Hearth Record

Caring Hospice Services

A hospice in Fort Washington, Pennsylvania 19034

400 Commerce Drive Suite C, Fort Washington, Pennsylvania 19034. (215) 619-7650.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 4 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

4 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 22 hospices serving ZIP code 19034 had 3.

The last inspection on record was on May 19, 2025: a complaint inspection by the state.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

4 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.

4 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 Dec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNov

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Jan 24, 2025: complaint inspection by the state1 deficiency
  • Plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 237 words

    “Based on review of clinical records (CR) and interviews with staff the agency failed to ensure staff followed the visit schedule as ordered for by the physician on the plan of care for one (1) of three (3) records reviewed. CR #1 Findings include: Agency policies were reviewed on 1/24/25 at approximately 1:30 PM and revealed the following. Policy titled, “;Physician Orders” stated, “;Some of the reasons orders are obtained from physicians include, but are not limited to....change in visit frequency if not within the range specified in the patients plan of care...” Policy titled, “;Plan of Care” stated, “;The care and services provided to patients and their families are in accordance with an individualized, written plan of care established by the hospice IDG (interdisciplinary group) A review of clinical records (CR) were reviewed onsite on 1/24/25 starting at approximately 10:00AM which revealed the following: CR #1: Start of Care (SOC): 11/26/24. File contained a Hospice plan of care for the certification period of 11/26/24-2/23/25 that contained an order for a Chaplain evaluation. Chaplain visits were documented as conducted on 12/2/24 12/11/24, and 1/3/25. There was a note by the chaplain from the evaluation visit on 12/2/24 that listed a plan for visits to be conducted, “;1-2 month and 2 PRN (as needed).” There were no additional physician orders/notification to cover the additional chaplain visits. Interview with administration on 1/24/25 at approximately 2:00PM confirmed the above findings.”

    Rule L0543. Standard-level. From a complaint.

Sep 9, 2024: complaint inspection by the state3 deficiencies
  • Rights of the patient (42 CFR 418.52(c)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 536 words

    “Based on review of clinical records (CR), hospice policies, staff interviews and additional hospice documentation, the hospice failed to ensure that the patient had the appropriate medications delivered in a timely manner to manage the patient’s symptoms for one (1) of three (3) CR reviewed. (CR #1). Findings include: Review of agency policies on 8/29/24 at approximately 2:00PM and 9/4/24 at approximately 11:00 AM revealed the following: Policy titled, “;Medication availability” stated, “;All medication will be dispensed by the Caring Hospice Services contracted pharmacy, with a physician order. The contracted pharmacy will utilize neighborhood pharmacies for immediate dispensing of medication.” Policy titled, “;Medication-Management” stated, “;Medications are provided on a timely basis and are available 24 hours a day and seven days a week as needed...” Clinical records were reviewed on 8/27/24, 9/3/24, 9/4/24, 9/6/24 and 9/9/24 at approximately 10:00AM, which revealed the following: CR #1: Start of Care (SOC): 4/16/24, Subject of the complainant. Passed away on 7/17/24. Certification periods reviewed: 4/16/24-7/14/24 and 7/15/24-10/12/24. There was a verbal order written by PF#1 for medication refills and medication changes on 7/16/24 for the following: morphine oral solution 20mg/mL take 0.5mL (10mg) P.O. (by mouth) every 2 hours as need for pain/SOB (shortness of breath). Lorazepam liquid 2mg/mL take 0.5 mL (1mg) P.O. (by mouth) every 6 hours as needed for anxiety. Atropine 1% solution take 1-2 drops every 6 hours as needed for secretions. Patient’s chart contained previous/different dosing of morphine (5mg every 3 hours). Patient already had Lorazepam but in pill form and the atropine was a new medication that was ordered. In email with the Director of Nursing on 9/4/24 she stated that the nurse educated the patient/family that they could crush the pill form of Lorazepam that they already had until the liquid form was delivered. Review of email between the Hospice and pharmacy was reviewed on 9/3/24 at approximately 10:00 and revealed the following: Pharmacy company that hospice agency uses utilized a non-local/national delivery company to deliver the medications to the patient. Paperwork notes a delivery date of 7/18/24 (after the patient passed away on 7/17/24). Pharmacy representative stated, “;Per (delivery company name), plane arrived late to the hub, making the package late in delivery.” Hospice representative then asked, “;Would we have received notification of the delay” and pharmacy responded, “;Unless it was part of a larger services failure where we were notifying clients, we would not have sent a notification.” Onsite interview conducted with regional director quality assurance and compliance on 8/29/24 at approximately 10:00AM. She stated the daughter never called the hospice to let them know that the medications ordered on 7/16/24 did not arrive in a timely matter so they had no way of knowing it did not arrive until after the patient passed away. During exit interview conducted on the phone with Director of Nursing on 9/9/24 at approximately 10:15 AM it was stated that the pharmacy/hospice could have communicated better as their policy states STAT medications will be delivered in a timely matter. She stated the pharmacy does partner with local pharmacies and it could have been obtained that way. An interview with the Hospice Director of Nursing on 9/9/24, at approximately 10:15 AM. confirmed the above findings.”

    Rule L0512. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 374 words

    “Based on review of clinical records (CR) and interviews with staff the agency failed to ensure staff followed the visit schedule as ordered for by the physician on the plan of care for one (1) of three (3) records reviewed. CR #1 Findings include: Review of agency policies on 8/29/24 at approximately 2:00PM and 9/4/24 at approximately 11:00 AM revealed the following: Policy titled, “;Plan of Care” stated, “;The care and services provided to patients and their families are in accordance with an individualized written plan of care established by the hospice IDG (interdisciplinary team) in collaboration with the patients attending physician (if any) and if appropriate the patient and/or his or her representative...” Policy titled, “;Missed Visit Note” stated, “;All services are provided according to the physicians plan of care including scope and frequency of services to meet the needs of the patient and family...in the event a visit is not completed according to the patients plan of care and is unable to be assigned to another clinician and/or replacement refused, a missed visit form will be completed. Notification will be made to the patient/family, physician and facility (if applicable). Documentation of the missed visit will be included in the patient record.” A review of Clinical records completed 8/29/24, 9/3/24, 9/4/24, 9/6/24 and 9/9/24, at approximately 10:00AM and revealed the following: CR #1: Start of Care (SOC): 4/16/24, Passed away on 7/17/24. Certification periods reviewed: 4/16/24-7/14/24 and 7/15/24-10/12/24. Both certification periods contained nursing orders for 1-2 times per week for 2 weeks and 1 visit PRN (as needed), and Hospice Aides for five (5) times per week for 2 weeks. The hospice orders were reviewed by the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) and continued throughout the certification periods above. During the following weeks No Hospice Aides were provided by the hospice: 4/16/24-4/20/24, 4/21/24-4/27/24, 4/28/24-5/4/24, 5/5/24-5/10/24, 5/12/24-5/18/24, 6/9/24-6/15/24, 6/30/24-7/6/24, 7/7/24-7/13/24, 7/14/24-7/17/24. During the following weeks only one hospice aide visit was conducted: 5/19/24-5/25/24, 5/26/24-6/1/24, 6/2/24-6/8/24, 6/16/24-6/22/24, and 6/23/24-6/29/24. There were only two (2) “;Hospice Aide Missed Visit notes” completed for 5/27/24 and for 6/12/24 but not for any of the other missed visits noted above and no orders to change the frequency. Interview with Director of Nursing on 9/9/24 at approximately 10:00AM confirmed the above findings.”

    Rule L0543. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Governing body and administrator (42 CFR 418.100(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 241 words

    “Based on a review of personnel files (PF), agency policy, and interview with agency staff, it was determined that the Governing Body failed to ensure that initial competency evaluations were completed for one (1) of five (5) PF reviewed. (PF #1) Findings include: Review of agency policies on 8/29/24 at approximately 2:00PM and 9/4/24 at approximately 11:00 AM revealed the following: Policy titled, “;Competency Assessment” stated, “;Caring Hospice implements a systematic competency assessment program to assure that all staff and volunteers are competent to perform their jobs effectively...As a component of the orientation process, new staff and volunteers complete a competency assessment evaluation prior to providing care or assuming administrative responsibilities. Competency evaluations are specific to the skills needed for each job category and specific competencies are delineated in job descriptions and performance evaluations. The competency of staff and volunteers is assessed through self-evaluations and checklists, supervised visits, interviews, simulated practice and written tests. Policy titled, “;Personnel File Contents” stated, “;employee/volunteer personnel documentation must include at a minimum but not limited to the following items...at least one in-home visit...skills/competency evaluation...” A review of PFs on 8/29/24 at approximately 11:30 AM and on 9/5/24 and 9/6/24 at approximately 2:00PM which revealed the following: PF #1: Date of Hire: 3/2/23, Personnel file is a Registered Nurse. File contained initial in-home evaluation completed after hire on 8/9/23. An interview with the director of nursing on 9/9/24, at approximately 10:00 AM. confirmed the above findings.”

    Rule L0651. Standard-level. From a complaint.

All 4 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
May 19, 2025Complaint inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited
Jan 24, 2025Complaint inspection by the state1 deficiency cited
Oct 10, 2024Complaint inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited
Sep 9, 2024Complaint inspection by the state3 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Nov 7, 1996.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 4 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 18.1 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 5.4% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 92.1% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 13% at home, 36% in assisted living, 51% in a nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day18.1 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends5.4%
Visits near death92.1% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • 12 owners or officers are people: David Rosenbaum (owns 5% or more directly, 55%); Sara Rosenbaum (owns 5% or more directly, 5%); Batsheva Tauber (owns 5% or more directly, 5%); Rachel Olshin (owns 5% or more directly, 5%); Christina Visco (corporate director, 0%); Randolph L Brown (managing employee (on the payroll)); Leah Stern (owns 5% or more directly); Leah Stern (corporate director); Miriam Mansback (corporate officer); David Rosenbaum (corporate director); Yocheved Hirschfeld (owns 5% or more directly); Alan Ira Abramowitz (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 82% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 88% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 96.25% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 68.4% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 54 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 22 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 19034, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 3; this one had 4.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.