Hearth Record

Interim Health Care Hospice

A hospice in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15238

Ohara Commons, 285 Kappa Drive, Suite 270, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15238. (412) 371-3726.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 9 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

9 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 22 hospices serving ZIP code 15238 had 1.

The last inspection on record was on Jul 24, 2026: a reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

9 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.

9 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 Dec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNov

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Jul 24, 2026: reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner9 deficiencies
  • EP Training Program (42 CFR 418.113(d)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 296 words

    “It is required that the hospice maintains an emergency preparedness training program that is based on the emergency preparedness plan, risk assessment, policies and procedures, and the communication plan. The training program is reviewed and updated at least every two (2) years. The hospice EP training program includes for all new hospice employees and those providing services under arrangement, initial training in EP policies and procedures consistent with their expected roles, demonstration of staff knowledge of emergency procedures, EP training of all hospice employees and individuals providing services under arrangement at least every two (2) years, more frequent training occurs if there is a significant update of EP policies and procedures, a periodic review and rehearsal of the hospice’s EP plan with hospice employees (including non-employee staff), with special emphasis placed on carrying out the procedures necessary to protect patients and others; and documentation of each training including the date(s), participants, and content. This standard was not met as evidenced by interview and personnel record review. In 2 of 10 (20%) personnel records reviewed, the agency did not ensure that hospice provided an emergency preparedness training program at the time of hire and at least every 2 years for all new hospice employees and those providing services under arrangement. PERSONNEL RECORD 2: The Director of Patient Care Services (DPCS) was hired on 01/07’2025. A personnel record review revealed no documented evidence of emergency preparedness training at the time of hire. PERSONNEL RECORD 9: The Hospice Medical Director (contractor) was hired on 10/01/2015. A personnel record review revealed no documented evidence of emergency preparedness training during the period reviewed. Following interview and a joint record review on 07/24/2026, the Administrator and Human Resources Director confirmed that there was no documented emergency preparedness training for these staff members.”

    Rule E0037. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6)(i))

    The inspectors’ words, 190 words

    “It is required that the documented comprehensive assessment includes a drug profile that contains the patient’s current: prescription and over-the-counter (OTC) drugs; supplements; herbal remedies; [and other alternative treatments that could affect drug therapy. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review, observation, and interview. In 1 of 4 (25%) home visits observed, the agency did not ensure that the comprehensive assessment included a drug profile that contained the patient’s current prescription and over-the-counter medications. CLINICAL RECORD 2: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 06/05/2025 with a primary diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease. The patient resided in an assisted living facility (ALF). During a home visit with the Social Worker (SW), a medication reconciliation identified that Sertraline 100 mg daily and ABHR compounded medication (a custom-compounded topical gel or cream containing four active drugs: Ativan (lorazepam), Benadryl (diphenhydramine), Haldol (haloperidol), and Reglan (metoclopramide), 1 gram every 4 hours as needed, were documented on the hospice medication profile but were not documented on the ALF’s medication administration record/profile. Following a joint review and interview on 07/22/2026, the Administrator confirmed that a discrepancy was identified and would be investigated.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 182 words

    “It is required that each patient’s individualized written plan of care: includes all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness, including the following: drugs and treatment necessary to meet the needs of the patient. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 1 of 19 (5%) clinical records reviewed, the agency did not ensure that the plan of care included treatments necessary to meet the needs of the patient. CLINICAL RECORD 16: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 07/02/2025 with a primary diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). A clinical record identified that the patient had a gastrostomy tube (G-tube) in place for potential future use. However, review of the interdisciplinary plan of care revealed no documented interventions related to the G-tube, including assessment, maintenance, dressing changes, flushing protocols, or other care and monitoring requirements. Following a joint review of the clinical record and interview on 07/23/2026, the Administrator confirmed that the plan of care did not include documentation related to the patient’s G-tube, including assessment, maintenance, monitoring, or care interventions.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Competency evaluation (42 CFR 418.76(c)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 301 words

    “It is required that all hospice aide services must be provided by an individual who has successfully completed one (1) of the four (4) training and competency evaluations programs described below. The competency evaluation addresses each of the following subject areas from item 2, above; they are evaluated by observation of an aide’s performance with a patient or pseudo-patient, including communication skills, including the ability to read, write, and verbally report clinical information to patients, caregivers, and other hospice staff reading and recording temperature, pulse, and respiration appropriate and safe techniques in performing personal hygiene and grooming tasks, including items on the following basic checklist including bed bath, sponge, tub, and shower bath, hair shampoo (sink, tub, and bed), nail and skin care, oral hygiene, toileting and elimination, safe transfer techniques and ambulation, normal range of motion and positioning, The remaining subject areas in item 2 above may be evaluated through written examination, oral examination, or after observation of a hospice aide with a patient or a pseudo-patient during a simulation. This standard was not met as evidenced by interview and personnel record review. In 1 of 1 (100%) personnel record review of a Hospice Aide (HA), the agency did not ensure that the HA had successfully completed a competency evaluation prior to furnishing care to a patient. PERSONNEL RECORD 6: The HA was hired on 07/28/2025. A review of the personnel record revealed no evidence of a competency evaluation completed at hire. The personnel record did not include documentation that the HA’s competency had been assessed and validated in the required area, including observation of performance with a patient or pseudo-patient. During a joint review of personnel records and discussion on 07/24/2026, the Administrator and Human Resources Director confirmed that the required information was not present in the personnel record.”

    Rule L0615. Standard-level.

  • Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(1)(i))

    The inspectors’ words, 416 words

    “It is required that hospice aides are supervised by a registered nurse who makes an on-site visit to the patient’s home no less frequently than every 14 days to assess the quality of care and services provided by the hospice aide, ensure that services ordered by the hospice Interdisciplinary Group (IDG) meet the patient’s need and the hospice aide does not need to be present. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 4 of 18 (22%) clinical records reviewed for patients receiving Hospice Aide (HA) services, the agency did not ensure HA supervisory visits were conducted at least every 14 days, as required. CLINICAL RECORD 3: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 03/30/2026 with a primary diagnosis of acute/chronic diastolic congestive heart failure. Hospice Aide services were ordered two times per week. During the certification period dated 06/28/2026, the Registered Nurse Case Manager documented visits on 06/10/2026, 06/24/2026, 06/17/2026, 07/01/2026, 07/08/2026, and 07/15/2026. No HA supervisory visits were documented. CLINICAL RECORD 5: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 03/05/2026 with a primary diagnosis of chronic diastolic congestive heart failure. Hospice Aide services were ordered five times per week. During the certification period dated 06/24/2026, the Registered Nurse Case Manager documented visits on 06/08/2026, 06/09/2026, 06/11/2026, 06/15/2026, 06/18/2026, 06/25/2026, 06/30/2026, 07/02/2026, 07/07/2026, 07/14/2026, and 07/16/2026. No HA supervisory visits were documented. CLINICAL RECORD 9: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 03/24/2026 with a primary diagnosis of chronic right heart failure. Hospice Aide services were ordered two times per week. During the certification period dated 06/22/2026, the Registered Nurse Case Manager documented visits on 06/23/2026, 06/30/2026, 07/07/2026, 07/14/2026, and 07/21/2026. No HA supervisory visits were documented. CLINICAL RECORD 10: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 05/22/2026 with a primary diagnosis of chronic diastolic heart failure. The plan of care ordered Skilled Nursing (SN), Social Work, and Hospice Aide services. Hospice aide services were ordered once per week. During the certification period dated 05/22/2026, the Registered Nurse Case Manager documented visits on 06/22/2026, 07/06/2026, 07/09/2026, 07/15/2026, and 07/20/2026. No HA supervisory visits were documented. Following a joint record review and interview on 07/23/2026, the Administrator confirmed that the Registered Nurse Case Manager (RNCM) did not document completion of the required HA supervisory visits. The Administrator stated that the RNCM was new to the role and had selected only the documentation field indicating Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) supervision but did not complete or select the field indicating HA supervision.”

    Rule L0629. Standard-level.

  • Training (42 CFR 418.78(a))

    The inspectors’ words, 230 words

    “It is required that the hospice maintains, documents, and provides hospice volunteer orientation and training that is consistent with hospice industry standards that includes the volunteer’s duties and responsibilities, the person to whom they report, the person to contact if they need assistance and instruction, hospice goals, services, and philosophy, confidentiality and protection of the patient’s and family’s rights, family dynamics and psychological issues surrounding terminal illness, death, and bereavement, procedures to be followed in an emergency and/or following the death of a patient and guidance specific to individual responsibilities. This standard was not met as evidenced by interview and personnel record review. In 1 of 1 (100%) personnel record reviewed of a hospice volunteer, the agency did not ensure that the hospice volunteer received orientation and training consistent with hospice industry standards that included the volunteer’s duties and responsibilities. PERSONNEL RECORD 10: The hospice Volunteer was hired on 10/27/2025. A personnel record review revealed no documented evidence that the hospice volunteer received orientation and training to the volunteer’s duties and responsibilities. There was no evidence that the volunteer received instruction regarding the hospice philosophy, patient rights, confidentiality, volunteer responsibilities, or other agency-specific policies and procedures relevant to the volunteer role. During a joint review of personnel records and discussion on 07/24/2026, the Administrator and Human Resources Director confirmed that the required information was not present in the personnel file.”

    Rule L0643. Standard-level.

  • Level of activity (42 CFR 418.78(e))

    The inspectors’ words, 241 words

    “It is required that hospice volunteers provide day-to-day administrative or direct patient care services in an amount that, at a minimum, equals five percent (5%) of the total patient care hours of all paid hospice employees and contract staff. This standard was not met as evidenced by document review and interview. The agency did not ensure that hospice volunteers provided day-to-day administrative or direct patient care services that equaled at a minimum five percent (5%) of the total patient care hours of all paid hospice employees and contract staff. A review of the current hospice volunteer program with the Hospice Volunteer Coordinator revealed that the hospice did not provide the minimum 5% of total patient care hours. The program has one active volunteer, and for the calendar year 2025, the hospice volunteer program provided 0.68% of total patient care hours of all paid hospice employees and contract staff. During interview and review of the hospice volunteer program on 07/22/2026, the Administrator agreed that the hospice program is not meeting the required volunteer hours and stated there is an active process improvement plan in place related to this. Following discussion with the Hospice Volunteer Coordinator and review of the current hospice volunteer program, it was determined that the program did not meet the required 5% volunteer contribution of total patient care hours. The program currently has only one active volunteer, with volunteer hours accounting for approximately 0.68% of total patient care hours.”

    Rule L0647. Standard-level.

  • Training (42 CFR 418.100(g)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 124 words

    “It is required that the hospice provides an initial orientation for each employee that addresses the employee’s specific job duties including infection control and organization procedures and policies and procedures on advance directives. This standard was not met as evidenced by interview and personnel record review. In 1 of 10 (10%) personnel records reviewed, the agency did not ensure that there was initial orientation completed for each employee upon hire. PERSONNEL RECORD 7:The Spiritual Care Coordinator was hired on 05/04/2026. A personnel record review revealed no evidence that orientation was provided at hire or to date. During a joint review of personnel records and interview on 07/24/2026, the Administrator and HR Director confirmed that the required information was not present in the personnel records.”

    Rule L0662. Standard-level.

  • Hospice plan of care (42 CFR 418.112(d)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 225 words

    “It is required that the hospice plan of care identifies the care and services that are needed and specifies which provider is responsible for performing the functions that are agreed upon and included in the plan of care. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 1 of 3 (33%) clinical records reviewed of facility patients, the agency did not ensure that the hospice plan of care identified which provider was responsible for performing the functions that were agreed upon and included in the plan of care. CLINICAL RECORD 7: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 07/09/2026 with a primary diagnosis of unspecified severe protein-calorie malnutrition. The patient resided in a skilled nursing facility (SNF) and had multiple wounds located on the hips, legs, and ankles, all of which required ongoing wound care interventions. The hospice plan of care did not include documentation identifying responsibility for providing the wound care. The plan of care did not specify which wound care tasks- wound care assessments, dressing changes, treatment implementation, monitoring of wound progression, and follow-up care were being performed by hospice staff and which were being performed by facility staff. Following a joint clinical record review and interview on 07/21/2026, the Administrator confirmed that the patient’s plan of care did not include documentation identifying responsibility for wound care services.”

    Rule L0774. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jul 24, 2026Reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner9 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Jul 17, 2009.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 18.5 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 6.2% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 95.5% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 50% at home, 10% in assisted living, 28% in a nursing facility, 12% in a skilled nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day18.5 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends6.2%
Visits near death95.5% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Interim Healthcare of Pittsburgh, Inc. owns 100% directly since Dec 19, 2008.
  • 14 owners or officers are people: Thomas Joseph Dimarco (owns 5% or more through other companies, 71.19%); Christine D Oswald (owns 5% or more through other companies, 13.49%); Anthony Bruno (corporate officer); Anthony Bruno (managing employee (on the payroll)); Aimee Castor (managing employee (on the payroll)); Aimee Castor (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Christine D Oswald (corporate officer); Christine D Oswald (corporate director); Thomas Joseph Dimarco (corporate officer); Thomas Joseph Dimarco (corporate director); Diane S Piccard (corporate officer); Vincent J Trapanotto (managing employee (on the payroll)); Eric J Talbert (corporate officer); Eric J Talbert (managing employee (on the payroll)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Salo Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Dec 19, 2008
Interim Healthcare of Pittsburgh, Inc.Owns 5% or more directly100%Dec 19, 2008

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • In CMS’s survey of family caregivers (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 85% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 84% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 9 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 95.56% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 48.6% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold9 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 22 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 15238, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 1; this one had 9.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.