Hearth Record

Highpoint Hospice

A hospice in Gallatin, Tennessee 37066

300 Steam Plant Road, Suite 220, Gallatin, Tennessee 37066. (615) 328-5515.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.

The last 24 months 1 deficiency in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

1 deficiency cited in the last three years

The middle of the 13 hospices serving ZIP code 37066 had 2.

The last inspection on record was on Aug 5, 2026: a recertification inspection by the state.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

1 deficiency in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

1 deficiency by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Jul 8, 2026: recertification inspection by the state1 deficiency
  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 1,157 words

    “Based on review of the Journal of Wound Ostomy and Continence Nursing’s “Revised National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel Pressure Injury Staging System”, review of the National Institutes of Health “Patient Safety and Quality: An Evidence-Based Handbook for Nurses”, policy review, medical record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to accurately and appropriately assess pressure ulcers for 2 of 6 (Patient #1 and Patient #5) sampled patients with pressure ulcers. 1. Review of the Journal of Wound Ostomy and Continence Nursing’s “Revised National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel Pressure Injury Staging System” dated November/December 2016, revealed, “...A pressure injury is localized damage to the skin and underlying soft tissue...The injury occurs as a result of intense and/or prolonged pressure or pressure in combination with shear...Stage 1 Pressure Injury...Intact skin with a localized area of nonblanchable erythema [skin discoloration that stays red or bruised when pressed and released]...Stage 2 Pressure Injury...Partial-thickness loss of skin with exposed dermis...wound bed is viable [capable of living and growing], pink or red, moist...Adipose (fat) is not visible and deeper tissue is not visible. Granulation tissue [new, vascular connective tissue that forms at the base of a wound during the healing process], slough [layer or mass of dead non-viable tissue that separates from healthy surrounding tissue and is typically soft, moist, stringy and yellowish, tan or grayish in color] and eschar [thick, dry and leathery layer of dead, necrotic tissue that forms over a severe wound ulcer], are not present...Stage 3 Pressure Injury...Full-thickness skin loss, in which adipose (fat) is visible in the ulcer and granulation tissue and epibole (rolled wound edges), is often present. Slough and/or eschar may be visible...Stage 4 Pressure Injury...Full-thickness skin and tissue loss with exposed or directly palpable fascia [fibrous connective tissue], muscle, tendon, ligament, cartilage, or bone in the ulcer. Slough and/or eschar may be visible. Epibole (rolled edges), undermining [when tissue destruction extends beneath the intact skin at the wound margins], and/or tunneling [when tissue destruction extends beneath the surface of the skin, creating narrow passageways or tracts into surrounding tissue] often occur...Unstageable Full-Thickness Pressure Injury...Full-thickness skin and tissue loss in which the extent of tissue damage with the ulcer cannot be confirmed because it is obscured by slough or eschar...” 2. Review of the National Institutes of Health “Patient Safety and Quality: An Evidence-Based Handbook for Nurses” dated April 2008, revealed, “...The nurse should assess and stage the pressure ulcer at each dressing change...its [pressure ulcer] location, size (length, width, and depth), and color of the wound; amount and type of exudate [a fluid rich in protein, cells, and cellular debris that escapes from blood vessels and deposits in nearby tissues]...odor; nature and frequency of pain if present...color and type of tissue/character of the wound bed, including evidence of healing...or necrosis [unnatural death of living tissue in the body]...and description of wound edges and surrounding tissue...should be assessed and documented...” 3. Review of the facility policy titled, “WOUND ASSESSMENT DOCUMENTATION AND PHOTOGRAPHY,” dated 3/1/2021, revealed, “… all wounds will be assessed with appropriate documentation within the medical records…Document the following in the medical records…Treatment and condition of the wound each visit…Appearance of the wound bed (black, yellow or red)…Wound measurements (weekly) including the length, depth, and width of the wound in centimeters…Staged the wound weekly…” 4. Record review for Patient #5 revealed a Start of Care (SOC) of 6/28/2026 with diagnoses of Moderate Protein-Calorie Malnutrition, Hypertension, Hear Failure, Peripheral Vascular Disease, and Chronic Ulcer Right Foot with Necrosis. Review of the Hospice Recertification and Plan of Care (POC) dated 6/28/2026 to 9/25/2026, revealed “… SN [Skilled Nurse] effective 6/28/2026…3WK1 [3 week 1], 2WK2, 3WK1, 1WK1, 2WK8, 5PRN [5 as needed]…CLEASE WOUND TO RIGHT 5TH TOE WITH WOUND CLEANSER, APPLY BETADINE SOAKED GAUZE…CLEANSE WOUND TO RIGHT HEEL, CLEANSE WITH WOUND CLEANSER USING CLEAN TECHNIQUE APPLY BETADINE…” Review of the “Wound Record Report,” dated 6/28/2026, revealed “…5TH TOE, RT [right], PU [pressure ulcer] STAGE 1 [one]…DIST [distal] PLANTAR, RT, UNSTAGE [unstageable] PU SLOUGH/ESCHAR…5 toe, RT PU STAGE I…Onset Date 6/28/2026…Wound Detail…6/28/2026…MEASUREMENTS TAKEN…NO…TOTAL NECROTIC TISSUE AMOUNT…51 – 75 % [percent]… 7/6/2026… MEASUREMENTS TAKEN…NO…TOTAL NECROTIC TISSUE AMOUNT…76 – 100 %...DIST PLANTAR, RT, UNSTAGE PU SLOUGH/ESCHAR…Wound Detail…6/28/2026…LENGTHX [BY]WIIDTHXDEPTH(CM) [centimeters]…1 X 1 X 0…DEPTH DESCRIPTION…NECROTIC…TOTAL NECROTIC TISSUE AMOUNT…76 – 100 %...7/6/2026… MEASUREMENTS TAKEN…NO…DEPTH DESCRIPTION…NECROTIC…TOTAL NECROTIC TISSUE AMOUNT…76 – 100 %...” Review of the “HOSPICE PHYSICIAN ORDER,” dated 7/2/2026, revealed “…CLEANSE RIGHT HEEL . APPLY BETADINE, ALLOW TO DRY. LEAVE OPEN TO AIR…CEANSE RIGHT 5TH TOE. APPLY BETADINE. ALLOW TO DRY. LEAVE OPEN TO AIR…” Observation at Patient #1’s home during a home visit on 7/6/2026 at 1:00 PM, revealed a wound on the lateral side of the right 5th toe was covered in eschar and a wound on the lateral side of the heel was approximately a dime size eschar. The facility failed to provide measurements of the wound weekly according to the facilities policy. The facility failed to stage the wound to the 5th toe that was covered in eschar. During an interview on 7/8/2026 at 2:07 PM, the Executive Director stated the nursing staff members should measure and staged the pressure ulcers weekly and if a pressure ulcer is covered in eschar it’s unstageable. The Executive Director stated the pressure ulcers were not measured weekly and on admission showed eschar on the 5th toe and the heel…” 5. Record review for Patient #5 revealed a Start of Care (SOC) of 1/13/2026 with diagnoses of Cerebral Infarction, Heart Disease, and Atrial Fibrillation. Review of the Hospice Recertification and Plan of Care dated 4/13/2026 to 7/11/2026 revealed, “...SN [Skilled Nurse] effective 4/13/2026 2WK[Week]13 [2 times a week for 13 weeks]...” Review of the “HOSPICE PHYSICIAN ORDER,” dated 6/30/2026 at 12:12 PM, revealed “…WOUND CARE FOR RIGHT ANKLE…CLEANSE WOUND WITH CLEANSER UNSING CLEAN TECHNIQUE. APPLY SANTYL TO SLOUGH. COVER WITH FOAM DRESSING. CHANGE TWICE WEEKLY…” Review of the “Client Coordination Note Report” dated 6/30/2026, revealed, “…NP [Nurse Practitioner]…PRESENT FOR VISIT…WOUND ON RIGHT ANKLE, HAS PURLENT DRAINAGE WITH AN ODOR. SANTYL ORDERED FOR WOUND CARE…” Review of the “Client Coordination Note Report” dated 6/30/2026, revealed Patient #5 had a wound identified to the right ankle, the facility failed to document the wound measurement, treatment and condition of the wound, appearance of the wound bed, depth and location, surrounding tissue, amount of drainage, and stage of wound. Review of the “Client Coordination Note Report” dated 7/2/2026, revealed there was no documentation of the treatment and condition Patient #5’s wound. Review of the “Client Coordination Note Report” dated 7/7/2026, revealed there was no documentation of the treatment and condition Patient #5’s wound. Review of “Wound Assessment Tool Report,” revealed no documentation of the wound was entered. During an interview on 7/9/2026 at 3:00 PM, the Executive Director (ED) stated our policy is wounds are measured weekly, and treatment and condition are to be done each visit. The ED stated there was no documentation of the wound measurement, complete wound assessment, or treatment of Patient #5’s wound.”

    Rule L0556. Standard-level.

All 4 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Aug 5, 2026Recertification inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited
Jul 8, 2026Recertification inspection by the state1 deficiency cited
Jun 25, 2026Complaint inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited
Nov 5, 2024Complaint inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Oct 11, 1988.
  • Ownership: other.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 12.2 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 6.4% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 92.9% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 62% at home, 22% in assisted living, 13% in a nursing facility, 1% in a skilled nursing facility, 1% in a hospital, 1% in an inpatient hospice.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day12.2 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends6.4%
Visits near death92.9% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Tennessee In-Home Healthcare Partnership-II LLC owns 100% directly since Jan 1, 2017.
  • LHC Group Inc. runs it.
  • 7 owners or officers are people: Kevin T Childers (managing employee (under contract), 0%); Marcus Macip (corporate officer, 0%); Kimberly Seymour (corporate officer, 0%); Wendy Daigle (corporate director, 0%); Joshua Lee Proffitt (corporate officer); Lacey Jenkins Scott (managing employee (on the payroll)); Amy Cormier (corporate officer, 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
In-Home Healthcare Partnership LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Jan 1, 2017
Tennessee In-Home Healthcare Partnership-II LLCOwns 5% or more directly100%Jan 1, 2017
Unitedhealth Group IncorporatedOwns 5% or more through other companies80%Feb 22, 2023
Lhcg Partner LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies80%Jan 1, 2020
LHC Group Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies80%Jan 1, 2020
Home Health Partner LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies20%Jan 1, 2020
Historic Lifepoint Hospitals LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies20%Jan 1, 2020
Legacy Lifepoint Health LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies20%Jan 1, 2020
LHC Group Inc.Runs it (operational or managerial control)Jan 1, 2017

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 81% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 82% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 100% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 64.2% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 53 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 13 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 37066, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 2; this one had 1.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.