Hearth Record

Heartland Hospice (York)

A hospice in York, Pennsylvania 17402

3417c Concord Road, York, Pennsylvania 17402. (717) 840-1002.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 17 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

17 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 20 hospices serving ZIP code 17402 had 1.

The last inspection on record was on Aug 7, 2025: a reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

17 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.

17 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 Dec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNov

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Aug 7, 2025: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care14 deficiencies
  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 197 words

    “Upon patient record review, 5 of 19 (Patients #3,#5,#6,#7,#9) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications. Patient 3: The medication profile contained duplicative listing of cholestyramine scheduled doses. Corrected on site with removal of one listing. Patient 5: The medical record contained nursing documentation since admission identifying patient use of oxygen. There was no evidence of oxygen listed on the medication profile. Corrected on site with order received and medication profile updated. Patient 6: The medication profile contained diclofenac topical gel with no area defined for administration. Corrected on site with order clarification and medication profile updated. Patient 7: The medical record contained nursing documentation since admission identifying patient use of oxygen. There was no evidence of oxygen listed on the medication profile. The profile also contained instructions for oxycodone tablets with a route in the vein. Corrected on site with orders received and medication profile updated. Patient 9: The medical record contained care planning regarding use of oxygen and orders for oxygen equipment. There was no evidence of oxygen listed on the medication profile. Corrected on site with order received and medication profile updated.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(7))

    The inspectors’ words, 110 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 19 (Patients #7,#10) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment includes a bereavement component which includes the needs of the patient’s family and other individuals focusing on the social, spiritual, and cultural factors that may impact their ability to cope with the patient’s death. Information gathered from the initial bereavement assessment is incorporated into the plan of care and is considered in the bereavement plan of care. Patient 7: The medical record contained an initial bereavement assessment 6/18/25. Start of care occurred 6/9/25. Patient 10: The medical record contained an initial bereavement assessment 7/30/25. Start of care occurred 7/23/25.”

    Rule L0531. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 219 words

    “Upon patient record review, 4 of 19 (Patients #2,#7,#11,#13) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient 2: The medical record contained nursing documentation since admission identifying patient issues with dyspnea, pitting edema, and a peritoneal dialysis catheter in place. The CTI for benefit period starting 7/13/25 also indicated the patient has diagnosis of heart failure. There was no evidence of problems, goals, and interventions related to the dialysis catheter or respiratory and cardiovascular dysfunction. Plan of care updated for addition of respiratory and cardiovascular. Corrected on site with plan of care update. Patient 7,11: The medical record contained an order for Eliquis. There was no evidence of problems, goals, and interventions related to the risk for bleeding. Corrected Patient 13: The medical record contained nursing documentation since admission identifying patient issues with alcohol dependence and depression. There was no evidence of problems, goals, and interventions related to chemical dependency and depression. Corrected on site with plan of care update.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 170 words

    “Upon patient record review, 4 of 19 (Patients #5,#6,#7,#14) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient 5: The medical record contained nursing documentation since admission identifying patient use of oxygen. There was no evidence of an order for oxygen rate, frequency and delivery method. Corrected on site with order received. Patient 6: The medication profile contained diclofenac topical gel with no area defined for administration. Corrected on site with order clarification. Patient 7: The medical record contained nursing documentation since admission identifying patient use of oxygen. There was no evidence of oxygen listed on the medication profile. The profile also contained instructions for oxycodone tablets with a route in the vein. Corrected on site with orders received and medication profile updated. Patient 14: The medical record contained nursing documentation since admission identifying patient use of a CPAP. There was no evidence of an order for CPAP parameters.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))

    The inspectors’ words, 151 words

    “Upon patient record review, 4 of 19 (Patients #1,#2,#5,#13) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including equipment and supply needs. Patient 1,13: The medical record contained an order for a nebulized medication. There was no evidence of an order for a nebulizer included in the plan of care. Corrected on site with order received. Patient 2: The medical record contained nursing documentation 7/2/25 identifying patient use of a walker. There was no evidence of an order for the walker included in the plan of care. Corrected on site with order received. Patient 5: The medical record contained nursing documentation since admission identifying patient use of a walker and nebulizer. There was no evidence of orders for the walker and nebulizer included in the plan of care. Corrected on site with orders received.”

    Rule L0550. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 106 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 19 (Patients #3,#19) did not have evidence that a revised plan of care includes information from the patient’s updated comprehensive assessment and must note the patient’s progress towards outcome/goals from the plan of care. Patient 3: The medical record contained a CTI for benefit period starting 6/30/25 identifying patient diagnosis of chronic proctitis with diarrhea. There was no evidence the plan of care was updated to include problems, goals, and interventions related to gastrointestinal dysfunction. Corrected on site with plan of care update. Patient 19: There was no evidence the plan of care was updated to include plan to discharge.”

    Rule L0553. Standard-level.

  • Competency evaluation (42 CFR 418.76(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 176 words

    “Upon personnel record review, 1 of 16 (Personnel #8) did not have evidence in the personnel file that the following competency assessment was performed by the aide with a patient: (This standard applies to all Hospice Aides providing care/service who are directly employed by the hospice or through a contractual agreement.) ·Communication skills, including the ability to read, write, and verbally report clinical information to patients, caregivers, and other hospice staff. ·Reading and recording temperature, pulse, and respiration ·Safe transfer techniques and ambulation. ·Normal range of motion and positioning ·Appropriate and safe techniques in personal hygiene and grooming that include-- ·(A) Bed bath ·(B) Sponge, tub, and shower bath ·(C) Shampoo, sink, tub, and bed ·(D) Nail and skin care ·(E) Oral hygiene ·(F) Toileting and elimination The other subject areas in this section may be evaluated through written examination, oral examination or after observation of a Hospice Aide with a patient. Personnel 8: The skills competency did not observe temp, pulse, respiration, tub bath, and shower. Required vitals corrected on site with skills competency completed.”

    Rule L0615. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 142 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 19 (Patients #4,#9,#14) did not have evidence in the patient record that hospice aide assignments and duties are specific to patient needs. Patient 4: The aide care plan included instructions for the aide to leave a wound dressing in place. There was no evidence the patient had a wound. Corrected on site with aide care plan update. Patient 9: The medical record contained nursing documentation 5/29/25 identifying patient is a 2 person max assist with transfers. There was no evidence of transfer instructions included on the aide care plan. Corrected on site with aide care plan update. Patient 14: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon admission identifying patient need for moderate assist with transfers. There was no evidence of transfer instructions included on the aide care plan. Corrected on site with aide care plan update.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2))

    “Upon patient record review 1 of 19 (Patient #7) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a hospice aide provides services that are: • Ordered by the interdisciplinary group • Included in the plan of care • Permitted to be performed under state law by such hospice aide • Consistent with the hospice aide training Patient 7: The medical record contained an order for aide visits twice weekly. There was no evidence of second visits completed the weeks of 6/29/25 and 7/20/25.”

    Rule L0626. Standard-level.

  • Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 97 words

    “Upon patient record review 2 of 19 (Patients #11,#14) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a Registered Nurse made an on-site visit to the patient’s home no less frequently than every 14 days to assess the quality of care and services provided by the hospice aide and to ensure that services ordered by the hospice interdisciplinary group meet the patient’s needs. Patient 11: There was no evidence of an aide supervisory visit documented from 5/15/25 to 7/28/25. Patient 14: There was no evidence of an aide supervisory visit documented from 6/19/25 to 7/10/25.”

    Rule L0629. Standard-level.

  • Level of activity (42 CFR 418.78(e))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the annual report documents the use of volunteers providing day to day administrative and/or direct patient care services in an amount that, at a minimum, equals 5 percent of the total patient care hours of all paid hospice employees and contract personnel. The provider had a volunteer utilization rate of 0.62% in 2024. Current year to date rate is 1.73% despite performance improvement project since February 2025.”

    Rule L0647. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(6))

    “Upon patient client record review, 3 of 19 (Patients #7,#15,#17) did not have evidence that each patient record contains Advance Directives. Patient 7,15,17: The plan of care identified the patient as DNR. There was no supporting evidence of code status such as a POLST or living will in the medical record.”

    Rule L0677. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(7))

    “Upon patient client record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #19) did not evidence that each patient record contains physician orders. Patient 19: There was no evidence of an order to discharge for extended prognosis.”

    Rule L0678. Standard-level.

  • Authentication (42 CFR 418.104(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 102 words

    “Upon patient client record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #11) did not have evidence that all entries are legible, clear, complete, and appropriately authenticated and dated in accordance with the organizations policies and procedures and currently accepted standards of practice. Electronic signatures are acceptable as long the hospice is following appropriate safeguards to prevent unauthorized access to the patient records. Patient 11: The medical record contained nursing documentation identifying patient use of a walker upon admission and a hospital bed 5/12/25. After agency investigation, the patient does not have this equipment and the documentation was inaccurate. Corrected on site with documentation clarification.”

    Rule L0679. Standard-level.

Jun 20, 2024: complaint inspection by the state3 deficiencies
  • Plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 206 words

    “Based on review of medical records and interviews with staff the agency failed to ensure staff followed the visit schedule as ordered for by the physician on the plan of care for two (2) of three (3) records reviewed. MR #1-2. findings include: A review of medical records completed May 14, 2024, between approximately 11:30AM and 2:30PM revealed the following: MR#1, SOC: 6/30/2023, Certification period: 4/25/2024-6/23/2024, Physician Orders dated 4/29/24: “Frequency changes HHA reduce from 5x weekly to 3x weekly M/W/F not enough aide support to justify 5x weekly event though patient has minimal other supports and is showing declines and needs assistance. MSW visit needed to manage patient needs.” Documentation showed home health aide visits made: M 4/29, W 5/1, Th 5/2, W 5/8, Th 5/9 and M 5/13. No documentation to show the physician was notified of the missed visits or the change to ordered schedule. MR #2, SOC:10/26/2023; certification period: 4/23/24-6/21/24: Physician Orders dated 4/9/24: “Calendar frequency HHA 2wk1, 3wk8”. Documentation showed the home health aide made visits 4/29, and 5/1. No other visits were documented for the Month of May. No documentation to show the physician was notified of the missed visits. Interview with EMP#2 at approximately 12:30PM confirmed the above findings.”

    Rule L0543. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 206 words

    “Based on review of policies and procedures, medical records and interviews with staff the agency failed to ensure wound care was performed as ordered for one (1) of three (3) records reviewed. MR #2. findings include: A review of policies/procedures completed 5/14/2024 between approximately 5:00PM and 7:00PM revealed the following: Wound assessment, Documentation and Clinical Oversight: CLIN.14; Role of the LPN/LVN in wound care; 1. “The RN retains the overall responsibility for patient care.” 3. The LPN/LVN will execute interventions in accordance with the Plan of Care, collect data on wound status, document the patient record, and contribute to the evaluation of individualized interventions related to the Plan of Care”. A review of medical records completed May 14, 2024, between approximately 11:30AM and 2:30PM revealed the following: MR #2, SOC:10/26/2023; certification period: 4/23/24-6/21/24: Physician Orders: Right side of stump Stage II diabetic ulcer cleanse with Normal sterile saline, pat dry with gauze, use skin prep on surrounding skin place square of aquacel with silver on open area of wound cover with optifoam dressing. Change daily by caregivers and nurse during visits”. Visit note: 5/8/24 did not contain any documentation showing the nurse followed the above order. Interview with EMP#2 at approximately 12:30PM confirmed the above findings.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Level of activity (42 CFR 418.78(e))

    The inspectors’ words, 256 words

    “Based on review of policy/procedures, review of volunteer services documentation and interview with the agency administrator, the agency failed to ensure documentation showed volunteers services equaled, at a minimum, five (5)% of the total patient care hours of all paid hospice employees and contract staff for one (1) of one (1) year reviewed. 2023. Review of policy 4-007 on 6/20/24 between approximately 11:00 AM through 1:30 PM revealed: Policy: Volunteer Services; “Gentiva, Hospice division (the hospice) will provide volunteer services under the direction of a Volunteer Coordinator and with the assistance of trained hospice volunteers. Section: Procedure 1. “The Volunteer Coordinator will develop, implement and evaluate the volunteer services program on an ongoing basis but at least annually”. 7. “The Volunteer Coordinator will ensure that volunteers provide a minimum of 5% of the total number of patient care hours of paid and contracted hospice personnel... The volunteer coordinator will maintain records of cost savings achieved through the use of volunteers”. Review of agency documentation completed on 6/20/24 between approximately 10:00 AM and 12:00 PM revealed the following: Volunteer cost savings report for 2023 broke down as follows: January total patient care hours was = 2% February was = 2% March was = 2% April was = 2% May was =4% June was = 2% July was = 2% August was = 2% September was = 4% October was = 3% November was = 4% December was = 4% An interview with the agency administrator completed on 6/20/24 between approximately 2:00PM and 3:00PM confirmed the above findings.”

    Rule L0647. Standard-level. From a complaint.

All 3 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Aug 7, 2025Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care14 deficiencies cited
Aug 2, 2024Complaint inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited
Jun 20, 2024Complaint inspection by the state3 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Dec 13, 2000.
  • Ownership: non-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 3 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 11.9 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 7.6% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 93.6% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 54% at home, 15% in assisted living, 30% in a nursing facility, 1% in a hospital.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day11.9 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends7.6%
Visits near death93.6% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Southerncare Holdings, Inc. owns 100% directly since Dec 30, 2002.
  • 10 owners or officers are people: Candice Poole (managing employee (on the payroll)); Ronald C Lazas (corporate officer, 0%); Ronald C Lazas (corporate director, 0%); David Robinson Arnold (corporate officer, 0%); David Robinson Arnold (runs it (operational or managerial control), 0%); Thomas Joseph Dolan (corporate officer, 0%); Robina Renee Santaniello (managing employee (under contract), 0%); David Allen Causby (corporate officer, 0%); David Allen Causby (corporate director, 0%); Janet L Combs (corporate officer, 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Ch Services Midco Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Feb 5, 2015
Curo Health Services Holdings, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Jun 6, 2014
Ksoc Holdings, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Dec 1, 2011
Southerncare Holdings, Inc.Owns 5% or more directly100%Dec 30, 2002
Charlotte Midco, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Aug 11, 2022
Curo Hospice SC, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Jun 6, 2014
Falcon Hospice, LPOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Aug 11, 2022
Charlotte Buyer, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Jul 11, 2018
Curo Health Services LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Jun 6, 2014
Kah Hospice Company, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Ch Services Group Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Feb 5, 2015
Ch Services Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Feb 5, 2015
Cd&r Falcon Holdings, LPOwns 5% or more through other companies60%Aug 11, 2022
Kentucky Homecare Parent Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Aug 11, 2022
Kentucky Homecare Holdings, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Aug 11, 2022
Humana Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Aug 11, 2022
Centerwell Health Services Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Dec 22, 2022

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 79% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 78% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 97.79% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 65.3% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 53 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 20 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 17402, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 1; this one had 17.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.