Encephalopathy. Medical record review of a Physician Order dated 11/4/2024, showed Patient #2 had been ordered Oxycodone-Acetaminophen (an opioid used to treat pain) 5 mg milligrams (MG)-325 MG tablet every 6 hours as needed for pain. Medical record review of the medication profile summary showed Patient #2 had not been ordered medications for constipation. Medical record review revealed Patient #3 was admitted to the agency on 10/25/2024 with diagnoses including Alzheimers Disease and Right Femur Fracture. Medical record review of a Physician Order dated 10/25/2024, showed Patient #3 had been ordered Tramadol (a medication used to treat pain) 50mg tablet every 6 hours as needed for pain. During an interview on 11/13/2024 at 12:10 PM, the Administrator confirmed the agency failed to follow the agency policy for Patient #2 and #3 who received opioids and had not been placed on a bowel regimen for constipation.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level. From a complaint.

All 3 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Feb 12, 2026Initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care13 deficiencies cited
Dec 17, 2024Complaint and recertification inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited
Nov 14, 2024Complaint and recertification inspection by the state1 deficiency cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Sep 16, 1998.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 1 deficiency cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 13 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 5.5% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 97.3% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 70% at home, 29% in assisted living, 2% in a hospital.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day13.0 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends5.5%
Visits near death97.3% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Regency Healthcare Group LLC owns 100% directly since Apr 15, 2011.
  • Curo Health Services LLC and Regency Healthcare Group LLC run it.
  • 8 owners or officers are people: Traci Eastman (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Ronald C Lazas (corporate officer, 0%); David Robinson Arnold (corporate officer, 0%); David Robinson Arnold (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Thomas Joseph Dolan (corporate officer, 0%); David Allen Causby (corporate officer, 0%); Janet L Combs (corporate officer, 0%); Susan J Gouge (managing employee (under contract), 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Ch Services Midco Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Feb 5, 2015
Curo Health Services Holdings, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Nov 9, 2011
Charlotte Midco, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Aug 11, 2022
Falcon Hospice, LPOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Aug 11, 2022
Regency Healthcare Holdings LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Apr 15, 2011
Charlotte Buyer, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Jul 11, 2018
Curo Health Services LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Nov 9, 2011
Kah Hospice Company, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Regency Healthcare Group LLCOwns 5% or more directly100%Apr 15, 2011
Ch Services Group Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Feb 5, 2015
Ch Services Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Feb 5, 2015
Cd&r Falcon Holdings, LPOwns 5% or more through other companies60%Aug 11, 2022
Kentucky Homecare Parent Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Aug 11, 2022
Kentucky Homecare Holdings, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Aug 11, 2022
Humana Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Aug 11, 2022
Centerwell Health Services Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Aug 11, 2022
Curo Health Services LLCRuns it (operational or managerial control)Nov 9, 2011
Regency Healthcare Group LLCRuns it (operational or managerial control)Apr 15, 2011

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 9 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 100% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 56.5% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold9 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 6 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 37403, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 12; this one had 14.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

The 6 hospices CMS lists serving ZIP code 37403
PlaceDeficiencies, 3 years
Gentiva This hospice14
Hospice of Chattanooga Holdings, LLC14
Amedisys Hospice, An Adventa Company10
Hearth Hospice11
Hearth Hospice13
Adoration Home Health & Hospice Care East Tennesse2

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.