Hearth Record

Gracious Care Hospice

A hospice in Beaverton, Oregon 97008

8196 SW Hall Boulevard, Suite 101, 3rd Floor, Beaverton, Oregon 97008. (503) 893-9866.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 8 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

8 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 19 hospices serving ZIP code 97008 had 5.

The last inspection on record was on Jun 28, 2024: a reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

8 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

8 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Jun 28, 2024: reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner8 deficiencies
  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6)(iv))

    The inspectors’ words, 228 words

    “It is required that the documented comprehensive assessment includes a drug profile that contains the patient’s current prescription and over-the-counter (OTC) drugs, supplements, herbal remedies; and other alternative treatments that could affect drug therapy. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review, interview and observation. In 1 of 4 (25%) home visits performed revealed the agency did not ensure the drug profile contained the patient’s current prescription and over-the-counter (OTC) drugs; supplements; herbal remedies; and other alternative treatments that could affect drug therapy. Clinical Record 14: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 2/5/2024 for the diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma. During Home Visit 1 on 6/27/2024 to observe Staff 5 (SW), the hospice medication profile was compared to the medications in the patient’s adult foster home and reviewed with the caregiver. It was found that the Immodium dosing schedule had been changed on 6/14/2024 from 1 mg twice daily (ordered on 2/5/2024) to 2 mg once daily (ordered on 6/14/2024). The hospice medication profile did not discontinue the 1 mg twice daily and left both dosing schedules on the medication profile. During an interview and joint record review with the Administrator, Co-CEO, and Director of Patient Care Services on 6/27/2024, it was confirmed the medication profile had not been reconciled and the “nurse must have forgotten to discontinue to old dosage of the medication.””

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 342 words

    “It is required that the Interdisciplinary Group, in collaboration with the individual’s attending physician (if any), reviews, revises, and documents the individualized care plan as frequently as the patient’s condition requires; but no less frequently than every 15 calendar days. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 1 of 19 (5%) clinical records reviewed revealed the agency did not ensure the individualized plan of care was updated as frequently as the patient’s condition required. Clinical Record 15: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 4/24/2024 for the diagnosis of malignant neoplasm of the liver. On 5/21/2024 communication/progress notes were entered that noted: “9:20 AM PCG (primary caregiver) reporting patient hurting bad in left shoulder. Pain 8 on a 1-10 scale. Dr contacted. 9:22 AM Dr ordered Oxycodone with STAT delivery. 10:30 AM No relief from Morphine and Tylenol.” A nursing visit on 5/21/2024 at 1:20 PM noted: “arrived for routine visit. Patient made 4 calls to agency this morning due to pain. Pain 8 on scale of 1-10.” On 5/21/2024 at 9:36 PM an on-call communication/progress noted “Severe pain to left shoulder. Patient angry and screaming d/t pain. Medications given prior to call. Call hospice again in 30 minutes if no relief.” The plan of care dated 4/24/2024 included the following: “Pain. Problem: Patient has chronic pain at times > ...........shoulders. Goal: Pain will remain in a comfortable level during care daily. Intervention: Monitor/assess the effectiveness of current and new medication/treatment. Tylenol.” This plan of care was not modified or updated as the medications changed from Tylenol to Morphine and Ativan. There was no evidence in the plan of care being updated to reflect the education by the nurse when the family was described as “hesitant to give medications for fear it would cause death.” During an interview and joint record review with the Administrator, Co-CEO, and Director of Patient Care Services on 6/26/2024, it was confirmed that the patient had a “significant change of condition”, and the care plan did not reflect those changes.”

    Rule L0552. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 517 words

    “It is required that written patient care instructions for a hospice aide are prepared by a RN who is responsible for the supervision of the hospice aide. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 5 of 13 (38%) clinical records reviewed in which hospice aide services were accepted revealed the agency did not ensure the registered nurse provided specific instructions for the hospice aide. Clinical Record 3: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 7/6/2023 for the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease. The initial nursing assessment dated 7/6/2023 noted patient had a “left forearm laceration with pressure dressing applied in the emergency department. “ The hospice aide care plan dated 7/7/2023 included the relevant tasks of “bathing via a shower chair and visualize skin condition and report to RN.” The aide care plan did not notify the aide of the wound nor provide specific instructions for care of the dressing (as needed) during tasks. Clinical Record 7: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 6/4/2024 for the diagnosis of congestive heart failure. A nursing comprehensive assessment dated 6/8/2024 noted “wound care to lower extremities, cover with Xerofoam.” The hospice aide care plan dated 6/4/2024 included the relevant task of “bathing via a shower chair.” The aide care plan did not notify the aide of the wound nor provide specific instructions for care of the dressing during tasks. Clinical Record 10: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 4/4/2024 for the diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. On a hospice aide visit dated 5/3/2024, the aide documented reporting a wound to the left ankle to the registered nurse. The registered nurse made a “visit to cover the wound with a dressing”. This wound was not added to the hospice aide care plan dated 4/4/2024 nor were specific instructions provided for care of the dressing during tasks. Clinical Record 17: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 4/19/2024 for the diagnosis of malignant neoplasm of the duodenum. The hospice aide care plan dated 4/19/2024 included the relevant tasks of “incontinent care, change briefs and bathing via a bed bath.” The clinical record contained a physician order dated 4/30/2024 and a nursing visit in which a Foley catheter was started. The aide care plan was not updated to reflect the Foley nor specific instructions provided for the Foley care. Clinical Record 19: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 3/7/2024 for the diagnosis of malignant neoplasm of connective and soft tissue. The initial nursing assessment dated 3/7/2024 noted the patient had bilateral nephrostomy tubes. The hospice aide care plan dated 3/7/2024 included the relevant tasks of “bathing via bed bath and empty collection bag.” It did not provide any further detail for the aide on the nephrostomy tubes or “collection bags”. During an interview and joint record review with the Administrator, Co-CEO, and Director of Patient Care Services on 6/26/2024, it was confirmed adding wounds to the hospice aide care plans was “new to them”. The foley and nephrostomy tubes care had been missed and the nurses would need to “continue to receive education.””

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2)(ii))

    The inspectors’ words, 169 words

    “It is required that a hospice aide provides services included in the plan of care. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 1 of 13 (8%) clinical records reviewed in which hospice aide services were accepted revealed the agency did not ensure the aide provided services included in the plan of care. Clinical Record 5: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 6/17/2024 for the diagnosis of malignant neoplasm of the lower respiratory tract. The hospice aide care plan dated 6/17/2024 included the relevant task of providing a bed bath. Hospice aide visit dated 6/21/2024 noted, “Provided companionship, shower, and personal care.” During an interview and joint record review with the Administrator, Co-CEO, and Director of Patient Care Services (DPCS) on 6/26/2024, it was confirmed the aide provided a shower instead of a bed bath as ordered in the plan of care. The DPCS advised, “The aides have been educated not to perform tasks until the plans of care have been updated.””

    Rule L0626. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 769 words

    “It is required that a patient clinical record containing past and current findings was maintained for each hospice patient. Each patient’s record includes, at a minimum: Responses to medications, symptom management, treatments, and services. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review, document review and interview. In 3 of 19 (16%) clinical records reviewed revealed the agency did not ensure that responses to medication, symptom management, treatments and services were documented. Document 1: Agency Policy PC.P10 Pain and Symptom Management stated in the relevant part: “ 2. Patient pain and other symptoms are thoroughly assessed by RN Case Manager or designee. 4. Pain is re-assessed any time a patient states his/her pain level has changed. This information is documented in the patient’s clinical record.” Document 2: Agency Policy PC.010 On Call stated in the relevant part: “10. Problems that require an emergency visit from a hospice nurse include, but not limited to: b. New, unusual or severe pain. m. duplicate calls regarding the same problem.” Document 3: Agency Policy AD HS57 HIPAA Compliant Texting (Tiger Connect) stated in the relevant part: “Clinical information is transferred from the text to the patient’s clinical record when appropriate” Clinical Record 10: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 4/4/2024 for the diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. A hospice aide visit dated 6/21/2024 noted “Patient was having pain to lower legs and ankles, notified RNCM xxxxx of this.” There was no documented visit from the RN or a phone call to indicate the report of pain had been followed up. The clinical information exchanged between the RN and the patient to address the patient’s pain (via the he agency’s HIPAA-compliant texting system) had not been transferred to patient’s clinical record. Clinical Record 15: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 4/24/2024 for the diagnosis of malignant neoplasm of the liver. On 5/21/2024 communication/progress notes were entered that noted: “9:20 AM PCG (primary caregiver) reporting patient hurting bad in left shoulder. Pain 8 on 1-10 scale. Dr contacted. 9:22 AM Dr ordered Oxycodone with STAT delivery. 10:30 AM No relief from Morphine and Tylenol.” A nursing visit on 5/21/2024 at 1:20 PM noted: “arrived for routine visit. Patient made 4 calls to agency this morning due to pain. Pain 8 on scale of 1-10.” On 5/21/2024 at 9:36 PM an on-call communication/progress noted “Severe pain to left shoulder. Patient angry and screaming d/t pain. Medications given prior to call. Call hospice again in 30 minutes if no relief.” The family did not return a call to the hospice agency with 30 minutes. The nurse visited during the day, but the agency did not follow their on-call policy which stated in part duplicate calls regarding the same problem warranted a nursing visit. Clinical Record 18: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 4/27/2023 for the diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. A hospice aide visit dated 5/4/2023 noted “RN xxxx contacted about patient having some pain that resulted in me not being able to do bed bath.” There was not a documented visit from the RN, a progress note, or a phone call to indicate the report of pain had been followed up. The next scheduled visit was on 5/5/2023. The clinical information exchanged between the RN and the patient to address the patient’s pain (via the agency’s HIPAA-compliant texting system) had not been transferred to patient’s clinical record. During an interview and joint record review with the Administrator, Co-CEO, and Director of Patient Care Services on 6/26/2024, it was confirmed Clinical Records 10 and 18 did not contain documentation of follow-up on the hospice aide reports. It was stated that “information was communicated via Tiger Connect, “ the Agency’s HIPAA-compliant texting system. It was agreed this is not in line with Agency policy as stated in Document 3. This was also not in compliance with Document 1 which requires a registered nurse assess pain and symptoms. During the interview regarding Clinical Record 15, it was stated the family member was “hesitant to give pain medications”. The Site Visitor asked the Administrator for clarification on Agency Policy regarding On Call during an interview on 6/26/2024. The administrator stated an LPN (licensed practical nurse) triaged calls and an RN (registered nurse) was available to make visits. A visit was expected to be made “for duplicate calls for pain and symptom management or a death within two hours”. The Administrator and Director of Patient Care Services agreed that the Agency Policies were not followed regarding sending a nurse out when duplicate calls came in regarding the same issue or assessing pain and symptoms.”

    Rule L0674. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(5))

    The inspectors’ words, 291 words

    “It is required that the hospice medical director or physician-designee provides written and signed recertification of the terminal illness to meet the hospice care benefit requirement. Recertification is completed no later than two (2) calendar days after the first day of each benefit period, and no more than fifteen (15) days before the next benefit period begins. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 2 of 9 (22%) clinical records reviewed in clinical records reviewed with recertification, revealed the agency did not ensure the recertification of the terminal illness was completed by the physician no later than two calendar days after the first day of the benefit period and no more than 15 days before the next benefit period. Clinical Record 3: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 7/6/2023 for the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease. Clinical record review revealed the third benefit period started on 1/2/2024 and the recertification of terminal illness was signed by the hospice medical director on 1/5/2024, 3 days after the start of the benefit period and 1 day outstanding. There was not a verbal order present. Clinical Record 13: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 3/7/2023 for the diagnosis of malignant neoplasm of the prostate. Clinical record review revealed the 3rd benefit period started on 9/3/2023 and the recertification of terminal illness was signed by the hospice medical director on 8/15/2023, 18 days before the start of the benefit period and 3 days outstanding. There was not a verbal order present. During an interview and joint record review with the Administrator, Co-CEO, and Director of Patient Care Services on 6/26/2024, it was confirmed the recertifications were signed outside the time frame and there was no explanation provided.”

    Rule L0676. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(1)(i))

    The inspectors’ words, 187 words

    “It is required that if the care of a hospice patient is transferred to a Medicare/Medicaid certified facility, the hospice forwards to the receiving facility a copy of the hospice discharge summary described in HCDT 40.I. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review. In 1 of 2 (50%) clinical records reviewed in which a patient was discharged revealed the agency did not ensure the receiving facility received a copy of the discharge summary. Clinical Record 15: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 4/24/2024 for the diagnosis of malignant neoplasm of the liver. The patient elected to revoke their hospice benefit for aggressive treatment on 5/22/2024 and was transferred to a hospital which is a Medicare/Medicaid certified facility. The clinical record did not contain evidence that the discharge summary had been faxed to the hospital. During an interview and joint record review with the Administrator, Co-CEO, and Director of Patient Care Services on 6/27/2024, the Co-CEO advised she had “called the hospital and talked to them about the status of the patient but had not faxed anything from the clinical record to them.””

    Rule L0682. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(3)(ii))

    The inspectors’ words, 223 words

    “It is required that the hospice discharge summary provided to a facility receiving a hospice patient for care—or to the patient’s community attending physician upon hospice discharge—includes at least the following the patient’s current plan of care. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 1 of 2 (50%) clinical records reviewed in which the patient was live discharged revealed the agency did not ensure the discharge summary included at least the patient’s current plan of care. Clinical Record 15: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 4/24/2024 for the diagnosis of malignant neoplasm of the liver. The patient elected to revoke their hospice benefit for aggressive treatment on 5/22/2024. A nursing visit note dated 5/22/2024 noted: “Received call from ***** RN (registered nurse) supervisor requesting RN go to patient’s SO (significant other) to have her sign the revocation form. Patient had serious fall with head lacerations and confusion and taken to hospital for sutures and evaluation.” The nursing visit note did not include a discharge summary with the patient’s current plan of care, hospice diagnosis or any further information. During an interview and joint record review with the Administrator, Co-CEO, and Director of Patient Care Services on 6/27/2024, it was confirmed the nursing note did not meet the requirements as described in the discharge summary regulation.”

    Rule L0684. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jun 28, 2024Reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner8 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Sep 20, 2021.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 9.4 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 4.9% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 81.2% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 74% at home, 24% in assisted living, 2% in a skilled nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day9.4 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends4.9%
Visits near death81.2% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • 15 owners or officers are people: Ioana Maria Cristurean (owns 5% or more directly, 40%); Ioana Maria Cristurean (managing employee (on the payroll), 40%); Ioana Maria Cristurean (runs it (operational or managerial control), 40%); Andreea C Benea (owns 5% or more directly, 40%); Andreea C Benea (managing employee (on the payroll), 40%); Andreea C Benea (runs it (operational or managerial control), 40%); Catalin Hreniuc (owns 5% or more directly, 20%); Catalin Hreniuc (managing employee (on the payroll), 20%); Mohamed Refaat (corporate director); Catalin Hreniuc (general partner); Jennifer Eileen Harvey (managing employee (on the payroll)); Jennifer Eileen Harvey (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Heather Lorraine Bronson (managing employee (on the payroll)); Heather Lorraine Bronson (runs it (operational or managerial control)); James Baley- Pierce (managing employee (on the payroll)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 79% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 82% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 82.86% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 22.9% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 54 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 19 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 97008, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 5; this one had 8.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.