Hearth Record

Family Pillars Hospice Inc.

A hospice in Bethlehem, Pennsylvania 18017

3910 Adler Place Suite 130, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania 18017. (610) 372-4400.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 7 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

7 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 18 hospices serving ZIP code 18017 had 5.

The last inspection on record was on Jul 14, 2025: a recertification inspection by the state.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

7 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

7 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

May 23, 2025: recertification inspection by the state7 deficiencies
  • EP Testing Requirements (42 CFR 418.113(d)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 147 words

    “Based on a review of agency policy/procedure, a review of the agency emergency preparedness plan, and an interview with the agency alternate Administrator, the agency failed to conduct exercises to test the emergency plan annually, for one (1) of one (1) emergency preparedness plan documentation (EPP) reviewed (EPP#1). Agency policy/procedure reviewed on May 22, 2025 at approximately 10:00 a.m. ‘Emergency Operations Plan’ ‘Procedure’ section (18) :The plan will be tested and evaluated annually at each site, either in response to an actual emergency or in a planned exercise. ...”The EPP was reviewed on May 21, 2025 at approximately 10:00 a.m.EPP#1: No documentation provided of the agency conducting exercises to test the emergency plan annually for 2023. Documentation provided of a table top exercise conducted on September 25, 2024.An interview conducted with the agency alternate Administrator on May 22, 2025 at approximately 11:30 a.m. confirmed the above findings.”

    Rule E0039. Standard-level.

  • Plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 241 words

    “Based on a review of agency policy/procedure, a review of hospice services contracts, and an interview with the agency alternate administrator, agency failed to follow the patients written plan of care for four (4) of nineteen (19) patient clinical records (CR) reviewed (CR#5, CR#10, CR#13, CR#15). Agency policy/procedure was reviewed on May 22, 2025 at approximately 10:00 a.m. IDG Care Planning Process’ ‘Procedure’ section (6) “All care and services furnished to the patients and their families follows an individualized written plan of care established by the IDG.....”A review of patient CRs was completed on May 22, 2025 at approximately 10:30 a.m. The patients start of care (SOC) is included below. CR#5, SOC 11/06/24: ‘Assignment Details’ dated 04/09/25 include but not limited to ‘Hospice Aide’ “5 visits weekly”, ‘Skilled Nurse’ “2 visits weekly.”Weeks of 04/13/25-05/17/25: 1/5 hospice aide visits.Week of 04/20/25-04/26/25: 0/2 skilled nurse visits.CR#10, SOC 04/02/25: ‘Assignment Details’ dated 04/09/25 include but not limited to ‘Skilled Nurse’ “2 visits weekly.”Week of 04/13/25-04/19/25: 1/2 skilled nurse visits.Week of 04/22/25-05/03/25: 0/2 skilled nurse visits.Week of 05/04/25-05/10/25: 1/2 skilled nurse visits.CR#13, SOC 03/24/25: ‘Assignment Details’ dated 04/09/25 include but not limited to ‘Skilled Nurse’ “2 visits weekly.”Week of 04/27/25-05/03/25: 0/2 skilled nurse visits.CR#15, SOC 04/11/24: ‘Assignment Details’ dated 04/09/25 include but not limited to ‘Hospice Aide’ “5 visits weekly.”Week of 05/12/24-05/18/24: 4/5 hospice aide visits.An interview conducted with the agency alternate Administrator on May 22, 2025 at approximately 11:30 a.m. confirmed the above findings.”

    Rule L0543. Standard-level.

  • Control (42 CFR 418.60(b)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 290 words

    “Based on a review of agency policy/procedure, employee files, and an interview with the agency alternate Administrator, it was determined that the agency failed to ensure employees were tested and screened for tuberculosis (TB) upon hire and/or annually, per policy, for eight (8) of nine (9) employee files (EF) reviewed (EF#1, EF#2, EF#4 - EF#9). Agency policy/procedure reviewed on May 22, 2025 at approximately 10:00 a.m. ‘Occupational Exposure to Tuberculosis/Prevention of Transmission of TB Plan’ ‘Policy’ “Hospice will comply with .... as well as the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) guidelines.” ‘Procedure’ section (11) “All employees and patient care volunteers will receive education regarding TB ...., before initial assignment and annually.” A review of EFs conducted on May 19, 2025 at approximately 9:45 a.m. revealed the following:EF#1, date of hire 10/30/23: No documentation provided of 2024 annual TB education being provided.EF#2, date of hire 06/12/23: No documentation provided of 2024 annual TB education being provided.EF#4, date of hire 07/01/19: No documentation provided of 2023 nor 2024 annual TB education being provided.EF#5, date of hire 03/28/23: No documentation provided of 2024 annual TB education being provided.EF#6, date of hire 07/31/23: No documentation provided of 2024 annual TB education being provided.EF#7, date of hire 05/22/23: No documentation provided of a TB test being conducted upon hire. Documentation provided of a two-step TB test being administered late on 08/03/23 and on 08/24/23. No documentation provided of 2024 annual TB education being provided.EF#8, date of hire 06/24/19: No documentation provided of 2023 nor 2024 annual TB education being provided.EF#9, date of hire 06/24/19: No documentation provided of 2023 nor 2024 annual TB education being provided.An interview conducted with the agency alternate Administrator on May 22, 2025 at approximately 11:30 a.m. confirmed the above findings.”

    Rule L0580. Standard-level.

  • Level of activity (42 CFR 418.78(e))

    The inspectors’ words, 228 words

    “Based on a review of agency policy/procedure, a review of the agency volunteer utilization records, and an interview with the agency alternate Administrator, the agency failed to ensure volunteers provide day-to-day administrative and/or direct patient care services in an amount that, at a minimum, equals 5 percent of the total patient care hours, for one (1) of one (1) volunteer cost savings documentation (VD) reviewed (VD#1). Agency policy/procedure reviewed on May 22, 2025 at approximately 10:00 a.m. ‘Volunteer Services’ ‘Procedure’ section (2) “Hospice will document the cost savings achieved through the use of volunteers and will include: .... Hospice will document and maintain a volunteer staff sufficient to provide administrative and/or direct patient care in an amount that, at a minimum, equals 5% of the total patient care hours of all paid hospice employees and contract staff.” Total patient care hours and volunteer percentage time was reviewed from June 2024 - April 2025.VD#1:June 2024: ‘Percent Volunteer Time’ .36%.July 2024: ‘Percent Volunteer Time’ 0%.October 2024: ‘Percent Volunteer Time’ 0%.November 2024: ‘Percent Volunteer Time’ 0%.December 2024: ‘Percent Volunteer Time’ 0%.January 2025: ‘Percent Volunteer Time’ 0%.February 2025: ‘Percent Volunteer Time’ 0%.March 2025: ‘Percent Volunteer Time’ 0%.The total cost savings equated to less than five (5) percent of the total patient care hours.An interview conducted with the agency alternate Administrator on May 22, 2025 at approximately 11:30 a.m. confirmed the above findings.”

    Rule L0647. Standard-level.

  • Inpatient care provided under arrangements (42 CFR 418.108(c)(5))

    The inspectors’ words, 252 words

    “Based on a request of agency policy/procedure, inpatient facility contracts, and an interview with the agency alternate Administrator, it was determined that the agency failed to ensure the training of personnel who will be providing the patient’s care in an inpatient facility for two (2) of two (2) agency inpatient contract reviews (Inpatient Facility #1, Inpatient Facility #2). Agency policy/procedure related to short-term inpatient care facility employee training requested on May 22, 2025 at approximately 10:00 a.m. No specific policy provided.A review of inpatient facility contracts was conducted on May 21, 2025 at approximately 1:00 p.m. Inpatient Facility #1: A ‘One Time Hospice Services Agreement’ was signed by the hospice agency on 07/22/24 and signed by the inpatient facility on 07/25/24. The agreement specified the arrangement for care for patient #20 for the time period of 09/06/24 - 09/11/24. Documentation provided of patient #20 admitted to the facility for respite care 09/06/24 - 09/11/24. No documentation provided of the hospice agency ensuring training of the personnel who would be providing the patient’s care in the inpatient facility.Inpatient Facility #2: A ‘Nursing Facility Agreement (Single Patients)’ dated 07/07/2020 was signed by the Hospice and the Facility. Documentation provided of patient #15 admitted to the facility for respite care 05/20/24 - 05/23/24. No documentation provided of the hospice agency ensuring training of the personnel who would be providing the patient’s care in the inpatient facility.An interview conducted with the agency alternate Administrator on May 22, 2025 at approximately 11:30 a.m. confirmed the above findings.”

    Rule L0715. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.112(e)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 350 words

    “Based on a review of agency policy, a review of patient clinical records, and an interview with the agency alternate Administrator, the hospice agency failed to provide the skilled nursing facility the patient hospice benefit of election form for two (2) of two (2) skilled nursing facilities (SNF) visited (SNF#1, SNF#2). Agency policy/procedure reviewed on May 22, 2025 at approximately 10:00 a.m. ‘Care to Patients of a SNF/NF or ICF/MR’ ‘Procedure’ section (7) “Hospice will provide to the SNF/NF or ICF/MR the following information: ..... Hospice election form ....”Patient home visits were conducted on May 20, 2025 between approximately 9:00 a.m. - 1:30 p.m. SNF#1: Review of the agency/facility written agreement was conducted on May 21, 2025 at approximately 11:00 a.m. Documentation provided of a ’’Purchase of Service Contract’ dated 10/09/24, signed by the Hospice agency and the facility.During a home visit for (patient #2) conducted at the facility on 05/20/25, the hospice benefit of election form was not in another hospice patients (patient #21, who also resided at the facility) hospice chart nor in the patients facility chart. This was confirmed onsite by the hospice agency nurse (employee #3) who was present during the patient home visit. SNF#2: Review of the agency/facility written agreement was conducted on May 21, 2025 at approximately 11:00 a.m. Documentation provided of a ’’Business Associate Agreement’ dated 05/15/19, unsigned by the Hospice agency and the facility.During a home visit for (patient #3) conducted at the facility on 05/20/25, the hospice benefit of election form was not in (patient #3) hospice chart nor the facility chart. Two (2) other hospice patients (patient #22, patient #23) residing at the facility also did not have the hospice benefit of election form in the hospice chart nor the facility chart. This was confirmed onsite by the hospice agency chaplain (employee #10), who was present during the patient home visit and by the hospice agency nurse (employee #9) who was present at the facility during the patient home visit. An interview conducted with the agency alternate Administrator on May 22, 2025 at approximately 11:30 a.m. confirmed the above findings.”

    Rule L0781. Standard-level.

  • Orientation and training of staff (42 CFR 418.112(f))

    The inspectors’ words, 200 words

    “Based on a review of agency policy/procedure, a review of hospice services contracts, and an interview with the agency alternate administrator, agency failed to provide skilled nursing facility staff inservices for one (1) of one (1) skilled nursing facility contracts (SNFC) reviewed (SNFC#1). Agency policy/procedure was reviewed on May 22, 2025 at approximately 10:00 a.m. ‘Care to Residents of a SNF/NF or ICF/MR’ ‘Procedure’ section (8) “Hospice staff will assure orientation of SNF/NF or ICF/MR staff furnishing care to Hospice patients in the Hospice Philosophy, including hospice policies and procedures regarding methods of comfort, pain control and symptom management, as well as the principles about death and dying ...” SNFC #1: Review was conducted on May 21, 2025 at approximately 11:00 am of the agency/facility written agreement. Date of agreement 10/09/24. ‘Appendix A’ ‘Program Descriptions; ‘Nursing Services’ section (3) “Teaching patients/patients families and facility staff the Hospice philosophy and palliative care modalities, including pain control and symptom management...”No documentation provided of the hospice agency orienting facility staff to the hospice philosophy. (Hospice patient Clinical Record #21 currently resides at this facility.)An interview conducted with the agency alternate Administrator on May 22, 2025 at approximately 11:30 a.m. confirmed the above findings.”

    Rule L0782. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jul 14, 2025Recertification inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited
May 23, 2025Recertification inspection by the state7 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Aug 17, 2016.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 12.6 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 4% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 94.5% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 18% at home, 40% in assisted living, 7% in a skilled nursing facility, 35% elsewhere.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day12.6 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends4%
Visits near death94.5% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • 13 owners or officers are people: Salina Ngugi (owns 5% or more directly, 100%); Denis Tighe (corporate director, 100%); Denis Tighe (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); James Kusko (corporate officer); James Kusko (corporate director); Salina Ngugi (corporate officer); Denis Tighe (corporate officer); Denis Tighe (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Ralph Feldmann (corporate officer); Ralph Feldmann (corporate director); Chandrakant C Shah (corporate officer); Chandrakant C Shah (corporate director); Chandrakant C Shah (runs it (operational or managerial control)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 5 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 91% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 94% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 8 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 65.9% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 64.1% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 55 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold8 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 18 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 18017, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 5; this one had 7.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.