Amedisys Hospice Care
A hospice in Butler, Pennsylvania 16001
240 Pullman Square Suite 255, Butler, Pennsylvania 16001. (724) 431-4170.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.
- 6 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- 3of 5 family caregiver rating
- 10of 10 CMS’s Hospice Care Index
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
6 deficiencies cited in the last three years
The middle of the 25 hospices serving ZIP code 16001 had 0.
The last inspection on record was on Apr 24, 2026: a complaint inspection by the state.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
When those deficiencies happened
6 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited May 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Dec | |||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
May 14, 2025: complaint inspection by the state2 deficiencies
-
Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(1))
The inspectors’ words, 510 words
“Based on review of agency policy, clinical records (CR), and staff (EMP) interview, the agency failed to ensure the interdisciplinary group maintained responsibility for directing, coordinating, and supervising the care and services provided for one (1) of three (3) patients (CR1). Findings included:Review of agency policy on May 14, 2025, at 12:30 p.m., showed, “Policy: AA-006 ... Topic: Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) ... The composition of the IDT includes at a minimum a physician, a registered nurse, a social worker, and a spiritual counselor, ... Members of the IDT must coordinate and supervise care with all service providers involved in the care of the patient ... Operational guidelines: The IDT maintains a system of communication and integration in order to: 1. Ensure that the IDT retains responsibility for directing, coordinating, and supervising the care and services provided. 4. Provide for and ensuring the ongoing sharing of information between all disciplines providing care and services in all setting. ... The IDT review is part of the overall agency evaluation process and assists the agency in meeting patient care objectives by: 1. Providing a means for effective interchange, reporting and coordination of patient care.”Review of CR1 on May 14, 2025, at 9 a.m. showed patient was admitted to hospice on 8/28/2024 for an initial benefit period ending 11/25/2024. The patient elected the hospice benefit on 8/28/2024 after an extended hospitalization for urinary problems that included an infection and stent placement to help drain urine from the bladder. The physician’s ordered plan dated 8/28/2024 included an order to place a foley urinary catheter (to drain urine from bladder into a bag), “Skilled nurse to perform insertion of 16F [size] catheter [urinary].” Review of CR1’s admission visit note from 8/28/2024 showed the RN (registered nurse) documented, “Patient is agreeable to have a foley [urinary] catheter placed after the weekend.” After the weekend and during a skilled nurse visit on 9/3/2024, the RN documented, “Unsuccessful [sic] attempted to place a foley catheter. Genital scarring [sic] from prior surgical procedures and genital disfigurement evident. Unable to successfully place foley catheter. Call placed to [patient’s urologist] to inquire on having the catheter placed in [his/her] office. Family calling urology office. No other needs at this time. Will call the office with further needs.” During the next skilled nurse visit the following week on 9/11/2024 the licensed practical nurse documented, “PT has 14 FR- 5 CC foley catheter inserted 9/6/2024 by a nurse neighbor after verbal call consent from [patient’s urologist]. Foley catheter patent straw colored urine.” Further review of CR1 showed the IDT was not aware of the registered nurse’s inability to place CR1’s urinary catheter, or the need for a urinary consult until 9/18/2024 or 15 days after the patient agreed to have it placed. Per the 9/18/2024 “Hospice IDG Comprehensive Assessment and Plan of Care Update Report” the medical director documented, “Current Meeting Summary IDG [interdisciplinary group] Team Members HOSPICE PHYSICIAN ... Details ... HAS NEW FOLEY.” Interviews with EMP1 (administrator) and EMP2 (regional vice president) on May 14, 2025, at 1 p.m. confirmed above findings.”
-
Nursing services (42 CFR 418.64(b)(1))
The inspectors’ words, 493 words
“Based on review of agency policy, a clinical record (CR), and staff (EMP) interview, the registered nurse failed to update the comprehensive assessment to ensure the needs of the patient were met for one (1) of three (3) records (CR1). Findings included:Review of CR1 on May 14, 2025, at 9 a.m. showed patient was admitted to hospice on 8/28/2024 for an initial benefit period ending 11/25/2024. The patient elected the hospice benefit on 8/28/2024 after an extended hospitalization for urinary problems that included an infection and stent placement to help drain urine from the bladder. The physician’s ordered plan dated 8/28/2024 included an order to place a foley urinary catheter (to drain urine from bladder into a bag), “Skilled nurse to perform insertion of 16F [size] catheter [urinary].” Review of CR1’s admission visit note from 8/28/2024 showed the RN1 (registered nurse) documented, “Patient is agreeable to have a foley [urinary] catheter placed after the weekend.” After the weekend and during a skilled nurse visit on 9/3/2024, RN1 documented, “Unsuccessful [sic] attempted to place a foley catheter. Genital scarring [sic] from prior surgical procedures and genital disfigurement evident. Unable to successfully place foley catheter. Call placed to [patient’s urologist] to inquire on having the catheter placed in [his/her] office. Family calling urology office. No other needs at this time. Will call the office with further needs.” During the next skilled nurse visit the following week on 9/11/2024, the licensed practical nurse documented, “PT has 14 FR- 5 CC foley catheter inserted 9/6/2024 by a nurse neighbor after verbal call consent from [patient’s urologist]. Foley catheter patent straw colored urine.” Further review of CR1 showed the IDT was not aware of the registered nurse’s inability to place CR1’s urinary catheter, or the need for a urinary consult until 9/18/2024 or 15 days after the patient agreed to have it placed. Per the 9/18/2024 “Hospice IDG Comprehensive Assessment and Plan of Care Update Report” the medical director documented, “Current Meeting Summary IDG [interdisciplinary group] Team Members HOSPICE PHYSICIAN ... Details ... HAS NEW FOLEY.” There was nothing in the clinical to show the RN updated the patient’s comprehensive assessment related to unsuccessful urinary catheter placement or that the IDT / urologist was notified concerning CR1’s needs.Review of RN1’s job description on May 14, 2025, at 12:30 p.m. showed, “Job Title: HSP Case Manager ... Job Summary: Responsible for providing coordinating, and directing the provision of hospice care according to the interdisciplinary team (IDT) plan of care through the competent application of the nursing process, ... Essential Functions: 1. Performs initial nursing assessment on new admissions and completed initial plan of care. Coordinates the total Plan of Care and maintains continuity of patient care by collaborating with appropriate staff. Revise plan of care as needed. Completes updated Plan of Care ... and communicates changes to attending physician, hospice staff.”Interviews with EMP1 (administrator) and EMP2 (regional vice president) on May 14, 2025, at 1 p.m. confirmed above findings.”
Jun 28, 2024: recertification inspection by the state4 deficiencies
-
EP Testing Requirements (42 CFR 418.113(d)(2))
The inspectors’ words, 143 words
“Based on review of agency policy, documentation, and staff (EMP) interview, the agency failed to coduct annual exercises to test its emergency plan for 2022, and 2023. Findings: Review of agency policy on June 28, 2024, at 9 a.m. showed, “EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PLANNING ... Emergency management is a dynamic process. Planning, though critical, is not the only component. Training, conducting drills, testing equipment and coordinating activities within the community are other important functions. ... POLICY: ... The agency will participate in practice drills.” Review of agency’s emergency preparedness binder on June 28, 2024, at 9:50 a.m. showed an incomplete fire drill (no evaluation and not community based) dated 7/31/2023. The agency had no other documentation to show it had completed required annual exercises for the years 2022 and 2023. Interview with EMP1 (administrator) on June 28, 2024, at 11 a.m. confirmed above findings.”
-
Program scope (42 CFR 418.58(a)(2))
The inspectors’ words, 255 words
“Based on review of agency policy, clinical records (CR), quality assessment and performance improvement (QAPI) data, and staff (EMP) interview, the agency failed to measure, analyze, and track quality indicators, including adverse patient events, and other aspects of performance that enable the hospice to assess processes of care, hospice services and operations for two (2) of four (4) records with infections (CR15, & CR16). Review of agency policy on June 28, 2024, at 11:05 a.m. showed, “PI-001 Quality Assessment Performance Improvement (QAPI) ... PI Data includes and is not limited to systemic reviews of: ... 6. Adverse patient events ... 9. Infection Surveillance and Prevention practices and surveillance data.” Review of CR15 on June 25, 2024, at 10:30 a.m. showed a hospice plan of care with a recertification period from 2/21/2024 to 5/20/2024. A physician order from 4/28/2024 showed, Levaquin [medication/antibiotic] ... X 5 days ... Reason: UTI [urinary tract infection].” Review of CR16 on June 25, 2024, at 12:30 p.m. showed a hospice plan of care with a recertification period from 3/19/2024 to 6/16/2024. A physician order from 5/12/2024 showed, “Amoxicillin [medication/antibiotic] ... X 7 days for ear infection.” Review of QAPI documentation and agency’s method for tracking infections “QI Event Report” on June 28, 2024, at 10:45 a.m. did not show CR15’s or CR16’s infections listed. The “QI Event Report” period was from 6/28/2023 to 6/28/2024. Interview with EMP1 (administrator) on June 28, 2024, at 11 a.m. confirmed above findings, and that the above infections were not captured within QAPI for tracking purposes.”
-
Prevention (42 CFR 418.60(a))
The inspectors’ words, 294 words
“Based on observation, review of agency policy and procedure, and staff (EMP) interview, the agency failed to ensure one (1) of one (1) registered nurse followed agency policy and procedure for infection control (EMP6). Findings: Review of agency policy and procedure on June 24, 2024, at 11:15 a.m. showed, “Bag Technique ... Purpose: To provide guidance for the adherence of the principles of infection prevention in relationship to practitioner equipment and supply bag usage ... Procedure: ... 3. The field staff member cleanses hands prior to accessing materials from the supply bag. ... 4. Equipment and supplies to be used, such as blood pressure cuff and thermometer, are removed and placed on a clean field. Keep he supply bag closed when not in use. 5. Wash hands again if you need to re-enter the bag for additional supplies during patient care. ... 8. Hands are cleansed prior to returning clean equipment to the bag.” Observation during home visit on June 27, 2024, at 9:15 a.m., at a skilled nursing facility, revealed EMP6 enter facility wearing his/her stethoscope around his/her neck (not stored in supply bag). Once in patient’s room, EMP6 removed equipment from supply bag (blood pressure cuff, thermometer, etc.) without placing equipment on a clean field or closing the bag (open for entire visit). EMP6 then used equipment on patient. When EMP6 completed his/her assessment of the patient, he/she reached into supply bag to obtain a disinfectant wipe but did not sanitize his/her hands prior to entering the bag. Once the visit was finished, EMP6 used the previously retrieved disinfectant wipe on his/her equipment and placed each item back into bag one at a time without sanitizing his/her hands first. Interview with EMP6 on June 27, 2024, at 9:35 a.m. confirmed above findings.”
-
Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.112(e)(3))
The inspectors’ words, 212 words
“Based on review of clinical records (CR), contracts, and staff (EMP) interviews, the agency failed to ensure the patient’s clinical record located at the skilled nursing facility (SNF) contained the patient’s initial certification of terminal illness, and election of the hospice benefit for one (1) of one (1) SNF record reviewed during a home visit (CR7). Findings: Review of contract between agency and SNF, “NURSING FACILITY SERVICES AGREEMENT” on June 28, 2024, at 11 a.m. showed, “3. Responsibilities of Hospice. ... (e) Provision of Information. ... At a minimum, Hospice shall provide the following information to Facility for each Hospice Patient residing at the facility: ... (ii) Elections form. The hospice election form and any advance directives; (iii) Certifications. Physician certifications and recertification of terminal illness.” Review of CR7 on June 27, 2024, at 9:00 a.m. showed a plan of care with an initial certification from 5/31/2024 to 8/28/2024. Further review of CR7’s clinical record maintained by the SNF during a home visit on June 27, 2024, at 9:45 a.m. showed that it did not contain the hospice election of benefit or the initial certification of terminal illness. EMP1 reviewed CR7’s clinical record maintained by the SNF during an interview on June 28, 2024, at approximately 11 a.m., and confirmed above findings.”
All 4 inspections in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 24, 2026 | Complaint inspection by the state | No deficiencies cited |
| May 14, 2025 | Complaint inspection by the state | 2 deficiencies cited |
| Aug 22, 2024 | Recertification inspection by the state | No deficiencies cited |
| Jun 28, 2024 | Recertification inspection by the state | 4 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified hospice since Oct 25, 2010.
- Ownership: for-profit.
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency or CMS’s most serious finding: the place’s failure to meet a rule caused, or was likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment or death to someone in its care. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 489.3. on record in the last three years.
CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Has anything been proven against it?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- 2 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who does the caring?
- From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 12.4 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 7.6% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 91.2% of patients who died.
- Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 62% at home, 25% in assisted living, 9% in a nursing facility, 4% in a skilled nursing facility.
CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | This provider |
|---|---|
| Nurse care minutes per routine home care day | 12.4 min |
| Skilled nursing minutes at weekends | 7.6% |
| Visits near death | 91.2% of patients who died |
Who owns it?
- Amedisys Holding LLC owns 100% directly since Jun 17, 2010.
- 8 owners or officers are people: Marcus Macip (corporate officer); Kimberly Seymour (corporate officer); Bridget R Kaigler (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Joni Babineaux (corporate officer); Kristina J Braud (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Letha Buser (managing employee (on the payroll)); Jeanne Shingleton (corporate officer); Joshua Lee Proffitt (corporate officer).
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Organisation | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unitedhealth Group Incorporated | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Aug 14, 2025 |
| Amedisys Inc. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Oct 26, 2010 |
| Amedisys Holding LLC | Owns 5% or more directly | 100% | Jun 17, 2010 |
What do families say?
- Family caregivers rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 79% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 85% would definitely recommend it.
- CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
- 98.72% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 74.4% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5 | 3 of 5 |
| Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold | 10 of 10 |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 25 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 16001, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 0; this one had 6.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Deficiencies, 3 years |
|---|---|
| VNA Hospice, Western Pa | 3 |
| Amedisys Hospice Care This hospice | 6 |
| Family Hospice | Not given |
| Heartland Hospice | 28 |
| Gentiva | 9 |
| Hope Hospice Inc. | 0 |
| Good Samaritan Hospice of Pittsburgh | 9 |
| Vitas Healthcare Corporation Atlantic | 1 |
| Medi Home Hospice | 0 |
| Three Oaks Hospice Pittsburgh | 0 |
| Aseracare Hospice | 0 |
| Three Rivers Hospice | 0 |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
- Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice General Information (yc9t-dgbk).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Provider Data (252m-zfp9).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, CAHPS Hospice Survey (gxki-hrr8).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR hospice inspection reports (Hospice Survey Reports - Oct 2021 through Sep 2026.xlsx).
Released Oct 23, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice All Owners (e983965e-1603-4cb8-82b5-c40090e380d1).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Enrollments (25704213-e833-4b8b-9dbc-58dd17149209).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice ZIP Data (95rg-2usp).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.
From the hospice
The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.