Hearth Record

Accentcare Hospice & Palliative Care of Oregon

A hospice in Portland, Oregon 97239

6500 S Macadam Avenue, Suite 160, Portland, Oregon 97239. (503) 265-6600.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 19 deficiencies in 3 months of the last 36. Last cited Oct 2024. Most serious: Condition-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
Condition-level deficiency
For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.

What did inspectors find?

19 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 23 hospices serving ZIP code 97239 had 5.5.

The last inspection on record was on Oct 1, 2024: a follow-up inspection by The Joint Commission.

6 deficiencies at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

19 deficiencies in 3 months of the last 36. Last cited Oct 2024. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

19 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Oct 1, 2024: follow-up inspection by The Joint Commission1 deficiency
  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 5 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to plan the patient’s care. During record review for RRNHV 2, the aide care plan was not individualized as there had been orders for the aide to ‘provide post mortem care’ every visit. This was validated with the RN Director of Clinical Operations.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

Mar 15, 2024: follow-up inspection by The Joint Commission1 deficiency
  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 153 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 4 patient records reviewed with aide services ordered, the Hospice Nurse Surveyor observed the aide did not follow the care plan and the agency did not follow the organizations process to communicate changes reported by the aide. Agency documented process is for the aide to notify the RN if there is changes with the patient and document their contact in the aide note. The RN then will review and make changes to POC if needed and document the conversation in a communication note. On RRNHV #1, it was noted on record review that the aide did not perform bed/chair transfer during the last visit and documented in the aide visit note that the RN was contacted, however, there was not case communication note from the RN in the record this communication had occurred. This was reviewed and discussed with the Hospice Director and Director of Quality.”

    Rule L0628. Standard-level.

Feb 2, 2024: reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission17 deficiencies
  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 160 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 20 of 20 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to plan the patient’s care. During record review for all records, the Hospice Nurse Surveyor observed there was no documentation in the medical record of time frames for meeting goals. For example in RRHV#1, the patient had a goal for patient/ cg to demonstrate proper wound care with no projected timeframe to meet that goal. In RRHV#2, the patient had a goal for patient will have decreased fear and anxiety regarding death with no projected goal date. And in RRHV#3, the patient had a goal for patient/ cg will verbalize understanding of when to use PRN medications with no projected date to achieve the goal. In RRHV#1, RRHV#3, RRHV#4, RRNHV#2,RRNHV#3, RRNHV#5, and RRNHV#8 the patient’s had goals for the music therapist but the person that filled that role had left and there was no current music therapist. This was discussed and reviewed with the Hospice Team.”

    Rule L0545. Condition-level.

  • Phys, occupnl therapy & speech-lang pathology (42 CFR 418.72)

    The inspectors’ words, 101 words

    “Observed in Tracer Activities. The organization failed to plan for scope and level of care. During tracer activities for Contract Review, the Hospice Nurse Surveyor observed the organization could not provide an active contract for the purposes of symptom management or to enable the patient to maintain activities of daily living related to physical therapy, occupational therapy and speech therapy needs. The contract in place was 7 years old with no outreach to the contracted company for contract oversite and no utilization of therapy services over at least the last 2 years. 

This was reviewed and discussed with the Hospice Team.”

    Rule L0603. Condition-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 207 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 13 of 13 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to plan the patient’s care. During record review for RRHV#1, RRHV#2, RRNHV#1, RRNHV#2, RRNHV#3, RRNHV#4, RRNHV#6, RRNHV#7, RRNHV#8, RRNHV#9, and RRNHV#10, the Hospice Nurse Surveyor observed the aide care plan did not include all items needed. 

For example in RRHV#1 and RRHV#2, both patients were on oxygen but the aide care plan did not give instructions on what to do with the oxygen during the bath/ shower. During RRHV#2, the Hospice Nurse Surveyor observed the bath time and observed the patient remove her oxygen prior to getting in the shower. 

In RRNHV#2, the patient had bleeding precautions on the POC but this was not addressed on the aide POC. 

In RRNHV#7, the patient was a high fall risk but this was not addressed on their aide POC. 

During record review for RRHV#1, RRHV#2, RRHV#3, RRHV#4, RRNHV#2, RRNHV#3, RRNHV#6, RRNHV#7, RRNHV#8, RRNHV#9 and RRNHV#10, the aide care plan was not individualized. Both care plans stated to provide post mortem care every visit. 

In RRNHV#1, the nurse developed an aide plan of care but there were no orders for aide visits and no aide visits documented. 

This was discussed and reviewed with the Hospice Team.”

    Rule L0625. Condition-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 177 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 5 of 5 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to provide care, treatment, or services in accordance with the orders. 

During record review for RRHV#1, RRHV#3, RRNHV#6, and RRNHV#10, the Hospice Nurse Surveyor observed the aide did not follow the care plan and failed to include documentation that it was reported to the RN. This was discussed with the Director who stated their policies says they need to document communication in the record and they in fact did education on this a week prior to survey. 

For example RRHV#1 and RRHV#3, patient toileting was already completed but there was no communication to the RN. 

In RRHV#4, the patient refused oral care and nail care but there was no documentation of communication to the RN. 

In RRNHV#6, the patient refused bathing and oral care and there was no documentation of communication to the RN. 

In RRNHV#10, the patient refused skin care and perineal care and there was no documentation of communication to the RN. 


This was discussed and reviewed with the Hospice Team.”

    Rule L0628. Condition-level.

  • Governing body and administrator (42 CFR 418.100(b))

    “Observed in Tracer Activities. The organization failed to provide evidence that the governing body and leadership established processes to support patient care, treatment, or services through sustained compliance as evidenced by previous findings for 418.56, 418.76, 418.104, 418.100, 418.54, and 418.72. 

This was discussed and reviewed with the Hospice Team.”

    Rule L0651. Condition-level.

  • Clinical records (42 CFR 418.104)

    The inspectors’ words, 181 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 3 of 20 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to maintain a complete and accurate patient record. During record review for RRHV#1, the Hospice Nurse Surveyor observed the RN had checked a box for no oxygen in the home but later documented education was provided for the 2 Liters by NC that was ordered. During record review for RRNHV#1, the Hospice Nurse Surveyor observed the RN documented an aide supervisory visit but the patient did not have an aide visiting. During record review for RRHV#1, RRHV#2, and RRNHV#1, the Hospice Nurse Surveyor observed the use of abbreviations not included on the approved abbreviation list. For example in RRHV#2, the patient had abbreviations such as BP and Beg. Leadership assumed it meant benefit period and beginning but was unsure. In RRHV#2, the patient had notation for liq Ativan but liq was not included on the abbreviation list. And for RRNHV#2, the patient recertification note included abbreviations BP, CBP and Beg but the leadership were unsure what it meant. This was discussed and reviewed with the Hospice Team.”

    Rule L0670. Condition-level.

  • Timeframe for completion of assessment (42 CFR 418.54(b))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 3 of 20 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to assess its patient’s condition according to defined time frames. During record review for RRHV#3, RRNHV#2, and RRNHV#5, the Hospice Nurse Surveyor observed the initial social work evaluation was not completed within five days of the election of benefits. 

This was discussed and reviewed with the Hospice Team.”

    Rule L0523. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(5))

    The inspectors’ words, 113 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 20 of 20 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to assess and reassess its patient’s. During record review for RRNHV#2, the Hospice Nurse Surveyor observed the patient came onto service with a pleurex drain which the wife was managing, which was part of his hospice diagnosis End Stage Liver Disease. The organization failed to document assessment of the pleurex drain site. 


During record review, the Hospice Nurse Surveyor observed the need for therapy services was not assessed as part of the comprehensive assessment as evidenced by no utilization of the therapy contract for at least the last two years. 

This was discussed and reviewed with the Hospice team.”

    Rule L0529. Standard-level.

  • Update of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(d))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 17 of 17 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to assess and reassess. During record review for all records, the Hospice Nurse Surveyor observed the comprehensive assessments for all disciplines did not include progress towards goals. After conversation with the Director, it was noted that care plans have been a process improvement project. 

This was discussed and reviewed with the Hospice Team.”

    Rule L0533. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 196 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 6 of 20 patient records reviewed, the plan of care did not include all services needed for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. In RRHV#3, the patient had a resolved goal for preventing falls but had many recent falls and the POC was not updated. She also had issues with sleep disturbance and it was not addressed on her POC. In RRNHV#2, the patient had ascites, confusion and new onset grief from losing his brother the week before survey, but these items were not on the POC. In RRNHV#5, the patient was had high risk for fall and had a recent fall, but falls were not addressed on his POC. In RRNHV#6, the patient had recent edema and SOB but it was not addressed on his POC. In RRNHV#7, the patient was at high risk of fall but it was not addressed on his POC. In RRNHV#10, the patient had a new rash, was at high risk for fall and has multiple aide/ nursing notes stating agitation and being combative but these were not on the POC. This was discussed and reviewed with the Hospice Team.”

    Rule L0546. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 115 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 20 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to plan the patient’s care. During record review for RRHV#4, the Hospice Nurse Surveyor observed the patient had both bilateral legs wrapped with ace wraps at the last nursing visit but there were no orders for that type of leg wrap. The orders received was for tubi-grips. During record review for RRNHV#2, the Hospice Nurse Surveyor observed the patient had a pleurex drain in place that the wife was managing but the management of the drain (i.e. how often to drain, how much can be drained) was not addressed on the POC. This was discussed and reviewed with the Hospice Team.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Prevention (42 CFR 418.60(a))

    The inspectors’ words, 111 words

    “Observed in Patient Home. In 2 of 4 home visits conducted, the organization failed to implement infection prevention and control activities it had planned. During RRHV#3 and RRHV#4, the Hospice Nurse Surveyor observed the staff did not follow the organizational hand hygiene policy. During RRHV#3, the Chaplain did not perform hand hygiene before having direct contact with the patient. In RRHV#4, the RN placed tubi-grips on the patients legs and immediately placed gloves on to do equipment cleaning without performing hand hygiene. She also removed a thermometer sleeve from the thermometer to throw away and did not do hand hygiene right after. 

This was discussed and reviewed with the Hospice Team.”

    Rule L0579. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2)(ii))

    The inspectors’ words, 91 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 5 of 5 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to provide care, treatment, or services in accordance with the orders. 

During record review for RRHV#1, RRHV#3, RRNHV#6, and RRNHV#10, the Hospice Nurse Surveyor observed the aide did not follow the care plan. 

For example RRHV#1 and RRHV#3, patient toileting was already completed.

In RRHV#4, the patient refused oral care and nail care.

In RRNHV#6, the patient refused bathing and oral care.

In RRNHV#10, the patient refused skin care and perineal care.


This was discussed and reviewed with the Hospice Team.”

    Rule L0626. Standard-level.

  • Volunteers (42 CFR 418.78)

    “Observed in Tracer Activities. In 1 of 13 HR files reviewed, the organization failed to document supervision. During HR file review, the Hospice Nurse Surveyor observed HR#3 ( volunteer) did not have documentation of back to bedside supervisory visit as required by organizational policy. 

This was discussed and reviewed with the Hospice Team.”

    Rule L0641. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(1)(i))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 2 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to give information about the care the patient received to the service provider who will provide care moving forward. During record review for RRDC#1 and RRDC#2, the Hospice Nurse Surveyor observed no discharge summary was sent to the provider as required by organizational policy. 

This was discussed and reviewed with the Hospice Team.”

    Rule L0682. Standard-level.

  • Criminal background checks (42 CFR 418.114(d)(2))

    “Observed in Tracer Activities. In 1 of 13 HR files reviewed, the organization failed to obtain a background check on volunteer staff. During record review for HR#3 ( volunteer) the Hospice Nurse Surveyor observed no documentation of a background check at hire per company policy. 

This was discussed and reviewed with the Hospice Team.”

    Rule L0796. Standard-level.

  • Federal, state, local laws & regulations (42 CFR 418.116)

    “Observed in Tracer Activities. The organization failed to comply with law and regulation. During license verification and review the Hospice Nurse Surveyor observed the Clia certificate was not updated with the person currently responsible. During conversation with the Hospice Team, it was noted the person who is listed on the CLIA certificate left 5 months previous to survey. The paperwork was submitted the day the surveyor discovered it. 

This was discussed and reviewed with the Hospice Team.”

    Rule L0797. Standard-level.

All 3 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Oct 1, 2024Follow-up inspection by The Joint Commission1 deficiency cited
Mar 15, 2024Follow-up inspection by The Joint Commission1 deficiency cited
Feb 2, 2024Reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission17 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Jan 27, 2015.
  • Ownership: other.
  • Cited at in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 11.7 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 6.9% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 94.8% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 21% at home, 54% in assisted living, 24% in a nursing facility, 1% in a hospital, 1% elsewhere.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day11.7 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends6.9%
Visits near death94.8% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Accentcare, Inc. owns 100% directly since Dec 21, 2020.
  • 6 owners or officers are people: Clarissa Lafferty (managing employee (on the payroll)); John Guess (corporate officer); Heather Siscel (corporate officer); Andrew Johnston (corporate officer); Dino William Ramzi (managing employee (under contract)); Dena Schwartz-Doty (corporate officer).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Horizon Acquisition Co Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Dec 21, 2020
Horizon Group Holdings Intermediate 2, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Dec 21, 2020
Horizon Group Holdings Intermediate 1, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Dec 21, 2020
Horizon Group Holdings, L.P.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Dec 21, 2020
Accentcare, Inc.Owns 5% or more directly100%Dec 21, 2020
Pluto Acquisition I Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Dec 21, 2020
Seasons Rollover Holdings LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies15.4%Dec 21, 2020
Advent International Gpe VIII-B, L.P.Owns 5% or more through other companies15.1%Dec 21, 2020
Advent International Gpe VIII-A LPOwns 5% or more through other companies11.2%Dec 21, 2020
Advent International Gpe Viii-B-3, L.P.Owns 5% or more through other companies6.3%Dec 21, 2020
Advent International Gpe VIII-H, L.P.Owns 5% or more through other companies5.5%Dec 21, 2020
Advent International Gpe Viii-B-1, L.P.Owns 5% or more through other companies5.4%Dec 21, 2020
Advent International Gpe VIII-I, L.P.Owns 5% or more through other companies5.1%Dec 21, 2020
Advent International Gpe VIII-J LPOwns 5% or more through other companies5%Dec 21, 2020

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • In CMS’s survey of family caregivers (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 76% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 87% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 99.1% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 60.3% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 23 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 97239, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 5.5; this one had 19.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.