Holisticare Hospice, LLC
A hospice in Wayne, Pennsylvania 19087
985 Old Eagle School Road Suite 504, Wayne, Pennsylvania 19087. (610) 995-0100.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.
- 16 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- 3of 5 family caregiver rating
- 10of 10 CMS’s Hospice Care Index
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
16 deficiencies cited in the last three years
The middle of the 23 hospices serving ZIP code 19087 had 3.5.
The last inspection on record was on Mar 20, 2026: a reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
When those deficiencies happened
16 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Mar 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Dec | |||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Mar 20, 2026: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care16 deficiencies
-
EP Training Program (42 CFR 418.113(d)(1))
The inspectors’ words, 114 words
“Upon personnel record review, 1 of 17 (Personnel #17) did not have evidence Emergency Preparedness training including: • Initial training in emergency preparedness policies and procedures to all new and existing hospice employees, and individuals providing services under arrangement, consistent with their expected roles • Demonstrate staff knowledge of emergency procedures • Provide emergency preparedness training at least annually • Periodically review and rehearse its emergency preparedness plan with hospice employees (including nonemployee staff), with special emphasis placed on carrying out the procedures necessary to protect patients and others • Maintain documentation of all emergency preparedness training Personnel #17: Upon review, there was no available evidence of emergency preparedness training for ST providing care”
-
Timeframe for completion of assessment (42 CFR 418.54(b))
“Upon patient record review 1 of 19 (Patient #8) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice interdisciplinary group, in consultation with the individual’s attending physician (if any), completed the comprehensive assessment no later than 5 calendar days after the election of hospice care. Patient #8: Election statement effective date is 1/5/25 and signatures are 1/5/26. There was no evidence the comprehensive assessments were completed within 5 days after the election of hospice care.”
-
Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c))
“Upon patient record review 1 of 19 (Patient #9) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment identifies the physical, psychosocial, emotional, and spiritual needs related to the terminal illness that must be addressed in order to promote the hospice patient’s well-being, comfort, and dignity throughout the dying process. Patient #9: Psychosocial assessment was not completed within 5 calendar days after election. The MSW entry was that visit was declined and was not completed by the RN.”
-
Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))
The inspectors’ words, 127 words
“Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #10) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions • Duplicate drug therapy • Drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring Patient #10: Hospice Rx Profile includes 2/16/26 Ativan 1 mg tab prn anxiety every 4 hours po. SNF Rx profile has 2/23/26 Ativan 0.5 mg tab every 4 hrs prn anxiety. (1 mg ended 2/23 on SNF orders) Facility Rx Profile has Acetaminophen supp rectally 650 mg prn, but Hospice Rx profile does not specify mg.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))
The inspectors’ words, 203 words
“Upon patient record review, 6 of 19 (Patient #2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 10) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient #2: Patient has Depakote and Eliquis prescribed with no related problems, goals, interventions. Patient #3: Patient with heart disease and supporting dx of senile degeneration of the brain, dyspnea, and an order for oxygen 2 LPM prn. There are no respiratory or oxygen related problems, goals, interventions. Patient #4: Patient admitted with CVD and history of AF, PE, falls, with no related problems, goals, interventions including but not limited to no CV, respiratory, safety. Also patient has Xarelto and Plavix prescribed with no bleeding precautions. Patient #5: Patient has Eliquis prescribed and no related problems, goals, interventions. Patient #6: Patient has Xarelto and aspirin prescribed with no related problems, goals, interventions. Patient #10: Patient has Kepra for seizures, but no seizure precautions.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(2))
The inspectors’ words, 170 words
“Upon patient record review, 4 of 19 (Patient #1, 2, 4, 6) did not have evidence the plan of care must includes all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including the following: • A detailed statement of the scope and frequency of services necessary to meet the specific patient and family needs • The IDG demonstrates a proactive approach in developing each patient’s plan of care by planning ahead for anticipated patient changes and needs. Decisions should reflect the patient/family preferences rather than be solely a response to a crisis. Patient #1: Initial visit frequency SC 2m2, 6 prn. There are too many PRN visits ordered. Patient #2: Initial visit frequency SC 2m3 and 6 prn. There are too many PRN visits ordered. Patient #4: Initial visit frequency SC 2m3 and 6 prn; MSW 1m3 and 6 prn. There are too many PRN visits ordered. Patient #6: Initial visit frequency SC 2m3 and 6 prn. There are too many PRN visits ordered.”
-
Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))
“Upon client record review, 2 of 19 (Patient #2, 6) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services are provided in accordance with the plan of care. Patient #2: SOC 2/6/26, SC and MSW ordered 2mo3. SC 6 prn. MSW 3 prn. No documented SC visits after 2/6/26 visit. (only 1 visit Feb and no visit so far for March). IDG continued to identify SC frequency as 2x/month Patient #6: SOC 1/13/26. SC was ordered 2mo3 and 6 prn. No February visits documented by SC.”
-
Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))
The inspectors’ words, 239 words
“Upon patient record review, 5 of 19 (Patient #2, 3, 4, 5, 6) did not have evidence in the patient record that hospice aide assignments and duties are: • Assigned to a specific patient by a registered nurse that is a member of the interdisciplinary group • Written patient care instructions for a hospice aide must be prepared by a Registered Nurse who is responsible for the supervision of a hospice aide as specified under paragraph (h) of 418.76 • There is evidence in the patient record that the plan of care; indicate what tasks are to be done by the Aide and the frequency of these tasks. The use of “PRN” or “per patient choice”, for any task, whether personal care or non-personal care tasks, are not acceptable Patient #2: Patient had Depakote and Eliquis prescribed with no related seizure and/or bleeding precautions included on the aide plan of care. Patient #3: Patient had PRN oxygen prescribed with no related safety precautions on the aide plan of care. Patient #4: Patient had Xarelto and Plavix prescribed with no related bleeding precautions on the aide plan of care. Patient #5: Patient had PRN oxygen prescribed with no related safety precautions. Eliquis prescribed with no related bleeding precautions on the aide plan of care. Patient #6: Patient had PRN oxygen prescribed with no related safety precautions. Xarelto and aspirin prescribed with no bleeding precautions on the aide plan of care.”
-
Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2))
The inspectors’ words, 91 words
“Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #8) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a hospice aide provides services that are: • Ordered by the interdisciplinary group • Included in the plan of care • Permitted to be performed under state law by such hospice aide • Consistent with the hospice aide training Patient #8: Hospice Aide Care Plan assignment includes shower and shampoo weekly on Thursdays. Patient was showered 3/5/26 (Thurs), 3/6 (Fri), 3/8 (Sun), 3/12/26 (Thurs). Shampoo was performed 3/5 (Thurs), and 3/6 (Fri).”
-
Training (42 CFR 418.100(g)(1))
“Upon personnel record review, 1 of 17 (Personnel #17) did not have evidence the hospice employees and contract employees have received orientation on the hospice philosophy. Personnel #17: Upon review, there was no available evidence of orientation to hospice philosophy for ST providing care”
-
Training (42 CFR 418.100(g)(2))
“Upon personnel record review, 1 of 17 (Personnel #17) did not have evidence that the hospice employees have received orientation on their specific job requirements. Personnel #17: Upon review, there was no available evidence of orientation to specific job requirements for ST providing care, as evidenced by signed job description and/or documentation of orientation.”
-
Training (42 CFR 418.100(g)(3))
“Upon personnel record review, 1 of 17 (Personnel #17) did not have evidence that a skills competency assessment, specific to each discipline had been conducted for all personnel including volunteers initially during orientation. Personnel #17: Upon review, there was no available evidence that a skills competency assessment for ST providing care”
-
Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(2))
“Upon patient client record review, 2 of 19 (Patient #8, 12) did not have evidence that each patient record contains: • Signed copies of the notice of patient rights in accordance with 418.52 • Signed election statement in accordance with 418.24 Patient #8: Election statement effective date is 1/5/25 and signatures are 1/5/26. Patient #12: Election date “to begin on....” space is left blank.”
-
Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(6))
“Upon patient client record review, 4 of 19 (Patient #4, 8, 12, 15) did not have evidence that each patient record contains Advance Directives. Patient #4, 12, 15: POC identifies patient as DNR. DNR/POLST has no MD/NP/PA signature. Patient #8: The POC identifies patient as a DNR. There is no DNR on file.”
-
Authentication (42 CFR 418.104(b))
The inspectors’ words, 113 words
“Upon patient client record review, 2 of 19 (Patient #3, 7) did not have evidence that all entries are legible, clear, complete, and appropriately authenticated and dated in accordance with the organizations policies and procedures and currently accepted standards of practice. Electronic signatures are acceptable as long the hospice is following appropriate safeguards to prevent unauthorized access to the patient records. Patient #3: Document uploads include plan of care 12/2/25-03/01/25 for patient with same last name, different first name and different agency location under IDG updates. Upon staff interview, staff confirms not the same patient. Documents subsequently removed. Patient #7: Patient record inadvertently includes problems/precautions for gastrostomy when patient does not have one.”
-
Protection of information (42 CFR 418.104(c))
“Upon observation, there was no evidence the organization follows their policies and procedures to maintain the the patient’s clinical record in confidential manner. Patient #3: Document uploads include plan of care 12/2/25-03/01/25 for patient with same last name, different first name and different agency location under IDG updates. Upon staff interview, staff confirms not the same patient. There is evidence records were not maintained in a confidential manner.”
The one inspection in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2026 | Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care | 16 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified hospice since Aug 2, 2012.
- Ownership: for-profit.
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency or CMS’s most serious finding: the place’s failure to meet a rule caused, or was likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment or death to someone in its care. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 489.3. on record in the last three years.
CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Has anything been proven against it?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who does the caring?
- From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 13.7 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 5.6% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 92.7% of patients who died.
- Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 36% at home, 43% in assisted living, 21% in a nursing facility.
CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | This provider |
|---|---|
| Nurse care minutes per routine home care day | 13.7 min |
| Skilled nursing minutes at weekends | 5.6% |
| Visits near death | 92.7% of patients who died |
Who owns it?
- Care Hospice, Inc. owns 100% directly since Sep 19, 2018.
- 11 owners or officers are people: John B Hunter (owns 5% or more through other companies, 9.42%); Jesse Reo Moore (corporate officer); Jesse Reo Moore (managing employee (on the payroll)); Diane Lincoln (managing employee (on the payroll)); Bart K Valdez (corporate officer); Bart K Valdez (managing employee (on the payroll)); Michael F Carnuccio (managing employee (under contract)); Grant Brown (corporate officer); Grant Brown (managing employee (on the payroll)); Dana K Reid (corporate officer); Dana K Reid (managing employee (on the payroll)).
- A private-equity firm is among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Organisation | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Care Hospice, Inc. | Owns 5% or more directly | 100% | Sep 19, 2018 |
| Care Hospice Acquisition, Inc. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Dec 9, 2020 |
| Hospice Care Buyer, Inc. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Dec 9, 2020 |
| Hospice Care Holdings, L.P. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Dec 9, 2020 |
| Hospice Care Intermediate I, Inc. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Dec 9, 2020 |
| Hospice Care Intermediate II, Inc. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Dec 9, 2020 |
| Thl Equity Fund VIII Investors (Hospice Care), L.P. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 29.16% | Dec 9, 2020 |
| Thomas H. Lee Parallel Fund VIII, L.P. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 27.44% | Dec 9, 2020 |
| Thomas H. Lee Equity Fund VIII, L.P. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 15.07% | Dec 9, 2020 |
What do families say?
- Family caregivers rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 82% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 85% would definitely recommend it.
- CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
- 96.84% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 62.3% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5 | 3 of 5 |
| Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold | 10 of 10 |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 23 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 19087, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 3.5; this one had 16.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Deficiencies, 3 years |
|---|---|
| Main Line Health Homecare & Hospice - Hospice | 0 |
| Patient Care Hospice | 1 |
| Holisticare Hospice, LLC This hospice | 16 |
| Penn Medicine Hospice | 8 |
| Holy Redeemer Hospice - Pa | 9 |
| Vitas Healthcare Corporation Atlantic | 5 |
| Keystone Hospice | 5 |
| Hospice Compassus - Philadelphia | 0 |
| Caring Hospice Services | 4 |
| Gentiva I | 13 |
| Ascend Hospice | 6 |
| Aseracare Hospice | 2 |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
- Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice General Information (yc9t-dgbk).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Provider Data (252m-zfp9).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, CAHPS Hospice Survey (gxki-hrr8).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR hospice inspection reports (Hospice Survey Reports - Oct 2021 through Sep 2026.xlsx).
Released Oct 23, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice All Owners (e983965e-1603-4cb8-82b5-c40090e380d1).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Enrollments (25704213-e833-4b8b-9dbc-58dd17149209).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice ZIP Data (95rg-2usp).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.
From the hospice
The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.