Hearth Record

Amedisys Hospice

A hospice in Murfreesboro, Tennessee 37129

1639 Medical Center Parkway, Suite 302, Murfreesboro, Tennessee 37129. (615) 316-2243.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 15 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

15 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 16 hospices serving ZIP code 37129 had 4.5.

The last inspection on record was on Jun 24, 2026: a complaint inspection by the state.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

15 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

15 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Jun 24, 2026: complaint inspection by the state1 deficiency
  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 513 words

    “Based on interview, record review, and review of agency policy, the Hospice agency failed to ensure discharge summaries were sent to the physician and/or organization the patients were transferred to for two of two patients (Patient (P) 10 and P12) reviewed for discharges out of a total sample of 14. This had the potential for continuity of care not being met. Findings include: 1. Review of P10’s “Hospice Certification and Plan of Care,” provided by the agency, revealed P10 had a start of care date of 12/27/25 with a primary diagnosis of Parkinsonism. P10 received skilled nursing services, social services, chaplain services, and volunteer services. Review of P10’s “Discharge-Transfer Summary Report,” provided by the agency, revealed P10 was discharged to another hospice agency per the patient’s family request on 01/13/26. There was no evidence in the patient’s medical record that the “Discharge-Transfer Summary Report” was sent to the hospice agency who was taking over hospice services for the patient. 2. Review of P12’s referral document (untitled) dated 07/09/25, provided by the agency, revealed the patient was referred to the hospice agency by a local hospital. Under the “Admission Information” in the referral document was listed an admitting physician, attending physician, and a referring physician. Review of P12’s “Hospice Certification and Plan of Care,” provided by the agency, revealed a start of care date of 07/11/25 with a primary diagnosis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). P12 received skilled nursing services, social services, aide services, and chaplain services. Review of P12’s “Discharge-Transfer Summary Report,” provided by the agency, revealed P12 discharged from the agency on 11/16/25 due to being admitted to a non-contracted facility. There was no evidence in the patient’s medical record that the “Discharge-Transfer Summary Report” was sent to the facility P12 was discharged to or to the patient’s primary care physician (PCP). During an interview on 06/24/26 at 8:45 AM, the Administrator confirmed there was no evidence that discharge summaries were sent to either the patient’s PCP or to the facility the patient’s transferred to. The Administrator revealed that they do send discharge summaries to PCPs or to organizations that the patients care was transferred to. The Administrator indicated it should be documented in the discharge coordination note and confirmed neither patient had evidence the discharge summaries were sent to P10’s new hospice agency or to P12’s PCP or the non-contracted facility the patient was transferred to. Review of the agency’s policy titled, “Discharge” last reviewed 06/06/26 revealed . . . Operational Guidelines: . . . 2. Criteria for patient-initiated discharge includes but is not limited to: a. The patient chooses to revoke their hospice benefit. b. The patient/family requests a transfer to another hospice program or home health agency . . . j. If a patient is discharged alive, the hospice will forward to the attending physician: i. A copy of the hospice discharge summary. ii. the patient’s clinical record if requested . . . 7. When the patient is discharged to another organization, relevant medical information is provided to that agency and/or patient when requested . . . “”

    Rule L0682. Standard-level. From a complaint.

Jul 19, 2024: initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care14 deficiencies
  • Local, State, Tribal Collaboration Process (42 CFR 418.113(a)(4))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the Emergency Preparedness plan includes a process for cooperation and collaboration with local, tribal, regional, state, and federal emergency preparedness officials’ efforts to maintain an integrated response during a disaster or emergency situation.”

    Rule E0009. Standard-level.

  • Primary/Alternate Means for Communication (42 CFR 418.113(c)(3))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the Emergency Plan communication plan must includes a primary and alternate means for communicating with hospice’s employees and state, tribal, regional emergency management agencies. Corrected on site.”

    Rule E0032. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 201 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 14 (Patient #1,#2) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions • Duplicate drug therapy • Drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring Patient #1: Upon medication reconciliation during home visit in SNF and included on the Hospice medication profile, Haldol 5mg one PO PRN ordered 3/8/2024 and Buspirone 7.5mg one Q 12hrs PRN ordered 3/8/2024. There was no evidence in the SNF that these meds were on their medication profile and were not being given. Corrected on site. Patient #2: Medication profile dated 4/19/2024 included Furosemide 100mg one PO daily. Upon medication reconciliation during home visit found the medication had been dispensed as 20 mg tablets with the bottle stating take 5 tablets daily. Patient was taking one tablet for the days her weight was 114 lbs. or less, and two tablets if her weight was over 117 lbs. there was no evidence of a clear instructions for administration. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 174 words

    “Upon patient record review, 4 of 14 (Patient #1,#3,#5,#14) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient #1: Per psychosocial assessment no funeral plans in place, no evidence on POC for problem/goals/interventions for funeral planning. Corrected on site. Patient #3: Per RN assessment “requires support for funeral planning”, no evidence on POC for problem/goals/interventions for funeral planning. Corrected on site. Patient #5: Per RN assessment psychosocial assessment no funeral plans in place, no evidence on POC for problem/goals/interventions for funeral planning. Corrected on site. Patient #14: RN identified at SOC pt. using O2, has dysphagia, and is high risk for falls. No evidence on the POC of Problem/goals interventions for falls, O2 or aspiration precautions.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 157 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 14 (Patient #1,#2) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient #1: Upon medication reconciliation during home visit in SNF and on hospice agency medication profile, Haldol5mg one PO PRN ordered 3/8/2024 and Buspirone 7.5mg one Q 12hrs PRN ordered 3/8/2024. There was no evidence of an order in the Hospice chart to discontinue these medications. Corrected on site. Patient #2: Order dated 4/19/2024 included Furosemide 100mg one PO daily. Upon medication reconciliation found the medication had been dispensed as 20 mg tablets with the bottle stating take 5 tablets daily. Patient was taking one tablet for the days her weight was 114 lbs. or less, and two tablets if her weight was over 117 lbs. there was no evidence of an order for this dosing. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Control (42 CFR 418.60(b)(2))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence in the QAPI reports that the hospice maintains a coordinated agency-wide program for the surveillance, identification, prevention, control, and investigation of infectious and communicable diseases. No evidence of logging or surveillance of employee infections”

    Rule L0581. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 223 words

    “Upon patient record review, 4 of 14 (Patient #3, #11,#13,#14) did not have evidence in the patient record that hospice aide assignments and duties are: • Assigned to a specific patient by a registered nurse that is a member of the interdisciplinary group • Written patient care instructions for a hospice aide must be prepared by a Registered Nurse who is responsible for the supervision of a hospice aide as specified under paragraph (h) of 418.76 • There is evidence in the patient record that the plan of care; indicate what tasks are to be done by the Aide and the frequency of these tasks. The use of “PRN” or “per patient choice”, for any task, whether personal care or non-personal care tasks, are not acceptable Patient #3: RN identified and placed aspiration precautions on the comprehensive POC. No evidence on aide assignment/POC of aspiration precautions. Corrected on site Patient #11:RN identified and placed aspiration precautions on the comprehensive POC. No evidence on aide assignment/POC of aspiration precautions. Patient #13:RN identified and placed fall risk, O2 use and anticoagulant use on the comprehensive POC. No evidence on aide assignment/POC of fall, O2 or bleeding precautions. Patient #14: RN identified at SOC pt. using O2, has dysphagia, and is high risk for falls. No evidence on aide assignment/POC of falls, O2 or aspiration precautions.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(1))

    “Upon patient record review 2 of 14 (Patient #1,#2) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a Registered Nurse made an on-site visit to the patient’s home no less frequently than every 14 days to assess the quality of care and services provided by the hospice aide and to ensure that services ordered by the hospice interdisciplinary group meet the patient’s needs. Patient #1: RN supervisory visit occurred on 5/25/2024 and 6/11/2024 (16 days). Patient #2: RN supervisory visit occurred on 6/14/2024 and 7/5/2024 (21 days).”

    Rule L0629. Standard-level.

  • Level of activity (42 CFR 418.78(e))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the annual report documents the use of volunteers providing day to day administrative and/or direct patient care services in an amount that, at a minimum, equals 5 percent of the total patient care hours of all paid hospice employees and contract personnel. End of year 2023 result 1.29%.”

    Rule L0647. Standard-level.

  • Governing body and administrator (42 CFR 418.100(b))

    “Upon personnel record review, 1 of 13 (Personnel #2) did not have evidence the alternate administrator’s personnel record verifies that: • The employee has appropriate education and experience requirements • There is a signed job description for this role • The employee has been orientated to this role Personnel #2: There is no evidence of a signed job description or orientation for this role.”

    Rule L0651. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(6))

    “Upon patient client record review, 3 of 14 (Patient #11,#12,#13) did not have evidence that each patient record contains Advance Directives. Patients #11,#12,#13: All identified as being DNR, no evidence of documentation to support this.”

    Rule L0677. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e))

    “Upon client record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #12) did not have evidence that the hospice forwarded a summary and a copy of the patient record, if requested, to a facility when transferring the patient to that facility. Patient #12: there was no evidence the hospice forwarded a transfer summary to which the hospice pt. was transferred.”

    Rule L0682. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(2))

    “Upon client record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #11) did not have evidence that if a patient revokes the election of hospice care or is discharged from hospice in accordance with §418.26, the hospice must forward to the patient’s attending physician: • A copy of the hospice discharge summary • The patient’s clinical record, if requested Patient #11: There was no evidence that a discharge summary was sent to the attending physician or hospital when patient entered hospital when they revocated.”

    Rule L0683. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(3))

    “Upon client record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #11) did not have evidence that the discharge summary includes all required information. Patient #11: There was no evidence of a completed discharge summary.”

    Rule L0684. Standard-level.

All 4 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jun 24, 2026Complaint inspection by the state1 deficiency cited
Apr 27, 2026Complaint inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited
Aug 11, 2025Complaint inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited
Jul 19, 2024Initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care14 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Mar 19, 1992.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 1 deficiency cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 14.8 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 14.7% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 96% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 86% at home, 7% in assisted living, 7% in a nursing facility, 1% in a skilled nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day14.8 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends14.7%
Visits near death96.0% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Hospice of Eastern Carolina, Inc. owns 100% directly since Jun 1, 2020.
  • 12 owners or officers are people: Marcus Macip (corporate officer); Kimberly Seymour (corporate officer); Bridget R Kaigler (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Casandra Waymire (managing employee (under contract)); Casandra Waymire (managing employee (on the payroll)); Casandra Waymire (other role (CMS gives no detail)); Joni Babineaux (corporate officer); Kristina J Braud (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Jeanne Shingleton (corporate officer); Joshua Lee Proffitt (corporate officer); Khurram Khan (managing employee (on the payroll)); Khurram Khan (other role (CMS gives no detail)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Unitedhealth Group IncorporatedOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Aug 14, 2025
Amedisys Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Jun 1, 2020
Amedisys Hospice, L.L.C.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Jun 1, 2020
Amedisys Holding LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Jun 1, 2020
Homecare Preferred Choice, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%May 24, 2004
Hospice of Eastern Carolina, Inc.Owns 5% or more directly100%Jun 1, 2020

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • In CMS’s survey of family caregivers (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 77% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 82% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 100% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 80.6% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 16 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 37129, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 4.5; this one had 15.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.